So, meh.
-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
So, meh. -WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear | ||
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
On July 11 2014 22:08 raynpelikoneet wrote: ##vote: WeDemandALawyer wut? | ||
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
On July 11 2014 22:19 raynpelikoneet wrote: Glowingbear talking about stuff that does not even make anyone mafia in his opinion. I don't even know why Haru is trying to "defend him" because apparently they haven't even talked about this as he said "i don't know what GlowingBear's interntion was". He literally cannot explain it so it's useless to even try. This makes 0 sense I am not supposed to 'defend' glowingbear, WHO IS THE SAME ENTITY AS ME? So I can't explain glowingbear's intentions AND THIS IS SCUMMY? | ||
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
##Vote: TeamVendettaStrada -WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear | ||
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
On July 11 2014 22:29 raynpelikoneet wrote: You cannot possibly defend him regardless of your affiliation if you don't even know why he has said something!! All you do is shit up the thread with irrelevant things. lol dat vote ![]() ![]() I still don't see how not knowing what glowingbear's intentions are/why he said something is scummy I still don't see where I shit up thread with irrelevant things | ||
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
On July 11 2014 22:33 raynpelikoneet wrote: So what's your case? I am not making sense to you? Everything makes sense, except it doesn't warrant a vote | ||
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
On July 11 2014 22:43 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On July 11 2014 21:52 HaruRH wrote: No I dont have a legit answer because only glowingbear can answer palmar for what he said. I dont know what glowingbear was thinking when he said it, so I am not supposed to give a legit answer in glowingbear's stead since it would be incorrect. -WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear This is the correct answer. Which you should have provided in the first place. Instead you went on for nearly a page saying something else, things like "we needed to talk about it anyways" (which is incorrect in the first place). You do not talk about stuff that's irrelevant, in fact it's more likely you are mafia if you do. I don't see anything relevant coming out of either of you, anything that leads to any conclusions. Except the vote on us which is pretty.. funny. ^^ I need you to point out what you felt was irrelevant, and not just say 'yea you said irrelevant stuff etc' | ||
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
On July 11 2014 22:46 raynpelikoneet wrote: Like Haru, i got a simple question for you: Do you think there was any point in you trying to defend your team against Palmar's accusation (the point where he specifically calls out GlowingBear)? How would you say you can contribute to the matter in any way if you don't know what your teammate's intentions behind his posting were in the first place? Yes. There is a point to defending. This is a team game ffs. I don't just lurk and see glowingbear get attacked while I talk about other things. That is way more scummy. and bad. I can contribute by showing OUR collective intention. Which was to watch out for the kenpachi argument because we felt it might be scum driven. | ||
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
On July 11 2014 23:14 raynpelikoneet wrote: Anyways. I still don't get why Haru's vote is on me. Everything makes sense in his opinion, why do i deserve to get voted for saying basically the same shit Palmar did but he does not? Apparently the reason is not sheeping because he didn't say so.. I gotta travel for a couple of hours, i'll be back tonight, occasionally. Because it is scummy for me to say irrelevant things, so it is scummy for you to point out that I said ireelevant things. #logic | ||
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
On July 11 2014 23:12 Eden1892 wrote: Show nested quote + On July 11 2014 21:47 HaruRH wrote: I don't want to omgus so early :/ So you're mistaken accidentally. -WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear Show nested quote + On July 11 2014 22:22 HaruRH wrote: Even after re-reading your sentence, it still don't make sense. ##Vote: TeamVendettaStrada -WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear ? first of all why even be worried at all about "omgus"ing? if you're town then vote your suspects, that's all that matters secondly if you're gonna be worried about omgusing then why turn right back around and do it? third why does someone accusing you before you accuse them make them more likely town? Because if you noticed my other games, I omgus a lot. Because I hate bad logic. That isn't the point. The point is, I let them say whatever they want. They think they're town for doing so, then let them feel that I think they are town. Period. | ||
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
On July 11 2014 23:18 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On July 11 2014 23:15 HaruRH wrote: On July 11 2014 22:46 raynpelikoneet wrote: Like Haru, i got a simple question for you: Do you think there was any point in you trying to defend your team against Palmar's accusation (the point where he specifically calls out GlowingBear)? How would you say you can contribute to the matter in any way if you don't know what your teammate's intentions behind his posting were in the first place? Yes. There is a point to defending. This is a team game ffs. I don't just lurk and see glowingbear get attacked while I talk about other things. That is way more scummy. and bad. I can contribute by showing OUR collective intention. Which was to watch out for the kenpachi argument because we felt it might be scum driven. Well this is not what your teammate pointed out in his post. He said "it might be or it might be not, no conclusion thxbye". Anyways it's pointless to discuss this with you, only GlowingBear can answer regarding this unless you are lying and actually know why he made such a post. Yes it is so pointless to discuss this. I also have no idea why you think MY posts are crap -> votes for us, then wants to talk to glowingbear. Lying about my teammate's intentions still isn't scummy by the way. | ||
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
On July 11 2014 23:25 marvellosity wrote: I don't understand why Haru gives a blanket pass to Palmar for making a case on his slot, yet votes rayn's slot. I hate it when people vote, then gives reasons when only asked to | ||
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
hurts my pride | ||
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
On July 11 2014 23:33 marvellosity wrote: so you're voting for him based on wounded pride and because you apparently legitimately think only mafia vote and talk about it later? or what? I'm voting him because he had no reasons to vote for us, but chose to anyway So im doing the same | ||
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
On July 12 2014 00:32 IAmRobik wrote: Show nested quote + On July 12 2014 00:28 OnceKing wrote: On July 11 2014 14:31 OnceKing wrote: On July 11 2014 12:38 Stratiform wrote: On July 11 2014 12:28 27ninjabunnies wrote: Stratiform, I've never seen you before or played with you before. Do you play here on TL often? How familiar are you with the game mafia? What is your take on the game so far? I've never played on TL, only irl and some facebook based games. I'm familiar with how mafia works. As for the game so far, I don't really see any information to cast more than suspicion on anyone. Fun question What merits casting more than suspicion then And who is your suspicion cast upon So I go to sleep and I wake up and this question still isn't answered... Stratiform pls -- Robik can you tell me what bunnies/poof have done that's scummy other than "they disagree with each other"? Alternately can you explain why disagreeing with your teammate is alignment indicative? I don't know. The only thing that really bothers me strongly is that they have differing reads based off of my previous experience with playing as a hydra and the two heads expressing differing reads -- it also happened in my first game with rayn and mocsta expressing different reads. So both hydras that I've played with that were mafia had different reads. The one hydra that I played with that had the same reads (mattisfoolish) had the same reads. it also MINORLY bothers me that bunnies is trying to push scum on me because I'm town, so that's pushing an anti-town agenda I was waiting for you to say that robik Top town | ||
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
On July 12 2014 00:38 IAmRobik wrote: Based God harurh. I am never voting you this game Your teammate said something super towny we should forge an alliance you should recruit rayn/slendy for it since they're town too. Then we just need to find 1 more team and we've pretty much got ourselves a lock. Lol robik you will always be my top town this game So you want to make a town circle? | ||
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
On July 12 2014 01:24 sqrtofneg1 wrote: Haru is definitely strange. He is not acting like in previous games. I don't like him. His partner, Glowingbear, however, I do like. This: Show nested quote + On July 12 2014 00:19 GlowingBear wrote: On July 11 2014 21:28 Palmar wrote: Actually, I'm going to do this: ##Unvote ##Vote Team WeDemandALawyer The reasons: 1. They both seemed excited to play pre-game, but haven't posted anything of value. 2. This post On July 11 2014 11:47 GlowingBear wrote: /confirm Hello guys, it's my second game here. It seems that there is a ruckus going on already. Can someone explain me what Is the Kenpachi rule? Also, I'll be signing every post of mine with a bolded "-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear" so it gets easier to identify the team. -WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear Specifically the bolded sentence feels like massively useless fluff observation. 3. This post On July 11 2014 12:38 GlowingBear wrote: Kenpachi rule doesn't sound as a winning plan to me. You may use it as a secondary argument but to get to the point you have a primary one there is so much game to be played. I think that if we keep discussing this topic it will just a waste of breath. Why do I think it's secondary: a scum can fake claim vt just so he can get townie to accuse him and get mislynched. More than that, a vt can simply try to pressure someone who claimed vt. Why not? -WeDemandALawyer: Haru and Glowingbear Talking about stuff that is really easy to talk about without giving any sort of an opinion on anyone in the game. I think it was sinani who pointed out that this post also came at a really awkward time, after people had mostly dropped the kenpachi thing. 3. This post On July 11 2014 19:59 HaruRH wrote: /confirm Robik is going to be afk? But exo is a d1 non-poster too... Meh -WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear I like the summary of his opinion on the issue. "Meh". 1) Being excited =\= spamming. More than that, I wasn't posting anymore because I was sleeping. Different time zones hooray. I'm excited and I'm reading through everything but if you think not giving a opinion on someone is scummy, I'll say that giving free useless opinions on everyone is scummy. As I didn't know at the time what the Kenpachi rule was and as I said we needed more game to have a primary argument, I think it's pretty reasonable to just point out useless effort and wait to have more food to make a case, probably around midday. 2)Pointint out that I didn't know exactly what was happening because I didn't know the meaning of Kenpachi rule. How can I understand a fight if I can not understand the language? I think the team name bolding is very good so we can give a better analysis while diving through the topic. 3) See point 1. Also, I don't think it was unnecessary post as we were wasting breath on a useless subject by the moment, and I find scummy people who just spam things about useless objects, so town loses time and focus. It has already stopped, well, yes, but to the point you would say that I pratically necrobumped it? Check the post times or the distance between my post and the last "Kenpachi rule" post. It's less than a page. More: why would I bring the discussion back just to say "let's not discuss this"? If it was a misleading topic and I were scum, shouldn't I just keep the topic going on saying something like "oh we have to use this policy because of X"? Is a good post. Decent logic here. Overall, I'm on the fence with these guys. Haru, a question for you. Show nested quote + On July 12 2014 00:34 HaruRH wrote: On July 12 2014 00:32 IAmRobik wrote: On July 12 2014 00:28 OnceKing wrote: On July 11 2014 14:31 OnceKing wrote: On July 11 2014 12:38 Stratiform wrote: On July 11 2014 12:28 27ninjabunnies wrote: Stratiform, I've never seen you before or played with you before. Do you play here on TL often? How familiar are you with the game mafia? What is your take on the game so far? I've never played on TL, only irl and some facebook based games. I'm familiar with how mafia works. As for the game so far, I don't really see any information to cast more than suspicion on anyone. Fun question What merits casting more than suspicion then And who is your suspicion cast upon So I go to sleep and I wake up and this question still isn't answered... Stratiform pls -- Robik can you tell me what bunnies/poof have done that's scummy other than "they disagree with each other"? Alternately can you explain why disagreeing with your teammate is alignment indicative? I don't know. The only thing that really bothers me strongly is that they have differing reads based off of my previous experience with playing as a hydra and the two heads expressing differing reads -- it also happened in my first game with rayn and mocsta expressing different reads. So both hydras that I've played with that were mafia had different reads. The one hydra that I played with that had the same reads (mattisfoolish) had the same reads. it also MINORLY bothers me that bunnies is trying to push scum on me because I'm town, so that's pushing an anti-town agenda I was waiting for you to say that robik Top town Why were you waiting for robik to say this? ![]() Everytime robik attacks someone with the word 'anti-town agenda' he is town Like seriously | ||
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
July 12 2014 07:09 GMT
#1058
| ||
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
July 12 2014 10:16 GMT
#1070
On July 12 2014 18:54 marvellosity wrote: I'm at my best friend's wedding today, so I'm leaving things in mderg's capable hands. He's probably going to make the final decision, not sure if/when I'll be able to check my phone. Few things I noted, mebbe they're useful or will be, maybe not. With slam/sqrt, check how easy the wagon is, I don't see any pushback for the lynch. I don't really get this weird martyring behaviour from a team of 2, you'd expect at least one of them to prop up the other. I don't know what that means. They're both unstable? Or it's a ploy? ?? I'm not used to Slam insulting the thread like this. That doesn't make me feel good. I'm tentatively ok with this lynch but with reservations I guess. Stratiform doesn't look quite so bad. Not sure about Palmar. Not gonna be around to judge him on today's play so meh. Poofter didn't bother playing. Many scumpoints. I've felt ok about bunnies, but Poofter dragging her down. Probably not lynch but I don't trust. Right now I like Haru/Glowing for mafia most. Show nested quote + On July 12 2014 14:29 GlowingBear wrote: So, for what I read until now, I have three main targets I want to read more: ExO, Robik and Eden. I'll filter dive them tomorrow, as I didn't have energy enough even to read through 50 long pages. I have a stronger hunch on sqrt/alakaslam, as a lot of people were saying here. Why these guys? Because my way of scumhunting is going through passivity and too much friendly behavior. Going against people there were being quite and being friendly was my best bet on my first game and when I did that most of my readings got the right guys. Show nested quote + On July 12 2014 15:29 GlowingBear wrote: But I didn't said that... geez... I had suspicions on you, which doesn't mean you're necessarily suspicious of overly friendly behavior or passivity... that's why I'll filter dive you, so I can get a better view of what gave me the feeling that you were suspicious. My main scumhunting is attacking passivity/friendly behavior. It's not may only scumhunting method. Throws in random names (Robik, ExO, Eden) and a couple of times states that he scumhunts through passivity and friendly behaviour. These 3 names don't make much (any?) sense in this context. Robik the most abrasive of them all, Eden has been active, ExO's argued his corner firmly enough. His description of what he's looking for -> these 3 names doesn't seem natural to me. He brings up Robik as suspicious again in a later post but again never explains why, again it is the opposite of what he's looking for in mafia. sqrt/Slam may have been passive to some extent maybe? They've been quite prickly too. There seems to be a whole bunch of other targets that conform to his self-professed view. Basically I find the 3 names he throws in, together with his self-styled description of scumhunting, together with how he introduced sqrt/slam as scummy after that, very suspicious indeed. My best bet for mafia right now. Really? From what I read, robik is playing weird at first. He isn't coming into the thread and turning it into a shitstorm. This is acceptable at first since he noted his intent to let exo learn. Also, his strong will to kill anyone who thinks he is scum (town|robik does this) makes me think he is scum. But glowingbear probably doesn't meta read him and thus it is also acceptable for glowingbear to have a suspicion on him. Glowingbear isn't just throwing out names. We had discussed about these people in the qt and my opinions differs from glowing's in these regards. Thus, glowingbear isnt just writing them off as scum as I have a conflicting opinion. Exo doesn't post jackshit d1 as town btw. eden doesn't make sense? Read the thread bro Sqrt/slam IS passive. Their posts were mostly replies and shit. So glowingbear is scum for saying he wants to scumhunt through passivity, but others who aren't doing shit isn't suspicious? (LIKE MDERG) | ||
HaruRH
Singapore2780 Posts
July 12 2014 10:21 GMT
#1072
On July 12 2014 19:14 Eden1892 wrote: Unflipped associations time! If you're right about Shiny Ursaring being mafia, marv, then that explains why there's no counterwagon: the other mafia is busing. Slamroot set itself up to be bused when it got caught -- notice how both members completely drop any effort to defend themselves from pressing questions as soon as they're brought up. If we're being honest, sqrt's post that I called him out on which started the avalanche of suspicion on their slot wasn't this damning or obvious. It snowballed because Slamroot didn't bother responding to any accusations whatsoever. I would acknowledge that giving up straight away is probably suboptimal play for the mafia because I don't think it would have been very difficult to defuse suspicions about them; however, even if suboptimal, it still conceivably advances scum wincon by allowing the partner to bus for credit. As town behavior OTOH it's not merely suboptimal, it's completely nonsensical. Giving up, spamming the thread and getting mislynched by a case that could reasonably be refuted is literally 100% negative utility for town. So of course there isn't gonna be a counterwagon, and this shouldn't discourage anyone from voting for Slamroot today. There's not gonna be a counterwagon because Slamroot's partner is going to bus because the current situation is unsalvageable. What we want to look for is a slot that's acknowledging Slamroot's guilt and probably even voting for them, but whose reasoning isn't sound and whose primary claimed suspicions are elsewhere (and relatively unexplained). So far Shiny Ursaring fits the bill there and I'd be happy to lynch them tomorrow, but I think there's just no way Slamroot is town. WRONG WRONG WRONG Theres no counter wagon because NOBODY SET IT UP YET Its not too late to salvage the situation dude, if I was scum and slam is scum now, I can easily salvage this hole they jumped into easily Rather than thinking if we were bussing, think if slam is scum in the first place Glowingbear doesn't fit the bill at all. You're just looking for another town to steamroll through d2. So I understand from your intent that you want to -> lynch slam d1 into lynching us d2. Note that only scum would set up a d2 lynch before a d1. your actions have been recorded. | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games summit1g8184 Grubby5653 ScreaM2779 Beastyqt1295 ceh9896 B2W.Neo617 FrodaN553 syndereN401 ArmadaUGS162 mouzStarbuck102 QueenE93 Trikslyr65 ToD40 Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • MindelVK StarCraft: Brood War![]() • StrangeGG ![]() • Reevou ![]() ![]() • IndyKCrew ![]() • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube League of Legends Other Games |
Code For Giants Cup
SOOP
ShoWTimE vs Clem
Replay Cast
ReBellioN vs HonMonO
The PondCast
WardiTV Invitational
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
[BSL 2025] Weekly
[ Show More ] Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Replay Cast
Clem vs Zoun
|
|