| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On February 28 2014 01:23 Oatsmaster wrote: I would love it if scum kills a scummy townie. Much better than scum killing a townie that is good. Why are you guys so fixated on night actions. This setup is kind of based around night actions. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
There is literally no reason to hide what you think because all it does is hurt town. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On February 28 2014 01:28 Xatalos wrote: Even if you think it's more beneficial to share reads right now, just as NK decisions are being made, it's blatantly false to say that there's "literally no reason" not to. So the reason is that instead of playing the game, you pussy about doing nothing? that helps town. a lot. | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
It can't be bad. If only I had reads. | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
My reliable scumtell on him is when he hasn't found scum inside a cycle. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
This post from Sn0 is scummy to me: On February 27 2014 07:06 Sn0_Man wrote: K, he typod here. Sentence should read as:If I was the medic, and the doc claimed (obviously post n0), I'd probably not protect the doc since scum literally can't shoot the doc. "If I was the medic, and the COP claimed (obviously post n0), I'd probably not protect the COP since scum literally can't shoot the COP. " To me this sounds like a scum mindset. A townie would say "I'd probably not protect the either of the claimed COPs" The way he words it makes it seem like he knows who the real cop is gonna be. | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
When you get towncred for being demonstrably incorrect about the situation, that doesn't mean ur supposed to keep being blatantly wrong. Sincerely, Me | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 28 2014 01:49 Sn0_Man wrote: What was I demonstrably incorrect about? Dear JJD, When you get towncred for being demonstrably incorrect about the situation, that doesn't mean ur supposed to keep being blatantly wrong. Sincerely, Me | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
still wrong u were demonstrably incorrect about the claiming logic early game. Which BH was quick to point out meant that ur probably town cuz u didn't think through claims. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On February 28 2014 01:29 Oatsmaster wrote: So the reason is that instead of playing the game, you pussy about doing nothing? that helps town. a lot. To be fair, I've shared more of my reads so far than you have... | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
On February 28 2014 01:56 Oatsmaster wrote: He isnt incorrect here though. Did you scumslip sn0 did u miss the part where i said "still wrong"? there's no mention of a counterclaim in that post cuz i was wifom'ing the no-counter-claim scenario. in the counter claim scenario I don't think u protect either cop. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 28 2014 01:53 Sn0_Man wrote: We can discuss the whole "doc claims if cop dies" debate again if you want but I feel like I won that argument.u were demonstrably incorrect about the claiming logic early game. Which BH was quick to point out meant that ur probably town cuz u didn't think through claims. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12973 Posts
On February 28 2014 01:22 Xatalos wrote: Or it could be that I'm trying not to share all my reads and observations yet. We concluded that sharing scumreads is probably a good idea. Are you saying you observed what I did but purposefully didn't share it? | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 28 2014 02:01 Sn0_Man wrote: did u miss the part where i said "still wrong"? there's no mention of a counterclaim in that post cuz i was wifom'ing the no-counter-claim scenario. in the counter claim scenario I don't think u protect either cop. I saw no indication that you were talking about wifom for a no counter scenario. You said "scum literally can't shoot the [cop]" The only reason that would be true is because of a counter. not to mention the fact that you know there will be a counter since you made this post before roles were sent: On February 26 2014 07:06 Sn0_Man wrote: Of course there will be a counter. Unless maf is hella lucky in which case the cop will be flipped and there's no way maf claim obviously. But by the same token even if maf hit the cop N0, the game still goes on its not like town straight up lose. Now, if maf hit the DOCTOR N0, then shenannies start happening because town can't cop claim anymore (unless they cop-checked scum N0). Alright this is working out. me likey. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 27 2014 07:44 Sn0_Man wrote: oke jjd is actively promoting ways for town to lose tho wtf | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
And yes, you just identified the part where I said u were full of bad ideas and right around there BH chipped in with "well that makes JJD town". | ||
| ||
|
|
WardiTV Weekly
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Afreeca Starleague
Monday Night Weeklies
GSL
PiGosaur Cup
Replay Cast
The PondCast
IntoTheTV X SOOP
CranKy Ducklings
|
|
|
EPT
