EPTWorld Heavyweight Championship Mafia II - Page 77
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43267 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 30 2014 02:09 raynpelikoneet wrote: I am kinda thinking who is stupid enough to believe Robik's claim over yours. or not reading  | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43267 Posts
On March 30 2014 02:09 Holyflare wrote: you know when we were talking to him about thrawn and then he was trying to disprove you and randomly flipped? that was right after he said he re-read the palmar interaction and came to this conclusion etc. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/446774-world-heavyweight-championship-mafia-ii?page=32#635 he never talked about this again and dropped it all for thrawn I'm not sure what do you mean by this. Could you clarify what he dropped regarding who? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43267 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43267 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 30 2014 02:12 raynpelikoneet wrote: I'm not sure what do you mean by this. Could you clarify what he dropped regarding who? like he has this line of thought saying "is palmar actually mafia because of some random game with toad who got coached" etc... which in itself is really fucking weird to bring up at all ever because it's 2 totally unrelated players posting in 2 different games but then he totally drops that line of reasoning and starts talking about thrawn and ends up defending thrawn only to vote him and that whole you/him conversation looked really weird | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43267 Posts
- Me and gumshoe have a different theory of what Palmar said. gumshoe is so sure he is right he calls me bad and refuses to listen to the obvious rgiht conclusion (yes it was obvious). - Me and gumshoe have a different theory of what thrawn did. gumshoe argues, then concedes and drops Palmar who he was so sure of being mafia (see the first point). | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43267 Posts
 I'll be back in ~30. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Palmar: Still not sure about him, early interactions have left uneasy because a) I still feel his immediate interactions with Rayn were somewhat artificial and b) he responded to my questions well enough, but I'm not sure why he treated me as seriously as he did when he has a precedent of responding to better accusations with anger and mockery. Null leaning scummy. he said this after me and you talked to him about thrawn and after he talked about palmar being scum | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43267 Posts
Like it's not obvious who tram is when there is a discussion between mre and Holyflare about gumshoe about last 20 posts.. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43267 Posts
On March 30 2014 02:27 Holyflare wrote: urgh but the only thing is i don't think tram is capable of that kind of argument with palmar..... Maybe he would. We had a pretty good argument in GSL IV. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 30 2014 02:51 raynpelikoneet wrote: ugh this is exactly what bothers me about prplhz. Like it's not obvious who tram is when there is a discussion between mre and Holyflare about gumshoe about last 20 posts.. it was more like "why (do you call him) tram?" and not so much "who is tram?" | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43267 Posts
On March 30 2014 03:23 prplhz wrote: it was more like "why (do you call him) tram?" and not so much "who is tram?" Well this is interesting viewpoint because why does it matter? | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On March 30 2014 03:25 raynpelikoneet wrote: Well this is interesting viewpoint because why does it matter? because i was curious | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
if you really think that's the case then i suggest you pm iamperfection about it, he had some pretty strict rules in the OP. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/egMOA3b.png) | ||
| ||
