[T] Cell (Mini?) Mafia III

Not really holyflare says this sometime:
How about you vote me and so I can set the groups at D -> A -> C -> B -> E?
Since my group will be the first, I literally cannot change the ordering without being lynched for lying. Easier to vote for me, don't you think?

On August 29 2014 00:22 marvellosity wrote:
Do we get any more of your wisdom, Oatsie?

On August 29 2014 00:47 marvellosity wrote:
splendid. How do you like Amiko?

On August 29 2014 01:08 marvellosity wrote:

What makes you think he's happy, cupcake?

On August 28 2014 10:43 Amiko wrote:

lol

On August 28 2014 09:34 Amiko wrote:
Ah okay I know who it is now the korea should have tipped me off anyway haha

On August 28 2014 09:40 Amiko wrote:
@Holyflare: Do you have any comments on the content of this game? Or the thoughts I posted above? Since you wanted to talk about it

On August 28 2014 05:55 Amiko wrote:
I really wanted Blazinghand and MysteryMeat1 to be in the same cell. >:D

On August 29 2014 01:08 Professor Apathy wrote:

it's mostly just horribly stupid because it would most likely start a a giant discussion over nothing. That being said, if I'd do it now that I stated that, yes it would certainly be scummy because I realize that such a discussion would be hurting town for no reason.
As for other people, depends on wether I think they're stupid or doing it on purpose.

On August 29 2014 01:27 Professor Apathy wrote:

Are you asking how to differentiate the two or are you really asking why I plan on treating someone who's doing things with ill intent differently than someone who's just know to be doing stupid things?

On August 29 2014 12:45 Amiko wrote:


Everything you said here is pretty awful so I'll take a minute to address it-.

It doesn't matter whether his pregame stance is townfavored and his ingame stance is scum favored. Pregame he said one strategy was the best, but ingame he proposes the opposite.
I didn't say that made him scum, and I didn't vote for him. If you had read my next posts you'd see that I was looking at ritoky and batsnacks. It's something to bring up, see how BH responds, and then make reads accordingly.

If you found that post worth commenting on, why don't you weigh in on the way that batsnacks / marvellosity / WaveofShadow / Apathy voted for BH and their explanation (or lack thereof)?

Btw, the fact that the post I put above on Blazinghand is super obvious and also 2 of the first 4 posts of his filter makes me think that the people who were voting for him didn't read his filter at all.

batsnacks, marvellosity, WaveofShadow, and Professor Apathy all voted for Blazinghand without really making an argument or noting the (what I think was fairly obvious) slip. Does this mean anything to you on their alignment?

On August 29 2014 12:24 WaveofShadow wrote:

And on that note, this is terrible.
Typical Oats though, so I can't really say terrible town/scum

On August 29 2014 14:08 WaveofShadow wrote:

There's a lot of 'typical' being thrown around lately.
What's terrible about your post?
Pretty simple. There is nothing you described about batsnacks' posting that actually makes him scum.
There are plenty of other people who consistently shit about as town early on in the game; hell plenty of people in THIS game are doing it/have done it. Like what would batsnacks even need to distract the town from doing at that point in the game? Do you think scum were super gung-ho about grabbing the mayor spot?

Do you think scum were super gung-ho about grabbing the mayor spot?

On August 29 2014 14:46 WaveofShadow wrote:
Is there something not scummy about it, Oats?

On August 29 2014 22:39 marvellosity wrote:
like if ninja or oats or whoever can give me a single reason why BH is town, I'm all ears.

On August 29 2014 23:45 marvellosity wrote:

none of this is true about bh

On August 29 2014 23:45 Holyflare wrote:
He had 4 people voting him and one of those could potentially be mafia because it's someone from his cell. Heck he doesn't give a shit or care that people voting him could be mafia. When has bh done that?

On August 29 2014 23:51 marvellosity wrote:
i've played iwth BH more than anyone else in this game?

That said, oats' post on me feels more scummy since he seems to be misconstruing my comments in a way to present me as mafia. If I had to pick right now, I'd say oats is the scum in our cell.

Amiko
Oatsmaster

On August 30 2014 01:07 your mom wrote:
oats you feel like bh is trying to solve the game or find the scum in his cell?

i only see him complaining about him getting lynched and how he found a perfect strategy, and nothing is lft of his D1 tryhardness

On August 30 2014 11:39 batsnacks wrote:


Wasn't looking for points. your mom is busing, you aren't (for now); this is absolutely conceivable to me.

marv thinks toad is town

On September 01 2014 01:14 Holyflare wrote:
Well i dunno low interest really, wade aint playing and looks scummy and bunnies is playing and looks scummy

On September 01 2014 18:28 marvellosity wrote:

^

this dude is not reading the thread.

On September 01 2014 21:12 marvellosity wrote:

conclusion is that you need to read the thread as well

On September 03 2014 09:23 Amiko wrote:
@Oats:
Since you are sheeping marv on the off chance we get to day 5 I'll be asking you to vote on marv and letting me hammer. So let's talk till you realize the error of your ways.

- Did that question about me being happy early game have any significance?

- What do you think of the conversations between you and marv while blazinghand was up for lynch?
I didn't see an answer from marv to your question as to whether whether Blazinghand gave up as scum, but not too much else to say.

- As I see it, you thought I was suspicious on D2 based on thinking that although I had decided to vote Blazinghand, I hadn't voted. I don't understand this because (1) I think it's fairly obvious I was asking questions regarding the other players before you ever raised that point and (2) I don't real see why voting early or late seems suspicious, anyway. I guess a mafia player in Cell 4/5 could vote at the last minute to get a mislynch (and then just hope to get two more before that Cell ever comes up), but I don't see anyone as having done that so otherwise it seems null to me.

- If you think voting early or late is a scumtell, why is that any more valid than BH's slip pre-game and during-game? It seems to me the other 'slip' would be more reliable.

- If you think voting late is a scumtell, why aren't you reading any other players who voted late as scummy?

---

(Don't you wish Cell C was 3rd now? :D)

On September 03 2014 15:38 MysteryMeat1 wrote:
As for the case of bunnies HF, i never once tried to bury lilwade. I made my case on bunnies, and never pushed once on lilwade, if you think that i had any effect or that the lynch would have been different if i had kept my votes on bunnies your wrong.

@oats: Do you think my late vote switching, is a town or scum tell?

On September 03 2014 19:48 marvellosity wrote:
has Oats taken to calling me mafia? excellent.

On September 04 2014 14:13 WaveofShadow wrote:

lol wtf?
I don't think I have ever even seen you use the word 'narrative' to attack someone's play before. It doesn't suit you. There is no narrative for you Oats, you just post random shit and hope that people call you town for it.

Like...I don't even understand what the hell you just said and how that answers my accusation at all.

Oh wait I think I get it lol.
Yes, townies should really post at least some of their thought process in thread to let other people get a read. I see no thought process from you regarding how you came to conclusions about my cell, therefore I can conclude that you're hiding your thoughts (or in your case, probably have none) and are scum.

But please, let's hear what you have 'thought about,' by all means.

On September 04 2014 20:12 Holyflare wrote:
Just like your read on all the ither cells, based solely on one person with no questioning whether it's wrong or not and ignoring everything else

On September 04 2014 20:35 Holyflare wrote:


yes so therefore voting me = wrong

wrong = mafia?

On September 04 2014 20:38 Holyflare wrote:
Here's the thing, you WERE wrong because the first cell you spent the entire time burying and burying batsnacks and saying EVERYTHING BH did was towny when in actual fact it was most likely the opposite! The second cell you didn't actually have your own opinion at all:




^^^ that was all you said (marv wasn't even voting for your mum at this point either) and for some reason you said smurf me was scummy but then sheeped someone who said he wasn't really caught up and doesn't really look particularly towny this game??

now you're pushing the biggest mafia agenda by trying to vote me off

On August 31 2014 10:05 Oatsmaster wrote:
aiiiiiii fuck.

pretty much the same today, 1 town looking and 2 skecthy dudes. Leaning lilwade for the moment. balls dont = town man, content does.

On August 31 2014 21:03 Oatsmaster wrote:
americans too lazy on weekends.

Hey smurf holyfake, how is this lilwade the same as the other ones?

On August 31 2014 21:32 Oatsmaster wrote:
but is this style or alignment though.
How do you draw that link.
Maybe he is trying to replicate that play.

I thought you were talking about the attitude tbh, in your opinion, is it?

On August 31 2014 21:42 Oatsmaster wrote:
So you dont think Toad is town?

elaborate

On September 01 2014 12:48 Oatsmaster wrote:
Amiko, please tell me why mafia votes in thread and not in the voting thread intentionally

On September 05 2014 17:50 Holyflare wrote:
I don't mention waves name when i analyse him also no. You're saying I'm fucking scummy for calling you scummy since day 1 WHEN YOU DIDN'T PLAY THE GAME.

My only alternative is then wave because you literally did shit all. Then you make some ridiculous bs case on me that relies on me calling you scum for doing scummy things.

"hf called me scum after the trap!"
(even though I didn't say shit or do shit or even comment on anything!)

"hf hasn't stopped calling me scum!"
(even though everything i did since the game start hasn't really been towny looking!)

"hf has been on towny lynches! "
(even though almost everyone alive was too)

Brackets are your real thoughts. If you town read wave so much for so long why am i scummy for calling you scum for so long??? Surely I've been correct in my accusations.


Also no idea wtf oats is doing. Useless scummy person.

On September 05 2014 20:22 Holyflare wrote:
Also batsnacks lynch is the time of the game where 5 mafia are alive and have the biggest driving force for a mislynch ever. Now there are only 2.

On September 06 2014 00:17 Holyflare wrote:
What the fuck does the ratio matter? 5 people talking about the same thing is way more sway. Especially as we learnt that quite a few townies were just afkers. So if anything the ratio of active townies has gone up.

On September 06 2014 00:42 WaveofShadow wrote:
I was actually kinda curious about that...which scum were driving the mislynches exactly?

On September 06 2014 01:46 Amiko wrote:
@Oats:
I know he hasn't voted yet, but I'm wondering why you voted today on your own instead of sheeping marv today?

On September 06 2014 01:40 Amiko wrote:
1) Focuses too much on MM1 (to set up a mislynch)


3) You say MM1 is trying hard and Holyflare is laughing away
It seems like holyflare is trying pretty hard to me - I feel like he went sorta went ham on MM1, has more posts throughout the game, longer filter, etc.