|
On March 02 2014 14:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I wish you guys would think.
Are you serious? I've been trying to figure out the game the entire time. I've given a reasonable thought process for you being scum which you have not been able to reply to. Your "case" on JJD is two quotes with two oneliners attached to it that you haven't even asked JJD to reply to when he was here and we're the ones not thinking? You're barely even trying to get JJD lynched, it's like you've already given up.
On March 02 2014 15:42 Sn0_Man wrote:
I will absolutely not be instavoting anybody
In that case I'm fine with you getting saved too. I would prefer to be alive myself though as I have a bit more trust in myself, no offense. Just got me plans.
|
On March 02 2014 22:32 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Are you serious? I've been trying to figure out the game the entire time. I've given a reasonable thought process for you being scum which you have not been able to reply to. Your "case" on JJD is two quotes with two oneliners attached to it that you haven't even asked JJD to reply to when he was here and we're the ones not thinking? You're barely even trying to get JJD lynched, it's like you've already given up. Show nested quote +On March 02 2014 15:42 Sn0_Man wrote:
I will absolutely not be instavoting anybody In that case I'm fine with you getting saved too. I would prefer to be alive myself though as I have a bit more trust in myself, no offense. Just got me plans.
No, I really cant make a convincing case on JJD other than inactivity and some funny shit around the Xata lynch.
By think, I meant how would a reasonable scumplayer play this game?
Would I tell Syl to claim? nope. Ill probably claim instead even.
But when Syl claimed, clearly it means his scumbuddy cant claim for some reason right?
|
On March 02 2014 22:42 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 02 2014 22:32 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On March 02 2014 14:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I wish you guys would think. Are you serious? I've been trying to figure out the game the entire time. I've given a reasonable thought process for you being scum which you have not been able to reply to. Your "case" on JJD is two quotes with two oneliners attached to it that you haven't even asked JJD to reply to when he was here and we're the ones not thinking? You're barely even trying to get JJD lynched, it's like you've already given up. On March 02 2014 15:42 Sn0_Man wrote:
I will absolutely not be instavoting anybody In that case I'm fine with you getting saved too. I would prefer to be alive myself though as I have a bit more trust in myself, no offense. Just got me plans. No, I really cant make a convincing case on JJD other than inactivity and some funny shit around the Xata lynch. By think, I meant how would a reasonable scumplayer play this game? Would I tell Syl to claim? nope. Ill probably claim instead even. But when Syl claimed, clearly it means his scumbuddy cant claim for some reason right?
Well unless you want to scumclaim or call me scum JJD has to be mafia to you so obviously he will have made mistakes. Find them and show them.
Also I think you'd stand a better shot against JJD than you would against Xatalos in a cop battle so I don't find it unreasonable given the events that happened. It could also be that Sylencia yoloclaimed because you were asleep and thread sentiment was getting Xatalos too confirmed and you didn't have a choice but to go along with it. I don't find the fact that Sylencia claimed unreasonable.
|
I posted right after Syl. I wouldve talked about who should claim. JJD couldnt fight Xata because of the way he played n0. I couldve totally fought him.!!!
|
sheeple.
On February 28 2014 01:46 JarJarDrinks wrote:Ok, I think the benefits of giving reads outweighs the downsides. This post from Sn0 is scummy to me: Show nested quote +On February 27 2014 07:06 Sn0_Man wrote:
If I was the medic, and the doc claimed (obviously post n0), I'd probably not protect the doc since scum literally can't shoot the doc.
K, he typod here. Sentence should read as: "If I was the medic, and the COP claimed (obviously post n0), I'd probably not protect the COP since scum literally can't shoot the COP. "To me this sounds like a scum mindset. A townie would say "I'd probably not protect the either of the claimed COPs" The way he words it makes it seem like he knows who the real cop is gonna be.
Its not actually a scumslip.
On February 28 2014 02:12 JarJarDrinks wrote:I also think this post is Sn0 getting pissed off that I was getting towncred my "noob mistake" Show nested quote +On February 27 2014 07:44 Sn0_Man wrote:
oke jjd is actively promoting ways for town to lose tho wtf
Incorrect, Sn0 was pissed off that jjd was proposing bad stuff. Misrepresentation.
On February 28 2014 10:14 JarJarDrinks wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2014 09:31 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
This is a very interesting claim though. Very interesting.
JJD why didn't you believe Xatalos' claim? I lied cause I wanted there to be a counter. I figured scum might not counter if everyone was all in on Xat being town. Xat is 100% the cop because if he was scum he'd have no way to know Sn0 wouldn't be the actual cop which would immediately out Xat as the fake (cause he gave him a green check). That logic make sense to everyone?
Way too sure that Xata is cop here without even considering the possibilities for mafia fakeclaiming for Xata.
On March 02 2014 02:09 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Oats is as close to confirmed scum as possible. If Oats is town that would make either Me or Art scum. If me or Art was scume we would just shoot the other person and win the game game the next day after Oats votes Xat
Here's the breakdown:
If I'm scum, I shoot Art.
- Art Dies
- Syl and Xat vote each other
- Sno votes for Syl mosy likely
- Oats votes for Xat
- I hammer Xat and we win
And you can switch me and Art for the same conclusion.
This is wrong. If he's scum, Xat checks me and finds that Im town, I dont instantly want to lynch him. Hahaha yeah I think this is the best. JJD fakes up a scenario that is totally incorrect.
|
On March 02 2014 22:42 Oatsmaster wrote:
Would I tell Syl to claim? nope. Ill probably claim instead even.
Of course you tell syl to claim. You're planning on shooting the cop. You dont want Syl to try to bring the game home by himself.
Claiming against Xat who was super townie was way worse play for you.
|
On March 02 2014 23:19 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2014 10:14 JarJarDrinks wrote:On February 28 2014 09:31 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
This is a very interesting claim though. Very interesting.
JJD why didn't you believe Xatalos' claim? I lied cause I wanted there to be a counter. I figured scum might not counter if everyone was all in on Xat being town. Xat is 100% the cop because if he was scum he'd have no way to know Sn0 wouldn't be the actual cop which would immediately out Xat as the fake (cause he gave him a green check). That logic make sense to everyone? Way too sure that Xata is cop here without even considering the possibilities for mafia fakeclaiming for Xata.
My logic was completely sound. Once Syl shows up and confirms Sn0 as town, eliminating a Sn0/Xat scumteam, it's basically confirmed.
|
On March 03 2014 01:01 JarJarDrinks wrote:Show nested quote +On March 02 2014 23:19 Oatsmaster wrote:On February 28 2014 10:14 JarJarDrinks wrote:On February 28 2014 09:31 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
This is a very interesting claim though. Very interesting.
JJD why didn't you believe Xatalos' claim? I lied cause I wanted there to be a counter. I figured scum might not counter if everyone was all in on Xat being town. Xat is 100% the cop because if he was scum he'd have no way to know Sn0 wouldn't be the actual cop which would immediately out Xat as the fake (cause he gave him a green check). That logic make sense to everyone? Way too sure that Xata is cop here without even considering the possibilities for mafia fakeclaiming for Xata. My logic was completely sound. Once Syl shows up and confirms Sn0 as town, eliminating a Sn0/Xat scumteam, it's basically confirmed.
What? Again, this isnt the first time you totally missed the point of what someone was saying.
|
The point im making is that Xat is town cop for many reasons but not that one. Hes not town because hes played like town? Hes not town because Syl has not played like town?
|
How am I missing the point?
You say I'm "Way too sure that Xata is cop"
I say "No way, he was practically confirmed"
thats not the point?
|
On March 03 2014 00:58 JarJarDrinks wrote:Show nested quote +On March 02 2014 22:42 Oatsmaster wrote:
Would I tell Syl to claim? nope. Ill probably claim instead even. Of course you tell syl to claim. You're planning on shooting the cop. You dont want Syl to try to bring the game home by himself. Claiming against Xat who was super townie was way worse play for you.
And no its not actually. Why would I tell syl to claim?
|
On March 03 2014 01:13 JarJarDrinks wrote:
How am I missing the point?
You say I'm "Way too sure that Xata is cop"
I say "No way, he was practically confirmed"
thats not the point?
no, you said your logic was correct. Thats totally different things.
I phrased it badly but its k.
I shouldve said, "bad reason for Xata to be town therefore way too sure off THAT reason."
|
So 00:59 GMT (+00:00)? JJD, can you be there?
|
can we do it now actually?
|
like 15-20 mins after would be better.
|
we _could_ do it now to be honest. Just tell me if you're here and start F5ing. I want you two to answer at the exact same time.
|
Actually doing it now might be better, dunno why I wanted to do it after the deadline.
|
|
|
You can delay your F5ing for a bit because I've got dinner in a moment. Let's agree to 18:00 GMT (+00:00) for now. JJD, please confirm your presence when you can. Use http://time.is/ for the specific time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
