|
On December 15 2013 23:59 kushm4sta wrote: XATALOS StOP TAlking about past games... your blatant scumminess is pissing me off.
yes i caught you in my second newbie and i have caught you again.
Was purpletrator on your "game solved" scumlist?
I wouldn't be quick to trust your reads...
|
On December 16 2013 00:00 Plutarch wrote: Nah i'm better than clarity or perfection. Hue. Also meta won't sway me. I've been watching you for days. I am more sure you are SK than anything else.
Hah hah. Okay then. But you've played with me, so maybe WBG, Hapahauli, marvellosity or Acrofales.
Seems like you're set on me being SK, so I guess you'll just realize I'm town when I flip. Or maybe you'll be swayed by something else I do. Dunno. Hard to change your mind now when you're so confident.
|
On December 16 2013 00:10 kushm4sta wrote: case closed. yes first i own the smurfs then i own the scums.
Just like you owned the "town" purpletrator.
Is there any reason why you were away for the deadline happenings and came back after that to say you thought he was townie?
|
|
On December 16 2013 00:24 raynpelikoneet wrote: Xatalos how would you play if you were SK?
It's hard to say since I've never been SK... But definitely more passive/friendly than now. I've been making too many enemies for me to feel comfortable as SK, I think. I do agree on Plutarch's point that I would probably be somewhat sheepish, but I do that as town too, so.... It's not any big indicator IMO.
|
On December 16 2013 01:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:Basically this is what i think, at least if you are town.
Do you think Plutarch is scum for this then? I really think he's just a misguided townie. He basically single-handedly enabled the purple lynch too.
Well I'm always relatively friendly, but I mean... I think I've been much more aggro than I would have been as SK. But who knows, it's hard to say.
|
On December 16 2013 13:07 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Show nested quote +On December 16 2013 12:09 VayneAuthority wrote: implying I care about the town or anything else besides surviving Show nested quote +On December 16 2013 12:16 VayneAuthority wrote: nah, you are fucking trash at this game kid Show nested quote +On December 16 2013 12:19 VayneAuthority wrote: You are basing a scumread off a joke I made you dumb cum dumpster. I'm sorry but we can't have this any longer. I explicitly warned you, and everyone in this thread, that these personal attacks have to stop. You have failed to do so and have blatantly stopped playing to your win condition, giving the assumption that you did not heed my previous warning, and leaving me no choice but to modkill you.
Please learn how to control your temper more. We're all here to have fun.
VayneAuthority the Civilian (Vanilla Townie) has been modkilled for insulting multiple players despite public warning for his and for others' actions in-thread.
There are 12 people remaining in the game. Day ends in .Show nested quote + Inappropriate posts: If you want to post something insulting or inappropriate and know the TL mods would have a problem with it elsewhere, don't post it here. If you do, a host will warn you or modkill you and request that you be banned from future games. The hosts have the final say on what is inappropriate. If you do not like how someone is talking to you, please PM a host, Flamewheel, or Mig before involving the TL staff. If you are unsatisfied with how the situation is resolved, then you can appeal to the TL staff normally.
+ Show Spoiler +I was originally going to have BAN SKEWERING at the top of this, but I don't feel it's appropriate for this post.
This gives me a flashback to Mocsta from GoT.... Pro-town in a way, but pretty lame.
On December 17 2013 01:02 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2013 19:58 Xatalos wrote:On December 11 2013 19:47 raynpelikoneet wrote: Yeah i agree with that Xatalos. ##unvote The risk is that the Vigi(s) will just shoot someone else and Alakaslam will live to LYLO. That wouldn't be a good situation, since it's clearly difficult to say anything about his alignment. And he's being harmful to the discussion... But even so, I think he's such a likely Vigi shot that it's better to lynch someone else. purpletrator hasn't still posted, and the pressure on him has died almost completely. Hopefully he comes back soon. It'd be sad if he was scum and slipped away by just lurking. Hopefully bum has some explanations soon as well. This is understandable except now the vig shot has been wasted. Do you now feel I should be lynched? Show nested quote +On December 11 2013 20:15 Xatalos wrote:On December 11 2013 20:07 raynpelikoneet wrote: Slam starts contributing in English or we lynch him. purple starts contributing or we lynch him.
In case both of those do not happen one gets lynched other one vigged. In case both of those happen we lynch the scummiest dude. I'd prefer lynching someone like Artanis or Corazon over Alakaslam. Anti-town/lurker lynches tend to be just giant bandwagons where nobody learns anything. Even if the coin-flip is a success and he flips scum, it doesn't tell almost anything about the voters/non-voters. It's easy to vote for a player like that no matter what alignment the player or his voter is... Rayne am I doing the bold? Is this why I am not being lynched? Town is just confusing me right now.
I thought you were a good Vigi shot during D1, but then you started contributing somewhat starting from N1... Would have still been better than HF lol. Anyways, I don't want to lynch you now. There are far, far better lynches.
I wonder though, why am I town for those posts?
- - -
Artanis felt more towny after he went for purple instead of VA (and now VA flipped town so it couldn't have even been a choice between two scum). I still think there's a good chance he flips Mafia, but I doubt that his lynch is happening today especially after how the purple lynch went down.
I think LSB is scum/SK, maybe more likely SK. Why? Because he's just coasting by and doesn't appear to care about anything that's happening. Plutarch seemed to think that he just doesn't care about the game at all - but I think he does, just not really about the thread. He's made sure to appear at specific times to quickly cast his vote or to talk about something irrelevant, but he seems to play just for himself, not for any greater purpose (town/scum). And if I'm right and he's SK, lynching him would also reduce anti-town KP by 1 and thus almost seal the deal.
##Vote LSB
|
On December 17 2013 02:02 Alakaslam wrote: Oh yeah
##Vote: xigxag
I think XigXag is just AFK and will get modkilled soon. If he comes back just to vote again, he's probably scum, but otherwise he's probably going to die to a modkill anyways.
LSB all the way!
|
On December 17 2013 02:47 Blazinghand wrote: Xigxag is obviously going to come back and vote to avoid being modkilled, we get rid of him now rather than at lylo. He's done it before, he'll do it again. Don't rely on the mods, do your own work. yada yada
##vote: xigxag
Does he do this as scum or as either alignment? If it's not alignment indicative, it's a coin-flip and we'd be better off reducing scum/SK.
|
Right.. Don't you think that LSB has posted barely more than XigXag - and what LSB has posted has been way more suspicious?
|
On December 17 2013 03:19 JarJarDrinks wrote: @Xat - You really think all that Purple/LSB interaction was faked? LSB pushed really hard for Purps lynch.
Worth noting is that LSB voted for VA and didn't vote for purple, when it came to be between purple/VA. Especially considering that he didn't have VA as a red read, but he was after purple all game:
On December 12 2013 05:38 LSB wrote: I filtered VA and I don't get the red read. If someone could link me a post explaining why you think he is scum I might rethink it.
That's really shady.
In case there's some IRL reason or something for not switching to purple, then he's just SK.
|
On December 17 2013 03:34 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2013 03:14 Xatalos wrote: Right.. Don't you think that LSB has posted barely more than XigXag - and what LSB has posted has been way more suspicious? LSB has posted much more than xigxag in the past day, though his activity is also low. I don't see how this is even remotely relevant though, since nothing is more suspicious than what XigXag is doing. You're either xcum and trying to protect your xcumbuddy or you're being blinded by the availability heuristic. The fact that LSB's post seem more suspicious is not relevant given that xigxag has actually not been posting. You can't say his posts are more suspicious than xigxag's have been, you just remember him posting more and therefore he sticks out in your mind. Get your HEAD IN THE GAME. If LSB seems scummy because he's at least making a trivial effort to play the game, THAT MEANS HE CAN BE ANALYZED. That means he is NOT our lynch for today. You're basically arguing that we should lynch LSB because he's a worse lynch. Come on man. COME ON.
I'd think that barely posting above the lurker definition, and being scummy in those few posts, is more scummy than not posting at all.......
|
On December 17 2013 03:42 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2013 03:40 Xatalos wrote:On December 17 2013 03:34 Blazinghand wrote:On December 17 2013 03:14 Xatalos wrote: Right.. Don't you think that LSB has posted barely more than XigXag - and what LSB has posted has been way more suspicious? LSB has posted much more than xigxag in the past day, though his activity is also low. I don't see how this is even remotely relevant though, since nothing is more suspicious than what XigXag is doing. You're either xcum and trying to protect your xcumbuddy or you're being blinded by the availability heuristic. The fact that LSB's post seem more suspicious is not relevant given that xigxag has actually not been posting. You can't say his posts are more suspicious than xigxag's have been, you just remember him posting more and therefore he sticks out in your mind. Get your HEAD IN THE GAME. If LSB seems scummy because he's at least making a trivial effort to play the game, THAT MEANS HE CAN BE ANALYZED. That means he is NOT our lynch for today. You're basically arguing that we should lynch LSB because he's a worse lynch. Come on man. COME ON. I'd think that barely posting above the lurker definition, and being scummy in those few posts, is more scummy than not posting at all....... Okay, great idea, let's not lynch xigxag i'm sure that will just work itself out.... oh wait no the opposite of that
Do you want LSB at LYLO either?
Though I agree that it's impossible to analyze XigXag, so it might be safer to lynch him now rather than at LYLO.
|
Fine then. Let's see if he comes back to post now.
##Vote XigXag
|
Don't lunch me guys GG
|
|
On December 17 2013 20:33 sidesprang wrote:If i was legitimatly 50/50 on a guy right now, that seal might had won me over
It's not too late to change your mind!
|
On December 17 2013 20:46 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2013 03:02 Blazinghand wrote: unless someone LITERALLY claims scum, i'm not voting anyone else.
I think we just met your criteria!
I didn't literally claim yet
You'll see when I flip
|
On December 17 2013 21:04 Artanis[Xp] wrote:Show nested quote +On December 17 2013 21:00 Xatalos wrote:On December 17 2013 20:46 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On December 17 2013 03:02 Blazinghand wrote: unless someone LITERALLY claims scum, i'm not voting anyone else.
I think we just met your criteria! I didn't literally claim yet You'll see when I flip May I ask for your reasoning to vote on yourself then?
bumatlarge did that too during D1, yet nobody called him scum for it
|
Btw SK, we kill Plutarch tonight, so please kill rayn
Town wins if they live
|
|
|
|