[I] [S] Shadow Mini Mafia - Page 138

On February 01 2014 01:35 austinmcc wrote:
Hey marv, do you remember any games in particular where townprome looked very scummy early on?

On February 01 2014 01:30 Toadesstern wrote:
I am. I think you're better of trying to convince WoS and trying to get Marv to abort his bus on you.

On February 01 2014 01:43 Toadesstern wrote:
I really don't think I'm going to switch to someone else. Sorry I know that's going to be furstrating (no matter of alignment), I went through that in the failgame as well but yeah I really don't see me changing my vote today

On February 01 2014 02:31 marvellosity wrote:
Gonna try answer me / the rest of austin's questions, twinkletoes?

On November 02 2012 19:33 risk.nuke wrote:
We're still killing Muso for not having a partner. While prplhz/Promethelax was suspicious Muso is basically busted scum.

On November 02 2012 20:55 Acrofales wrote:

I suggest to just read the thread and do some traditional behavioural analysis. I like my vote on prplhz (sorry Promethelax, your predecssor said some stuff that I cannot jibe with town).

@Kushm4sta: you're not thinking straight. Also, blame Bugs for my rolename.

On November 02 2012 21:48 Acrofales wrote:
Prplhz
What initially made my scumdar ping was this passage:

He pre-excuses his lack of activity (although now that he was replaced we can safely assume this was not a ploy, but a simple headsup: it still got my attention at the time, though) and chums up to quite a number of players for no good reason: he indicates that thrown2112, kushm4sta and Hopeless1der should see him as town. He further chums up with Mattchew, Muso and Release by calling them town, when the game is about 12 hours old. I personally didn't have a town read yet on anybody and found this passage decidedly strange.

However, prplhz slipped badly in the claiming ordeal, which I explained earlier and Muso fleshed out in sufficient detail.

Note that this case ONLY works if Muso is in fact town. If Muso is scum, then prplhz has no reason to be so surprised. So the question is what case you think is better on its own. A compounding problem is that prplhz will not be around to explain himself and Promethelax cannot explain it, obviously.

Also, gonna bring in the meta-lynch-all-replacements rule: it is more likely to replace scum in this manner than to replace town. I don't like using moderator actions to hunt scum, but it is something that is a simple truth. Losing a townie to inactivity is not the end of the world. Losing scum in a similar manner is extremely bad for the game.

On November 02 2012 23:13 Acrofales wrote:
About 8 hours left. It seems time to consolidate.

Out of Kush and prplhz, against who the main body of the case is similar, I feel prplhz has shown more dodgy behaviour. At least kush's switch came after the majority of the thread had weighed in and said they weren't Muso's mason partner: prplhz did his 180 (thanks for that reminder in your filter, risk) with only my statistics to persuade him in the meantime.

I don't feel particularly happy pushing for a lynch on someone who has just subbed in, but the worst thing possible is a no-lynch today: we need that flip information.

PS: if the aim is to get information from a lynch, Muso will give info if he flips town (namely, a stronger case against prplhz and kush), whereas prplhz and kush are dudds if they flip town, so that is a point in favour of killing Muso. However, I feel prplhz is FAR more likely to flip scum at this point and killing scum is my goal.

Re-voting for emphasis:
##vote Promethelax