|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 25 2014 04:24 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On January 25 2014 04:12 gonzaw wrote:
Toad, what do you think about Foolishness' attitude towards you and your predecessor?
I.e instantly finding Holy scummy (because of my case), but never doing anything else about it (other than fleetingly mention him a few times), to him being his 2nd scum read after Prome, to him not mentioning him nor you AT ALL after he had a 100% change of heart on Prome? No idea, I haven't read a single post from Holyflare so no idea if his accusations on my predecessor as you coined it so nicely make sense, btw also something WoS mentioned about me how I kept the reads from Holy... I didn't even know that lol I did ignore it in general as I was seeing the same thing from foolishness about Sandro and it was so extreme that I just thought it has to be an exaggeration until austin pointed out that is indeed weird. He has been on Sandro for a while, called him mafia and suddendly started calling the lynch bad and wasn't willing to vote him. Haven't put too much thought into it. I had to catch up, I had to reread a bunch and as stupid as this situation may be I just can't catch up, reread and at the same time put the same amount of time into reading yet other filters as you guys are doing right now. I have to make this work somehow and I start out with what's #1 on my priority list. Just saying because you still don't seem to understand the situation I'm in. Yes a bunch of stuff I'm going to say will be less in detail than stuff you do and I don't have the time to do proper research like you guys. That's to be expected and there's nothing I can do about that. Yes I'm slightly angry about the fact that you've basicly called me out about not reading carefully enough... Yeah I'm explaining it from the Sandro <-> Foolish perspective but it seems to be the same thing you're getting at? Because like I said I haven't read Holy's posts.
How is this possible if you've read the game? ...
|
Germany16350 Posts
On January 25 2014 06:43 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On January 25 2014 04:24 Toadesstern wrote:On January 25 2014 04:12 gonzaw wrote:
Toad, what do you think about Foolishness' attitude towards you and your predecessor?
I.e instantly finding Holy scummy (because of my case), but never doing anything else about it (other than fleetingly mention him a few times), to him being his 2nd scum read after Prome, to him not mentioning him nor you AT ALL after he had a 100% change of heart on Prome? No idea, I haven't read a single post from Holyflare so no idea if his accusations on my predecessor as you coined it so nicely make sense, btw also something WoS mentioned about me how I kept the reads from Holy... I didn't even know that lol I did ignore it in general as I was seeing the same thing from foolishness about Sandro and it was so extreme that I just thought it has to be an exaggeration until austin pointed out that is indeed weird. He has been on Sandro for a while, called him mafia and suddendly started calling the lynch bad and wasn't willing to vote him. Haven't put too much thought into it. I had to catch up, I had to reread a bunch and as stupid as this situation may be I just can't catch up, reread and at the same time put the same amount of time into reading yet other filters as you guys are doing right now. I have to make this work somehow and I start out with what's #1 on my priority list. Just saying because you still don't seem to understand the situation I'm in. Yes a bunch of stuff I'm going to say will be less in detail than stuff you do and I don't have the time to do proper research like you guys. That's to be expected and there's nothing I can do about that. Yes I'm slightly angry about the fact that you've basicly called me out about not reading carefully enough... Yeah I'm explaining it from the Sandro <-> Foolish perspective but it seems to be the same thing you're getting at? Because like I said I haven't read Holy's posts. How is this possible if you've read the game? ...
would have taken more time to read them and I don't see a reason to do so. Whenever I saw his name I skipped the post and when someone quoted him I read the quoted part but I didn't really pay attention to it and couldn't remember a single thing he said by now.
Like I said, it's a shitty situation I'm in and I have to prioritize things to get this going. Reading his filter isn't even on the list of things I intend to do.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
the bullshit is strong with this one.
VE can you answer kita please?
|
Germany16350 Posts
you do realize that I replaced in for Holyflare? I know his / my alignment, why would I care to read his filter. I don't intent to carry over his reads either so no need to know that, if that happened as WoS pointed out it's a mere coincidence and people thinking alike because I have literally not read a single post from him except for stuff quoted by other people.
So why would I want to spent some hours to read that as well instead of getting through the thread as fast as possible or reading up on other things that are actually interesting, like the voteswitch period or people I consider to be scummy.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
it's nothing to do with reading his filter, it's the totally unnatural idea that you're reading a game and for some totally bizarre reason you decide to ignore one user's posts despite the fact that the rest of the game is reading and responding to those posts, so you have no contextual idea of what you're reading from anyone else regarding that user. That's really what you did?
|
On January 25 2014 04:29 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 25 2014 04:23 VisceraEyes wrote:
Like, and he was last on the wagon - whether it was a minute or 10 minutes, he voted last on the wagon and was NOT the hammer vote on sandroba. Do you think it's likely that scum sandroba moved the lynch from 2-3 to 3-3 onto a scum Prom?
I mean if it was his last act in the game then I don't see why not - especially if you're talking about the 2-3 vote being onto prom, as if this is plurality lynch then the other guy would have been voted off anyway.
|
Germany16350 Posts
On January 25 2014 07:02 marvellosity wrote:
it's nothing to do with reading his filter, it's the totally unnatural idea that you're reading a game and for some totally bizarre reason you decide to ignore one user's posts despite the fact that the rest of the game is reading and responding to those posts, so you have no contextual idea of what you're reading from anyone else regarding that user. That's really what you did?
yeah? What point would there be in having contextual knowledge about a player that's not in the game anymore, a player who used to have my spot in this game. Not like I'm going to explain anything he posted and say "that's totally townie" or "that's totally mafia" because even if I did read his posts, despite replacing in for him, we don't share memories or a brain in general.
Also you guys (mostly gonzaw) told me to read as quickly as possible. It was a corner to cut.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On January 25 2014 07:08 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On January 25 2014 04:29 kitaman27 wrote:On January 25 2014 04:23 VisceraEyes wrote:
Like, and he was last on the wagon - whether it was a minute or 10 minutes, he voted last on the wagon and was NOT the hammer vote on sandroba. Do you think it's likely that scum sandroba moved the lynch from 2-3 to 3-3 onto a scum Prom? I mean if it was his last act in the game then I don't see why not - especially if you're talking about the 2-3 vote being onto prom, as if this is plurality lynch then the other guy would have been voted off anyway.
Why would sandroba think it was his last action in the game? It didn't even look remotely close to a sandroba lynch at the time.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 25 2014 07:08 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On January 25 2014 04:29 kitaman27 wrote:On January 25 2014 04:23 VisceraEyes wrote:
Like, and he was last on the wagon - whether it was a minute or 10 minutes, he voted last on the wagon and was NOT the hammer vote on sandroba. Do you think it's likely that scum sandroba moved the lynch from 2-3 to 3-3 onto a scum Prom? I mean if it was his last act in the game then I don't see why not - especially if you're talking about the 2-3 vote being onto prom, as if this is plurality lynch then the other guy would have been voted off anyway.
the point is, Foolishness exists
|
On January 25 2014 07:12 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On January 25 2014 07:08 VisceraEyes wrote:On January 25 2014 04:29 kitaman27 wrote:On January 25 2014 04:23 VisceraEyes wrote:
Like, and he was last on the wagon - whether it was a minute or 10 minutes, he voted last on the wagon and was NOT the hammer vote on sandroba. Do you think it's likely that scum sandroba moved the lynch from 2-3 to 3-3 onto a scum Prom? I mean if it was his last act in the game then I don't see why not - especially if you're talking about the 2-3 vote being onto prom, as if this is plurality lynch then the other guy would have been voted off anyway. the point is, Foolishness exists
I don't get your point. I'm not allowed to think both Prom and Foolish are scum.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
probably ignore what i said and listen to kita instead
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On January 25 2014 07:11 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 25 2014 07:08 VisceraEyes wrote:On January 25 2014 04:29 kitaman27 wrote:On January 25 2014 04:23 VisceraEyes wrote:
Like, and he was last on the wagon - whether it was a minute or 10 minutes, he voted last on the wagon and was NOT the hammer vote on sandroba. Do you think it's likely that scum sandroba moved the lynch from 2-3 to 3-3 onto a scum Prom? I mean if it was his last act in the game then I don't see why not - especially if you're talking about the 2-3 vote being onto prom, as if this is plurality lynch then the other guy would have been voted off anyway. Why would sandroba think it was his last action in the game? It didn't even look remotely close to a sandroba lynch at the time.
And it was 3-2 Foolishness. Is there a reason you haven't even checked on how the votes went down?
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On January 25 2014 07:12 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 25 2014 07:11 kitaman27 wrote:On January 25 2014 07:08 VisceraEyes wrote:On January 25 2014 04:29 kitaman27 wrote:On January 25 2014 04:23 VisceraEyes wrote:
Like, and he was last on the wagon - whether it was a minute or 10 minutes, he voted last on the wagon and was NOT the hammer vote on sandroba. Do you think it's likely that scum sandroba moved the lynch from 2-3 to 3-3 onto a scum Prom? I mean if it was his last act in the game then I don't see why not - especially if you're talking about the 2-3 vote being onto prom, as if this is plurality lynch then the other guy would have been voted off anyway. Why would sandroba think it was his last action in the game? It didn't even look remotely close to a sandroba lynch at the time. And it was 3-2 Foolishness. Is there a reason you haven't even checked on how the votes went down?
Nevermind. But you think it's a risk worth taking? Making it 3-3 rather than 2-4?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
that's what I was getting at, badly ^
|
I have a general idea of how they went down. I know Foolish was up for lynch, and Prom and sand both were possibilities. I was thinking about switching to Prom but felt like Foolish was manipulating me and so I stayed on Foolish.
Like, it just seems like people are putting WAAAAY too much stock into VCA. That hardly ever happens here, and I'm starting to see why.
|
On January 25 2014 07:09 Toadesstern wrote:
Also you guys (mostly gonzaw) told me to read as quickly as possible. It was a corner to cut.
Yeah....26 hours ago
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Does anyone else find that Toad not reading holy's posts sketchy, or am i making something out of nothing?
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On January 25 2014 07:15 VisceraEyes wrote:
I have a general idea of how they went down. I know Foolish was up for lynch, and Prom and sand both were possibilities. I was thinking about switching to Prom but felt like Foolish was manipulating me and so I stayed on Foolish.
Like, it just seems like people are putting WAAAAY too much stock into VCA. That hardly ever happens here, and I'm starting to see why.
Isn't that incredibly relevant though?
sandroba has his choice of lynches there. You think he goes for the bus to further his on position?
|
Not that I think they're meaningless, but I know that at least I'm town and I wasn't here and my vote was NOT on the scum lynch so it's at least going to be a little inaccurate FMP.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 25 2014 07:15 VisceraEyes wrote:
I have a general idea of how they went down. I know Foolish was up for lynch, and Prom and sand both were possibilities. I was thinking about switching to Prom but felt like Foolish was manipulating me and so I stayed on Foolish.
Like, it just seems like people are putting WAAAAY too much stock into VCA. That hardly ever happens here, and I'm starting to see why.
It's not really VCA, VE.
It's "would mafia do something that makes it more likely for mafia to get lynched, or something that makes it more likely for town to get lynched"
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
