[I][T][M] Vengeful Mini Mafia! - Page 26
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
raynpelikoneet
Finland43190 Posts
| ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
| ||
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
On February 04 2014 23:45 marvellosity wrote: Because his read on Holy wasn't even remotely interesting, it was simply pointless. As explained. I'm talking mostly about your second and third points here. As for the first, I could see it as a post basically telling HF to not purposefully enrage DP and his thoughts wandered from there. Posts being pointless does not equal scum, you should be well aware of that. | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On February 04 2014 23:51 raynpelikoneet wrote: Are you saying you are scum Wave? You know, I can actually picture you saying this sentence now. No, that is not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is HF's meta case makes some degree of sense only because he is comparing this game to my very last (which isn't a great comparison to begin with). He isn't trying to compare this game to my scumgame 9 months ago---so he is technically right when he says i am playing differently this game as compared to my last. The problem is, that doesn't make me scummy in the slightest. No amount of wishy-washiness or lack thereof will do so either. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On February 04 2014 23:53 Artanis[Xp] wrote: I'm talking mostly about your second and third points here. As for the first, I could see it as a post basically telling HF to not purposefully enrage DP and his thoughts wandered from there. Posts being pointless does not equal scum, you should be well aware of that. Which points? Be clear, boy. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On February 04 2014 23:53 Artanis[Xp] wrote: I'm talking mostly about your second and third points here. As for the first, I could see it as a post basically telling HF to not purposefully enrage DP and his thoughts wandered from there. Posts being pointless does not equal scum, you should be well aware of that. Actually this is awful because rayn explained this is not how it went down. I could see it as a post basically telling HF to not purposefully enrage DP and his thoughts wandered from there rayn literally said he was setting up the point. Nothing to do with wandering. Artanis, I am disappointed. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43190 Posts
On February 04 2014 23:55 WaveofShadow wrote: You know, I can actually picture you saying this sentence now. No, that is not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is HF's meta case makes some degree of sense only because he is comparing this game to my very last (which isn't a great comparison to begin with). He isn't trying to compare this game to my scumgame 9 months ago---so he is technically right when he says i am playing differently this game as compared to my last. The problem is, that doesn't make me scummy in the slightest. No amount of wishy-washiness or lack thereof will do so either. But my point is I never defended you. I was saying the exact same thing you are saying here. That making a meta case on you based on what HF said is shit. | ||
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
Second and third means the second and third posts you quoted and commented on. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43190 Posts
On February 04 2014 23:53 Artanis[Xp] wrote: I'm talking mostly about your second and third points here. As for the first, I could see it as a post basically telling HF to not purposefully enrage DP and his thoughts wandered from there. Posts being pointless does not equal scum, you should be well aware of that. no. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On February 04 2014 23:56 raynpelikoneet wrote: But my point is I never defended you. I was saying the exact same thing you are saying here. That making a meta case on you based on what HF said is shit. Still a defense imo, but whatever. You were saying the same thing I was to some degree, true, but you brought up the wrong reason. it has nothing to do with the fact that my only scumgame was played 9 months ago, it has to do with the fact that most meta cases on me are shit, barring those made by marv and I think Prome. People seem to think for some reason that I should play the same way every game or I'm scum, or they seem to think that when I DO play the same way as many of my games (weak D1, wishy-washy etc) that I'm also scum, but neither of those are true. Be back alter today. Will answer any questions or whatever desired of me when i get back. | ||
Cephiro
Finland1934 Posts
Make what you want out of that. I just felt it would be better for me to say something rather than be quiet and keep you guessing if I'll play or not. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43190 Posts
On February 04 2014 23:55 WaveofShadow wrote: You know, I can actually picture you saying this sentence now. No, that is not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is HF's meta case makes some degree of sense only because he is comparing this game to my very last (which isn't a great comparison to begin with). He isn't trying to compare this game to my scumgame 9 months ago---so he is technically right when he says i am playing differently this game as compared to my last. The problem is, that doesn't make me scummy in the slightest. No amount of wishy-washiness or lack thereof will do so either. And also yes, your play is more comparable to what i read in Shadow game than what i have witnessed in other games you have been in lately. In Shadow game, as in this game on D1 you did not stand out as much as you have in other games, for example 4 Persona and Thug Life (i don't remember much of NWM). In those games, to me, you looked far more aggressive and emotional in comparsion to this and Shadow game. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43190 Posts
On February 05 2014 00:01 Cephiro wrote: I felt like I'd let everyone know I am around and will be providing my insight, whether you'll find it useful or not. I've read the threat enough to know that there are people doubting about my level of participation, even at the first 6-12 hours of the game part which was night and morning my time, so I wanted to let everyone know I am not going to just lurk. Make what you want out of that. I just felt it would be better for me to say something rather than be quiet and keep you guessing if I'll play or not. well this is not useful in the slightest.. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
On February 04 2014 23:58 marvellosity wrote: Artanis, be very specific what the issue is with my post, because at the moment I'm not seeing it and it looks like you're just saying things. Quote stuff and explain what is wrong with it. You might be right because I'm getting confused with specific wording. My point was simply that I considered point 2 and 3 non alignment indicative. That's all there is to it. I reread regarding point 1 and Rayn's answer and find his answer lacking. It's a bad open and together with the inconsistency I would consider him smelly. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43190 Posts
On February 05 2014 00:09 marvellosity wrote: Obviously it's not useful, but what else is there to say about it? Just wait and see what he posts later. If you remember what happened in LXII was that nearly every time Cephiro posted was to tell he will post later on.. But yes, you are right. | ||
raynpelikoneet
Finland43190 Posts
On February 05 2014 00:10 Artanis[Xp] wrote: You might be right because I'm getting confused with specific wording. My point was simply that I considered point 2 and 3 non alignment indicative. That's all there is to it. I reread regarding point 1 and Rayn's answer and find his answer lacking. It's a bad open and together with the inconsistency I would consider him smelly. How is my answer lacking? I don't even know what you are talking about. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On February 04 2014 20:13 marvellosity wrote: Revising this list 8.raynpelikoneet 4.Holyflare 3.DarthPunk 6.WaveOfShadow 2.iamperfection 5.Promethelax 9.Cephiro 1.marvellosity 7.Artanis DP ^ 3 places 7.raynpelikoneet 4.Holyflare 3.DarthPunk 6.WaveOfShadow 2.iamperfection 5.Promethelax 8.Cephiro 1.marvellosity 9.Artanis 4-6 reasonably interchangeable, Artanis down 2 because his posts here are just... well... extremely untownie. ##Unvote ##Vote: Artanis | ||
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
On February 05 2014 00:11 raynpelikoneet wrote: How is my answer lacking? I don't even know what you are talking about. Clarifying your position when you hadn't even entered the thread yet feels unnecessary. And if you felt there wasn't much alignment indicative things in the thread yet, why did you have a problem with Promethelax' post? | ||
| ||