EPTOn February 19 2014 07:02 WaveofShadow wrote:
I'm not following.
Why can't Oats be scum if one of you/VE/HF are?
And why am I scum now?
I'm not following.
Why can't Oats be scum if one of you/VE/HF are?
And why am I scum now?
No you're not reading.
VE's point is that Risen is probably not scum, as too many people are already voting for him without me/VE on the train.
and here's the reason Oats _might_ not be scum
On February 19 2014 06:38 VisceraEyes wrote:
Well there's also this about Oats: both yamato AND Wave have stated that they're at least partially interested in lynching Oats today. So if we're assuming Palmar and VE are town, that means that 4 players have stated interest or intent to lynch Oats.
Risen raged by way of Oats, HF hard defending Oats. Oats IS Oats.
So, if Oats is scum, that means that either A) all scum are NOT interested in lynching Oats, or B) at least one scum has stated that he'll lynch Oats or he could lynch Oats.
Considering how unlikely I find a Risen/HF scumteam, I'd say that B) is what we're looking at here, does anyone agree/disagree?
Well there's also this about Oats: both yamato AND Wave have stated that they're at least partially interested in lynching Oats today. So if we're assuming Palmar and VE are town, that means that 4 players have stated interest or intent to lynch Oats.
Risen raged by way of Oats, HF hard defending Oats. Oats IS Oats.
So, if Oats is scum, that means that either A) all scum are NOT interested in lynching Oats, or B) at least one scum has stated that he'll lynch Oats or he could lynch Oats.
Considering how unlikely I find a Risen/HF scumteam, I'd say that B) is what we're looking at here, does anyone agree/disagree?
So, if we say neither of them are (I think that's unlikely) it means that there's three scum in me/ve/hf/you/yam
But I don't think this is the case.
((((
