EPTI will not run climb or jump. I will not sit kneel or lie down. I will not spam either.
You Only Shoot Once Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
I will not run climb or jump. I will not sit kneel or lie down. I will not spam either. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On April 17 2014 07:20 geript wrote: Was RoL the guy who hated BH or was that someone else? everyone hates BH, he's a punk | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
##vote geript | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
VE: I understand what you're saying about Palmar, but I do not think it likely he will flip scum. I don't think it's a good policy to just maxvote anyone with a nuke on them because thye MIGHT be scum and shoot someone. If there's anyone I'd trust as town to actually make a non-shit shot, also (besides myself, who never misses) it would be palmar. I'd rather place my vote on geript. Suck it. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
Foolishness wish Is my command | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
##unvote ##vote geript | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On April 27 2014 02:45 strongandbig wrote: [/b][/b]On reread I don't get as bad a vibe from this post as I did before. I guess the first part feels a bit off/overwrought, but it's not as terrible as it seemed. That said, I don't like how VE insists on misunderstanding the caller situation, and how he hasn't been talking about anything but saying the same stuff over and over. --radom crap about claler-- What does that mean about VE? Well, VE focuses only on reasons why caller making this shot as scum would be strategically terrible, and even goes so far as to pull a strategic reason for caller to do this as town out of his ass. He ignores the (in my mind far more likely) possibility of a non-strategic action as either alignment. He also ignores the possibility that caller has some extra information as scum, which as I said above makes a strategic shot much more likely to have come from scum than town. I don't like that when this is the only thing VE has talked about, he's ignoring possibilities and building a particular story that I think is very unlikely. It feels kind of like VE knows caller is town. There are possible scum motivations for this. Someone else said that as scum VE likes talking about things where he's right, and if VE knows caller is town then he would be guaranteed to be right. Also, as long as he focuses on this one "big event," he won't have to participate in conversations about other players. (Except for the throwaway townread on geript.) So yeah. It's not a slam dunk but I'm putting my scum bet on VE at this point. tl;dr this post from VE feels good, random crpa about claler, serious wafflepush on VE then.. it's not a slam dunk but you're putting your "scum bet" on VE? Get real, I haven't seen this much waffle since my last trip to IHOP and they don't even DO waffles. Check it. Make a case on VE if you want, or don't make a case, but don't leave us guessing about what's what. Wanna know why Fool be votin you? It's cause of shit like this, followed by shit like this: On April 27 2014 02:51 strongandbig wrote: We have more than 30 hours left in the day. Lets talk about who is scum for a while. There's no need to shut anything down yet. I still don't know whether you actually think VE is scum or not even after reading these sorry excuse for posts. Let me quote some of your waffling so it's 100% unambiguous what I'm complaining about here. Oh wait I already did. Yeah. So look dude I'm gona be straight with you cause that's how I roll: you are not talking about who is scum, you're talking about weird feelings and shit. You're not even making it clear that you push on VE in your post. Yeah, at the end you say "it's not a slam dunk but i'm putting my scum bet (but clearly not my vote for some reason herpa derpa) on VE" but the ENTIREBODY OF YOUR POST IS WAFFLING. So EZ to backtrack, especially since you're so EZ 2 b scum. Look at that and tell me you're contributing meaningfully to the discussion. Oh, what you can't tell me that? YEah, that's cause you don't call anyone out, you don't push for reactions, you don't even VOTE him. You don't do anything because you're not here to DO anything. You're here to waffle. You're here to slink away later with some crap vote and you're not allowed to do that. Here's what I want from you in addition to your half-assed response to this post. You must include this in your post: 1) who you think is scum, and a vote on them 2) a response detailing what you think not only of VE, but of me, and all the people who you think had bad OR good reasoning about VE's alignment 3) sobbing nerd tears | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On April 27 2014 15:14 sandroba wrote: Gonna post more on week days, posting mostly from my phone now. I'll have something tomorrow most likely. I'm cool with prpl so far, fool is no to be taken srs at least till he posts something good. More talking, less not talking please. What do you think of snB | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On April 27 2014 15:19 sandroba wrote: Im cool with snb tô o, bh not so much Please stop overwhelming me with details the detials they are too many ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/cXkP52L.png) | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On April 28 2014 02:07 strongandbig wrote: Just to talk for a second about bh's case - it's stupid and lazy. He also uses way too many words to say I'm not being committal enough / am giving myself room to back out. This is the TL meta at work, no room for nuance or honest actual thought processes. The thing is, I feel like it's such a trope that I'm not even mad - like, the case is stupid but less stupid than koshi's cases. I said exactly what I thought in the post bh doesn't like, I guess I should've made up more machismo. Anyway, bh asked me to read him as well so here it is. He accused geript of overexplaining and put an early vote down, flipped that vote a few times, and made his own overexplained case on me. Honestly, I've stopped expecting much out of bh. I know his read on me is wrong, and I really disagreed with how he justified his vote on geript. I know he won't be happy if I just say "he's been wrong in a scummy way, but his posts don't give me a strong gut impression and I don't really expect him to be right so I have a mild scum lean" so I'm gonna go ahead and say "he's 100% scum seal of approval lynch this motherfucker but lynch VE first and probably some other people too." I'm not saying you can't be nuanced, though thanks for strawmanning the shit out of my statements. You can say that it's like "TL Meta" or whatever, but first, 1) TL Meta is objectively the best-- we are literally better htan other mafia sites 2) even if I use too many words or it's a trope or whatever, or you lack machismo, that still doesn't change the fact that your case still literally gave you the ability to back out and didn't include a vote. What you've said doesn't contradict what I've said, you've just made some words and put them on a page and made it LOOK like it does, but really you're just shitting the bed. I also would like to note saying "I have a weak read on BH but will pretend to have a strong read on him" is literally the same as saying "I have a weak read on BH" except with added snark. We should call you snarkandbig. You think my vote on geript was shit? Look at it this way, I'm here driving the town discussion and making things happen, and you're here not taking stances and being scum. Complain all you want about "expecting things out of BH" or "TL Meta" but all your whining is going to be extra funny when you flip scum kek On April 28 2014 02:05 sandroba wrote: wtf is this snb shit? honestly he is one of the few people I'm actually leaning town so far and somehow he is the one being wagoned? I'm gonna leave my vote on foolishness and probably will have time to read/post for a bit before the day ends. I still have no clue how this fake nuke thing worked, but since palmar isnt dying I see no reason to kill caller yet. See you guys later. ##vote: foolishness Foolishness almost certainly is not scum. His posts have real intention behind them and he's looking into people's meta to try to figure out whether their plays this game (and there have been many odd plays this game) align with their scum play or town play. That level of interest in actually determining people's alignment tells me Fool is town. Not a good lynch today imo. Not really sure why you're voting him. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
##unvote ##vote SnB | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On April 28 2014 07:04 Koshi wrote: I stick on SnB. gn. that's my boy | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On April 28 2014 07:24 yamato77 wrote: people will move off of snb or I will rng between the people left on him and shoot one. god what is it with you people this game? jesus christ | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
On April 28 2014 07:36 yamato77 wrote: it's literally imperative that we don't lynch my one solid townread you know what, don't RNG it. If people don't move off of SnB you shoot ME. You don't get to say rng or anything like that, so if you want to threaten someone, threaten BlazingHand and own up to the thread. Say you'll kill me, the best scumhunter on all of TL, if you don't get your why. Whine and cry like a baby and be specific about who you are shooting. I volunteer. And you won't shoot, either. You know why? You don't have the guts. Get in line, your read on SnB is wrong, we're lynching him today. nothing's stopping this wagon. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
| ||
