World Heavyweight Championship Mafia II - Page 5

On March 26 2014 08:29 Palmar wrote:

Do you think you will get an answer from gumshoe that has any chance of moving your read on him forward? If so, what kind of an answer would make you lean one way or the other?

On March 26 2014 08:31 marvellosity wrote:
I think I need to bait a multi-layered trap based on something that hasn't happened yet.

On March 26 2014 08:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Over-explained answer could be indicative of scumshoe. He tried to over-explain shit last game (geript's PYP) as mafia and it backpedalled quite hard. He also knows i am a tunnely guy and he also knows my questions have motive behind them so therefore he knows he must answer to me.

Joke is a joke, but gumshoe getting possibly scared as scum was worth a try.

On March 26 2014 08:38 Palmar wrote:

There is no reason for him not to answer you as any alignment, but I guess it is actually reasonable to think there is a small chance of panic and overexplanation.

On March 26 2014 08:41 gumshoe wrote:


Scum can be reasonable as well : P and this game is pretty stacked, mistakes this early on are not to be expected. I'm curious Palmer, what kind of reaction were you looking for out of Rayn, knowing farily well hed have an easy time answering your question as either alignment?

On March 26 2014 08:53 Palmar wrote:

If rayn does not have an explanation to his question it makes the question pointless and thus rayn more likely to be mafia.

On March 26 2014 08:58 gumshoe wrote:


But it is likely that a response will come easily, all you do if Rayns scum is strengthen his position in thread after an easy question, and I dont bilieve you honestly couldnt come with your own explanation for why Rayn asked his question of me.

Therefore I find your question not only pointless, but harmful / :

On March 26 2014 08:54 Palmar wrote:
The point being that I did not see how any answer I expected could possibly have revealed anything about your alignment.

On March 26 2014 09:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:

wait what?
Asking questions is scummy because it makes mafia gain town credit?
What kinda shitlogic is this?

On March 26 2014 09:06 gumshoe wrote:


MEGA LOGIC Im saying his question was dumb, which is funny because he accused you of much the same, and the only outcome of that question was that you would answer it and come off looking strong, regardless of your alignment.

Whereas your question was directed at someone (me) known to crack under pressure as scum and who had done so in a game you and palmer had just played. That question was perfectly fine.

On March 26 2014 08:58 gumshoe wrote:


But it is likely that a response will come easily, all you do if Rayns scum is strengthen his position in thread after an easy question, and I dont bilieve you honestly couldnt come with your own explanation for why Rayn asked his question of me.

Therefore I find your question not only pointless, but harmful / :

On March 26 2014 09:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:
gumshoe i am interested. Do you think Palmar is mafia?

On March 26 2014 09:10 Palmar wrote:


You're assuming I think rayn is smarter than me. I did not consider the option that you might panic and overexplain, or any other scenario that makes the question reasonable, thus I wanted to find out if rayn had considered any scenario where him questioning you might lead to something.

Please explain how it was harmful.

On March 26 2014 09:02 gumshoe wrote:


Eh, my attention is on robick for virtually no reason, maybe were scum together, bam, easy / : took me 5 seconds, and obviously you weren't that stalwart in your suspicion because you conceded there was a point to the questionafter one response from Rayn. Maybe your just trying to kick start the thread, but I highly doubt you really put much stock in what youve said so far / :

On March 26 2014 09:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:

I am pretty sure Palmar did not accuse me of anything.

If rayn does not have an explanation to his question it makes the question pointless and thus rayn more likely to be mafia.

On March 26 2014 09:11 gumshoe wrote:


I do not for a second think he could not come up with his own valid reasoning for your question twoards me and I dont see how he could imagine you in any world giving something up in response. As if when your scum you dont bother with reasons, whereas the opposite is true, your far more careful as red and he should know that.

The outcome of the question is inevitable, you look capable, he gives ground, it was unlikely to go any other way(and I dont see what other path he could have honestly imagined) and therefore it was pointless. Hes either fienting in an effort to kick start or hes scum trying to fit in. One thing for sure though, hes not bieng genuine atm.