EPTIII Titanic Mini Mafia: MS Paint Edition - Page 65
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
On March 20 2014 01:58 raynpelikoneet wrote: No it's the read on me which is so bad it can't come from a townie. he hasn't said he had a read on you at all, in fact he didn't even call you scummy for misrepresenting him like you did. He said we should stop clogging up the thread with the scooby doo stuff but then started all this coag stuff which has 0 relevance as he hasn't called you scum at all | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 20 2014 02:00 Holyflare wrote: he hasn't said he had a read on you at all, in fact he didn't even call you scummy for misrepresenting him like you did. He said we should stop clogging up the thread with the scooby doo stuff but then started all this coag stuff which has 0 relevance as he hasn't called you scum at all I have not misrepresented anything. I called him mafia for making up a bullshit read ("rayn looks bad") on me based on absolutely nothing and without referencing any evidence why i actually look bad. He took a stance that makes no sense from town perspective, the only explanation i can think of is that he knew Coag is town (because he did not even look/reference the argument at all). | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
"Because you argued with Coag in the first hour of the game and didn't do anything else" is not a valid reason. Never. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
On March 20 2014 02:04 raynpelikoneet wrote: I have not misrepresented anything. I called him mafia for making up a bullshit read ("rayn looks bad") on me based on absolutely nothing and without referencing any evidence why i actually look bad. He took a stance that makes no sense from town perspective, the only explanation i can think of is that he knew Coag is town (because he did not even look/reference the argument at all). I'm quoting what he was saying Stop misrepresenting crap and stop believing that people can only be thinking one or two things. yeah, i'm absolutely saying you looked bad for just arguing and arguing with coag. it didn't go anywhere, it didn't help the thread, and it just spammed useless pages. just like all this scooby doo stuff. He doesn't call you scummy or anything, just that you look bad. He doesn't even mention his earlier thought processes of me and dp just about this which had already happened at the time he was around anyway | ||
|
Giggletummy
Pitcairn200 Posts
On March 20 2014 01:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: it absolutely does mean something. kush signs some posts, coag signs some posts by calling out kush, when the hydra is just kush and coag, coag is identifiable as both coag and "not-kush". when there are way more people, "not-kush" doesn't matter and also Fuck you, you literally just said this: It doesn't mean shit if there is one or a thousand people with him on the account. The fact that there is even one other person makes your argument invalid. On March 20 2014 01:47 Holyflare wrote: not actually futile. coag's identity is actually wrapped up in rayn's reads.talking about futile conversations, goes on to talk about even more futile conversations! who do you actually think is mafia? if you disregard me because I am actually town and other people actually see that, what does that leave you with? On March 20 2014 01:50 Palmar wrote: planned on actually posting my case. Not gonna go, "next time on giggletummy posts a case, we took a look at holyflare's reasoning in post 458 and you'll be shocked at what we discovered!" Giggle, why did you not post even a summary or a hint of your thoughts on holyflare before leaving the thread last night? All you left was one quote from HF you "liked" I'm not even sure if that's meant to say you think it was a legit or a sarcastic "like". On March 20 2014 01:55 Hopeless1der wrote: followup is in Flare case. if flare's response was like that, "my read on DP is that he did this thing, got a scummy point, he's scum, who cares what he's done since," then I would have found it townie. it would show that his bad reasoning early on was likely fishing for reactions because the reaction really mattered to him. No good answer atm. I wouldnt lynch Holy but I dont like him much. Giggles: I want this followup | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 20 2014 02:07 Holyflare wrote: I'm quoting what he was saying He doesn't call you scummy or anything, just that you look bad. He doesn't even mention his earlier thought processes of me and dp just about this which had already happened at the time he was around anyway Oh right, good point. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
followup is in Flare case. if flare's response was like that, "my read on DP is that he did this thing, got a scummy point, he's scum, who cares what he's done since," then I would have found it townie. it would show that his bad reasoning early on was likely fishing for reactions because the reaction really mattered to him. here's the problem you didn't ask me anything to do with that at all and I DO follow up with reasoning on why he is scum! | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
I think it's bad logic to think so. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
4. djodref 6. VisceraEyes 8. Vivax 15. Alakaslam | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On March 20 2014 02:16 Holyflare wrote: meh I didn't think djodref was that bad, don't like his disappearance though can you find a non-rayn read in djo's filter? i can't. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
On March 20 2014 02:19 thrawn2112 wrote: can you find a non-rayn read in djo's filter? i can't. can you find a non-me read that wasn't useless in hopeless' filter? can you find any reads other than me in giggletummys filter? can you read oats' alignment from such little amount of posting? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Give me a little bit to kinda parse through all these pages, but that's approximately where I'm at after skimming. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
ggtmy should probably go on that list but there is something about how this stuff happened that makes me think he might be town: On March 20 2014 00:10 Giggletummy wrote: (1) I was fishing for a reaction. I got a scummy one. Therefore, DP is scum. He's done some stuff since, but I don't care, original reasons stand. (See this post, which is why I marked it - + Show Spoiler + On March 19 2014 08:44 Koshi wrote: I didn't like your early posting. I didn't like the non committal stuff. I didn't like the defensive attitude of other posts. I was reading the thread and I was actually looking at your posts strangely and then people put pressure on you and I simply +1 on everything. because I felt that needed to be done and they had a point. Out of everybody I really believe you had a really weak-ass start and I gave you a scummy point. The point is already put down and cannot be erased. -Koshi his judgement- as for oats, he had been consistently calling me scum up till a point where he wrote a lynch list that didn't innclude me, nowhere in his filter does it indicate that his read on me was changing before that lynch list post. his push on me wa a main component of his play so if he were scum i'd expect him to at least document the fact that his thrawn-read changed, if not give his reasons for the flop, given how scum want to keep their story straight. furthur, the fact that he has reads that change that aren't documented in his posts suggest that he is actualyl thinking about his reads even when he's not posting about them | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On March 20 2014 02:34 Holyflare wrote: so your scum team is lurker 1,2,3 and 4 then? correct! why is that an issue? we are in fact playing tlmafia right? | ||
| ||
