EPTNormal Mini Mafia: Episode I - Page 43
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On January 22 2014 06:18 thrawn2112 wrote: yeah that's my role except for the flavor name so we have three named vts now? | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
12. Posting a false role PM phrased as if you received it from the host. You can still fake roleclaim, but you cannot make it look like you are posting a PM you received from the host. | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
Wile - Named Zar - Named Thrawn - Named That is possible, but its a 1 in 8 chance. I believe there is very little downside for mafia to claim Named, especially one about to be lynched. | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
11. Breadcrumbing the specific phrasing of your role PM. Do not compare the phrasing in your role PM to prove your alignment. You can claim the abilities you have, but you can't use the specific phrasing of your role PM. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
| ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
| ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
| ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
Plus, modkilling someone an hour before a lynch would mess with the game. | ||
|
Crossfire99
United States1529 Posts
If the claim scares people off his lynch I'd be willing to vote Balla purely because of his "case" against me. On January 21 2014 17:09 Balla24 wrote: I don't like Crossfire at all. His case on Rayn is super weird, where exactly does what rayn does make him scum? He's pressuring a lot of people with cases and votes. Crossfire is calling him scum for not committing to them and switching targets a lot but how does that make rayn scum?? It doesn't. It makes him town. From town perspective everybody starts as neutral and either gets a mafia read or a town read... its the opposite as scum. Rayn builds cases on people he thinks are scum, and posts reasoning too, yet Crossfire just latches onto the action itself and NOT the reasoning of rayn's cases. Rayn is one of the most active people in this game, why does Crossfire feel the need to pressure rayn about something so weak? Then there's this: Where rayn points out why claiming Boxers is a bad thing for town and a good thing for mafia. He essentially brushes that off by saying "mafia already knows information about the setup" without really explaining what. Rayn gives him the courtesy to write out his expected outcomes from the plan but Crossfire does not reciprocate. ##vote Crossfire99 His bolded section is just wrong. It's like he just stopped reading my post after the green section or is trying to purposely misconstrue what I'm saying because there is no reason to stop reading in the middle of the sentence. Especially since the very next sentence explains what the advantage (expected outcome) of my plan was, preventing scum from fakeclaiming before a lynch (*cough* zarepeth *coug*). On January 22 2014 02:31 Balla24 wrote: Past 2 days have been busier than normal. Can't refresh and spam conversations with people like I normally do which is unfortunate. It's looking a lot better moving forward though. As far as Crossfire: His case against rayn is bad and really construed, its very large but the only thing he is attacking is the fact that rayn has jumped around a lot. Like it doesn't make sense to put that much effort into that first off, and secondly why does he feel the need to pressure rayn of all people who is active as hell and will be more readable because of it. It just feels very wrong. The second bit about the Boxers claiming thing is obvious that there is scum motivation for discussing it and getting the town onboard. So him brushing off what was said is super suspicious. Other people who look bad: Jonnylaw, Artanis. Artanis's game plan is really weird and underwhelming to me. He comes in trying to hard read rayn, accuses him of being scum and then leaves. Not only did he only accuse you of being scum because he thinks you have "something to hide" but you had done so much already and now that there was more. This quote where he restates his scum read on me also doesn't work. He's saying I shouldn't pressure rayn just because he's active. That's dumb. If you think someone could be scum, you don't just not pressure them because they're active. He also just assumes that my plan is purely scum motivated and didn't have a legitimate point which was what I said about the whole prevents scum from fake claiming. Basically, Balla seems to purposely miscontrue what I'm saying and paint it in a scummy light instead of just actually reading what I'm saying. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On January 22 2014 06:31 raynpelikoneet wrote: ugh.. i have no idea what to do. close your eyes, believe in scumslips, and vote bum | ||
|
Crossfire99
United States1529 Posts
| ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
fingers crossed. he does need to be modkilled though. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On January 22 2014 06:34 JonnyLaw wrote: I say 100% for fairness' sake we cannot change the vote. It's shitty but I think it would have passed regardless. Hell, he could still be lying but rules 11 and 12 make me believe scum did not receive at a role pm to fake claim. Well this is terrible. | ||
|
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
11. Breadcrumbing the specific phrasing of your role PM. Do not compare the phrasing in your role PM to prove your alignment. You can claim the abilities you have, but you can't use the specific phrasing of your role PM. 12. Posting a false role PM phrased as if you received it from the host. You can still fake roleclaim, but you cannot make it look like you are posting a PM you received from the host. | ||
| ||
