| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On January 25 2014 07:15 marvellosity wrote: Does anyone else find that Toad not reading holy's posts sketchy, or am i making something out of nothing? I'd expect him to read it at some point due to the need to see if cases against him are legitimate, but if he is using his time on other stuff I'd not entirely concerned. | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
Cant' see a reason for him to just not read them at all, specially now that he has time (and was not in a rush from yesterday). Holy doesn't have that huge of a filter either. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On January 25 2014 07:17 kitaman27 wrote: I'd expect him to read it at some point due to the need to see if cases against him are legitimate, but if he is using his time on other stuff I'd not entirely concerned. If he's town then how can the cases against him be legitimate? | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 25 2014 07:15 marvellosity wrote: Does anyone else find that Toad not reading holy's posts sketchy, or am i making something out of nothing? see this: so he agrees in principal, but you seem to have a problem with the fact that I didn't go back and read his filter and like I said, I still had 10 or so pages left inbetween to read, I still had to reread the voting section, I still had to watch through WoS filter and that's what I've done so far. Like I said, reading Holy's filter isn't even on the list of things I want to do, I'm going through foolish's filter right now and probably will take another look at prior to deadline afterwards. I just don't get why you think it's that strange that if I left them out in the first place it's so weird that I haven't read his filter when obviously other filters are way more important | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I don't know, if he's scum it's not because he didn't read Holy's filter imo. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
are you actually trying to infuriate me by repeatedly saying filters when ive said it isn't filters? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On January 21 2014 08:27 VisceraEyes wrote: I'm town. And damn sexy. On January 24 2014 05:10 VisceraEyes wrote: The important thing to remember when considering my read of Foolishness is that I know that I'm town. On January 24 2014 05:48 VisceraEyes wrote: All I know for sure is that I'm town On January 24 2014 05:58 VisceraEyes wrote: You're removing my opinion, but I'm town giving more power to scum. On January 25 2014 07:16 VisceraEyes wrote: Not that I think they're meaningless, but I know that at least I'm town Is there a reason you find it necessary to say this so many times? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Are we talking about the same Toad? | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
So, you are still arguing for Foo+Prome+sandro scumteam. You've been told a hundred times the unlikeliness of that scumteam. Some reasons are: 1)Pre-planned 3-way ongoing bus from very early in D1 2)Lack of push on any townie at all from the entire scumteam (except Prome voting kita for a little while which he later backed out of) 3)Seemingly lack of reason for their specific votes at the deadline (why would sandro vote Prome and not Foo? Why couldn't Prome vote for sandro as an OMGUS, yet instead voted Foo? Why would Foo ignore sandro?) 4)Lack of sense in their actions regarding the voteswitch (why wouldn't Foo eagerly switch over to sandro and be here with us as another "confirmed town"?) 5)Lack of care that the D1 lynch would be 100% on scum with no townie at all being considered scum 6)Knowing that all 3 of them were considered for the lynch (from their POV 2 at least), yet they were pretty chill about the whole issue, and weren't really concerned, nor nervous, etc (e.g Prome's and Foo's attitude right at the deadline) I'm sure there are plenty of other problems everybody said. So, you acknowledge these problems right? Please post that you do, if not I can't know if you are ignoring them or not. If you do so, and yet still believe this is the most likely scumteam, and most productive way for town to spend this D2, then it means you must be REALLY sure that Foo is (individually) scum, and that Prome is (individually) scum. I could see you being kind of sure Foo is scum. I don't really see you being so sure Prome is scum (for example those statements you made me answer a little while ago are not very convincing). So, if you are so sure each of them is individually scum, that it trumps any kind of shit the rest of us can throw at you, prove it. Prove you are so sure they are scum, make more cases, etc. If so, how am I supposed to believe you believe this totally impossible scumteam so much? The same thing to WoS, but he seems to come around a little bit, and well he did post a case. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On January 25 2014 07:27 kitaman27 wrote: Is there a reason you find it necessary to say this so many times? Because if I say it enough people might finally believe me! | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 25 2014 07:27 VisceraEyes wrote: But the principal is the same marv - you're telling me that a townToad who knows he's town and knows that Holyflare is town could NOT read the thread and anytime he sees a Holyflare post say "Welp no scum here, moving on" and just not read the post? Are we talking about the same Toad? It just seems unbelievably dumb. But you may have a point, it is toad. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 25 2014 07:27 VisceraEyes wrote: But the principal is the same marv - you're telling me that a townToad who knows he's town and knows that Holyflare is town could NOT read the thread and anytime he sees a Holyflare post say "Welp no scum here, moving on" and just not read the post? Are we talking about the same Toad? how is it that this apparently ISN'T considered to be the natural thing to do | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On January 25 2014 07:29 kitaman27 wrote: I got excited because you used the phrase 10 times between Mad Men and Nomination as mafia, with most of the town games using only once, but then I came across The Game which you used it a bajillion times and actually were town. I was also being unfairly called scum by Ace for something I'd only do as town. OH SHIT I'M BEING UNFAIRLY CALLED SCUM BY GONZAW FOR SOMETHING I'D ONLY DO AS TOWN IN THIS GAME!! Kita, you're my hero! ^^ | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On January 25 2014 04:24 Toadesstern wrote: No idea, I haven't read a single post from Holyflare so no idea if his accusations on my predecessor as you coined it so nicely make sense, btw also something WoS mentioned about me how I kept the reads from Holy... I didn't even know that lol Actually, now that I think about it Toad, you don't even need to read Holy's filter at all. All I've said about Foo's "interaction" with Holy was said in that post I made. Nothing is Holy's filter is necessary to understand what I meant. Nor you need to read Holy's filter to get a read on Foolishness, which is what my question was about. So if you can Toad, when you can, answer my question, even if you don't read Holy's filter. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On January 25 2014 07:30 Toadesstern wrote: how is it that this apparently ISN'T considered to be the natural thing to do I don't know, I was wondering that myself. | ||
| ||
|
|
The PondCast
WardiTV 2025
Cure vs Creator
Solar vs TBD
herO vs Spirit
Scarlett vs Gerald
Rogue vs Shameless
MaNa vs ShoWTimE
Nice vs TBD
WardiTV 2025
ByuN vs TBD
Clem vs TBD
OSC
CranKy Ducklings
SC Evo League
Ladder Legends
BSL 21
Sziky vs Dewalt
eOnzErG vs Cross
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Ladder Legends
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
