EPT[M][N] Default Suspicions Mafia - Page 13
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
CuteFluffyPuppy
Afghanistan138 Posts
I saw no point in your initial comments, and with a lack of a follow up to continue on them I saw them as fluff as they added nothing new to the table. You have given potential scenarios rather than ask Rayn to explain himself, so if your intention was to read him, it seems like a horrendous way of approaching it. Therefore since you already have a read I'd like to hear it so that it may make my read on you more accurate. I'm more interested in hearing thoughts from you rather than Rayn right now. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On February 20 2014 09:58 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote: I saw no point in your initial comments, and with a lack of a follow up to continue on them I saw them as fluff as they added nothing new to the table. Even rayn would tell you (and notice how he responded specifically to me) that it matters where people stand. I wanted to say I agreed with prplhz on his point about rayn's plan. That's about it. On February 20 2014 09:58 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:You have given potential scenarios rather than ask Rayn to explain himself, so if your intention was to read him, it seems like a horrendous way of approaching it. On February 20 2014 09:42 Palmar wrote: How about you explain your idea yourself? I mean I posted the two options I saw, but you can probably elaborate better than I on your intentions. Seems to me I did exactly what you're accusing me of not having done. On February 20 2014 09:58 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:Therefore since you already have a read I'd like to hear it so that it may make my read on you more accurate. I'm more interested in hearing thoughts from you rather than Rayn right now. I don't. I don't think I have nearly enough information to make a call, hence why I'm baffled why you're trying to force me to make a decision, it makes no sense for me to throw out a random conclusion when I haven't reached one. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On February 20 2014 10:04 Palmar wrote: Like I don't mind you asking questions, but please believe my answers. If I say I don't know if it makes rayn scum, then that probably means I don't know if it makes rayn scum. How can you agree with prplhz's vote if you don't think i am necessarily scum? | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On February 20 2014 10:05 raynpelikoneet wrote: How can you agree with prplhz's vote if you don't think i am necessarily scum? I said I had no problem with the vote. I don't think it makes prplhz any more likely to be scum. That doesn't mean I have reached the same conclusion. Now if you go all super-towny and start raping mafia left and right the rest of the day and prplhz's vote stays on you, then we have a problem, but at the moment I have no problem with the vote. | ||
|
CuteFluffyPuppy
Afghanistan138 Posts
On February 20 2014 10:03 Palmar wrote: Even rayn would tell you (and notice how he responded specifically to me) that it matters where people stand. I wanted to say I agreed with prplhz on his point about rayn's plan. That's about it. So why didn't you leave it at a simple +1? The additions were fairly redundant. It made the post appear bigger than the content was, which has scum motivation. On February 20 2014 09:58 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:You have given potential scenarios rather than ask Rayn to explain himself, so if your intention was to read him, it seems like a horrendous way of approaching it. On February 20 2014 09:42 Palmar wrote: How about you explain your idea yourself? I mean I posted the two options I saw, but you can probably elaborate better than I on your intentions. Seems to me I did exactly what you're accusing me of not having done.[/quote] My problem with this is that you did it 1. After I pressured you and 2. after you already presented him with scenario's to showcase what you're thinking, making it easier for him to adapt. If your intention was to get a read on him, why didn't you ask those questions immediately? The way it went down, it looks more like a convenient opportunity/necessity than actually trying to get a read. On February 20 2014 09:58 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:Therefore since you already have a read I'd like to hear it so that it may make my read on you more accurate. I'm more interested in hearing thoughts from you rather than Rayn right now. I don't. I don't think I have nearly enough information to make a call, hence why I'm baffled why you're trying to force me to make a decision, it makes no sense for me to throw out a random conclusion when I haven't reached one.[/QUOTE] See above. | ||
|
CuteFluffyPuppy
Afghanistan138 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On February 20 2014 10:10 raynpelikoneet wrote: My problem is that there are now at least 4 people who have no interest in thinking of my motives behind my posts. I'll make a clarification after marv posts anyways, but there is something i want out of marv first. I'll explain that too after. I'm asking exactly for your motives. But for some reason you don't seem to want to tell me? | ||
|
CuteFluffyPuppy
Afghanistan138 Posts
On February 20 2014 10:10 raynpelikoneet wrote: My problem is that there are now at least 4 people who have no interest in thinking of my motives behind my posts. I'll make a clarification after marv posts anyways, but there is something i want out of marv first. I'll explain that too after. I thought you had already made your intentions clear and thought the votes worked in a different light than they did. Is there more to it than that? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
rayn I don't have some special insight into you, dear. If I had to guess I'd just guess that you wanted it so that if someone had a vote on someone else, it meant something. I have no idea why having a method to unvote is supposed to be in any way scummy though (hi prplhz, suki, maybe other people I forgot in the last 3 minutes). I mean if anyone really thinks this is some convoluted method for rayn not to have to take stands (this is what prplhz said in his vote post), then you're basically totally insane and you should hit yourself on the head. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On February 20 2014 10:11 Palmar wrote: I'm asking exactly for your motives. But for some reason you don't seem to want to tell me? You are supposed to make educated guesses about my motives and post your conclusions about them. Apparently you don't understand them. That's technically fine. What's not fine is you blindly soft +1 prplhz and Toad while saying you don't understand what's going on. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On February 20 2014 10:13 raynpelikoneet wrote: You are supposed to make educated guesses about my motives and post your conclusions about them. Apparently you don't understand them. That's technically fine. What's not fine is you blindly soft +1 prplhz and Toad while saying you don't understand what's going on. I did already make two educated guesses that assume you're town, which of course are the only ones you'd ever confirm as either alignment. You just ignored me. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
CuteFluffyPuppy
Afghanistan138 Posts
On February 20 2014 10:12 marvellosity wrote: Smurf, you're fucking annoying already. That's what I've taken out of this thread so far. This wounds me. On February 20 2014 10:13 Palmar wrote: @Smurf can you please stop breaking posts, it's really annoying to reply to you when you constantly do. I'll try to be more careful. Rayn, are you saying you've still got a plan in motion or are you talking about the motivation behind your original plan? Because I'm pretty stumped. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
| ||
