EPTOn January 20 2014 09:22 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
I was expecting a counterclaim. I'm very disappointed
I was expecting a counterclaim. I'm very disappointed
Can you explain? I'm really confused...
Normal Mini Mafia: Episode I - Page 6
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
Can you explain? I'm really confused... | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On January 20 2014 09:32 kushm4sta wrote: I think the likelihood for our second lynch choice flipping scum is pretty close to our first choice. Also if they are scum and they claim blue, they are just postponing their lynch. Why would you as town want to postpone mafia lynch? Balla it's a joke. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On January 20 2014 09:33 raynpelikoneet wrote: Why would you as town want to postpone mafia lynch? it's worth it to make sure we don't lynch a blue. Eh honestly id rather argue about it out of game and get the unbiased thoughts of more mechanically minded players. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
Like if you are blue obviously you're going to claim before getting lynched, and town can either believe you or not. If you're scum and you claim blue before getting lynched then you get CC'ed or not. If you get CC'ed then you either get lynched or your CC gets lynched. You won't postpone in that case. If whoever is about to get lynched ends up being uncc'ed THEN you postpone the lynch. But there's nothing different than any other games? What makes your plan special? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On January 20 2014 09:40 Balla24 wrote: Kush the thing is that it's literally no different than any other game right? Like if you are blue obviously you're going to claim before getting lynched, and town can either believe you or not. If you're scum and you claim blue before getting lynched then you get CC'ed or not. If you get CC'ed then you either get lynched or your CC gets lynched. You won't postpone in that case. If whoever is about to get lynched ends up being uncc'ed THEN you postpone the lynch. But there's nothing different than any other games? What makes your plan special? the difference is that on this site people are retarded and they don't do that | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
Can someone explain what a 'Boxer' is? | ||
|
Balla24
2322 Posts
The boxers are much more interesting, what exactly do we gain from having boxers claim? Town cred for some players and setup information? The setup information is honestly not that helpful for us at this point right? | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
I don't like kush's plan, or his reason that it will save a blue and we can catch scum later. Also I think that kush is obviously not a VT or a named VT because if he were then he wouldn't have such stupid logic about how rayn is claiming named VT. ##vote kushm4sta | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
suki, kushmasta does not usually even read his own role PM properly (which is proven by last game for example) so unfortunately that plan does not make him non VT / non named VT and certainly not mafia. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I WILL say that I will likely be more active than I have been in the last few games I've played, if that gives you any indication. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On January 20 2014 09:55 raynpelikoneet wrote: Nobody should claim at this point. Named VT's (boxers) do not help us in any way now because there is a possibility of 0-3 boxers and claiming does not clear anyone, it only gives mafia information about the setup unless we want all people to claim which we don't. suki, kushmasta does not usually even read his own role PM properly (which is proven by last game for example) so unfortunately that plan does not make him non VT / non named VT and certainly not mafia. Yeah I'm mostly indifferent to the matter. I can see the argument for it not being needed and it giving scum information, but I think it could help us in the future by 1) eliminating scum's ability to fake-claim it on the block and 2) forcing scum to decide now whether they want to fake-claim the role. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
placeholder, omgus vote | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On January 20 2014 10:01 VisceraEyes wrote: Yeah I'm mostly indifferent to the matter. I can see the argument for it not being needed and it giving scum information, but I think it could help us in the future by 1) eliminating scum's ability to fake-claim it on the block and 2) forcing scum to decide now whether they want to fake-claim the role. Here is the problem: If the named VT's claim it gives mafia info about the setup.
Every single possible scenario only helps mafai and not town, so no, don't claim named VT's because they can't be confirmed and it only helps mafia if they know how many Named VT's there are. Discussion closed. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On January 20 2014 10:09 thrawn2112 wrote: ##vote: kushm4sta thrawn is scum because he's wrong lol | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
bai | ||
| ||
