EPTBut gumshoe, defending someone and calling out bad logic are two different thigns. I was not doing the former, ever.
World Heavyweight Championship Mafia II - Page 79
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43269 Posts
But gumshoe, defending someone and calling out bad logic are two different thigns. I was not doing the former, ever. | ||
|
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
Holyflare votes me because he is still alive, like WTF? thrawn made a case on me, I refute his points, he doesn't react to that. he posts another post where he claimed I defended him (which I never did) and then flipped the switch on him (which I couldn't since I never read him as town). gumshoe votes me although he has barely given any reason, and that little reason he had I questionened and never got an answer. And prplhz... well, he says my defense against his points are good but he still thinks I'm scum? What is this bullshit? | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 30 2014 07:57 raynpelikoneet wrote: Like i mean noone was like "gumshoe wow, your case on Palmar is so good that totally proves him mafia". noone is like "wow gumshoe you are most likely town because you made a good case on Palmar which we all followed" noone is like "wow rayn you are so scum because you argued against gumshoe's really good case on Palmar at the start of D1". He is perfectly capable of pointing out "shit logic" on his own (which couldn't have been that shit seeing as I was right) yet you felt pressured to do it for him. Let me ask you ,what is the result of pointing out the shit logic of an accusation on someones behalf without even calling the accuser scum, that person is defended. You are defending him. End of story. If you dont want to called out for it, shut your mouth when two people are having a conversation. Otherwise we have to assume you have an agenda, as I have. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 30 2014 08:02 raynpelikoneet wrote: Okay i am starting to be annoying, so i'll go to sleep. But gumshoe, defending someone and calling out bad logic are two different thigns. I was not doing the former, ever. This is the exact kind of distinction scum loves to make fyi / : makes it much harder to pin them down. | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 30 2014 08:22 thrawn2112 wrote: who is scum? Not Marv, Holy, Rayn(probally) or me. If your actually town, then its an easy answer from there, just gotta choose between prp or phagga / : | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 30 2014 08:34 thrawn2112 wrote: i was replying to phagga Sorry ) : | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On March 30 2014 08:31 gumshoe wrote: Not Marv, Holy, Rayn(probally) or me. If your actually town, then its an easy answer from there, just gotta choose between prp or phagga / : i think bolded shows a townie mindset like last night I was thinking about how it's probably easier for me to solve the game than it is for anyone else, because i don't have to worry about trying to read thrawn | ||
|
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On March 30 2014 08:22 thrawn2112 wrote: who is scum? you are. On March 28 2014 19:33 thrawn2112 wrote: iirc phagga defended me at first? then all the sudden he flipped this switch and I became mafia for the rest of his filter so much so that he said that even though he was reading palmar as wishy washy maybe scum, he'd still rahter lynch thrawn then it became obvuous that palmar would be lynched and phagga decided he didn't care too much about his thrawn read This is all so obviously wrong, as I wrote already earlier. First the case, then this, it feels as if you are just throwing shit at me and see if something sticks. ##Vote: thrawn:2112 | ||
|
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
Why am I scum? | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 30 2014 08:39 phagga wrote: @gumshoe Why am I scum? Honestly it's just a process of elimination lynch / : I'm not really considering holy or marv at all and my Rayn read is pretty out there( most likely wrong as well). Moving past the seemingly obvius townies (who are likely to get shot and should therefore not be lynch targets) I actually feel pretty good about prp(no tremendously good reasons as to why, I just kinda do going by his general play). That leaves you and thrawn, so long as one of you is lynched today, I really dont care / : and I'm too lazy to argue why town should choose chocolate over vannila, so thats pretty much where I'm at concerning todays lynch. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On March 30 2014 08:49 thrawn2112 wrote: gumshoe if you are town you should care, even if it's only for the sake of not setting yourself up to be mislynched if you're wrong It's actually in towns interest to mislynch me, you really dont want me at lylo / : that said, I'm pretty sure my votes gonna stay on Phagga, pretty much because your asking me to reconsider my play when my current course of action is already going your way XD seems like a pretty townie thing to do. | ||
|
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
prplhz is being prphlz (I know I said something similar before), I don't like his play this game since he is putting barely any content out in the thread. However, I know prplhz plays like this as town sometimes. I also assume that he would as scum not have done the vote shenanigans with Palmar and Marv (first voting Palmar, then almost immediatly switching to Marv without reasoning, even later only claiming that he was annoyed by him). gumshoe... I have filed his interaction with Palmar as conversation that makes him rather look like town. I think some of his other reasonings are pretty far fetched or he is focusing on points that are not that important. You know what, I'^m just gonna read his filter now. ##Unvote | ||
|
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On March 30 2014 08:45 thrawn2112 wrote: phagg's vote timing is exactly how palmar's vote happened Can you explain that? I don't understand it. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
as per marv's case, palmar's vote timing was awkward and forced because it only happened because someone pressured him into voting, same as yours. | ||
|
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On March 30 2014 08:59 thrawn2112 wrote: as per marv's case, palmar's vote timing was awkward and forced because it only happened because someone pressured him into voting, same as yours. hmm, I see what you mean, but it just happened that I realized I hadn't voted yet when you asked that question. | ||
| ||
