|
On March 05 2014 22:43 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2014 22:33 justanothertownie wrote:On March 05 2014 19:04 Palmar wrote: Meh.
I still think we should lynch boone. The QT makes her look a tiny bit better, but tbh I also have this nagging feeling that she outed the QT as a desperation move.
And then there's the point I made earlier on how much she's doing statements instead of conversations. Could you explain to me the scum motivation of outing the qt to the thread? In what way exactly would that be a desperation move? There is no reason to out the QT as either alignment because if all these people happen to be town, mafia knows where to shoot for a chance of a blue role. I refuse to believe there is a random mechanic in the game, so I'm pretty sure it has to be role related. She did it just to throw information out there. The only thing I take from it is that she wants to reveal she has additional information, but that might be a town thing to do as well. ie: she raised a new discussion point and her status in the thread. It's good for both alignments but a bad play in general. Why does boone perform a bad play for her own sake? It can be explained by her being both scum and town, which is why I said "I have this feeling". ie: I cannot prove it. Exactly.
|
So you don't have any strong scumread right now palmar? What do you think of rayn now that he has posted a lot more?
|
On March 05 2014 22:50 Palmar wrote: So we agree on lynching her then? Based on the policy? No.
|
On March 05 2014 22:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: Jesus JAT are you reading at all or just keep asking stupid questions? I have very clearly explained why i did vote for boone. In the post where i voted for her, and it has btw nothing to do with Palmar. Shit, that's what happens if you take a break during your reread. So you were convinced by VE instead. A very clear explanation still looks different though.
|
Ok, rayn I take that back. VEs post is really good.
|
This wagon is just rolling so easy. Everybody seems to read boone scum.
|
I never said she was town oats - I guess you will never learn to read. This is just unsettling.
|
On March 05 2014 23:04 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2014 22:52 justanothertownie wrote: So you don't have any strong scumread right now palmar? What do you think of rayn now that he has posted a lot more? I think boone is scum. I think austin is scum. If it helps you get a clearer picture: town to scum list: Town-ish reads:Palmar IAmRobik Oatsmaster Leaning town-reads:Dandel Ion Grackaroni Alakaslam Null/no idea/not read.raynpelikoneet justanothertownie VisceraEyes maybe scum:Killing GGTeMpLaR probably scum:boonetown austinmcc I am almost always wrong on at least one scum (and give him a townread) though. Explain to me the oats read please. I know you aren't the only one to have this huge townread on him (I think grack was the other one?) but I seriously don't understand it at all.
|
On March 05 2014 23:10 Palmar wrote: Just read his filter, he's active, gives reasons for just about everything he does, seems to be willing to engage in discussion, seems to be reading and following the thread. I could do post by post but I don't think it's necessary. And since when exactly are those things towntells for oats? It seems to me like you only registered that he engaged people and didn't pay any attention to the content of his posts.
|
Like he is just saying wrong shit all the time. Even disregarding the times he attacked me for some bullshit reason there are things like those austin read that rayn sheeped earlier. Or this:
On March 05 2014 16:02 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2014 15:56 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On March 05 2014 15:53 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 05 2014 15:51 GGTeMpLaR wrote: I'm not going to link the entire fight between Dandel/Robik, it's there for you to read. If you didn't get the same impression from it that I did then you're free to disagree. ok cool you cant back up your assumption. So you disagree and think that they both lost their temper and that Dandel wasn't jerking Robik around or that he didn't have the upper hand in that shitfest. Yes
|
On March 05 2014 23:16 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2014 23:04 justanothertownie wrote: I never said she was town oats - I guess you will never learn to read. This is just unsettling. fuck man, then dont say shit you dont mean. Please quote where I said she is town.
|
On March 05 2014 23:16 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2014 23:14 justanothertownie wrote:On March 05 2014 23:10 Palmar wrote: Just read his filter, he's active, gives reasons for just about everything he does, seems to be willing to engage in discussion, seems to be reading and following the thread. I could do post by post but I don't think it's necessary. And since when exactly are those things towntells for oats? It seems to me like you only registered that he engaged people and didn't pay any attention to the content of his posts. No I did, and I cba explaining it. If I'm wrong I'm wrong and will deal with it later. Ok, since he won't be lynched anyways.
|
On March 05 2014 23:19 Palmar wrote: yo JAT.
Not today. You won't get any support for lynching Oats today.
How about you focus your efforts into figuring out if there is scum anywhere in the people that are possibly going to get lynched? (templar, boone, austin etc etc). That's the problem. They all look equally bad to me (add killing to that list) so I have a hard time figuring this out.
|
On March 05 2014 23:24 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2014 23:18 justanothertownie wrote:On March 05 2014 23:16 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 05 2014 23:04 justanothertownie wrote: I never said she was town oats - I guess you will never learn to read. This is just unsettling. fuck man, then dont say shit you dont mean. Please quote where I said she is town. lynch too easy = someone is town. Seriously, is this hard to understand? Do you have to spell things out before I can comment on it? No, just no oats. I will ignore you for now.
@Palmar: Your reads on VE/rayn - are you not able to read them right now or did you not look at them? Because I think that would be really important. I can't blame you for townreading only the trolls (I agree on Dandel and slam at the very least) though.
|
On March 05 2014 23:06 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2014 22:59 justanothertownie wrote: This wagon is just rolling so easy. Everybody seems to read boone scum. yeah maybe. tbh though most of the people on the wagon can be town. I don't think it's a scum-driven wagon, even if it might end up being wrong. Hey oats. See, Palmar thinks boone is town! Better attack him!
|
On March 05 2014 23:39 raynpelikoneet wrote: btw i like your list a lot Palmar. I'd only swp Grack a bit lower and VE up and i am obviously town. Robik is probably just dumb and not scum. Also Slam & Oats are really much townier than Robik + you. I think I agree with that. So I am also in your neutral category rayn? Why? You said I would be so easy to read.
|
On March 05 2014 23:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2014 23:41 justanothertownie wrote:On March 05 2014 23:39 raynpelikoneet wrote: btw i like your list a lot Palmar. I'd only swp Grack a bit lower and VE up and i am obviously town. Robik is probably just dumb and not scum. Also Slam & Oats are really much townier than Robik + you. I think I agree with that. So I am also in your neutral category rayn? Why? You said I would be so easy to read. I am not comfortable reading you on D1. After that i am. You are one of the few people i am probably not comfortable lynching on D1 no matter how scummy you look. Damn you. This answer is generally reasonable while still not alignment indicative at all. Although I think I should be a pretty easy townread by now if you read my filter.
|
On March 05 2014 23:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:Like i get you can fish for "scum answers" but why unhappy? What would you expect a "really townie" answer to be because i just gave you one. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Well a townie answer would be an answer backed up by a game related reasoning. Yours wasn't, it was general and therefore totally null.
|
You mean the game where my play was totally different and which was a pm game that isn't comparable in the slightest?
|
On March 06 2014 00:05 raynpelikoneet wrote: You are asking a lot of questions which generally do not seem to be leading anywhere, like in that game. This has also happened in your towngames like in PYP LOL and that's why i am not comfortable making a judgement call on your alignment yet. I think I played pretty well in PYP LOL and pretty badly in the pm game but hey...
|
|
|
|