Catastrophe Mafia - Page 87
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
SO VA if you're here now, maybe an explanation as to why you did what you did in that QT? Also Oats holy shit dude. You totes deserve that power ranking imo. | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Also its not like Iamp is the only person just making comments and poking people and shit. I wonder why Foolishness focused on him exclusively for his first real scum read. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On April 04 2014 15:39 Oatsmaster wrote: Well for Iamp, I think that he has pressured some people and created some content through that. Also its not like Iamp is the only person just making comments and poking people and shit. I wonder why Foolishness focused on him exclusively for his first real scum read. Probably because he thinks he's scum? Again, looks like town Foolishness to me and at the very least his contributions are in earnest, but it just bothers me that his play is so extremely similar to Shadow (minus the flavour-trolliness). Foolishness if you're around maybe you can actually comment in your roundabout way as to why BH is actually town? Are you just assuming the Balla/BH lynch is something scum would jump on or can you admit the replacement factor has merit? And hey BH, maybe you know if you want to prove yourself you should do something? | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On April 04 2014 15:41 VisceraEyes wrote: So I read iamp's filter. Not so sure he's town anymore and would lynch with Foolishness pending reading Holyflare's filter. I'm sheeping today boys, show me ur cases. I'd probably lynch HF over iamp if I had to choose between the two of them. Meta presents an issue because HF never plays this terribly---maybe indicates 3P since no-one has seen him play this way and he has never been a 3P yet? But at the very least one should be expecting more from him as #1 power rank so could be reason enough to lynch him. Would not lynch 1st overall today though. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
| ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
It doesn't sit right with me, especially in light of his continued insistence to play the way he has---doesn't look like scum tactics to me. I will concede that his post calling you scum doesn't look particularly good, but I don't think it's the sole thing that proves him scum, which is what everyone voting him is currently relying on. | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On April 04 2014 15:48 Blazinghand wrote: yeah honestly i'm still in the process of catching up but i'm very very comfortable with where my vote is now. i'll keep you in the loop as the situation develops wow so useful blazinghand. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On April 04 2014 15:52 WaveofShadow wrote: I don't find your reason to vote him any stronger than any of the other 'easy' cases atm, including the 'replacement case' on you that I'm a part of. In fact, the case against you has gained more resistance while a whole bunch of people were pretty damn quick to jump aboard paperscraps as soon as it came up. It doesn't sit right with me, especially in light of his continued insistence to play the way he has---doesn't look like scum tactics to me. I will concede that his post calling you scum doesn't look particularly good, but I don't think it's the sole thing that proves him scum, which is what everyone voting him is currently relying on. is "you" in this post referring to me? | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
Yes. | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On April 04 2014 15:43 WaveofShadow wrote: Probably because he thinks he's scum? Again, looks like town Foolishness to me and at the very least his contributions are in earnest, but it just bothers me that his play is so extremely similar to Shadow (minus the flavour-trolliness). Foolishness if you're around maybe you can actually comment in your roundabout way as to why BH is actually town? Are you just assuming the Balla/BH lynch is something scum would jump on or can you admit the replacement factor has merit? And hey BH, maybe you know if you want to prove yourself you should do something? What happened in Shadow? I dont like that his first post didnt seem to have any objective although it was already a few hours into the game when it was posted. Hes clearly reading the thread but not influencing it highly in any way. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
I've already caught one scum so far in ps, give me a break i can catch like one scum per 24 hours at maxspeed bro | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On April 04 2014 15:55 Blazinghand wrote: I've already caught one scum so far in ps, give me a break i can catch like one scum per 24 hours at maxspeed bro you got a scum on the line, but you arent doing anything to reel him in. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On April 04 2014 15:55 Blazinghand wrote: I've already caught one scum so far in ps, give me a break i can catch like one scum per 24 hours at maxspeed bro ps? Oats in Shadow Foolishness only posted a few times per cycle in massively huge cases, and barely interacted with anyone directly all game until the day he was lynched. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
like if you see people agreeing with you, that doesn't cause you to re-evaluate usually unless they're all lurkey scummy people right, so that's evidence you're right. but then if peopel disagree, clearly that's evidence your target is scum?? ._. re the second part of your post, is "he" paperscraps? | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
On April 04 2014 15:56 Oatsmaster wrote: you got a scum on the line, but you arent doing anything to reel him in. well apparently everyone likes my case so we're set | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On April 04 2014 15:58 Blazinghand wrote: well apparently everyone likes my case so we're set by everyone you mean, sketchy dude 1. On April 04 2014 08:01 Amiko wrote: ##Vote: paperscraps and yourself. On April 04 2014 07:01 Blazinghand wrote: ##vote paperscraps Right. | ||
| ||