|
Ugh Moc I just don't like your tone right now. Like you are trying to pick fight with people. I hope its not intentional. I'm going to bed.
|
On December 06 2013 17:45 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On December 06 2013 15:30 OdinOfPergo wrote:
To expand on that previous post by me.... Half our players are afk.
The other .... umm.... like half? replaced. So great.. actually I'm just going to shut it because I have very little positive to town and I really hope we 180 tonight. I am going to comment on this because I have seen multiple people say this and I think Odin mentioned it multiple times. There are 200 pages of content 24h before the second lynch, if you are so fucking good that you can read people if they are active, then you should be able to perfectly read at least 20 people in this game. I am pretty sure that the amount of scum between the lurkers and the amount of scum between the actives is % wise the same. The scum between the actives should be catchable because they post shit, whining about "too many people don't care about the game" when the game is 200 pages long is pretty mehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.
So that's a no on lynching lurkers. Noted. Night.
|
On December 06 2013 17:47 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On December 06 2013 17:44 VisceraEyes wrote:
Ugh Moc I just don't like your tone right now. Like you are trying to pick fight with people. I hope its not intentional. I'm going to bed. Ermm it's not I just tried to make a joke instead. Night I'm off to mow the lawn. Lucky me.....
I took it as a joke the first time. The second time made me reconsider your motives.
|
Read the two-hundred some posts since I left. I still wanna kill lurkers, and I don't care if you don't like it. People think hyperactivity is annoying...get over it. At least they are playing the game. People not paying need to be dealt with.
|
Gosh Mig, if you think I'm not a lynch candidate then why mention me at all? :O
|
I think it's far more likely he DOES see me as a lynch candidate considering the medium amount of heat that's on me for my stances and lurkiness - and that he wants to appear townie by not wanting to lynch me because I'm a DT.
|
Like, how many pages are in the thread does NOT indicate how much actionable content there is in the thread. I don't care what you guys say. With people like Rayn and myself in the game, it was bound to get big, fast. The fact that there are so many content to sit on their laurels and watch townies fight with each other is not just irritating, but makes the game harder as well. Obviously scum aren't going to ALL be lurkers. I have no doubt in my mind that if we start mercilessly lynching lurkers, we're gonna hit a couple townies. But from my perspective, that's a small price for us to pay for some clarity in this game.
|
Oh and guys - my second ability is public. Just throwin that out there. You'll know when I cast it. <3
|
On December 07 2013 04:22 Mig wrote:Show nested quote +On December 07 2013 04:13 VisceraEyes wrote:
Gosh Mig, if you think I'm not a lynch candidate then why mention me at all? :O You shouldnt be a lynch candidate for obvious reasons. If you are town mafia either shoots you or risks you finding them with dt powers. But if you live a long time and you arent finding scum then something is up and town should keep this in mind. Can you explain why you think lurker lynch is optimal right now instead of actually putting the effort into scum hunting?
No one said anything about not scumhunting - I've been trying to find scum all game. I'm just saying that the LYNCH should be LURKERS. I've been saying it all game and I'll repeat it again - we have NO RELIABLE MEANS OF CLEARING THE LURKER POOL. I could check into them, sure. But then I can ask you the same question in reverse - why not be using my power on scummy people to try and find scum? We could use our combined KP on them, but we don't know their HP and we have no way of knowing if/when our actions will have any kind of effect on the NUMBER OF LURKERS we have.
I'm all about trying to find scum - I just want to use the LYNCH, at least for the present, on lurkers.
|
On December 07 2013 04:22 sandroba wrote:Show nested quote +On December 07 2013 04:17 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
Firstly @sandroba that's pretty weak.
Secondly @mig: why should I be concerned you shot me? You're voting me now, you apparently decided I was scum sometime last night, there are a lot of people I'd lynch ahead of you. Your shot is not a solid tell one way or another because I can make arguments for it being both town or scum. MZ don't you agree that mafia should be higher up on the list on average? I think my top 12 estimative is pretty mild. Looking at those top 12 who do you find suspicious? It's even better to look at that group right now since 2 townies have already flipped from it.
So are you basing this on scum's ability to coordinate their number picks?
|
On December 07 2013 11:32 mkfuba07 wrote:
I had a bunch of crap written out about my current thoughts, but most of it was unimportant so I erased it. What I feel is important to be said:
While I think Roffles should be taken care of somehow, I'm not voting for him. The wagon feels off, and it would feel like an empty vote.
The more I think about MZ, the more town I lean. He seems invested in the game, while austin and roffles have kinda checked out. He seems to want answers, not just seemingly arbitrary results. At first I was pretty convinced by austin's point against him regarding Koshi, but on reconsidering it it makes no sense. Why shouldn't he be suspicious of someone simply because they're not being lynched immediately? I'm just not seeing the scumminess.
That leaves me with austin. I wish I had more to contribute about austin, but a lot of what I'm considering "truth" has been told to me by other people. Something that I've inferred myself is that he didn't seem too concerned about being a lynch candidate. Sure, he posted a lot after he returned, and maybe that was in response to the votes on him (I don't have the time to check timestamps and such), but when he left he didn't give off the feel of someone being wrongly accused and up for mislynch. MZ, on the other hand, at least seems like he's defended himself against everything thrown at him and there's nothing more for him to do but wait. He seems agitatedly resigned, while austin just seemed relatively uncaring. So that's where my vote will go.
##Vote:austinmcc
This post makes me think austin is a mislynch far more than anything that's been posted anywhere.
|
On December 07 2013 11:45 jaybrundage wrote:Show nested quote +On December 07 2013 11:44 VisceraEyes wrote:On December 07 2013 11:32 mkfuba07 wrote:
I had a bunch of crap written out about my current thoughts, but most of it was unimportant so I erased it. What I feel is important to be said:
While I think Roffles should be taken care of somehow, I'm not voting for him. The wagon feels off, and it would feel like an empty vote.
The more I think about MZ, the more town I lean. He seems invested in the game, while austin and roffles have kinda checked out. He seems to want answers, not just seemingly arbitrary results. At first I was pretty convinced by austin's point against him regarding Koshi, but on reconsidering it it makes no sense. Why shouldn't he be suspicious of someone simply because they're not being lynched immediately? I'm just not seeing the scumminess.
That leaves me with austin. I wish I had more to contribute about austin, but a lot of what I'm considering "truth" has been told to me by other people. Something that I've inferred myself is that he didn't seem too concerned about being a lynch candidate. Sure, he posted a lot after he returned, and maybe that was in response to the votes on him (I don't have the time to check timestamps and such), but when he left he didn't give off the feel of someone being wrongly accused and up for mislynch. MZ, on the other hand, at least seems like he's defended himself against everything thrown at him and there's nothing more for him to do but wait. He seems agitatedly resigned, while austin just seemed relatively uncaring. So that's where my vote will go.
##Vote:austinmcc This post makes me think austin is a mislynch far more than anything that's been posted anywhere. Do you think Marv was scum.
For someone with a scumread on me, you certainly don't seem to have filtered me recently brah.
|
On December 07 2013 11:46 mkfuba07 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 07 2013 11:44 VisceraEyes wrote:On December 07 2013 11:32 mkfuba07 wrote:
I had a bunch of crap written out about my current thoughts, but most of it was unimportant so I erased it. What I feel is important to be said:
While I think Roffles should be taken care of somehow, I'm not voting for him. The wagon feels off, and it would feel like an empty vote.
The more I think about MZ, the more town I lean. He seems invested in the game, while austin and roffles have kinda checked out. He seems to want answers, not just seemingly arbitrary results. At first I was pretty convinced by austin's point against him regarding Koshi, but on reconsidering it it makes no sense. Why shouldn't he be suspicious of someone simply because they're not being lynched immediately? I'm just not seeing the scumminess.
That leaves me with austin. I wish I had more to contribute about austin, but a lot of what I'm considering "truth" has been told to me by other people. Something that I've inferred myself is that he didn't seem too concerned about being a lynch candidate. Sure, he posted a lot after he returned, and maybe that was in response to the votes on him (I don't have the time to check timestamps and such), but when he left he didn't give off the feel of someone being wrongly accused and up for mislynch. MZ, on the other hand, at least seems like he's defended himself against everything thrown at him and there's nothing more for him to do but wait. He seems agitatedly resigned, while austin just seemed relatively uncaring. So that's where my vote will go.
##Vote:austinmcc This post makes me think austin is a mislynch far more than anything that's been posted anywhere. ... =/ Why?
Because it came out of nowhere and I think you're scum and we're 10 minutes from deadline and just a bunch of really little things that culminated with your post.
|
On December 07 2013 11:47 jaybrundage wrote:
I bet VE was the person who was gonnna bus austin. With the vote's being so close together scum (VE) can switch the vote to a townie and avoid his mafia buddy being killed.
Scum tried to kill me. You're being ridiculous.
|
I don't want you dead bbygrl
|
On December 07 2013 11:50 jaybrundage wrote:Show nested quote +On December 07 2013 11:47 VisceraEyes wrote:On December 07 2013 11:46 mkfuba07 wrote:On December 07 2013 11:44 VisceraEyes wrote:On December 07 2013 11:32 mkfuba07 wrote:
I had a bunch of crap written out about my current thoughts, but most of it was unimportant so I erased it. What I feel is important to be said:
While I think Roffles should be taken care of somehow, I'm not voting for him. The wagon feels off, and it would feel like an empty vote.
The more I think about MZ, the more town I lean. He seems invested in the game, while austin and roffles have kinda checked out. He seems to want answers, not just seemingly arbitrary results. At first I was pretty convinced by austin's point against him regarding Koshi, but on reconsidering it it makes no sense. Why shouldn't he be suspicious of someone simply because they're not being lynched immediately? I'm just not seeing the scumminess.
That leaves me with austin. I wish I had more to contribute about austin, but a lot of what I'm considering "truth" has been told to me by other people. Something that I've inferred myself is that he didn't seem too concerned about being a lynch candidate. Sure, he posted a lot after he returned, and maybe that was in response to the votes on him (I don't have the time to check timestamps and such), but when he left he didn't give off the feel of someone being wrongly accused and up for mislynch. MZ, on the other hand, at least seems like he's defended himself against everything thrown at him and there's nothing more for him to do but wait. He seems agitatedly resigned, while austin just seemed relatively uncaring. So that's where my vote will go.
##Vote:austinmcc This post makes me think austin is a mislynch far more than anything that's been posted anywhere. ... =/ Why? Because it came out of nowhere and I think you're scum and we're 10 minutes from deadline and just a bunch of really little things that culminated with your post. Translation. I have a chance to save my scum buddy
Scum tried to kill me. Again, you're being ridiculous.
|
On December 07 2013 11:52 geript wrote:8 minutes explain who you want dead then.
I want austin dead. Is that not where my vote is?
|
On December 07 2013 11:52 jaybrundage wrote:Show nested quote +On December 07 2013 11:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On December 07 2013 11:47 jaybrundage wrote:
I bet VE was the person who was gonnna bus austin. With the vote's being so close together scum (VE) can switch the vote to a townie and avoid his mafia buddy being killed. Scum tried to kill me. You're being ridiculous. Lol yea cause some KP on you makes you confirmed town. (SARCASM) A good scum team will do shit like that on the regular.
Shit like shoot their own team? You're being even more ridiculous than I thought was even possible.
|
On December 07 2013 11:58 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On December 07 2013 11:57 jaybrundage wrote:On December 07 2013 11:49 justanothertownie wrote:On December 07 2013 11:47 jaybrundage wrote:
I bet VE was the person who was gonnna bus austin. With the vote's being so close together scum (VE) can switch the vote to a townie and avoid his mafia buddy being killed. This makes no sense. Austin was the most likely wagon when VE put his vote on him and by switching now he would look ridiculously bad. Austin was the most likely wagon. So therefore VE getting on the wagon early would help him get town cred. Smart scum do this. Good Scum Bus. VE would look bad however he's made this post. Indicating he was considering switching. On December 07 2013 11:44 VisceraEyes wrote:On December 07 2013 11:32 mkfuba07 wrote:
I had a bunch of crap written out about my current thoughts, but most of it was unimportant so I erased it. What I feel is important to be said:
While I think Roffles should be taken care of somehow, I'm not voting for him. The wagon feels off, and it would feel like an empty vote.
The more I think about MZ, the more town I lean. He seems invested in the game, while austin and roffles have kinda checked out. He seems to want answers, not just seemingly arbitrary results. At first I was pretty convinced by austin's point against him regarding Koshi, but on reconsidering it it makes no sense. Why shouldn't he be suspicious of someone simply because they're not being lynched immediately? I'm just not seeing the scumminess.
That leaves me with austin. I wish I had more to contribute about austin, but a lot of what I'm considering "truth" has been told to me by other people. Something that I've inferred myself is that he didn't seem too concerned about being a lynch candidate. Sure, he posted a lot after he returned, and maybe that was in response to the votes on him (I don't have the time to check timestamps and such), but when he left he didn't give off the feel of someone being wrongly accused and up for mislynch. MZ, on the other hand, at least seems like he's defended himself against everything thrown at him and there's nothing more for him to do but wait. He seems agitatedly resigned, while austin just seemed relatively uncaring. So that's where my vote will go.
##Vote:austinmcc This post makes me think austin is a mislynch far more than anything that's been posted anywhere. There is no towncred if he switches.
^
Jay is just making shit up to justify his god-awful read of me.
|
Jay you're way more certain about my alignment than you should be. Where's this certainty on like, ANYONE OR ANYTHING else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
