I may regret this, but the invitation PM was too funny

Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
I may regret this, but the invitation PM was too funny ![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On May 18 2014 23:13 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2014 22:34 Hapahauli wrote: /in Been a while, and I've been meaning to try a larger game again. I can't promise my customary of activity (I'll be periodically travelling for the next few weeks), but it should be enough to read/play the game. The pre-scum roll excuses have begun! Better say that now than after getting the role PM, I guess ![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On May 20 2014 06:28 ShiaoPi wrote: Show nested quote + On May 20 2014 06:26 Cavalinho wrote: Not gonna be around for start time. Hope I get my role before then. :DDD Role PMs will go out soon (Valve Time), will announce it again as all talking should also stop by then until game start | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On May 21 2014 06:01 Steveling wrote: MY GUARDIAN BALLS ARE HEAVY! Based on this, Steveling is scum. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
I doubt there are 4 scum factions though. There's probably at least one neutral faction of some kind. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On May 21 2014 06:05 jampidampi wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 06:04 Xatalos wrote: Oh yeah, there were multiple factions in this game. Should we agree on NK targets in-thread? How about we agree on killing you? By "we", do you mean the thread or your scum faction? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On May 21 2014 06:09 jampidampi wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 06:08 Xatalos wrote: On May 21 2014 06:05 jampidampi wrote: On May 21 2014 06:04 Xatalos wrote: Oh yeah, there were multiple factions in this game. Should we agree on NK targets in-thread? How about we agree on killing you? By "we", do you mean the thread or your scum faction? Right back at you: who do you refer to by "we"? Your faction? All of us? Non-town factions? I referred to every possible scum faction back there. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On May 21 2014 06:20 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 06:15 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 21 2014 06:12 Steveling wrote: On May 21 2014 06:09 WaveofShadow wrote: This is going to bed a very odd game with so many I don't know. In other news I'm getting real sick of rolling VT in massive theme-style games (or games in general). Really fucking boring. Gonna be the same basic formula: either I suck balls and get left alive forever and get demoralized and whatnot, or I get a flash of genius and play well and get killed earlyish. The latter means I gotta try though and even then there are no guarantees. Blehhhhhhhhhhh K so first order of business: ##vote: holyflare Sold. ##vote: holyflare Lol now I'm honestly debating whether or not to seriously push this. If he's scum nobody's gonna lynch the guy so as much as I'd feel bad not letting him play, mebbe somebody shoot him or something just to remove all doubt? ![]() I understand where the bolded logic comes from, in a normal game he wouldn't be lynched right away because scum wouldn't hop on the wagon. However in this game the same rules don't apply since there are more factions. I think it's very possible to see zero opposition wagons happen on scum. That actually adds a pretty interesting element to the game. Connection speculation is less useful - or more precisely said more complicated. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On May 21 2014 06:26 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 06:23 Xatalos wrote: On May 21 2014 06:20 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: On May 21 2014 06:15 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 21 2014 06:12 Steveling wrote: On May 21 2014 06:09 WaveofShadow wrote: This is going to bed a very odd game with so many I don't know. In other news I'm getting real sick of rolling VT in massive theme-style games (or games in general). Really fucking boring. Gonna be the same basic formula: either I suck balls and get left alive forever and get demoralized and whatnot, or I get a flash of genius and play well and get killed earlyish. The latter means I gotta try though and even then there are no guarantees. Blehhhhhhhhhhh K so first order of business: ##vote: holyflare Sold. ##vote: holyflare Lol now I'm honestly debating whether or not to seriously push this. If he's scum nobody's gonna lynch the guy so as much as I'd feel bad not letting him play, mebbe somebody shoot him or something just to remove all doubt? ![]() I understand where the bolded logic comes from, in a normal game he wouldn't be lynched right away because scum wouldn't hop on the wagon. However in this game the same rules don't apply since there are more factions. I think it's very possible to see zero opposition wagons happen on scum. That actually adds a pretty interesting element to the game. Connection speculation is less useful - or more precisely said more complicated. I agree that's it's gonna be more complicated which is why I'd rather not use it as a heuristic for a D1 lynch, after we see a few flips we can start speculating again but right now I think it's more distracting than useful and we should focus on simple behavior based scum hunting. Yeah, it's going to be very difficult to decide today's lynch based on voting patterns etc. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On May 21 2014 06:31 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 06:30 Xatalos wrote: On May 21 2014 06:26 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: On May 21 2014 06:23 Xatalos wrote: On May 21 2014 06:20 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: On May 21 2014 06:15 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 21 2014 06:12 Steveling wrote: On May 21 2014 06:09 WaveofShadow wrote: This is going to bed a very odd game with so many I don't know. In other news I'm getting real sick of rolling VT in massive theme-style games (or games in general). Really fucking boring. Gonna be the same basic formula: either I suck balls and get left alive forever and get demoralized and whatnot, or I get a flash of genius and play well and get killed earlyish. The latter means I gotta try though and even then there are no guarantees. Blehhhhhhhhhhh K so first order of business: ##vote: holyflare Sold. ##vote: holyflare Lol now I'm honestly debating whether or not to seriously push this. If he's scum nobody's gonna lynch the guy so as much as I'd feel bad not letting him play, mebbe somebody shoot him or something just to remove all doubt? ![]() I understand where the bolded logic comes from, in a normal game he wouldn't be lynched right away because scum wouldn't hop on the wagon. However in this game the same rules don't apply since there are more factions. I think it's very possible to see zero opposition wagons happen on scum. That actually adds a pretty interesting element to the game. Connection speculation is less useful - or more precisely said more complicated. I agree that's it's gonna be more complicated which is why I'd rather not use it as a heuristic for a D1 lynch, after we see a few flips we can start speculating again but right now I think it's more distracting than useful and we should focus on simple behavior based scum hunting. Yeah, it's going to be very difficult to decide today's lynch based on voting patterns etc. Since when are Day 1 lynches ever decided on voting patterns? What is this nonsense? For example, in a normal game it would be suspicious if everyone's votes just piled on one wagon. It's unlikely that he would be scum. With multiple factions things like that aren't as clear. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On May 21 2014 06:37 Tehpoofter wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 06:33 Xatalos wrote: On May 21 2014 06:31 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2014 06:30 Xatalos wrote: On May 21 2014 06:26 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: On May 21 2014 06:23 Xatalos wrote: On May 21 2014 06:20 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: On May 21 2014 06:15 WaveofShadow wrote: On May 21 2014 06:12 Steveling wrote: On May 21 2014 06:09 WaveofShadow wrote: This is going to bed a very odd game with so many I don't know. In other news I'm getting real sick of rolling VT in massive theme-style games (or games in general). Really fucking boring. Gonna be the same basic formula: either I suck balls and get left alive forever and get demoralized and whatnot, or I get a flash of genius and play well and get killed earlyish. The latter means I gotta try though and even then there are no guarantees. Blehhhhhhhhhhh K so first order of business: ##vote: holyflare Sold. ##vote: holyflare Lol now I'm honestly debating whether or not to seriously push this. If he's scum nobody's gonna lynch the guy so as much as I'd feel bad not letting him play, mebbe somebody shoot him or something just to remove all doubt? ![]() I understand where the bolded logic comes from, in a normal game he wouldn't be lynched right away because scum wouldn't hop on the wagon. However in this game the same rules don't apply since there are more factions. I think it's very possible to see zero opposition wagons happen on scum. That actually adds a pretty interesting element to the game. Connection speculation is less useful - or more precisely said more complicated. I agree that's it's gonna be more complicated which is why I'd rather not use it as a heuristic for a D1 lynch, after we see a few flips we can start speculating again but right now I think it's more distracting than useful and we should focus on simple behavior based scum hunting. Yeah, it's going to be very difficult to decide today's lynch based on voting patterns etc. Since when are Day 1 lynches ever decided on voting patterns? What is this nonsense? For example, in a normal game it would be suspicious if everyone's votes just piled on one wagon. It's unlikely that he would be scum. With multiple factions things like that aren't as clear. Just cause multiple factions doesn't mean scum still won't hop on a wagon. Anyone pushing this logic is silly. They may be less likely but still likely to do so their win con is still to lynch non-scum so they will gladly lynch any faction... Pushing this further is scummy. Of course there will be scum on almost any wagon. It's just that connection speculation (bussing, speed of wagons forming, etc.) are a bit less reliable than they usually are. It should be more useful to focus on individual scumminess for now. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On May 21 2014 06:46 Steveling wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 06:44 kushm4sta wrote: On May 21 2014 06:44 Steveling wrote: Why? because the game gets very big very fast. town stops reading. and separating lazy town from scum becomes very hard. The town that does that are not helping anyway. This view is a bit cruel. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On May 21 2014 06:50 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 06:49 Koshi wrote: On May 21 2014 06:46 marvellosity wrote: ##Vote: Xatalos AND SO IT BEGINS. Did he do the same thing like he did in the game we have banned out of our minds? ##Vote: Xatalos I don't know. All I know is he's waffling repeatedly and nonsensically about the same stupid thing. That'll do for now.[/QUOTE] What do you mean "I don't know"? You were very specific about your reasons last time. Please be more specific again. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On May 21 2014 06:57 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 06:54 Xatalos wrote: On May 21 2014 06:50 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2014 06:49 Koshi wrote: On May 21 2014 06:46 marvellosity wrote: ##Vote: Xatalos AND SO IT BEGINS. Did he do the same thing like he did in the game we have banned out of our minds? ##Vote: Xatalos I don't know. All I know is he's waffling repeatedly and nonsensically about the same stupid thing. That'll do for now. What do you mean "I don't know"? You were very specific about your reasons last time. Please be more specific again. I've been perfectly specific, especially for a vote less than an hour into the game. Afraid you'll have to put up with it, dear. It just felt like you didn't care too much about your vote. From my previous experience with you, you're very conservative and cautious at the start as town - carefully searching for a good lynch. On the other hand, you're more aggressive and lynch-happy as scum (I don't think I've ever played with you as being scum, but I went through your earlier games in one earlier game and came to that conclusion). That's why I'm afraid that you might have rolled scum this time. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On May 21 2014 07:03 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 07:01 Xatalos wrote: On May 21 2014 06:57 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2014 06:54 Xatalos wrote: On May 21 2014 06:50 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2014 06:49 Koshi wrote: On May 21 2014 06:46 marvellosity wrote: ##Vote: Xatalos AND SO IT BEGINS. Did he do the same thing like he did in the game we have banned out of our minds? ##Vote: Xatalos I don't know. All I know is he's waffling repeatedly and nonsensically about the same stupid thing. That'll do for now. What do you mean "I don't know"? You were very specific about your reasons last time. Please be more specific again. I've been perfectly specific, especially for a vote less than an hour into the game. Afraid you'll have to put up with it, dear. It just felt like you didn't care too much about your vote. From my previous experience with you, you're very conservative and cautious at the start as town - carefully searching for a good lynch. On the other hand, you're more aggressive and lynch-happy as scum (I don't think I've ever played with you as being scum, but I went through your earlier games in one earlier game and came to that conclusion). That's why I'm afraid that you might have rolled scum this time. Actually historically I throw my vote around more as town, although it varies from game to game. Worry all you like dear. I'd worry more about not talking bollocks over multiple posts if I were you ^_^ Specify "bollocks". Nobody else seems to agree with that definition of my posts (at least I don't think so). I've seen you start the game with a half-assed vote several times as scum. When you've been town, you're usually even overly passive/cautious to begin with. That's what I don't like here. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On May 21 2014 07:04 Yell0w wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 06:57 Xatalos wrote: If most players randomed their votes separately, it would just end up with scum getting to choose their preferred lynch. LMAO I disagree, if most people randomed their votes, the ones who didn't would instantly look scummy and we could lynch them tomorrow. Everyone would RNG their votes if most people did it, because they'd know how bad it would make them look otherwise. How can you ensure that everyone votes according to RNG? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On May 21 2014 07:10 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 07:07 Xatalos wrote: On May 21 2014 07:03 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2014 07:01 Xatalos wrote: On May 21 2014 06:57 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2014 06:54 Xatalos wrote: On May 21 2014 06:50 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2014 06:49 Koshi wrote: On May 21 2014 06:46 marvellosity wrote: ##Vote: Xatalos AND SO IT BEGINS. Did he do the same thing like he did in the game we have banned out of our minds? ##Vote: Xatalos I don't know. All I know is he's waffling repeatedly and nonsensically about the same stupid thing. That'll do for now. What do you mean "I don't know"? You were very specific about your reasons last time. Please be more specific again. I've been perfectly specific, especially for a vote less than an hour into the game. Afraid you'll have to put up with it, dear. It just felt like you didn't care too much about your vote. From my previous experience with you, you're very conservative and cautious at the start as town - carefully searching for a good lynch. On the other hand, you're more aggressive and lynch-happy as scum (I don't think I've ever played with you as being scum, but I went through your earlier games in one earlier game and came to that conclusion). That's why I'm afraid that you might have rolled scum this time. Actually historically I throw my vote around more as town, although it varies from game to game. Worry all you like dear. I'd worry more about not talking bollocks over multiple posts if I were you ^_^ Specify "bollocks". Nobody else seems to agree with that definition of my posts (at least I don't think so). I've seen you start the game with a half-assed vote several times as scum. When you've been town, you're usually even overly passive/cautious to begin with. That's what I don't like here. Find me someone who will vouch for your series of posts on voting patterns and crap deciding the Day 1 lynch actually being useful, and maybe we can talk again. Toddle along now ^_^ MZ and Tehpoofter I think mentioned that they liked what I said on the topic. Not that it was something über-useful, but definitely not "bollocks". Lol | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On February 14 2013 05:25 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On February 14 2013 05:09 gonzaw wrote: On February 14 2013 05:02 marvellosity wrote: On February 14 2013 04:57 gonzaw wrote: Kay im back I would like to kill randombum today. Stuff he posted seemed too "neutral" and shit, specially that "wall of text" about BH. Other than that maybe kill BH, he's being his usual trolly scum self, specially with that bad case on Oats. I know you usually to be a gentleman of many words; the Captain of Debates (Cods). Yet your discourse thus far has been sadly limited, one might say you have given up your place and become the Captain of Rare Pronouncements (Carps). Is the gentleman not amiable to great discourse with his colleagues? I skimmed the game and those are my first impressions. Everything else is null and some pointless discussions. marv, is this thing of yours a post restriction or are you doing it intentionally? Truly this does not sound like the same gentleman excited to enter this establishment; the excitement is gone. What happened at the door, I wonder? ##Vote: gonzaw Here's the first vote by town-marv in Les Mafia: On May 18 2013 03:37 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 18 2013 03:35 Blazinghand wrote: On May 18 2013 03:31 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 03:29 Blazinghand wrote: On May 18 2013 03:25 marvellosity wrote: On May 18 2013 03:21 Blazinghand wrote: On May 18 2013 03:07 iamperfection wrote: alright im off to the gym you guys are boring me and bh is making me angry. back in a few hours how am i making you angry when you're the one shitting up the thread How is he doing that, dear? flaming Looks like typical iamp aggression to me, wouldn't you say? nope Explain the difference then. I'm bored of how you're posting. ##Vote: BlazingHand All in all, it seems like this opening is more nullish than scummy by marv. marv, a question: When we last played together (town&town in the PYP game), and I played somewhat anti-town and scummy in the beginning, you hesitated to vote for me even though rayn was pushing for me to be lynched. Why this change of heart? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On May 21 2014 07:38 Blazinghand wrote: So Marv, you gotta admit, these whole steveling/holyflare thing is pretty silly and not worth your attention. What do you think about the possibility of an rng lynch in this setup? Could be good, yes? I actually laughed out loud at this post. GJ BH | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On May 21 2014 07:36 marvellosity wrote: Xatalos, I really have no idea, nor do I care, because I don't particularly strive to be consistent from game to game. Honestly the fact that you're beating away at this makes you look kinda better though, so maybe I'll unvote you if I'm feeling nice You do realise, though, that Steve's semi-ridiculous behaviour makes it less likely he's mafia though, yes? (or traditional mafia. I'm just gonna say town for town and mafia for all the other factions until something tells me otherwise) It's just that your stance is opposite to your stance in the last game (where you were town). I did some suspicious stuff ("picked" my numbers right away, didn't contribute in any meaningful way and went AFK) yet you still felt very hesitant to vote for me. Now just BAM! I say something that you can't immediately see making sense, vote away. (Not to mention that this seems to be your habit as scum - voting quickly on weak reasons - but apparently you've also done it as town so not sure what to make of it) About Steveling: indeed, he's somewhat likely town based on his weird push (that he seems to believe in himself too). Dunno about HF yet. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On May 21 2014 07:42 kitaman27 wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 06:17 27ninjabunnies wrote: I'd lynch HF in a heartbeat if he aligned with mafia. Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 06:23 27ninjabunnies wrote: Oh I'd lynch tamburini in a heartbeat regardless of his alignment. Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 07:28 WaveofShadow wrote: Sorry HF you've broken my heart too many times. ![]() Chalis (ハート Heart) is an antagonist in Golden Sun: Dark Dawn. Together with Blados, she is one of the commanders of a secretive military nation named Tuaparang. All three are bad guys taunting us in the thread. I rest my case. Game solved :D:D:D | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
Hapa: yeah, Valenius doesn't look too good. More of a gutread than anything concrete at this point. jampidampi doesn't look too good either. All of his posts are basically (filler) questions with no conclusions. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
##Unvote ##Vote: jampidampi | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 10:59 GMT
#1138
On May 21 2014 11:34 geript wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 11:09 Tehpoofter wrote: On May 21 2014 10:57 geript wrote: @Snooglewoogle. I need the blessings of ABBA to shoot Marv. Please make the appropriate sacrifices. Do you actually think Marv is scum or you just doing it cause he disagrees with you on slam? If you think scum is Slam and you shoot marv because you think hes cockblocking the lynch on slam that would be the most asinine play ever. Shoot who you think is lock scum lets find someone else scummy. What do you think of BKQ/Velanius/layabout? Marv I don't think would cockblock on a null read like this if he were town. More likely he'd ignore me and let me develop it. Not a 100% on that but his push on Xat early was for pretty awful reasoning. Like if Marv were town and has that "it's enough for now" line, he'd be far more willing to entertain a good outside lynch. Plus, he has done nothing to make me think he's either town or scum, which means he cares about how he comes across which is far more likely to be mafia Marv. I think geript is very likely town and this post is a good example. It's weird that marv would vote me for little to no reason (claiming it's "good enough" lol) and then defend Slam like this. marv: how is this post by geript terrible? (To be clear: marv probably isn't a good D1 lynch, since as scum he's forced to maintain some level of activity and leave behind clues about his scummates - and if he's town he's obviously too valuable to lose to a lynch - but I'd say I'm not getting any townie feeling from marv yet and so I'm slightly leaning scum) | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 11:02 GMT
#1139
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 11:03 GMT
#1140
It'd be weird to have such an obvious connection though | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 11:06 GMT
#1142
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 11:10 GMT
#1143
How is that line "totally baseless"? Are you often viewed as suspicious early on in your towngames btw? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 11:15 GMT
#1145
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 11:20 GMT
#1146
##Vote: mtamburini | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 11:24 GMT
#1150
On May 21 2014 20:21 marvellosity wrote: Careful now, you're voting for a lynch I said I'd support! Probably a mislynch. Haha. You said this: "So as it stands I guess I'd support this lynch." That's not really bussing, just barely semi-bussing if you're both scum. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 11:27 GMT
#1152
On May 21 2014 20:20 Koshi wrote: marv is coolio. I don't see anything scummy about his posts. Could he do more? Yes. Should he do more? No. Why not? Why would he? Exactly. Xatalos. Do you think I should do more scumhunting and making smart and good posts or am I cool for now? Tbh I've kind of given up on trying to read you, Koshi. Twice now I have townread you and you were scum in both games. I'll probably just sheep someone I find town+credible on if you're town/scum. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 11:29 GMT
#1153
On May 21 2014 20:26 marvellosity wrote: Xatalos, you have a serious lack of imagination and verve ![]() Sorry marv. I've activated my serious mode. Victory is all that matters. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 11:39 GMT
#1156
On May 21 2014 20:10 Xatalos wrote: The reason why I reiterated on the topic was because people kept asking me to reiterate...? >.> And it's not like there was anything hugely more useful to talk about at that point. How is that line "totally baseless"? Are you often viewed as suspicious early on in your towngames btw? Could you still answer to this post though? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 11:42 GMT
#1158
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 11:44 GMT
#1160
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 11:45 GMT
#1161
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 11:49 GMT
#1164
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 11:50 GMT
#1165
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 11:52 GMT
#1167
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 11:58 GMT
#1169
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 12:47 GMT
#1174
On May 21 2014 20:51 marvellosity wrote: he admitted he was a smurf? are you even reading? when do newbies smurf? I'm not speaking to you anymore, Xatalos, because you've basically shown that you're not capable of reading the thread and digesting it in any way. Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 17:40 bkqyrldp wrote: On May 21 2014 17:28 geript wrote: On May 21 2014 17:24 bkqyrldp wrote: On May 21 2014 17:17 geript wrote: Valenus I'm not quite seeing as mafia. Like there's a bit of seeming honesty and levity in his posting that I find a bit towny. Like I get why Hapa thinks he could be an ok lynch but he feels more like a "fun Fred" gamer instead of a "competitive Carl" gamer. It's not a real solid read but I'm looking elsewhere for D1 unless something more specific pops up. This is my perspective on him as well. His posts do not read like someone feigning contributions, just someone casually posting because he felt like. Holyflare's reason for considering him town is also the type of weak evidence that I find compelling early on. You mind telling us who you are? Like you're obviously a smurf of some kind. I'm not going to, because it not only invalidates the purpose of signing up as a smurf, but it feels also feels cheap to reveal your identity based on your alignment. That is, players are more likely to do that as town than as mafia. Ok >.> That was kind of out of place though considering that I had just read through your posts on brsjskfjdskjsd after initially forgetting the point of your accusation (which tbh wasn't all that great). | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 12:56 GMT
#1175
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 13:07 GMT
#1182
On May 21 2014 21:57 Koshi wrote: wow Xatalos. Pls ignore everything I say. Not sure what you're specifically referring to, but sorry I guess. You're just kind of under my radar considering that I fail at reading you. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 13:11 GMT
#1185
"If you don't consider me as mafia, you shouldn't be voting me. The only reason outside of you considering me as mafia for why you would vote for me is this: you want to get a read on me via my reactions to your voting on me to see if I react poorly or more town favored. This is only used if you don't have a read on me from what I've previously posted." It's a bit of a weird thing. Is it even a scumslip? Hard to say. Probably not. Still something that bothers me a bit. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 13:26 GMT
#1188
On May 21 2014 21:57 Tehpoofter wrote: @Marv can you explain a bit more about what you think on Thrawn? I have a hard time reading his normally small fitler. @Everyone Can we agree to call the scummy smurf BKQ (the first three letters of his vomit of a name) just for consitancy. @Koshi what is your read on Ceph/bunnies involving the case he had on her earlier? @Xat you said his points were directed at scum hunting. Can you look at his first post here + Show Spoiler + On May 21 2014 06:47 bkqyrldp wrote: Nice. The game has just started and there is already many people I dislike. I guess that's to be expected in a game with 4 factions. Steveling is the first one for asking a neutral filler question, followed then by xatalos and marvelocity grabbing that opportunity to provide an easy fake contribution. From those 2 I dislike marvelocity the most, since xatalos was already there bantering, so I'll read less into his response for now. The other person is meapak_ziph. Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 06:13 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: wait there are four factions in this game? Guess I might as well read the op then. Wave that was a mighty suspicious post, sounds like you're trying to make excuses for future bad play... He came into the thread with a weak confusion comment and something that didn't need to be said. Your post is basically the last line, which is pretty weak if your intent is to gather info from wave. What's up Marv, steve, MZ? + Show Spoiler + Marv and Koshi both saying I'm town/sheep worthy. + Show Spoiler + On May 21 2014 19:15 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 12:37 Tehpoofter wrote: Going to throw out some of my reads so far this game I'd like to see where others stand as well. Town Hero: Tehpoofter Townies: Hapa, BlueyD, HF, Steve, Bunnies, Geript Scum: Yellow, BKQ, Valenius, layabout People Geript Should shoot: Slam People Geript Shouldn't shoot: MarvelloCity 3rd Parties: Crazy MAn who wins by screaming and passing out the most fliers to his RNG party: Blazinghand Lazy People that need to do more: Marv, Koshi + Show Spoiler + Also Austin if there is an ABBA cult I would like to submit an application regardless of how its aligned I will fight for ABBA. I'm tempted to just sheep this guy until I'm more sure Hapa is town. Poofter most certainly is not "classical" mafia this game and all his reads look pretty sensible. And I'll let him off with my name because he's clearly just trolling me, which is mildly acceptable in this case. On May 21 2014 21:10 Koshi wrote: I think Poofter is the towniest town in this game. 4 page filter. Natural conversation. Pushing things forward. Jokes. 4 page filter Also this: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 12:37 Tehpoofter wrote: Going to throw out some of my reads so far this game I'd like to see where others stand as well. Town Hero: Tehpoofter Townies: Hapa, BlueyD, HF, Steve, Bunnies, Geript Scum: Yellow, BKQ, Valenius, layabout People Geript Should shoot: Slam People Geript Shouldn't shoot: MarvelloCity 3rd Parties: Crazy MAn who wins by screaming and passing out the most fliers to his RNG party: Blazinghand Lazy People that need to do more: Marv, Koshi + Show Spoiler + Also Austin if there is an ABBA cult I would like to submit an application regardless of how its aligned I will fight for ABBA. It is everything good combined. Good reads because I don't bluntly disagree with any of them. Jokes. Pro town stuff. Cav on the other hand. He is so tense this game. And his read on Steve is so boring. He entered the thread too assertive. Then he was angry at Cephiro. Ten meta townreaded Holyflare because another game he did the same. Then he tunneled Steve, but it might have started with asking thread permission. Hm. That first post was somewhat weak, yeah. He did follow up on it (although only reactively) a lot later on though: On May 21 2014 18:44 bkqyrldp wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 18:33 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2014 18:32 bkqyrldp wrote: So what did you skim and find suspicious? The fact you are a smurf and the fact you characterised my answer to Steveling as suspicious, when anyone on this forum knows 100% that my answer to Steveling was in no way suspicious and I would certainly answer that way as both alignments. It was just an answer to a question. The reason I am now voting for you is that because this page confirms you are a smurf, and if you are a smurf, you should know better. Which means you were just bullshitting vomit reads, so you're mafia. I'm not sure what I was exactly thinking when I made that post, you will know later when I ask myself, but my guess is that it was more about you entering the thread with that type of post. Personally I'm not impressed by the rest of your posts so far, as I'm not seeing any of the pointed questions you tend to typically ask. What I liked about his filter were posts like these (taking stances and analyzing the game): On May 21 2014 17:24 bkqyrldp wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 17:17 geript wrote: Valenus I'm not quite seeing as mafia. Like there's a bit of seeming honesty and levity in his posting that I find a bit towny. Like I get why Hapa thinks he could be an ok lynch but he feels more like a "fun Fred" gamer instead of a "competitive Carl" gamer. It's not a real solid read but I'm looking elsewhere for D1 unless something more specific pops up. This is my perspective on him as well. His posts do not read like someone feigning contributions, just someone casually posting because he felt like. Holyflare's reason for considering him town is also the type of weak evidence that I find compelling early on. Now that I think about it, that's the only post I really like from him. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 13:29 GMT
#1189
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 13:30 GMT
#1190
On May 21 2014 22:08 Koshi wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 22:07 Xatalos wrote: On May 21 2014 21:57 Koshi wrote: wow Xatalos. Pls ignore everything I say. Not sure what you're specifically referring to, but sorry I guess. You're just kind of under my radar considering that I fail at reading you. Just interact with me. Make me feel special. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 13:34 GMT
#1192
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 13:36 GMT
#1193
On May 21 2014 22:33 Koshi wrote: acceptable start. Oh, your vote is still one me. Any particular reason? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 17:46 GMT
#1324
On May 22 2014 00:56 sqrtofneg1 wrote: Xat: Just look at his filter. He's town. I'm happy that you feel this way, but this isn't very specific. How exactly am I obvtown? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 17:48 GMT
#1330
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 17:50 GMT
#1335
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 18:20 GMT
#1373
On May 22 2014 02:53 sqrtofneg1 wrote: Show nested quote + On May 22 2014 02:46 Xatalos wrote: On May 22 2014 00:56 sqrtofneg1 wrote: Xat: Just look at his filter. He's town. I'm happy that you feel this way, but this isn't very specific. How exactly am I obvtown? These are great indicators: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 06:44 Xatalos wrote: On May 21 2014 06:37 Tehpoofter wrote: On May 21 2014 06:33 Xatalos wrote: On May 21 2014 06:31 marvellosity wrote: On May 21 2014 06:30 Xatalos wrote: On May 21 2014 06:26 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: On May 21 2014 06:23 Xatalos wrote: On May 21 2014 06:20 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: On May 21 2014 06:15 WaveofShadow wrote: [quote] Lol now I'm honestly debating whether or not to seriously push this. If he's scum nobody's gonna lynch the guy so as much as I'd feel bad not letting him play, mebbe somebody shoot him or something just to remove all doubt? ![]() I understand where the bolded logic comes from, in a normal game he wouldn't be lynched right away because scum wouldn't hop on the wagon. However in this game the same rules don't apply since there are more factions. I think it's very possible to see zero opposition wagons happen on scum. That actually adds a pretty interesting element to the game. Connection speculation is less useful - or more precisely said more complicated. I agree that's it's gonna be more complicated which is why I'd rather not use it as a heuristic for a D1 lynch, after we see a few flips we can start speculating again but right now I think it's more distracting than useful and we should focus on simple behavior based scum hunting. Yeah, it's going to be very difficult to decide today's lynch based on voting patterns etc. Since when are Day 1 lynches ever decided on voting patterns? What is this nonsense? For example, in a normal game it would be suspicious if everyone's votes just piled on one wagon. It's unlikely that he would be scum. With multiple factions things like that aren't as clear. Just cause multiple factions doesn't mean scum still won't hop on a wagon. Anyone pushing this logic is silly. They may be less likely but still likely to do so their win con is still to lynch non-scum so they will gladly lynch any faction... Pushing this further is scummy. Of course there will be scum on almost any wagon. It's just that connection speculation (bussing, speed of wagons forming, etc.) are a bit less reliable than they usually are. It should be more useful to focus on individual scumminess for now. Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 19:59 Xatalos wrote: On May 21 2014 11:34 geript wrote: On May 21 2014 11:09 Tehpoofter wrote: On May 21 2014 10:57 geript wrote: @Snooglewoogle. I need the blessings of ABBA to shoot Marv. Please make the appropriate sacrifices. Do you actually think Marv is scum or you just doing it cause he disagrees with you on slam? If you think scum is Slam and you shoot marv because you think hes cockblocking the lynch on slam that would be the most asinine play ever. Shoot who you think is lock scum lets find someone else scummy. What do you think of BKQ/Velanius/layabout? Marv I don't think would cockblock on a null read like this if he were town. More likely he'd ignore me and let me develop it. Not a 100% on that but his push on Xat early was for pretty awful reasoning. Like if Marv were town and has that "it's enough for now" line, he'd be far more willing to entertain a good outside lynch. Plus, he has done nothing to make me think he's either town or scum, which means he cares about how he comes across which is far more likely to be mafia Marv. I think geript is very likely town and this post is a good example. It's weird that marv would vote me for little to no reason (claiming it's "good enough" lol) and then defend Slam like this. marv: how is this post by geript terrible? (To be clear: marv probably isn't a good D1 lynch, since as scum he's forced to maintain some level of activity and leave behind clues about his scummates - and if he's town he's obviously too valuable to lose to a lynch - but I'd say I'm not getting any townie feeling from marv yet and so I'm slightly leaning scum) Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 22:11 Xatalos wrote: I kind of like Cephiro's point on ninjabunnies - about how ninjabunnies doesn't apparently consider the possibility of Cephiro being scum when Cephiro pushes him: "If you don't consider me as mafia, you shouldn't be voting me. The only reason outside of you considering me as mafia for why you would vote for me is this: you want to get a read on me via my reactions to your voting on me to see if I react poorly or more town favored. This is only used if you don't have a read on me from what I've previously posted." It's a bit of a weird thing. Is it even a scumslip? Hard to say. Probably not. Still something that bothers me a bit. Definitely town. He's legitimately trying to figure out this game. Kk, thanks for the clarification. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 18:25 GMT
#1379
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 18:27 GMT
#1381
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 18:29 GMT
#1384
mtamburini: Very vague/conditional and unimpactful (while being direct earlier as town). jampidampi: His posts are mostly filler questions/comments and his only real "conclusion" is a plain listpost without any reasoning. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 18:32 GMT
#1389
On May 22 2014 03:30 geript wrote: Show nested quote + On May 22 2014 03:27 Xatalos wrote: I don't think either geript or BH are good lynches. geript is probably town and BH is at least active (and not anyhow particularly scummy). How in the fuck is BH not a good lynch? How in the fuck is BH being active make him in any way make him not a good lynch? How in the fuck do you consider BH active? How in the fuck is BH a player who firmly believes in his ability to catch scum who has wasted 24 hours spewing bullshit about an RNG lynch not scummy? Activity -> easier to read on the long run and more likely to help with connection speculation. His filter is mostly spam so far, yeah. I've just seen him as similarly useless (as town) before. And there are better lynches. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 18:34 GMT
#1392
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 18:37 GMT
#1397
On May 22 2014 03:33 geript wrote: His filter as mafia is quite often useless spam. Explain more Xat. He was pretty useless and spammy here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/438132-tl-mafia-lxiv-a-game-of-intrigue?user=Blazinghand (In the end he even got himself and two other players modkilled lol) | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 21 2014 18:40 GMT
#1401
On May 22 2014 03:36 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 22 2014 03:34 Xatalos wrote: I think it's not anyhow scummy to forget that you claimed a role. Scum would be more likely self-conscious about their claims and such. I get what you're saying here, but it goes a little farther than that. Scum would definitely be more "on it" about what role they claimed, but this is a bit more subtle. See, Geript said "let's lynch all the blue claims, starting with BH". As scum fakeclaiming blue, this is something you could easily forget/overlook, because you subconsciously do not categorize yourself as a blue, see? But a real blue would in fact subconsciously selfcategorize as blue. This all of course is scumslip heuristics, which are historically terrible for actually lynching scum. I'd be fine to watch Geript die just because his death would bring me pleasure, but let's give him a day anyways. If he's actually a town vigi we should give him a chance to shoot his gun. Well, I don't really think this counts as a reason to lynch someone ![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 14:16 GMT
#2247
Apparently mtamburini is still missing, but I've been rethinking about him. Actually his reads aren't that vague when you look more closely. He even has clear opinions on a lot of stuff. Posts like these look good for him: On May 21 2014 12:58 mtamburini wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 12:13 sqrtofneg1 wrote: On May 21 2014 12:12 Holyflare wrote: On May 21 2014 12:09 thrawn2112 wrote: On May 21 2014 12:09 Holyflare wrote: On May 21 2014 12:08 thrawn2112 wrote: holyflare I need you to clear something up for me sup are you town? ya 3 minutes to say 'ya'. I don't like it. ##Unvote ##Vote: Holyflare From the way many people have told me to read HF, hes prob town he seems disappointed and not having fun. I hear he enjoys being mafia 100x more than he is town. Then there's his earlier post with the vague/hesitant reads: On May 21 2014 12:09 mtamburini wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 11:05 Tehpoofter wrote: On May 21 2014 10:16 mtamburini wrote: cool im town read see you final 3 mafia remember I got the hammer. Your stream of conscious post was super long please make shorter posts. So what do you think of Hf/Steve/Marv/geript some of the others seems like you just focused on people you know/have played with for the most part. I don't agree with your MZ read btw. I felt BKQ, Velanius and layabout were way scummier today. I read 200 posts and felt like quoting things I thought were worth mentioning. Hf I wanna know if hes having fun yet and thinks hes going to be the best or not the best this game. Geript I am not convinced 100% he is town but maybe a non threatening faction to town. Never played forum with him but I know in video he lurks a lot more, but he claims he has a gun so I can see the eagerness to get shit done now. If steve is the guy going against HF he is in my bad boy list and would lynch today. I need to read marvs filter before I can give an opinion. Why do you no agree with MZ, what have you seen differently through your eyes? BKQ? Not sure if that is a short form will look in filter. Velanius was the person who made the heart post right? I agree that was weird, if hes not that person that person is also weird. Layabout would also be on the table for me that strikethrough bs vote on BH was like why the hell would u ever even post something like that. If that wasnt in my giant post it should be that was weird as fuck. On second thoughts, it reads more like a stream of consciousness type post than a filler/fake post. He has a pretty clear townread on geript and suspects layabout (and Steveling I guess). Most importantly it feels like he's just posting whatever comes to his mind and doesn't "force" the reads. It also looks like the post was made pretty quickly and I think scum would be more careful with manufacturing their reads. I at least always double-check what I'm posting as scum. Not sure if that's the case with him, but I feel like it's overall towny to express your thoughts more freely. All in all, I don't think mtamburini is a good lynch after all. I'd much prefer if we lynched jampidampi. jampidampi has a decent amount of posts, but they're pretty much all filler questions/comments without any real conclusions OR agreeing with thread sentiment on the easiest possible (mis)lynch targets. His "case" on mtamburini is just that "he hasn't said anything that hasn't already been said". I don't think that's even true (did anyone else mention HF enjoying playing as scum more for example?) and in any case it's a very weak/lazy reason to cast your vote. Especially since the tone of his vote post is like the vote would be final or at least "good enough": On May 22 2014 22:36 jampidampi wrote: Show nested quote + On May 22 2014 22:01 layabout wrote: On May 22 2014 21:56 jampidampi wrote: On May 22 2014 21:52 Yell0w wrote: On May 22 2014 21:48 jampidampi wrote: Yell0w, what do you think about layabout? Oh, I definitely disagree with you, I thought he seemed genuine when I first read it and again when you reposted it, it's actually a reaction I could see myself having if something like that happened to me. So I don't think that makes him scum at all. But I can't seem to find a reason why became angry between those posts. From the post it seems that he got angry because more people were jumping onto him, but that didn't hapen in that timeframe, so I'm confused as to why he wasn't angry in the first post. It was because i (re?)read more of the thread between them, i can't remember if i had fully caught up with the first one what do you think about ritoky? Well if you had only read the thread up to Marvs vote on you when you posted the first post, I can definetely see you getting angry over people hopping onto you or saying they would look into you more. Hmm... That actually makes me think you're town based on how you seemed to still be angry in your ritoky case. Which seems like an emotional backlash, but it has good points in it. Could lynch him, but I think I'd rather see tamburinis head roll. ##Unvote ##Vote: mtamburini In addition he has a ton of posts where he says "could lynch player X" without providing much, if any, reasoning. It looks like his primary goal in the game is growing his filter with meaningless posts or growing the list of players he could throw a vote on. He's most likely scum. ##Unvote ##Vote: jampidampi | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 14:43 GMT
#2255
On May 22 2014 23:19 Holyflare wrote: Xatalos what do you make of tamburini playing video mafia and purposefully afking? Didn't someone say that he didn't participate in this latest video mafia and that he'll be participating in the next one? Dunno. I don't think being AFK is inherently scummy. I also came to check the thread last night before going to sleep and saw that there were like 15+ new pages so I just went to sleep instead :D | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 14:48 GMT
#2256
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 14:53 GMT
#2266
On May 22 2014 23:50 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On May 22 2014 23:43 Xatalos wrote: On May 22 2014 23:19 Holyflare wrote: Xatalos what do you make of tamburini playing video mafia and purposefully afking? Didn't someone say that he didn't participate in this latest video mafia and that he'll be participating in the next one? Dunno. I don't think being AFK is inherently scummy. I also came to check the thread last night before going to sleep and saw that there were like 15+ new pages so I just went to sleep instead :D There's like 5 games of video mafia a night dude. He's the main lynch choice and he hasn't said a word since pressure started building. So he's been playing video mafia during his AFK period..? I still don't think that makes him scum. Could be just otherwise too busy while just having the time to play some video mafia. I guess it makes him more likely scum though. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 14:57 GMT
#2270
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 14:58 GMT
#2273
On May 22 2014 23:55 bkqyrldp wrote: Show nested quote + On May 22 2014 23:51 marvellosity wrote: yes, I rather think Xatalos, if you had a bunch of votes on you, you'd have been rather more inclined to post something than go straight to bed, no? ^^ So it doesn't concern at all how easily this lynch is going? Usually you have been very vary of lack of resistance. If he is mafia, do you think his teammates have been yelling at him to post more and he has just chosen to ignore the requests? There *is* the fact that this isn't a normal game. Multiple factions means that lack of resistance is less of a factor than normally. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 15:00 GMT
#2274
On May 22 2014 23:51 marvellosity wrote: yes, I rather think Xatalos, if you had a bunch of votes on you, you'd have been rather more inclined to post something than go straight to bed, no? ^^ Haha, yep. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 15:32 GMT
#2283
On May 23 2014 00:01 jampidampi wrote: Show nested quote + On May 22 2014 23:57 Xatalos wrote: It's weird that he doesn't bother to post anything while having the most votes, yeah..... And since he's been around too..... Dunno. Maybe he's just scum. I still feel like jampidampi would flip scum more likely. You do know that your case on me mostly shows your lack reading comprehension? I guess you refer to the fact that I misread your "case" on mtamburini. It's not an anyhow major part of why I think you're scum, and it carries the same point of you just following thread sentiment anyway. How is that "mostly"? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 15:49 GMT
#2288
On May 23 2014 00:45 mtamburini wrote: Fuck me i gotta read 50 pages since I was last online how the fuck did I get put up for a lynch! Now share your thoughts as much as you can (focusing on scumreads preferably). Mostly the case on you is about being AFK + having too vague/inconclusive reads. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 16:08 GMT
#2301
On May 23 2014 00:51 jampidampi wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 00:32 Xatalos wrote: On May 23 2014 00:01 jampidampi wrote: On May 22 2014 23:57 Xatalos wrote: It's weird that he doesn't bother to post anything while having the most votes, yeah..... And since he's been around too..... Dunno. Maybe he's just scum. I still feel like jampidampi would flip scum more likely. You do know that your case on me mostly shows your lack reading comprehension? I guess you refer to the fact that I misread your "case" on mtamburini. It's not an anyhow major part of why I think you're scum, and it carries the same point of you just following thread sentiment anyway. How is that "mostly"? You still don't get it? Others have already shown how I played early, so I'll just quote one of them: Show nested quote + On May 22 2014 19:00 Koshi wrote: On May 22 2014 18:46 ritoky wrote: but if you post 10x in a thread and all of it is shit, that's a 100% shit rate, which makes you a shitter in my mind at least. guess it's more of a % useful material thing for me. Since it seems like there is only 3 of us here, let's have a bit of a chat. @Marv/geript I am a little bit hung up on an odd interaction in the early game, that was part of the original reads I gave when I called MZ my top town. It was when he noticed Jampidampi supporting the people he would never lynch on day 1. I was actually a bit wrong on that when I went back and looked at it again. 27ninjabunnies was the one who said it, and she actually said "there is no way I would lynch meapak this game". Which meapak felt was very strange and then jampidampi hopped in to defend bunnies against that and a couple other accusations headed her way at the time. What do you think of that interaction, because to me it seems very odd, or if you don't particularly think anything of it what do you think about those 3 people? I am rereading that and to me it seems jampidampi started with questioning MZ about bunnies. MZ replies that bunnies made an "unguarded" comment and is likely town. jampidampi pressures MZ and is giving bunnies a scumread for being overly defensive. He is telling MZ that the way MZ clears Bunnies is wrong and that he should revisit that read. MZ doesn't do that and jampi gives MZ a light scumread for it. This is pretty towny from Jampi tbh. quotes: ↓ + Show Spoiler + On May 21 2014 07:40 jampidampi wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 07:11 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: On May 21 2014 07:08 jampidampi wrote: Meapak earlier you were interested in 27ninjabunnies, did you gather anything from my conversation with her? If you had to bet on her alignment, what would you guess? ehhhh I understand the part about gut reads, I've had them myself and I know how frustrating it is to try and explain them. I give her (is ninja a her?) a pass for now because her posts seem very unguarded and often early game is when scum are most uptight. Unguarded? To me it seems that she is very defensive here: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 06:52 27ninjabunnies wrote: On May 21 2014 06:45 jampidampi wrote: On May 21 2014 06:39 27ninjabunnies wrote: On May 21 2014 06:27 jampidampi wrote: On May 21 2014 06:21 27ninjabunnies wrote: -- It's also obvious who are going to jump out in the front and try and lead town one way or another. We definitely have a mafia or two in the first couple of pages. You sound confident, enough that I think you have your eye on someone already. Care to share as to who it may be? I may have my eye on a few people. From my experience, there are two type of mafia people: the lurkers, and the ones who like to come out first day and take control of town. I'm focusing on the latter because they are the ones to likely talk more, you can easily find their slips (if any), and they are also more likely to last longer than the lurker mafia. Why are you avoiding my question? I asked you to name your suspicions, but instead you give an indefinite answear and then babble on about something that could reasonably be figured out from your earlier post. If I'm avoiding your question, it's because I have a pretty good damn reason as to why. But because you are being persistant, the ones I have my eye on are Steveling, WaveofShadow and Tehpoofter. But this doesn't necessarily mean they are scum. I rather read more of their play and interactions before I straight out call someone mafia. The majority of these people I haven't played with, and this is my second forum game. If I don't have logic behind my reads, where does that put me? As a freaking town more likely to get mislynched. So hold your horses, let me get my reads, and then we'll talk. She has "a pretty damn good reason" to avoid my question, yet she anwears it. Earlier she said that "we definitely have a mafia or two" but now they are not necessarily scum. Brining out the newbie card, defending accusations that don't exist. I would definitely not call this post unguarded. Based on this I wouldn't clear bunnies so easily, but now you're interesting. What makes you think she was "unguarded" in this post? + Show Spoiler + For the annoyed thing, if she was slightly pissed at me, I would understand this kind of backlash. On May 21 2014 07:56 jampidampi wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 07:44 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: On May 21 2014 07:40 jampidampi wrote: On May 21 2014 07:11 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: On May 21 2014 07:08 jampidampi wrote: Meapak earlier you were interested in 27ninjabunnies, did you gather anything from my conversation with her? If you had to bet on her alignment, what would you guess? ehhhh I understand the part about gut reads, I've had them myself and I know how frustrating it is to try and explain them. I give her (is ninja a her?) a pass for now because her posts seem very unguarded and often early game is when scum are most uptight. Unguarded? To me it seems that she is very defensive here: On May 21 2014 06:52 27ninjabunnies wrote: On May 21 2014 06:45 jampidampi wrote: On May 21 2014 06:39 27ninjabunnies wrote: On May 21 2014 06:27 jampidampi wrote: On May 21 2014 06:21 27ninjabunnies wrote: -- It's also obvious who are going to jump out in the front and try and lead town one way or another. We definitely have a mafia or two in the first couple of pages. You sound confident, enough that I think you have your eye on someone already. Care to share as to who it may be? I may have my eye on a few people. From my experience, there are two type of mafia people: the lurkers, and the ones who like to come out first day and take control of town. I'm focusing on the latter because they are the ones to likely talk more, you can easily find their slips (if any), and they are also more likely to last longer than the lurker mafia. Why are you avoiding my question? I asked you to name your suspicions, but instead you give an indefinite answear and then babble on about something that could reasonably be figured out from your earlier post. If I'm avoiding your question, it's because I have a pretty good damn reason as to why. But because you are being persistant, the ones I have my eye on are Steveling, WaveofShadow and Tehpoofter. But this doesn't necessarily mean they are scum. I rather read more of their play and interactions before I straight out call someone mafia. The majority of these people I haven't played with, and this is my second forum game. If I don't have logic behind my reads, where does that put me? As a freaking town more likely to get mislynched. So hold your horses, let me get my reads, and then we'll talk. She has "a pretty damn good reason" to avoid my question, yet she anwears it. Earlier she said that "we definitely have a mafia or two" but now they are not necessarily scum. Brining out the newbie card, defending accusations that don't exist. I would definitely not call this post unguarded. Based on this I wouldn't clear bunnies so easily, but now you're interesting. What makes you think she was "unguarded" in this post? + Show Spoiler + For the annoyed thing, if she was slightly pissed at me, I would understand this kind of backlash. I agree that she made a terrible post there, my "unguarded" comment did not specifically relate to any one post in particular and more to her style of posting over all. My personal concern with her is actually her sudden clearing of me after I lightly defended her. It's waaaay too early in the game to say you won't lynch someone, even if you qualify it with D1. It still kinda baffles me that you could ignore such a heavy contrast to your generalization about bunnies play. Makes me think that you didn't actually put that much thought into it, which makes me think you might be scum. It's soon 2 AM here, so see you all tomorrow ______ From reading Jampi filter is goes like this: Jampi: Hey Bunnies I think you are scum. Let's interact. (interacting with scumread) Jampi: Hey MZ, do you agree with my scumread on Bunnies. (Interacts with MZ, gives MZ scumread for not seeing what he sees) This shows that jampi had a strong read on Bunnies at that time. Town mindset. Showing how I come to conclusions. Thus there are no filler questions without conclusions. If you refering to my entrance to the thread, then I wonder how you missed my conclusion that you were scum. Do I need to go on? You seriously read me as scum? >.> Even now? Surely it's not based on those early troll posts...? Hm, actually there's a bit more content in your filter than I noticed earlier. You even did come to conclusions based on some of your questions. There are some meaningless questions in between, but I can see some of them being more town-aligned. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 16:11 GMT
#2304
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 16:12 GMT
#2306
On May 23 2014 01:04 mtamburini wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 00:49 Xatalos wrote: On May 23 2014 00:45 mtamburini wrote: Fuck me i gotta read 50 pages since I was last online how the fuck did I get put up for a lynch! Now share your thoughts as much as you can (focusing on scumreads preferably). Mostly the case on you is about being AFK + having too vague/inconclusive reads. Me being AFK imo is not a good reason to cast a vote on someone currently working 2 jobs and I do not get an internet connection at either of them anymore, however i agree on the latter part. My reads are vauge and inconclusive, with day 1 starts I do not have any information to go on so I have to try and figure shit out on my own until Power Roles come out with useful information and then I can apply my reads to them and look back at peoples filters as days go on. Im not a strong day1 player which is my downfall and gets me mislynched a lot because I like posting long as posts with lots of quotes and small notes on them because I find that much more efficient then posting 100 smaller posts. There were a couple players who commented on my long post saying TLDR; which i find suspicious. I feel like mafia would probably be more likely to skip over it if there name was not mentioned in that post. At the same time the people that said my long post was bs (Alakazam was one of the first few) are looking for an easy target to ML day 1. I specifically bring up alakazam because he was questioned by someone about something ( I believe I made a post already calling him out for what I am about to say) and the first thing he responded back was sheeping a read that that person had just finished saying about me doing that long ass post. Not sure if enough people are going to be around closer to deadline so I might be the lynch today so I will leave some parting words if this is the case. With a game with 5 factions (town + 4 others) Mafia also have to scum hunt as well. Looking further down the road you will have to look for connections between people to link them to one faction (doesnt mean they are scum but if one flips scum someone who is defending them may most likely be in same faction) I don't think your lynch is set yet at all. Just try to read the thread and share your thoughts. It'll be good for us even if you end up being lynched. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 16:20 GMT
#2322
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 16:21 GMT
#2324
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 16:24 GMT
#2326
![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 16:42 GMT
#2347
On May 23 2014 01:35 jampidampi wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 01:08 Xatalos wrote: On May 23 2014 00:51 jampidampi wrote: On May 23 2014 00:32 Xatalos wrote: On May 23 2014 00:01 jampidampi wrote: On May 22 2014 23:57 Xatalos wrote: It's weird that he doesn't bother to post anything while having the most votes, yeah..... And since he's been around too..... Dunno. Maybe he's just scum. I still feel like jampidampi would flip scum more likely. You do know that your case on me mostly shows your lack reading comprehension? I guess you refer to the fact that I misread your "case" on mtamburini. It's not an anyhow major part of why I think you're scum, and it carries the same point of you just following thread sentiment anyway. How is that "mostly"? You still don't get it? Others have already shown how I played early, so I'll just quote one of them: On May 22 2014 19:00 Koshi wrote: On May 22 2014 18:46 ritoky wrote: but if you post 10x in a thread and all of it is shit, that's a 100% shit rate, which makes you a shitter in my mind at least. guess it's more of a % useful material thing for me. Since it seems like there is only 3 of us here, let's have a bit of a chat. @Marv/geript I am a little bit hung up on an odd interaction in the early game, that was part of the original reads I gave when I called MZ my top town. It was when he noticed Jampidampi supporting the people he would never lynch on day 1. I was actually a bit wrong on that when I went back and looked at it again. 27ninjabunnies was the one who said it, and she actually said "there is no way I would lynch meapak this game". Which meapak felt was very strange and then jampidampi hopped in to defend bunnies against that and a couple other accusations headed her way at the time. What do you think of that interaction, because to me it seems very odd, or if you don't particularly think anything of it what do you think about those 3 people? I am rereading that and to me it seems jampidampi started with questioning MZ about bunnies. MZ replies that bunnies made an "unguarded" comment and is likely town. jampidampi pressures MZ and is giving bunnies a scumread for being overly defensive. He is telling MZ that the way MZ clears Bunnies is wrong and that he should revisit that read. MZ doesn't do that and jampi gives MZ a light scumread for it. This is pretty towny from Jampi tbh. quotes: ↓ + Show Spoiler + On May 21 2014 07:40 jampidampi wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 07:11 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: On May 21 2014 07:08 jampidampi wrote: Meapak earlier you were interested in 27ninjabunnies, did you gather anything from my conversation with her? If you had to bet on her alignment, what would you guess? ehhhh I understand the part about gut reads, I've had them myself and I know how frustrating it is to try and explain them. I give her (is ninja a her?) a pass for now because her posts seem very unguarded and often early game is when scum are most uptight. Unguarded? To me it seems that she is very defensive here: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 06:52 27ninjabunnies wrote: On May 21 2014 06:45 jampidampi wrote: On May 21 2014 06:39 27ninjabunnies wrote: On May 21 2014 06:27 jampidampi wrote: On May 21 2014 06:21 27ninjabunnies wrote: -- It's also obvious who are going to jump out in the front and try and lead town one way or another. We definitely have a mafia or two in the first couple of pages. You sound confident, enough that I think you have your eye on someone already. Care to share as to who it may be? I may have my eye on a few people. From my experience, there are two type of mafia people: the lurkers, and the ones who like to come out first day and take control of town. I'm focusing on the latter because they are the ones to likely talk more, you can easily find their slips (if any), and they are also more likely to last longer than the lurker mafia. Why are you avoiding my question? I asked you to name your suspicions, but instead you give an indefinite answear and then babble on about something that could reasonably be figured out from your earlier post. If I'm avoiding your question, it's because I have a pretty good damn reason as to why. But because you are being persistant, the ones I have my eye on are Steveling, WaveofShadow and Tehpoofter. But this doesn't necessarily mean they are scum. I rather read more of their play and interactions before I straight out call someone mafia. The majority of these people I haven't played with, and this is my second forum game. If I don't have logic behind my reads, where does that put me? As a freaking town more likely to get mislynched. So hold your horses, let me get my reads, and then we'll talk. She has "a pretty damn good reason" to avoid my question, yet she anwears it. Earlier she said that "we definitely have a mafia or two" but now they are not necessarily scum. Brining out the newbie card, defending accusations that don't exist. I would definitely not call this post unguarded. Based on this I wouldn't clear bunnies so easily, but now you're interesting. What makes you think she was "unguarded" in this post? + Show Spoiler + For the annoyed thing, if she was slightly pissed at me, I would understand this kind of backlash. On May 21 2014 07:56 jampidampi wrote: Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 07:44 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: On May 21 2014 07:40 jampidampi wrote: On May 21 2014 07:11 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: On May 21 2014 07:08 jampidampi wrote: Meapak earlier you were interested in 27ninjabunnies, did you gather anything from my conversation with her? If you had to bet on her alignment, what would you guess? ehhhh I understand the part about gut reads, I've had them myself and I know how frustrating it is to try and explain them. I give her (is ninja a her?) a pass for now because her posts seem very unguarded and often early game is when scum are most uptight. Unguarded? To me it seems that she is very defensive here: On May 21 2014 06:52 27ninjabunnies wrote: On May 21 2014 06:45 jampidampi wrote: On May 21 2014 06:39 27ninjabunnies wrote: On May 21 2014 06:27 jampidampi wrote: On May 21 2014 06:21 27ninjabunnies wrote: -- It's also obvious who are going to jump out in the front and try and lead town one way or another. We definitely have a mafia or two in the first couple of pages. You sound confident, enough that I think you have your eye on someone already. Care to share as to who it may be? I may have my eye on a few people. From my experience, there are two type of mafia people: the lurkers, and the ones who like to come out first day and take control of town. I'm focusing on the latter because they are the ones to likely talk more, you can easily find their slips (if any), and they are also more likely to last longer than the lurker mafia. Why are you avoiding my question? I asked you to name your suspicions, but instead you give an indefinite answear and then babble on about something that could reasonably be figured out from your earlier post. If I'm avoiding your question, it's because I have a pretty good damn reason as to why. But because you are being persistant, the ones I have my eye on are Steveling, WaveofShadow and Tehpoofter. But this doesn't necessarily mean they are scum. I rather read more of their play and interactions before I straight out call someone mafia. The majority of these people I haven't played with, and this is my second forum game. If I don't have logic behind my reads, where does that put me? As a freaking town more likely to get mislynched. So hold your horses, let me get my reads, and then we'll talk. She has "a pretty damn good reason" to avoid my question, yet she anwears it. Earlier she said that "we definitely have a mafia or two" but now they are not necessarily scum. Brining out the newbie card, defending accusations that don't exist. I would definitely not call this post unguarded. Based on this I wouldn't clear bunnies so easily, but now you're interesting. What makes you think she was "unguarded" in this post? + Show Spoiler + For the annoyed thing, if she was slightly pissed at me, I would understand this kind of backlash. I agree that she made a terrible post there, my "unguarded" comment did not specifically relate to any one post in particular and more to her style of posting over all. My personal concern with her is actually her sudden clearing of me after I lightly defended her. It's waaaay too early in the game to say you won't lynch someone, even if you qualify it with D1. It still kinda baffles me that you could ignore such a heavy contrast to your generalization about bunnies play. Makes me think that you didn't actually put that much thought into it, which makes me think you might be scum. It's soon 2 AM here, so see you all tomorrow ______ From reading Jampi filter is goes like this: Jampi: Hey Bunnies I think you are scum. Let's interact. (interacting with scumread) Jampi: Hey MZ, do you agree with my scumread on Bunnies. (Interacts with MZ, gives MZ scumread for not seeing what he sees) This shows that jampi had a strong read on Bunnies at that time. Town mindset. Showing how I come to conclusions. Thus there are no filler questions without conclusions. If you refering to my entrance to the thread, then I wonder how you missed my conclusion that you were scum. Do I need to go on? You seriously read me as scum? >.> Even now? Surely it's not based on those early troll posts...? Hm, actually there's a bit more content in your filter than I noticed earlier. You even did come to conclusions based on some of your questions. There are some meaningless questions in between, but I can see some of them being more town-aligned. No, I don't currently think you're scum, but the case certainly didn't help with that. Though it was a semi-serious read, you have displayed some decent thoughts, like trying to figure Marv out. Hm. Ok. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 16:52 GMT
#2355
On May 22 2014 21:57 Yell0w wrote: Show nested quote + On May 22 2014 21:52 kitaman27 wrote: On May 21 2014 13:56 BlueyD wrote: I don’t like that the case on mtamburini seems to rely on a single post. It’s a really bad post due to format and scope, but the rest of the filter reads okay. On May 22 2014 13:51 BlueyD wrote: ##vote mtamburini Don't think Yellow is replying to me tonight so I'll just have to put my vote on who I think is the strongest case now. ##Vote BlueyD I don't think that makes him scum, I think there was a clear progression in his filter from the case his bad, to the case is good after more points where made, to voting for tamburini. I think Yell0w is probably town for this post. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 17:04 GMT
#2365
Now that I think about it, maybe he's just a bad scum player. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 17:13 GMT
#2368
##Unvote ##Vote: Valenius | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 17:14 GMT
#2369
![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 17:38 GMT
#2387
On May 23 2014 02:35 Koshi wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 02:34 OnceKing wrote: bluey's kinda sketch though i still want to know why there are like 4 votes on odin It's the crazy people. HAHA :D Thanks for a good laugh. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 17:58 GMT
#2408
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 18:01 GMT
#2415
I also kind of agree that Valenius's readpost is similar to mtamburini's readpost in the sense that it's a stream of consciousness post that doesn't come to many conclusions, but seems reasonably genuine anyway. Maybe we shouldn't lynch him yet. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 18:03 GMT
#2417
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 18:05 GMT
#2424
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 18:07 GMT
#2426
##Unvote ##Vote: OdinofPergo | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 18:08 GMT
#2429
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 18:13 GMT
#2435
On May 23 2014 03:11 Koshi wrote: Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. Maybe BH isn't crazy. It's crazy, I know :O | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 18:17 GMT
#2439
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 18:18 GMT
#2442
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 18:23 GMT
#2450
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 19:24 GMT
#2520
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 19:26 GMT
#2523
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 19:54 GMT
#2577
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 20:08 GMT
#2619
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 20:19 GMT
#2634
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 20:35 GMT
#2647
On May 23 2014 05:35 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 05:27 Steveling wrote: Yeah claiming isaac 10 hours after the game started wasn't a reason good enough for that. Scum gonna scum I guess. You can't honestly believe you can actually find like, more than 2 people willing to lynch me, do you? I'm motherfuckin Blazinghand, the best player on TL Mafia, Claimer Extraordinary and Intelligent, He Who Doesn't Always Make Cases, But When He Does He Doesn't, The Catcher of the Three, The RNG Lyncher of Odin. Can you mess with those titles? I think we both know you can't mess. Back down. It's over. It's always been over. A guy like you can't touch a guy like me. :D | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 22:13 GMT
#2699
On May 23 2014 06:46 Steveling wrote: Xatalos's vote history What he thought about Odin literally 4 mins before vote switching, I checked the times. Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 03:05 Xatalos wrote: I was actually talking about Valenius there, but yeah, the same applies to Odin too. Maybe even more so since there's some kind of pretense of scumhunting by Odin. And after 2mins Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 03:07 Xatalos wrote: I think I've become one of the crazy people. ##Unvote ##Vote: OdinofPergo His very next post is him trying to confirm his own bias, which himself admitted was crazy Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 03:08 Xatalos wrote: Odin played similarly as town in that game? How does he play as scum then? 1minute after claiming he stopped using logic, he asks what's Odin's scum play. Right. I understand voting on rng for the fun of it but this is 100% scummy posting. He confirms once again how silly this is Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 03:13 Xatalos wrote: On May 23 2014 03:11 Koshi wrote: Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. Maybe BH isn't crazy. It's crazy, I know :O Why did you ask that scummy question about Odin's scum meta then? Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 03:18 Xatalos wrote: I think Odin/Valenius are the best lynches atm. Gogo ¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿ Since when, 7 mins ago you said it's crazy. His last post of worth is this Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 03:23 Xatalos wrote: That's a bit weird yeah. Hopefully he's just reading the thread. 2 hours before the lynch, he refers to burini who disappeared. Not sure if he thought it was weird or just trying to post a shitty excuse about not voting him and voting Odin instead. I have to point out that I didn't mean the lynch itself was crazy, just that there were some crazy people behind it. Those posts you quoted also don't tell the whole story about my end of day reads. I originally wanted to lynch Valenius (mainly for his apathetic attitude to scumhunting), but Odin's play was so disconnected from his reads (and overall apathetic) that I thought he might be slightly more likely scum. I still somehow want to believe in mtamburini, I don't even think scum would antagonize the thread like that when close to being lynched. I really hope he steps up his play though. Otherwise he may just have to be shot or something. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 22:14 GMT
#2700
On May 23 2014 07:06 Blazinghand wrote: if by some miracle i'm alive? so you expect me to get shot by scum, yet you also want to lynch me? HAHA | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 22:15 GMT
#2701
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 22:34 GMT
#2712
On May 23 2014 07:25 Steveling wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 07:13 Xatalos wrote: On May 23 2014 06:46 Steveling wrote: Xatalos's vote history What he thought about Odin literally 4 mins before vote switching, I checked the times. On May 23 2014 03:05 Xatalos wrote: I was actually talking about Valenius there, but yeah, the same applies to Odin too. Maybe even more so since there's some kind of pretense of scumhunting by Odin. And after 2mins On May 23 2014 03:07 Xatalos wrote: I think I've become one of the crazy people. ##Unvote ##Vote: OdinofPergo His very next post is him trying to confirm his own bias, which himself admitted was crazy On May 23 2014 03:08 Xatalos wrote: Odin played similarly as town in that game? How does he play as scum then? 1minute after claiming he stopped using logic, he asks what's Odin's scum play. Right. I understand voting on rng for the fun of it but this is 100% scummy posting. He confirms once again how silly this is On May 23 2014 03:13 Xatalos wrote: On May 23 2014 03:11 Koshi wrote: Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. Maybe BH isn't crazy. It's crazy, I know :O Why did you ask that scummy question about Odin's scum meta then? On May 23 2014 03:18 Xatalos wrote: I think Odin/Valenius are the best lynches atm. Gogo ¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿ Since when, 7 mins ago you said it's crazy. His last post of worth is this On May 23 2014 03:23 Xatalos wrote: That's a bit weird yeah. Hopefully he's just reading the thread. 2 hours before the lynch, he refers to burini who disappeared. Not sure if he thought it was weird or just trying to post a shitty excuse about not voting him and voting Odin instead. I have to point out that I didn't mean the lynch itself was crazy, just that there were some crazy people behind it. Those posts you quoted also don't tell the whole story about my end of day reads. I originally wanted to lynch Valenius (mainly for his apathetic attitude to scumhunting), but Odin's play was so disconnected from his reads (and overall apathetic) that I thought he might be slightly more likely scum. I still somehow want to believe in mtamburini, I don't even think scum would antagonize the thread like that when close to being lynched. I really hope he steps up his play though. Otherwise he may just have to be shot or something. That's all nice and cute but you didn't say anything of the sort at the time. So I can only take your post as an excuse. Or you can just look at my filter. On May 23 2014 02:38 Xatalos wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 02:35 Koshi wrote: On May 23 2014 02:34 OnceKing wrote: bluey's kinda sketch though i still want to know why there are like 4 votes on odin It's the crazy people. HAHA :D Thanks for a good laugh. ---> This is where the "crazy people" thing came from. On May 23 2014 03:01 Xatalos wrote: I can lynch Odin. I also kind of agree that Valenius's readpost is similar to mtamburini's readpost in the sense that it's a stream of consciousness post that doesn't come to many conclusions, but seems reasonably genuine anyway. Maybe we shouldn't lynch him yet. --> This is where I switch my opinion to lynching Odin instead. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 22 2014 22:36 GMT
#2714
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 11:02 GMT
#2868
On May 23 2014 18:52 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 11:30 Steveling wrote: I'm not even sure if bh and marv are playing this game or just messing around. A bit of both. Which means I'm pretty obviously not mafia because I don't enjoy myself enough as mafia to mess around. I can't give a convincing argument that I'm not another faction though (am not, superhomopinkyswear promise). This is kind of funny since I had a thought about marv belonging to a neutral(?) 3rd party faction earlier, while going to sleep. I think he doesn't tryhard enough to be scum (he's supposed to be quite a bit more serious as scum), but there's something that bothers me deeply about him this game. I just can't see him as town either. Unlike two previous games where I could clearly tell that he was town. He didn't really care about yesterday's lynch either. Conclusion: probably belongs to some (the?) neutral faction. I wish I knew what their win condition was. Benign? Neutral? Anti-town? That'd make some decisions a lot easier. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 11:09 GMT
#2870
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 11:14 GMT
#2872
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 11:16 GMT
#2874
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 11:28 GMT
#2876
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 17:44 GMT
#2924
![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 17:50 GMT
#2927
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 17:51 GMT
#2928
On May 24 2014 02:46 Steveling wrote: Oh look another omgus case. If you consider that a case, I don't know what to say :D | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 17:56 GMT
#2932
On May 24 2014 02:52 Steveling wrote: Show nested quote + On May 24 2014 02:51 Xatalos wrote: On May 24 2014 02:46 Steveling wrote: On May 24 2014 02:44 Xatalos wrote: Hello, Scumeling ![]() Oh look another omgus case. If you consider that a case, I don't know what to say :D Judging by your standards boting on Odin I would say this is a quality case of you. Think what you will. To be clear, that was a joke. It's weird that I have to say it out loud. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 18:19 GMT
#2964
(To be clear: I don't have any strong read on you, but I think you're more likely town based on your constant activity and being engaged with the thread.) | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 18:24 GMT
#2970
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 19:03 GMT
#3034
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 19:04 GMT
#3035
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 19:08 GMT
#3039
On May 24 2014 04:05 Steveling wrote: Show nested quote + On May 24 2014 04:03 Xatalos wrote: Btw the night action deadline passed. If you have something to say that could have affected the night actions earlier, now is the time to say it. That's you trying to seem like you contribute or you soft claim? xD ![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 19:24 GMT
#3053
1) You gain credibility. 2) You eliminate enemy players/KP. What's not to like? Overall it was between Odin/mtamburini at the end at it would have been kind of pointless to keep your vote on Valenius. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 19:42 GMT
#3072
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 19:52 GMT
#3085
Valenius, kush and jampidampi could be good lynch candidates. Valenius for general apathy and disinterest in scumhunting. kush for casually lurking and not having much of an active role in the game. I was mistaken about some of jampidampi's filter earlier, but he's still not doing much and appears weirdly forced/angry whenever he posts. Not a good sign. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 19:56 GMT
#3088
On May 24 2014 04:53 austinmcc wrote: Xat, do you put zero faith in the power of the toilet read? Haha ![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 20:01 GMT
#3095
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 20:01 GMT
#3096
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 20:02 GMT
#3099
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 20:03 GMT
#3100
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 20:04 GMT
#3103
On May 22 2014 00:52 Valenius wrote: Show nested quote + On May 22 2014 00:46 sqrtofneg1 wrote: On May 22 2014 00:45 OdinOfPergo wrote: So some thoughts so far.. I'll try to keep in order as much as possible... but as I just skimmed like 50 pages that might be hard. This whole RNG stuff. It's pointless, it was pointless from the start. My few conclusions I'm going to take away from this are: BH is probably scum. Not as a baseless OMGUS, I'll explain. BH has literally no filter. None at all. I'm not saying I'm in-tune with how BH does his RNG thing people were saying was popular with him. But BH's filter consist of: Let's RNG Odin. No serious guys, let's do it. Guys? Why we no voting for Odin? Ok screw RNG then I'll just call Odin scum. You know the guy who's posted.. not a single time. How did this a RNG roll evolve to a scum read? I mean it's been almost half of day one now and I'm still the only read he has in the game atm. Okok, I lied a bit there. He wanted someone to shoot Geript iirc too. So my conclusion to his filter is: -Useless RNG talk -Filler post -Weird call for a shot on Geript (Dude's an ass? who knew! Geript you horse you.) -Impossible evolution of a scum read on Odin ##Vote: Blazinghand The Steve/Holy/MZ whoever else arguement was pretty weird to me too. I don't think Holy is scum atm. I'm not particularly partial to Steve's spam. 1/10 post he's made amount to anything to me. That worries me. MZ also had a few post I didn't like around this time. But he shares a lot of the reads I have now. So not sure if I just didn't like them because of the context, or because they were bad. I'll have to read his filter later to decide. I'd be fine with Vale lynch. All the reasons already said by other people. I'm totes a sheep if he becomes the lynch. The whole Ceph case on ninjabunnies reads really awful to me tbh. I mean I get what he's saying. But I have no idea why he believes that to be the case. You're basing your top scum read on "she didn't respond the way I expected town to respond." "she didn't think like I think a town should of thought" I mean your case isn't wrong per say. But it is very bad. Consider the player list of this game. If you don't understand why someone responded/acted towards something you were trying to lay a trap for... Umm I guess you might probably just go ahead lynching 1/3 of the player list. Conclusion of your case means I should of been mislynched in 95% of the town games I've ever played. Because I never make any sense.. Moving along, Bunnies case on Thrawn is stupid and bad. But it's not her fault really imo. If I had never played with Thrawn I'd probably be suspicious of him too. I mean this is probably why I'm eerie of Steve right now. His play so far isn't something I'd call super for town. But I have no idea what Steve's play looks like period. Anyway, /end wallpost. I'll be around for a short while before bed. Hopefully I'll be up again early enough to chat with people before work. Why would you be okay with Valenius lynch? Any original reasons? Sqrt, be my knight in shining armour. Travelling home now, so ill post properly in a bit. Fun fact: I took more toilet breaks than I ever have done at work before, just so I could semi-keep up with you all. Hmmm.... I must admit that there's something to the "toilet read". This comment feels somehow genuine. Dunno. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 20:09 GMT
#3112
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 20:11 GMT
#3114
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 20:12 GMT
#3117
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 20:13 GMT
#3120
On May 24 2014 05:11 kitaman27 wrote: Show nested quote + Mercury is the element of water, and therefore encompasses water and ice. Mercury is symbiotic with Jupiter, neutral toward Venus, and in conflict with Mars. Hmm, sounds like factions could possibly be allied/rivals of other factions based on this description from the wiki. So it would be like this? Town Scum Mercury Jupiter Mars or something | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 20:39 GMT
#3172
On May 24 2014 05:36 marvellosity wrote: Koshi died? That is unbelievably annoying You're also Mercury I guess? ![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 20:40 GMT
#3174
On May 24 2014 05:17 kitaman27 wrote: Show nested quote + On May 24 2014 05:13 Xatalos wrote: On May 24 2014 05:11 kitaman27 wrote: Mercury is the element of water, and therefore encompasses water and ice. Mercury is symbiotic with Jupiter, neutral toward Venus, and in conflict with Mars. Hmm, sounds like factions could possibly be allied/rivals of other factions based on this description from the wiki. So it would be like this? Town Scum Mercury Jupiter Mars or something I would think: Town Venus Mercury Jupiter Mars If it's like that, then some of the other factions may be hostile towards each others, some may be neutral, allied etc... | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 20:42 GMT
#3179
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 20:45 GMT
#3188
On May 24 2014 05:42 Blazinghand wrote: Show nested quote + On May 24 2014 05:40 Xatalos wrote: On May 24 2014 05:17 kitaman27 wrote: On May 24 2014 05:13 Xatalos wrote: On May 24 2014 05:11 kitaman27 wrote: Mercury is the element of water, and therefore encompasses water and ice. Mercury is symbiotic with Jupiter, neutral toward Venus, and in conflict with Mars. Hmm, sounds like factions could possibly be allied/rivals of other factions based on this description from the wiki. So it would be like this? Town Scum Mercury Jupiter Mars or something I would think: Town Venus Mercury Jupiter Mars If it's like that, then some of the other factions may be hostile towards each others, some may be neutral, allied etc... I think ShiaoPi would rather go for a like 2+2+2+2 setup, right? so that would be 8 scum vs 24 town. if scum have 4 kp, worst case scenario for town is D1: 24-2-2-2-2, mislynch, 4 shots D2: 19-2-2-2-2 mislynch, 4 shots D3: 14-2-2-2-2 LYLO? since presumably you'd need to lynch both scum to stop a scumteam's kp. Of course, there will be scum shooting at each other etc also happening which will help, but I think I could see the setup with 4x2 scum being balanced That seems plausible. It also means that it would be best if we got rid of the remaining Mercury (or Mercuries) to reduce KP? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 20:48 GMT
#3197
On May 24 2014 05:45 Cavalinho wrote: Mercury is water. Venus is earth. Mars is fire. Jupiter is wind. Koshi's faction didn't kill anyone, so it was likely that the hit was blocked, either by medics, veterans, or other opposing roleblockers. The Venus faction killed Koshi. Mars killed bk. Jupiter killed Meapak. There was no flavor concerning if the adepts/town killed anyone. Either we don't have vigs, they got roleblocked, or they didn't shoot for whatever reason. Doesn't matter now, because scum already knows if they roleblocked the right people or not. So why did those kills make sense to scum? Hmm... Could it be that the Mercury faction is neutral and doesn't have KP? (since Koshi's name was black instead of red) Or maybe their KP went to Steveling. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 20:51 GMT
#3202
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 20:53 GMT
#3206
On May 24 2014 05:51 Steveling wrote: I don't like how BH was the first to clearly speak about the setting after all these kills happened. Seems like he's one of them djinnis. But then why did he claimed isaac? But then why is scummy slam sheeping him? It all rests in the isaac role and I'm willing to take the risk of unveiling a good town role too early than him being scum surviving until late game abusing his semi-claim. If BH is still alive at LYLO and hasn't produced something good with his role, I think it's safe to lynch him. It'd be stupid to force him to fully roleclaim right now. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 21:33 GMT
#3267
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 21:40 GMT
#3278
On May 24 2014 06:27 Steveling wrote: Show nested quote + On May 24 2014 06:26 Blazinghand wrote: So, I'm not gonna reveal how I know this, but I know this and people need to know it. This is what I got: You can be controlled by a djinn I don't know what the connotations etc of that are. Maybe a djinn is a player, or an ability, or whatever, but it's possible to be controlled by a djinn. Is this alignment changing or is it your vote, or your actions, or some combination? Again, I don't know. All I know is what is bolded. That's crazy. If it's true I'm pretty sure that someone can use you as a bullet to kp someone else. Scumeling, can you explain this? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 21:45 GMT
#3294
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 21:47 GMT
#3299
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 21:50 GMT
#3305
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 21:52 GMT
#3308
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 21:56 GMT
#3312
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 22:00 GMT
#3318
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 22:03 GMT
#3321
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 22:04 GMT
#3323
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 22:06 GMT
#3326
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 22:09 GMT
#3329
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 22:11 GMT
#3333
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 22:23 GMT
#3356
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 22:24 GMT
#3360
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 22:28 GMT
#3367
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 22:38 GMT
#3371
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 22:40 GMT
#3373
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 22:41 GMT
#3375
Vote: kushm4sta | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 22:45 GMT
#3379
On May 24 2014 06:46 kushm4sta wrote: wat there is recruitment this game also??? are you fucking kidding me. scumhunting is 100% useless so good luck with that It's a totally useless message that actually even pushes scum agenda. Is this something that a townie would say? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 22:54 GMT
#3392
On May 24 2014 07:47 mtamburini wrote: Show nested quote + On May 24 2014 07:38 Xatalos wrote: mtamburini: You've been here today and commented on some stuff. Could you actually scumhunt or something in that direction? Have you even caught up with the thread yet? Just trying to understand the conversations that are going on right now, not sure what to make of it. Have not caught up yet but working on it. I plan to be caught up sometime tomorrow evening around the 24 hours mark I need to go to sleep in a couple hours I have work early tomorrow morning. With this being only an allignemnt flip game Im having trouble taking into consideration why certain people die over others (IE softing roles for example) All I can base the town kills off of are the scum thought they were the most towny people playing or if a town role decided to shoot them because they thought they were scummy. As far as I know no one has claimed any shots just yet so Im going to assume Scum have a Kp of 3 so there might be only one non town aligned factioned that is non threatening. With regards to the koshi death the same logic applies with the town people dying, did another faction think they were acting really town and shot him or did a town PR shoot him thinking he was scummy. Its hard to me do decipher information by the way the posts are being written, it seems like someone is writing up minutes to a meeting of what each person said. Its feel like were all conversing at a round table and there is bickering back and forth between parties. Almost like video mafia except I cant get any body reads of facial reactions from anyone. You should make catching up and forming reads your top priority. It's not very constructive to read the latest pages and just make vague comments. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 23:02 GMT
#3400
On May 24 2014 07:57 mtamburini wrote: Show nested quote + On May 24 2014 07:54 Xatalos wrote: On May 24 2014 07:47 mtamburini wrote: On May 24 2014 07:38 Xatalos wrote: mtamburini: You've been here today and commented on some stuff. Could you actually scumhunt or something in that direction? Have you even caught up with the thread yet? Just trying to understand the conversations that are going on right now, not sure what to make of it. Have not caught up yet but working on it. I plan to be caught up sometime tomorrow evening around the 24 hours mark I need to go to sleep in a couple hours I have work early tomorrow morning. With this being only an allignemnt flip game Im having trouble taking into consideration why certain people die over others (IE softing roles for example) All I can base the town kills off of are the scum thought they were the most towny people playing or if a town role decided to shoot them because they thought they were scummy. As far as I know no one has claimed any shots just yet so Im going to assume Scum have a Kp of 3 so there might be only one non town aligned factioned that is non threatening. With regards to the koshi death the same logic applies with the town people dying, did another faction think they were acting really town and shot him or did a town PR shoot him thinking he was scummy. Its hard to me do decipher information by the way the posts are being written, it seems like someone is writing up minutes to a meeting of what each person said. Its feel like were all conversing at a round table and there is bickering back and forth between parties. Almost like video mafia except I cant get any body reads of facial reactions from anyone. You should make catching up and forming reads your top priority. It's not very constructive to read the latest pages and just make vague comments. I appreciate the help and advice you are giving me, unfortunately the last time I remember getting spoonfed like this I ended up in the pocket of scum ![]() I can assure you I'm not scum. Now gogo read stuff ![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 23 2014 23:39 GMT
#3428
On May 24 2014 08:33 mattisfoolish wrote: Show nested quote + On May 24 2014 04:24 austinmcc wrote: kush. Kush's filter is tiny and not too helpful, but it reads like the right amount of giving no fucks and giving out fuck yous. He complains a little about spamminess, which is fine by me. He complains when people can't understand arguments, which is fine by me. He's not DOING anything really, but in a way that strikes me as town. This is a correct read but drawing the wrong conclusion; you've essentially given the tl;dr of my case but you didn't do the history check to see what it means for him. As I indirectly said above, what you said is indicative of his mafia play, not his town play. I think we can all agree that Kush is someone who always makes spammy, aggressive one-liners and in general just gives zero fucks. So there's not much to be garnered from that. However this is something to be garnered from how many reads he gives and thoughts about the players in the game. Let me demonstrate this by example. In our game I gathered all the posts where he directly says "I think person X is town/mafia". There's a total of two posts (maybe 3 if I missed one). + Show Spoiler + On May 22 2014 05:55 kushm4sta wrote: i think hapa is scumm because the below plus his case on valeris (or w/e) look like scum cases. Very surface level, generic, uncanny familiarity with what scum do. Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 11:25 Hapahauli wrote: + Show Spoiler + Ok Valenius can wait. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?page=33#650 This is the scummiest post in this thread by far. It is extremely long, and could not be more useless. He's making a show of contributing to the town without actually providing anything in the way of analysis. There's nothing constructive posting one's "reads" in this manner. It's just a giant mind-dump with a bunch of quotes - a format that no one could possibly pick any useful information out of. On top of it, the actual content of the post just shits and shits on random things that players have said in the game. It's a very common type of post for mafia to make, and I'd like to see this guy dead. ##Unvote ##Vote mtanburini Show nested quote + On May 21 2014 11:50 Hapahauli wrote: On May 21 2014 11:43 27ninjabunnies wrote: See, I don't find tamburini's post all that bad. Sure it was only focused on certain people, one of them including me, but its nt unlikely for him to include me specifically in his reads because we play video mafia together. Some of his reads were pretty good, and I like it questioning, though I completely agree some of it was filler. The problem with his post isn't necessarily that every little bit of info is terrible. The problem is the presentation and scope. Firstly, it's almost designed to be the least efficient/effective way of communicating one's reads/information. When a townie finds someone suspicious, they are generally direct about it "I find <xxx> town, and <yyy> suspicious, for <zzz> reason." However this post is just a clusterfuck. His reads are buried in the middle of irrelevant banter, and hell he changes his mind on reads of the course of his post! The post is not designed to be helpful - it's designed to be massive and showy. Ergo, he's trying to appear like he's contributing without actually contributing. Secondly, the scope of the post is just a mess. He just finds random things in the thread that he doesn't agree with and is really snarky about them. That's a really common mafia tactic - to find a bunch of things to critique/shit-on in the thread. It gives the effect of making one appear to contribute, when in reality, nitpicking several posters is generally easy, creates paranoia, and serves no real constructive purpose to actually finding mafia. On May 23 2014 05:49 kushm4sta wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 05:41 marvellosity wrote: the vets who sheeped the Odin case look the worst like me? btw i think wos requesting replacement means he is town Now I went to his filter in his town game, Normal Mini Mafia Episode 1 here and did the same thing. Keep in mind this game only last two days. + Show Spoiler + On January 20 2014 10:13 kushm4sta wrote: thrawn is scum because he's wrong lol On January 20 2014 22:23 kushm4sta wrote: Feels thrawn's town. wiley is town i think rayn is town i think VE is town balla is scummy for being a scumhunter extraordinaire yet doing nothing On January 20 2014 22:45 kushm4sta wrote: i think bum is town On January 20 2014 23:03 kushm4sta wrote: Show nested quote + On January 20 2014 23:00 VisceraEyes wrote: They won't get tucked by counterclaims because a counterclaim doesn't mean anything as there can be more than one Boxer. So there aren't going to be any counterclaims. So when is this magical moment when we suddenly know who all the boxers are Kish? godamn it is turning me on how you keep calling me kish. we know at lylo when all the claims claim. We will probably know before then because that's just what usually happens. fine i agree to disagree with you VE. Still have you as town. On January 21 2014 07:38 kushm4sta wrote: bum is scum and he is implying that you, VE, are wrong, and therefore town. I'm not even half-way through his filter at this point... For comparison, here's a game where he's mafia. + Show Spoiler + On February 23 2014 23:34 kushm4sta wrote: and fuck no are you obv town. i have seen you push scum teammates like that d1. LIQUID CITY On February 24 2014 22:15 kushm4sta wrote: koshi probalby scum also. all game all he does is tunnel me (major lynchbait), easy to make a "case" against now he is speechless "Cool Foolishness, you know how to data mine, but what does it mean?" Let me tell you what it means. When Kush is town, he is very open about giving his reads in his posts. He directly tells the town "this person is town here's why, this person is mafia here's why". Of course these come in the form of one-liners so the reasons aren't substantial (which is okay). This shows a town mindset, he's trying to figure out the game and he's not afraid to speak his mind which are both strong town characteristics. However these sorts of posts are absent when he's mafia. Why? He doesn't feel the need to tell the town who is town and who is mafia because he already knows. That's what is happening this game and what happens in the games he's mafia. I checked two of his other games (one town, one mafia) and they both align in this matter. Austin mentioned that Kush is complaining about spaminess, but that's not okay. He's complaining about spaminess but not doing anything to help the town. That's what mafia do and they do so well: tell the town they are sucking, running in circles, or needlessly fighting with each other. It's an easy thing to say and makes it look like they are helping when they aren't. And that's how you catch someone doing that, when they say what the town's problem is but not doing anything to help. ##Vote: Kushm4sta I think kush has a pretty decent chance to flip scum here. I like this post and it's most likely correct. kush was just more open and contributive as town. Let's get the wagon going! | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 10:54 GMT
#3569
![]() Not that I'm hugely better myself though. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 10:57 GMT
#3570
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 11:22 GMT
#3571
On May 24 2014 15:21 Alakaslam wrote: Show nested quote + On May 24 2014 15:14 geript wrote: BH I would like to point out that if I had a vendetta against you, I would just egged Scumeling on towards you as much as I could. Wait a minute Someone prolly djinni Steve? What does this mean? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 11:24 GMT
#3572
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 11:39 GMT
#3573
On May 22 2014 21:57 Yell0w wrote: Show nested quote + On May 22 2014 21:52 kitaman27 wrote: On May 21 2014 13:56 BlueyD wrote: I don’t like that the case on mtamburini seems to rely on a single post. It’s a really bad post due to format and scope, but the rest of the filter reads okay. On May 22 2014 13:51 BlueyD wrote: ##vote mtamburini Don't think Yellow is replying to me tonight so I'll just have to put my vote on who I think is the strongest case now. ##Vote BlueyD I don't think that makes him scum, I think there was a clear progression in his filter from the case his bad, to the case is good after more points where made, to voting for tamburini. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 11:42 GMT
#3574
BH Alakaslam Steveling geript Holyflare Hapa Foolishness Kita | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 11:50 GMT
#3575
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 14:45 GMT
#3579
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 14:47 GMT
#3580
##Unvote ##Vote: BlueyD | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 14:50 GMT
#3582
On May 24 2014 04:09 jampidampi wrote: You should all feel bad about not lynching tamburini. Just look at how reliefed he is about not getting lynched while proceeding to do nothing helpful. If a vig doesn't flip him I'll be pushing for his lynch D2. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 15:34 GMT
#3584
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 15:51 GMT
#3587
On May 25 2014 00:50 Yell0w wrote: ##Vote: BlueyD Done. That was fast. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 16:52 GMT
#3603
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 16:58 GMT
#3605
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 16:59 GMT
#3606
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 17:07 GMT
#3608
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 17:09 GMT
#3609
##Unvote ##Vote sqrtofneg1 | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 17:13 GMT
#3613
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 18:20 GMT
#3623
On May 25 2014 03:09 austinmcc wrote: Show nested quote + Given that the other hydra was town and seemed to believe he should be trusted, as well as the bit from elderly peruvian man about how one head was likely sand (and iirc, some analysis of a specific wording that pointed towards americas or maybe sand in brazil), do you think that in a 5 faction game, a Foolishness hydra and a Sandroba hydra both go townside for balance?On May 24 2014 20:50 Xatalos wrote: Foolishness is probably most likely town out of the veteran players. I think the roles are given out randomly and not based on player skill? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 18:44 GMT
#3635
On May 25 2014 03:25 austinmcc wrote: Show nested quote + Normally there's some consideration for balance. I would not expect a possible Sandroba, Foolishness, and the elderly heterosexual peruvian to be of one faction.On May 25 2014 03:20 Xatalos wrote: On May 25 2014 03:09 austinmcc wrote: On May 24 2014 20:50 Xatalos wrote: Given that the other hydra was town and seemed to believe he should be trusted, as well as the bit from elderly peruvian man about how one head was likely sand (and iirc, some analysis of a specific wording that pointed towards americas or maybe sand in brazil), do you think that in a 5 faction game, a Foolishness hydra and a Sandroba hydra both go townside for balance?Foolishness is probably most likely town out of the veteran players. I think the roles are given out randomly and not based on player skill? I think a little less strongly that both hydras wouldn't be one alignment. Town hydras strong, town hydras with strong players super strong. The only issue with this game is the closed setup, so it would be possible that things are balanced around town having strong PLAYERS. But the game would have to be designed BEFORE it was posted, so you wouldn't know who would sign up or hydra, and I don't think you'd balance in light of that. You'd already be set. There was that PYP game about half a year ago though where all the experienced players were town and the scumteam just lurked to their death. Dunno. I think it's usually random. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 18:51 GMT
#3637
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 19:21 GMT
#3646
I'm not sure if you're correct here, austin. I read it as Foolishness saying that kush doesn't really care too much generally, but in this game he *does* care (enough to complain about stuff) yet he spends his energy on something as unproductive while he could do something useful instead. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 19:31 GMT
#3651
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 19:32 GMT
#3653
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 19:34 GMT
#3654
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 19:42 GMT
#3657
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 19:59 GMT
#3663
![]() And I still don't think that Foolishness's case is bad/scummy. But I'll let him defend himself, I can't be completely sure what he was thinking on that specific point. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 20:00 GMT
#3664
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 20:19 GMT
#3677
On May 25 2014 05:14 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 23 2014 05:34 MysteryMeat1 wrote: sorry for not voting, super face palm moment, thought deadline was at 3pm pst... this guy. this guy is mafia or he sucks severely. kush's efforts put this guy to shame. And when that's the case you know something's not right. ROFL. That's seriously so bad as either town or scum. He would be the optimal Vig target IMO. Too bad I don't have a gun. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 20:24 GMT
#3682
##Unvote ##Vote: MysteryMeat1 | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 20:35 GMT
#3684
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 20:37 GMT
#3687
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 20:51 GMT
#3689
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 21:51 GMT
#3693
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 22:06 GMT
#3696
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 24 2014 22:31 GMT
#3701
On May 25 2014 07:25 Blazinghand wrote: technically RNG is policy BTW Now you finally convinced me that RNG is a good method for lynching. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 10:47 GMT
#4004
1) You were in Koshi's faction? 2) Did you "recruit" anyone yet? 3) What does "recruiting" actually do? Does the target become non-town? 4) What's the specific flavor on "recruiting" someone? Is it something like "being controlled by a Djinn"? 5) If so, I have reason to believe that this state of being controlled is temporary. That's why I have difficulty believing that it works like you said. If you make your target share your QT and stuff, won't he just reveal everything if he goes back to normal? 6) Do you have KP? 7) If so, who did you shoot last night? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 10:48 GMT
#4005
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 11:17 GMT
#4008
On May 25 2014 19:55 layabout wrote: I refuse to work on the assumption that there are multiple recruiting factions Ritoky sounds like a rolechecker. I don't understand the timing of his claim nor the fact that he doesn't appear to understand the mechanics of his role. Rito pls, can you clarify? We need to decide if we are banking on winning with 3p which seems dumb or just killing slam/bh/austin. Also, congratulations to anybody aligned to the adepts with a non-vanilla role that hasn't claimed halfway into day 2. My role isn't all that important, I think. I doubt the scum faction would kill me. Perhaps austin's faction, but eh, I think austin has to work with town for now. I refuse to believe that BH/Slam are scum/3P together and decided to go with the brilliant idea of linking each other as the same alignment... | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 11:44 GMT
#4010
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 11:49 GMT
#4011
If there's someone out there who can prevent Djinni from controlling people, you should probably use that ability on me. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 12:18 GMT
#4017
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 12:42 GMT
#4023
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 14:51 GMT
#4041
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 16:29 GMT
#4057
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 16:36 GMT
#4059
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 16:38 GMT
#4060
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 16:48 GMT
#4064
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 16:49 GMT
#4066
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 16:54 GMT
#4068
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 16:56 GMT
#4070
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 16:58 GMT
#4073
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 16:59 GMT
#4074
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 17:04 GMT
#4080
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 17:05 GMT
#4082
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 17:38 GMT
#4104
And the fact that you claim the KP being gone once you die....... It's kind of hard not to lynch you ![]() Btw I think the most eager ones to lynch austin probably belong to the faction that's hostile towards Mars. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 17:45 GMT
#4106
austin, do you have any idea about the remaining player(s) in Mercury? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 17:47 GMT
#4109
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 17:52 GMT
#4111
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:00 GMT
#4125
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:01 GMT
#4128
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:07 GMT
#4138
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:07 GMT
#4139
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:08 GMT
#4142
On May 26 2014 03:08 Steveling wrote: Yes I was recruited and am now blindly defending him because that's smart. ![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:14 GMT
#4152
On May 26 2014 03:03 marvellosity wrote: why on earth would we not kill austin? he singlehandedly can take out 2 townies per night. Indeed that's what he did last night. He's as dangerous as all the other factions put together probably. Plus after he talked about how amusing he finds the thought of lynching me, he obviously has to swing. The difference is, though, that (apparently) austin's faction can with with town and needs to reach endgame with one of the other factions dead. So it's at least a somewhat pro-town faction. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:15 GMT
#4153
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:16 GMT
#4157
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:21 GMT
#4169
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:22 GMT
#4172
On May 26 2014 03:21 Steveling wrote: Show nested quote + On May 26 2014 03:19 austinmcc wrote: Don't lose ALL djinns. Just the one I send. Again, based on the game it's similar to pokemans and I'm the fire gym leader or something. I choose a fire pokemans to send out, and it just burns roles off mafia, not converts, but I still my other pokemans cuz I'd be a shitty gum leader with just one pokemans. Or to put it in perspective, austin *could* purge 1 scum's role and kill another. It's like magic init? But you won't see djinni marv saying anything about that. marv = Mercury It is known ![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:26 GMT
#4180
On May 26 2014 03:24 Steveling wrote: Show nested quote + On May 26 2014 03:23 marvellosity wrote: On May 26 2014 03:22 Xatalos wrote: On May 26 2014 03:21 Steveling wrote: On May 26 2014 03:19 austinmcc wrote: Don't lose ALL djinns. Just the one I send. Again, based on the game it's similar to pokemans and I'm the fire gym leader or something. I choose a fire pokemans to send out, and it just burns roles off mafia, not converts, but I still my other pokemans cuz I'd be a shitty gum leader with just one pokemans. Or to put it in perspective, austin *could* purge 1 scum's role and kill another. It's like magic init? But you won't see djinni marv saying anything about that. marv = Mercury It is known ![]() If I'm not, do you accept that I can gloat like a total bastard in your face postgame, and you will accept it with good grace? So you are scum. This is a perfect logical conclusion. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:29 GMT
#4182
On May 26 2014 03:23 austinmcc wrote: Show nested quote + WellOn May 26 2014 03:21 Xatalos wrote: What do you think would happen if we both visited each other, austin? I recruit. Permanently. I don't think you can unrecruit (see stuff about QTs). Therefore, you're either lying about something OR you're involved in something else As far as I know, if you're town I would recruit you, you'd lose your powers but gain better ones, you'd become cooler, you'd get to hang out in a cool QT, be nice and warm, etc. etc. Notice how all those are positive. If you're mafia, I would burn all yo powers off, because my powers are awesome and I've decided they're better than whatever scum powers you would have. Which is to say I don't think I become a vanilla me. Well, the wording is about this: "You can remove an attached Djinn and restore it to your control." Does that help? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:34 GMT
#4190
On May 26 2014 03:32 jampidampi wrote: Show nested quote + On May 26 2014 03:29 Xatalos wrote: On May 26 2014 03:23 austinmcc wrote: On May 26 2014 03:21 Xatalos wrote: WellWhat do you think would happen if we both visited each other, austin? I recruit. Permanently. I don't think you can unrecruit (see stuff about QTs). Therefore, you're either lying about something OR you're involved in something else As far as I know, if you're town I would recruit you, you'd lose your powers but gain better ones, you'd become cooler, you'd get to hang out in a cool QT, be nice and warm, etc. etc. Notice how all those are positive. If you're mafia, I would burn all yo powers off, because my powers are awesome and I've decided they're better than whatever scum powers you would have. Which is to say I don't think I become a vanilla me. Well, the wording is about this: "You can remove an attached Djinn and restore it to your control." Does that help? Wait, if the djinni is returned to be under your control, doesn't that mean you controlled it orginally? I think it means that I remove a Djinn from a player and that player returns to our control (Adepts of Weyard instead of Mercury/Mars/etc.). | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:37 GMT
#4196
On May 26 2014 03:36 Steveling wrote: Don't think it's possible to swap factions 2nd time. Like, what, someone goes town-djinni-town and then he's like "yo guys, I was just talking to them lot in the djinni qt, they are x-z and y", lol. ROFL yeah, that's what I've been wondering about... | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:39 GMT
#4197
On May 26 2014 03:34 austinmcc wrote: Show nested quote + It makes me think you're town and that you shouldn't have revealed this On May 26 2014 03:29 Xatalos wrote: On May 26 2014 03:23 austinmcc wrote: On May 26 2014 03:21 Xatalos wrote: WellWhat do you think would happen if we both visited each other, austin? I recruit. Permanently. I don't think you can unrecruit (see stuff about QTs). Therefore, you're either lying about something OR you're involved in something else As far as I know, if you're town I would recruit you, you'd lose your powers but gain better ones, you'd become cooler, you'd get to hang out in a cool QT, be nice and warm, etc. etc. Notice how all those are positive. If you're mafia, I would burn all yo powers off, because my powers are awesome and I've decided they're better than whatever scum powers you would have. Which is to say I don't think I become a vanilla me. Well, the wording is about this: "You can remove an attached Djinn and restore it to your control." Does that help? ![]() I have some thoughts but I don't want to reveal them because I don't think it would be helpful. Show nested quote + Yes. Each djinn is a specific power, I choose what to try and assign to someone. As far as what power? I dunno, how 'bout the power of flight? That do anything for ya? That's levitation, homes.On May 26 2014 03:29 BlueyD wrote: Austin do you know what powers you can give people in advance? What power does your 1st recruit have? Please share those thoughts. If you do, I'll do everything in my power to save you. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:39 GMT
#4198
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:43 GMT
#4202
On May 26 2014 03:42 Steveling wrote: Marv and HF earth djinnis. ? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:50 GMT
#4211
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:51 GMT
#4215
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:54 GMT
#4226
On May 26 2014 03:52 Steveling wrote: Show nested quote + On May 26 2014 03:51 Xatalos wrote: Steveling, could you use one of your casks or whatever on me tonight? Hmmm, do you think people will kill you? My stuff don't protect from recruitment I think. The way austin worded that seemed like scum would be rushing to kill me. At least you can say that you'll protect me so that they'll think twice. And I don't think I'll be recruited if I'm such a high priority kill target. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 18:56 GMT
#4229
On May 26 2014 03:54 Steveling wrote: lmao ROFL! ![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 19:01 GMT
#4242
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 19:02 GMT
#4245
On May 26 2014 04:01 austinmcc wrote: MARS FACTION BEST FACTION. MERCURY FACTION WORST FACTION. So you admit that Mercury is your enemy >.> | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 19:03 GMT
#4246
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 19:06 GMT
#4252
On May 26 2014 04:03 Holyflare wrote: Xatalos implying i shouldn't be saved. Steveling implying I'm earth djin. This game is lol. You're the hero this town deserves, but I'm the hero it needs right now. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 19:12 GMT
#4262
##Unvote ##Vote: thrawn2112 | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 19:13 GMT
#4263
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 19:14 GMT
#4266
On May 26 2014 04:14 austinmcc wrote: I wish I'd recruited YOU :D:D | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 19:16 GMT
#4268
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 19:17 GMT
#4272
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 19:21 GMT
#4283
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 19:23 GMT
#4287
On May 26 2014 04:22 Steveling wrote: Show nested quote + On May 26 2014 04:21 Xatalos wrote: Btw Steveling, are you going to protect me or not? Um, I think I'll waste all my stuff on me you and hf. A good idea might be to go to random.org and protect one of us. That way it's less likely that one of us is killed. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 19:25 GMT
#4292
On May 26 2014 04:24 Steveling wrote: Why not protect all of us? Oh, you can protect multiple people at the same time? That's nice. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 19:31 GMT
#4298
On May 26 2014 04:30 Erandorr wrote: Show nested quote + On May 26 2014 04:29 Steveling wrote: Also, if austin survives this I'll sacrifice myself and protect him instead of me. r u on crack I laughed IRL when I read these two posts :D | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 19:33 GMT
#4301
On May 26 2014 04:32 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 25 2014 18:52 Erandorr wrote: Can someone explain to me in small words why austin gave us that information about himself? Show nested quote + On May 25 2014 18:52 Erandorr wrote: It is fantastic scum vote draw though look at that shit lollycopters By WE, I guess he refers to his faction ![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 19:38 GMT
#4305
On May 26 2014 04:36 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On May 26 2014 04:31 austinmcc wrote: I've got a not-town check on me and I'm townier than 2/3 this game Welcome to golden sun mafia :/ The promised land for scum and 3P. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 19:45 GMT
#4313
Now that I think about it a bit more.... | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 19:55 GMT
#4327
On May 26 2014 04:54 Holyflare wrote: Assuming i survive the night :p Dw Scumeling will protect you from harm | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 19:57 GMT
#4332
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 19:58 GMT
#4334
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 20:02 GMT
#4343
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 20:05 GMT
#4349
bkqyrldp, aligned with the Adepts was charred to a crisp! Meapak_Ziphh, aligned with the Adepts was electrocuted So... Mars = fire (killed blfsjfkfsjfs last night - random KP?) Mercury = ? Venus = ? Jupiter = ? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 20:05 GMT
#4350
On May 26 2014 05:03 Holyflare wrote: So geript shoot the shit out of thrawn plz +1 | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 20:13 GMT
#4364
Mars = fire (austinmcc down, 1 player converted during N1? - killed blfsjfkfsjfs last night - random KP?) Mercury = water (Koshi down, 1 left? - didn't kill anyone last night - no KP / protected / roleblocked?) Venus = earth (2 left? - killed Koshi last night) Jupiter = lightning (2 left? - killed MZ last night) | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 20:40 GMT
#4379
On May 26 2014 05:37 27ninjabunnies wrote: Finally caught up on reading!!! Wooooo Okay... So should there be much night discussion? Im kinda confused on the recruitment stuff... So austin said only he had kp right, not the person he recruited? Yeah, and we'll see if that's true in about 24h (if there's no fire death). If you have something crucial to say, you should leave it until the last hour (when night actions are locked). If it's nothing game-breaking, you can talk freely. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 20:44 GMT
#4381
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 20:45 GMT
#4382
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 20:45 GMT
#4383
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 20:51 GMT
#4386
![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 21:39 GMT
#4398
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 25 2014 23:59 GMT
#4440
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 00:13 GMT
#4458
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 00:19 GMT
#4462
On May 26 2014 09:09 Holyflare wrote: I started on sc2 mafia. Roflstomped every game. I once won like 6 games in a row. It's a bit dependent on luck too though. Usually there's like Mafia, SK, Arsonist etc. A ton of power roles. The night actions have a huge impact on the game. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 00:23 GMT
#4469
On May 26 2014 09:21 Cavalinho wrote: Show nested quote + On May 26 2014 09:19 Xatalos wrote: On May 26 2014 09:09 Holyflare wrote: I started on sc2 mafia. Roflstomped every game. I once won like 6 games in a row. It's a bit dependent on luck too though. Usually there's like Mafia, SK, Arsonist etc. A ton of power roles. The night actions have a huge impact on the game. The night actions are the game. I don't think I've ever been in a game where it came down to outarguing someone, especially since days only last 2 minutes or so. I've seen some games like that. 90% of the time town just relies on power roles though :/ (if most of the players don't talk at all for example) | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 00:29 GMT
#4475
On May 26 2014 09:27 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On May 26 2014 09:19 Xatalos wrote: On May 26 2014 09:09 Holyflare wrote: I started on sc2 mafia. Roflstomped every game. I once won like 6 games in a row. It's a bit dependent on luck too though. Usually there's like Mafia, SK, Arsonist etc. A ton of power roles. The night actions have a huge impact on the game. Well when i played i was ranked and everyone let me do my saved setup which was mostly vanilla Oh ok. That's a different type of game then. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 10:28 GMT
#4633
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 10:30 GMT
#4634
On May 26 2014 10:25 thrawn2112 wrote: I've returned. I've journeyed twice unto the abyss, both ventures being a success. I've glimpsed many endgames, and only a few to my liking. The path to victory lies through [redacted]'s battered corpse! He was not there. I saw a vision. A vision, of mine own endgame. Many were there... were they my foes? My allies? I could not say. All I knew was that I was victorious, and [redacted] was nowhere to be seen. THEREFORE, the heretic [redacted] must be purged from this game! All you who seek to win, direct your malice upon the heretic [redacted]! I post this now as a tribute to those who whose blood floweth green! This is either a blue claim (redcheck or something like that?) or a plot to survive for a little longer. Maybe geript should shoot someone else just in case. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 10:36 GMT
#4635
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 10:38 GMT
#4636
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 10:39 GMT
#4637
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 12:09 GMT
#4640
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 13:43 GMT
#4642
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 17:09 GMT
#4643
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 18:18 GMT
#4646
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 18:42 GMT
#4650
On May 27 2014 03:27 Holyflare wrote: I have rng'd, interesting result! It's super effective! | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 18:46 GMT
#4652
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 18:47 GMT
#4653
On May 27 2014 03:45 27ninjabunnies wrote: Show nested quote + On May 27 2014 03:42 Xatalos wrote: On May 27 2014 03:27 Holyflare wrote: I have rng'd, interesting result! It's super effective! BH | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:00 GMT
#4654
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:01 GMT
#4656
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:04 GMT
#4659
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:07 GMT
#4661
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:08 GMT
#4662
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:20 GMT
#4666
On May 27 2014 04:12 marvellosity wrote: I've done that with players too. Mostly everyone actually. You mean like everyone not in your faction? | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:21 GMT
#4668
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:24 GMT
#4670
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:26 GMT
#4673
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:27 GMT
#4675
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:36 GMT
#4676
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:37 GMT
#4680
On May 27 2014 04:36 marvellosity wrote: as in, tehpoofter, I'm not randomly calling you gay >.> | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:39 GMT
#4682
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:40 GMT
#4683
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:41 GMT
#4685
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:41 GMT
#4686
On May 27 2014 04:41 marvellosity wrote: totes gay. I hope you don't post anything more and die tonight :D | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:46 GMT
#4689
On May 27 2014 04:42 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 27 2014 04:41 Xatalos wrote: On May 27 2014 04:41 marvellosity wrote: totes gay. I hope you don't post anything more and die tonight :D I'm not sure how to take that ![]() It'd just be a funny last message for you. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:46 GMT
#4691
On May 27 2014 04:43 Cavalinho wrote: This just in: Xatalos is confirmed gay. I was found out ![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:47 GMT
#4692
On May 27 2014 04:46 Holyflare wrote: Rng'd myself as check thanks bh! If i die kill steve, if geript hasn't shot and claims rb kill geript because no way he gets rb'd over me ........................... | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:49 GMT
#4693
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:52 GMT
#4696
![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:52 GMT
#4697
![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:54 GMT
#4700
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:55 GMT
#4704
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:56 GMT
#4708
On May 27 2014 04:55 Holyflare wrote: .... I just put my faith in the rng. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:58 GMT
#4711
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 19:59 GMT
#4714
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 20:05 GMT
#4730
Mars = fire (austinmcc down, 1 player converted during N1, 1 player converted during N2? - killed blfsjfkfsjfs N1, no kill N2 - random KP, now gone?) Mercury = water (Koshi down, 1 left? - didn't kill anyone N1 or N2 - no KP probably?) Venus = earth (2 left? - killed Koshi N1, killed marv N2) Jupiter = lightning (2 left? - killed MZ N1, killed ritoky N2) | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 20:07 GMT
#4732
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 20:08 GMT
#4733
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 20:10 GMT
#4734
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 20:11 GMT
#4737
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 20:12 GMT
#4740
On May 27 2014 05:11 Valenius wrote: He had pokemon that he attached to people, which was how he recruited them. Do you really think he'd have a role giveout that adds another recruiter? That'd effectively give him 3kp a night, and then that recruiter would have another recruiter role giveaway etc etc etc In Doctor Who Mafia the conversion power was factional. That might be the case here. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 20:13 GMT
#4741
On May 27 2014 05:12 layabout wrote: yeah there is absolutely nowhere in shoapi's posts that mention kill flavor is relevant it's a shaky and kinda pointless assumption you are making. in fact: now cut it out Can't you see with your own eyes that kill flavor is relevant? Just see how each enemy faction has their own flavor for example. I doubt a town Vig would have any of those elemental flavors. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 20:14 GMT
#4745
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 20:16 GMT
#4747
On May 27 2014 05:14 Steveling wrote: I will now reveal that I was vanilla towny, I faked my claims. Seeing that HF/xat and I(for 2 nights) weren't shot/rng'd it is safe to assume that there is no rng in these killings. Hahaha ![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 20:23 GMT
#4766
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 20:28 GMT
#4783
It was fun anyways. HF really made great use of his failed conversion on austinmcc. I was slightly suspicious when he "checked" marv, but... Probably wouldn't have been considering him for a lynch before I died. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 20:29 GMT
#4794
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 20:31 GMT
#4802
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 20:34 GMT
#4811
On May 27 2014 05:32 marvellosity wrote: Show nested quote + On May 27 2014 05:29 Xatalos wrote: LOL and yeah, thrawn&kush were scum -.- I guess when you act too scummy the town starts to doubt itself too much. kush wasn't scum till d2 tbf. That's true. | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 20:39 GMT
#4816
"Also does Slam always play like this? I can't remember having played with him before and he seems like a retarded child of Coagulation and Kurumi." | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 20:48 GMT
#4829
On May 27 2014 05:47 marvellosity wrote: I fucked around because i couldn't find good lynches because there weren't any fucking good lynches. I know how you feel :/ Although I guess thrawn would have been a decent lynch (useless and semi-scummy + actually scum). | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 20:49 GMT
#4833
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 20:53 GMT
#4843
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 20:54 GMT
#4848
05-25-2014 04:50 PM ET (US) ##recruit xatalos gasp ##shoot bh for now Damn, why didn't you do that ![]() My role was this: Welcome to Golden Sun Mafia Djinn Edition! You are a Ivan, prodigy of Kalay! You have already chased Saturos and Menardi halfway across the world, but Weyard is still in danger even after you have slain them at the Venus Lighthouse. In the current emergency regarding the Djinn you have a pivotal role. You are immune to being controlled by rogue Djinn. Furthermore you are so skilled as an adept that any Djinn, which tries to attach to you is instead restored to your control. This ability only functions once in the game. You win with the Adepts of Weyard! | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 21:06 GMT
#4859
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 21:08 GMT
#4863
| ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 21:10 GMT
#4866
On May 27 2014 06:08 WaveofShadow wrote: Show nested quote + On May 27 2014 06:07 layabout wrote: I don't want to write an(other) essay about the rate of posting and the absurd amount of it that was irrelevant but has this forum really changed so much that big games are like this now? For the most part big games don't exist anymore I think. This one was never going to start without Koshi and his mass recruitment. I guess it was fitting considering the theme of this setup that Koshi recruited the necessary people to play ![]() | ||
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
May 26 2014 21:39 GMT
#4876
On May 27 2014 06:15 Steveling wrote: Can we agree that my fake claim bait was awesome. xD Haha yeah, that worked out pretty well. Actually the only "power role" that did anything for town all game >.> | ||
| ||
PiG Sty Festival
PiGFest 6.0 Group A
Serral vs MaNaLIVE!
ByuN vs Classic
[ Submit Event ] |
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Sea Dota 2![]() Bisu ![]() BeSt ![]() ZerO ![]() Soulkey ![]() Hyun ![]() Zeus ![]() JYJ334 Hyuk ![]() Stork ![]() [ Show more ] Rush ![]() Larva ![]() Dewaltoss ![]() Shinee ![]() NotJumperer ![]() Liquid`Ret ![]() Barracks ![]() HiyA ![]() Sexy ![]() SilentControl ![]() Terrorterran ![]() Bale ![]() Hm[arnc] ![]() Yoon ![]() League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games singsing1452 ceh9789 XBOCT753 mouzStarbuck337 Beastyqt295 DeMusliM272 crisheroes258 ArmadaUGS231 B2W.Neo164 Lowko96 Trikslyr42 Organizations Other Games StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • StrangeGG StarCraft: Brood War![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s |
Replay Cast
PiG Sty Festival
herO vs Creator
Cure vs ShoWTimE
OSC
Replay Cast
SpeCial vs Cham
The PondCast
PiG Sty Festival
Reynor vs Bunny
Dark vs Astrea
Replay Cast
OSC
PiG Sty Festival
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] Korean StarCraft League
PiG Sty Festival
Hatchery Cup
PassionCraft
Circuito Brasileiro de…
Sparkling Tuna Cup
PiG Sty Festival
Circuito Brasileiro de…
Afreeca Starleague
Snow vs Rain
Afreeca Starleague
Soulkey vs Rush
|
|