EPT[M][N] Default Suspicions Mafia - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
| ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
On February 21 2014 08:32 Balla24 wrote: I don't see any possible reason for you to withhold that reasoning. Regardless, if you think suki and I are scummy. Then why are you voting toad? What do you think of toad's case on me beyond "I don't believe it", why don't you believe it etc etc... What about suki's case on me? and has your opinion of suki changed since you sheeped on rayn? She's posted plenty since then. | ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
On February 22 2014 03:11 Palmar wrote: oh, I see that tl;dr post I ignored was kind of a list. nvm then, carry on. i mean... the whole post was a list... just providing indepth reasoning for the mafia/town part and little reasoning for the questionable people and why they arent in the mafia and town section | ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
| ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
Why did you vote marv without explaining? It was absolutely not obvious what you were seeing. I thought it was for a reaction but it clearly wasn't. | ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
| ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
Suki made bad cases in normal mini mafia 1 which you played with her and she was town, do you disagree completely with that meta of her that I posted? Why would this game be different for her... | ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
On February 22 2014 04:19 raynpelikoneet wrote: Toad's play makes no sense from mafia perspective and at the start of the game noone payed attention to marv's case on him enough to vote for him and now pretty much everyone is voting for him. Noone has even given any reasoning for their votes other than marv and Palmar. Why did he make that shitty case on me that he's barely pushing and not even following up with anymore even though there is way more content for him to meta now? | ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
| ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
| ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
On February 22 2014 04:27 Koshi wrote: The content is just fine, Balla. pls. It's 14 fucking pages and nobody found anything scummy or got an "off" feeling about a series of posts. So pls gooby, pls. It was more meant as to why rayn isn't agreeing with people calling him town for his filter size. | ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
| ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
| ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
On February 22 2014 04:36 raynpelikoneet wrote: Yes i have seen his scum games. I have also lynched him on D1 and D2 in those games. Based on those games I find it really hard to believe you actually think a lot of what you're saying right now about me and about suki.... This whole seems so convoluted from you rayn. | ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
| ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
On February 22 2014 04:48 raynpelikoneet wrote: Balla's scumread on Toad is so terrible it can't possibly come from a townie. It has nothing to do with what Toad has done in this game and how it makes him mafia. ROFL dude WHAT? Please do the thing where you paraphrase people's cases and show me how that's true, pls pls pls!!!! | ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
On February 22 2014 04:51 raynpelikoneet wrote: Seriously, look at this: 1) so he called something scummy scummy. it makes him mafia? 2) not scummy in the slightest 3) i don't even know what this is about. Toad did something and then did something else? That makes him mafia. WHAT THE FUCK? 1) NOPE. His entire case was based on the early game which is so non-indicative of my alignment ESPECIALLY when you purposefully misrepresent what I was saying. Why do you ignore that line? That's important. 2) How is that NOT scummy? To jump the gun on someone to act like you've done something. Tell me rayn, what has toad done AFTER this that is any sort of real contribution? 3) Toad has done 3 things this game. - Bitch to you and marv about I don't even remember what you guys were arguing about - Call me mafia by misrepresenting me -Say he will do other stuff then not do it. | ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
On February 21 2014 05:50 Toadesstern wrote: Mmh, don't really have anything on Suki that I find that interesting to talk about. Some odd things but except for the "I want to lynch this guy [...here are about 20 lines of text...] but I'd totally be fine to lynch Toad if my vote is needed!" nothing that make me feel strongly in either direction about her. Given that I couldn't find anything of importance while trying to look through her I'd say it's time to look at Oats instead for now and well, still Balla tomorrow and Sidesprang when and if he starts to post. Like he promises things and NEVER does them. The only thing he followed up on in this sentence is this about me: On February 21 2014 19:54 Toadesstern wrote: I'm calling you a liar because you're a liar. I've got you in my bottom 5 people if that makes you happy. I wouldn't exactly call that townie and if you look through my filter you'll actually find me mentioning you doing weird shit like that a lot. I don't have a case on you so I'm left with that, especially since I still think Balla's an awesome lynch for today. Also no, I'm not painting myself as a luseless douchebag, if you had actually read what I posted you would have read that I said pregame that I wanted to change my style, I EXACTLY pointed out what I'm talking about in that post you're quoting and if I don't follow up feel free to lynch me based on that. I'm not going to be the usual hypno-Toad this game. Where he doesn't even say anything about why i'm STILL a good lynch. | ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
| ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
On February 22 2014 05:06 raynpelikoneet wrote: 1) wrong. He saw something scummy based one meta and called you out of it. You said you could play like this as scum. That makes Toad's argument not scummy. Maybe wrong, but you can't possibly say it's scummy to call something scummy scummy. That's just retarded. 2) It's not scummy, it's pressure. I don't need to tell you what Toad has done after that, that was not a part of your case. Don't change your argument in the middle of one. That's bullshit. 3) So what? That's not what you say in the last paragraph. You don't say it's scummy and you don't explain why it's scummy. You say you need to hear more from him. That's what you say, not "scummy", but "need to hear more". If you can't see why I think that his case is scummy for misrepresenting me and using meta on a small amount of contribution then you're not going to be convinced. 2) What are you talking about thats exactly the point. It might be pressure but it also could be fake contribution and to me it looks like fake contribution considering what I think of 1) 3) THATS EXACTLY THE POINT THOUGH. I wanted to see more contribution because all he's done at the point of my case was what I said. He hasn't done anything else now so it just proves my point that he's for some reason hesitant to talk about anything else. On February 22 2014 05:07 raynpelikoneet wrote: Balla you are making a new case as we speak. Why don't you answer my concerns in your original case intead of making a new one? And if you think these new points you bring up are so good why were they not in your original case? That's just wrong. I'm not making up new points, you are making it out to be but i'm not so go somewhere pls. ##vote raynpelikoneet Everything since you came back is so convoluted and just shitting up the thread. I think you're scum and I think you know toad is town so you want to springboard onto marv/suki/me after toad flips. I don't think your views on toad are consistent, earlier you were voting him. Literally the only reason you think toad is NOT SCUM is because you think marv/suki and I are scum which is total bullshit, especially on suki and I. I don't know your relationship with marv so I don't know how bullshit that is. | ||
| ||
