EPT[C][M][T] Survivor Series Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On February 07 2014 23:32 Mocsta wrote: I wonder if this will be lazy Palmar like last time And then flips a switch and suddenly is super town True fact. Last nomination game Palomar offered to die in my place.!! Well everyone nominated was town and I was like "whatever". | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
I'm up for lynching anyone who voted for starting on a weekend. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
I'm like 20 posts into reading the game, so no. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
While I'm reading and since a few people seem to be around, I'd like to ask anyone that thinks he's posted well enough for him to think that others should have a strong townread on him, to step up and claim it. ie: if you think you're obvious town, please say you are obvious town. And please don't troll this questions, only say you are if you genuinely think your posting so far in the game should allow for an easy townread on you. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On February 09 2014 06:06 WaveofShadow wrote: This is an intriguing question, but do you find it all at odds with the idea that we should not be giving out townreads in this game? I'm a cocky bastard. I think I can find townies faster than mafia can get me to lynch lazy/shit townies. So I do not agree with the "don't give out townreads" thing. Not to mention, this actually has nothing to do with townreads. I doubt anyone would claim to have a scumread on himself. The point is to gauge how people feel about their own contributions to the game. I don't care whether you _think_ other people have a townread, I care if _you think they should_ have a townread. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
I've finished reading the thread. I think we should kill geript. I may be biased because I think he's a dick, but I also think he has a good chance of being scum. ##Vote: geript | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
There are several other things that stand out. He opened the game by going after two players unlikely to defend themselves at that point in the game. The Oats asked him about his intentios with the vote which is a perfectly reasonable question but that prompted geript to call the question stupid and countervote Oats, which is clearly not very productive. I mean maybe he's just decided to be a dick which would actually fit what I think of him in general, but it's not helping us win the game and if he continues to play like this I'd frankly simply be ok with lynching him no matter his alignment just so I don't have to deal with him. But there's also the option that he's being a dick because it's easier than playing normally when you're scum... so.. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On February 09 2014 06:48 geript wrote: No this is blatantly false and Palmar's fucking scum for trying to push me like this. Everyone who's ever played with me should know like the simplest way to read me is by filter length. Marv explained it in LoL. It's been true every time. I fucking struggle like hell to post as scum. Palmar even fucking knows this; he played LXI or whatever one I was confrimed town in and my activity was shit for most of the game. Not only this, but Palmar is trying to skew my actions on Oats. Oats is generally pretty easy to read based on how much of a dick he's being in combination with his activity. As town, Oats is far more willing to get into shitfests at any moment and is far more active than he is as scum. Just like in LoL he wasn't a dick early, despite being given the option to get into a shitfest he's just avoided it. So yah, PALMAR IS SCUMB!!!!!!!!! Palmar is scum with Oats and is using his name to protect him just like Rayn does. What is blatantly false? I'm not sure I'm following you. I think everything I said in my post was in fact true. I don't care what you think should be the best way to read you. How am I trying to skew your actions, literally what I said happened. I'll even quote it. On February 08 2014 11:32 Oatsmaster wrote: What are you hoping your vote will achieve geript? No one is gonna lynch va just because of that. Its not useful to discuss the nomination mechanic now so dont On February 08 2014 12:54 geript wrote: ##unvote ##vote Oats Stupid question bro. I put my vote where I wanna. Are you denying this happened? I mean feel free to attack my conclusion, but you can't attack my premise, that's just dumb. Also, I don't care what you think about "how players normally are". I'm not going to let people get away with doing stuff on "meta". | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On February 09 2014 06:56 geript wrote: I don't know what Palmar is doing exactly. But he's completely and intentionally misconstruing my actions against Oats. Hell, Palmar IIRC has had scumreads on oats before due to lack of activity. The fact that he's painting my actions on Oats so scummy and not even looking at Oats is scummy as fuck. He's chainsawing onto me and using his "name" to put pressure. How isn't that exactly what I posted and what he did? Second, how do you even know what Palmar is doing? That either means that you know that Palmar is town because you're scum or you're both scum together. Explain. 1. Where did I say I'm not looking at Oats? 2. I even said that I assumed the rest of town is better than me by now, so how am I "using my name" 3. He knows what I'm doing because he has read my posts | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On February 09 2014 06:58 geript wrote: No. It happened. You're trying to skew my purpose behind it in a scummy light. Do you deny that you've had scumreads on Oats before for lack of activity. Absolutely not, I have in fact had scumreads, or at least willingness to lynch, based on activity alone, and I think you may be right that Oats has been in the past one of those people. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On February 09 2014 06:58 geript wrote: No. It happened. You're trying to skew my purpose behind it in a scummy light. Do you deny that you've had scumreads on Oats before for lack of activity. Well my conclusion was that it wasn't productive, as I said in my post. I mean you may think it was but to me what you did was not productive at all. Now we can debate whether or not it's reasonable to make the jump from "unproductive" to "scummy". | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On February 09 2014 07:02 geript wrote: 1. You're trying to push me based on complete bullshit instead of Oats. That warrants protecting him. 2. Despite what you say, we all know that you think you're the best at this game ever or some other hsit. 3. Why answer for him? Do you want to protect him too? 1. If that is protecting, then yeah, I'm protecting every single player in the game except you at the moment. I could push oats, but I could also be pushing other people. I decided to push you. 2. How on earth am I meant to answer that... are you seriously accusing me of being Palmar? I don't have an alternative account I can post under. Please stop this. 3. Because I can. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On February 09 2014 07:21 geript wrote: How the fuck am I not supposed to use meta. How do you think people play mafia with people they don't know well? On February 09 2014 07:21 geript wrote:I've literally been intentionally interacting with people to get a read on them. Like the Scooby doo post with Alakaslam. The best way to read him now and always is to determine whether or not he's having fun in the game. Like if he's carefree and having fun then he's town; as scum he gets all tense and freezes up. So my point was to get a series of interactions with him where I could tell the difference. The fact that he replaced out bothers me and I'm not quite sure what to think of it. This is fair, it's obviously a bit dumb, but I guess the story makes sense. On February 09 2014 07:21 geript wrote:Then there's the Oats thing which I've already covered. There's the activity thing which you seem content to ignore completely despite the fact that it's true. You say you've "covered" the Oats thing, but I still don't understand why you couldn't just answer Oats the question at the time. I mean you've now explained why you did what you did, and since you changed your vote in the same post you refused Oats an answer, your "poke" was no longer valid, so I still struggle with why you feel like you have to be a dick. On February 09 2014 07:21 geript wrote:Hell, I even wanted to understand how VE was intending to approach Cora as I figured it'd help me give a read on him. Like I pick and probe so that I can get reads You said something like "treat cora like geript is in the game (tm)". I have no idea what that even means. On February 09 2014 07:21 geript wrote: I'm literally like the simplest person to read ever. The fact that people can't ever even fucking read me right is so frustrating when i was so fucking stoked to just be able to play a fucking game again. You think you're easy to read, but because you fucking insist on being a dick and intentionally do stupid and bad things, you're not. It's objectively bad to do some of the things you've done. If you want to be easy to read, be less of a dick and less disruptive. That all being said I need to consider. I have no opinion on Marv yet but he seems to think you're town... so idk. Please come back to the thread more useful and less asshole. | ||
| ||
