JJD has no scumreads.... and is throwing away a vote on a replacement slot...
Back To The Basics Mini Mafia - Page 88
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
JJD has no scumreads.... and is throwing away a vote on a replacement slot... | ||
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
On November 25 2013 10:31 sciberbia wrote: @Aquanim I honestly wouldn't consider this a tell. This line of thinking just requires too many assumptions to make analysis on. Even naming any 3 players in this game town I could probably only do with 70% confidence. I suppose that's fair from your perspective. I'm very, very sure about Mocsta, Thrawn and Bereft, personally. This thought process does not seem townie to me. He didn't like any of the cases in the thread, so therefore lynch a lurker? I dunno. I think the natural townie response when you don't like any of the current cases is to go find scum yourself. There is plenty to go on. Am I really asking too much for him to have one good scumread? This is why I want to see exactly why he doesn't "like ANY of the cases" he's seen. | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
Can anyone please look at the questions I proposed like one or two posts ago about jjd I actually don't have enough time to filter dive so can't verify. If those answers are no and yes, I will support a consolidated vote on JJD | ||
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
On November 25 2013 10:34 Mocsta wrote: Ok Can anyone please look at the questions I proposed like one or two posts ago about jjd I actually don't have enough time to filter dive so can't verify. If those answers are no and yes, I will support a consolidated vote on JJD ok I'll get on it | ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On November 25 2013 10:31 sciberbia wrote: This thought process does not seem townie to me. He didn't like any of the cases in the thread, so therefore lynch a lurker? I dunno. I think the natural townie response when you don't like any of the current cases is to go find scum yourself. There is plenty to go on. Am I really asking too much for him to have one good scumread? To add to this it makes sense that he'd vote for mocsta, who he has spent time posting about this cycle. I am not suggesting that they are both scum but I am suggesting that it's weird that he doesn't want to join a wagon (however unlikely it is to succeed) over joining a wagon that definitely will not succeed. He's throwing away his vote. ##vote: JarJarDrinks JarJar what is your read on mocsta? | ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On November 25 2013 10:34 Mocsta wrote: Ok Can anyone please look at the questions I proposed like one or two posts ago about jjd I actually don't have enough time to filter dive so can't verify. If those answers are no and yes, I will support a consolidated vote on JJD he just claimed that when he was talking to/at you and corazon earlier this cycle he wasn't pushing for your lynches because he didn't really have reads, but was trying to get them. he just now voted alakaslam. | ||
sciberbia
United States1359 Posts
To answer your questions, JJD by his own admission doesn't really have any scumreads and hasn't really been pushing anything. He wants us to lynch a lurker for lack of a lynch he actually likes. | ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
On November 25 2013 07:16 cDgCorazon wrote: While I think it is a great case Onegu (and your recent activity has earned my unvote), I'm worried that killing Mocsta will put the thread to a screeching halt like it has been for most of D2. Look how inactive the thread has been with Mocsta's limited time to play this weekend. In my opinion, Mocsta is one of those players who will either: a)get killed in the first 2-3 nights or b)be lynched due to his behavior A town Mocsta is a really good asset for town. Scum will be looking to nightkill him ASAP and if they don't do that, then there is a good chance he is one of them. I'm not disagreeing with you because of my read on your or your points in the case- I just disagree with the principle of lynching Mocsta right now. Is there anyone outside of Mocsta/Bereft you would be ok with lynching? My son cried so I woke up read the thread saw this and that cora basicly scum claimed here, then it goes from it was a great case, to it was a bad case just vote onegu. And since you guys obv didnt read my case, maybe it is to long and you thought you would just get the jist of it let me tl;dr it for you fools. Mocsta hasnt made a real case all game, his reads jump around all game without any reason given or BS. NOW LOOK AT HIS REASON TO WANT TO LYNCH JAMP. Because jamp tunneled onto Aqua, but when rayn says that mocsta gives a meta reason that is town for jamp. Uses the words scumslip for cora and scib, and scum claim for me. Then calls out HF for seeing scum slips. Also when I make my notes, if its true he can lynch bereft that cycle, doesnt check when he thinks he is out of time, says if I am wrong its not malicious, to he leaves out the most important piece and Im scum for trying to make bereft look bad. Is scum scum scum on rayn, then right before lynch switches to its a policy vote, then after lynch lies and says he didnt have rayn as scum but was afraid rayn wouldnt get a lynch through. | ||
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On November 25 2013 10:38 sciberbia wrote: @Mocsta To answer your questions, JJD by his own admission doesn't really have any scumreads and hasn't really been pushing anything. He wants us to lynch a lurker for lack of a lynch he actually likes. to be fair he *did* like the rean lynch so this could be an extension of that.. but it's still a very unhelpful vote | ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
| ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
I feel as frantic with the rayyn lynch. Whereas two cycles in a row he diesnt care. Why is it that it's all the same people talking at this pivotal time. I'm confident we are all town, and scum are letting us in fight with each other. Yes, wagon of justice. ##vote: jarjardrinks | ||
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On November 25 2013 10:31 sciberbia wrote: Unless scum is all lurkers. I think it's a totally natural thought process that if all the active players are reading town to me that I'd want to lynch one of the lurkers.This thought process does not seem townie to me. He didn't like any of the cases in the thread, so therefore lynch a lurker? I dunno. I think the natural townie response when you don't like any of the current cases is to go find scum yourself. And sorry but I just don't have the time to commit on the weekends. I don't really want to say that if you don't lynch me today then I'll be plenty active tomorrow because I know it sounds scummy but it's true. When I'm @ work is when I can commit alot of time. | ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
| ||
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
On November 25 2013 09:52 Mocsta wrote: Regarding jarjar Last night I didn't read his day2 Does anyone know what his top scum reads are and why? Well he wants to lynch the Rean slot for the same reasons as yesterday. No consideration of the fact that with a replacement we may be able to read the slot better. Still waiting on his reasons why he doesn't want to lynch Onegu or any of the other wagons going today. Answer: We know who he wants to lynch but don't have any reasons which indicate he's actually thinking about it. Has he actually pushed anything, or has just gotten into dialogue with holyflare about claiming? Things JJD has talked about today: - holyflare claim - picked up some point I raised earlier about something corazon said, calls it a scumslip. I'd sketched this in already and then dropped it, no evidence of original thought from JJD here - defends himself to thrawn; doesn't say much useful but thrawn's case was not really the kind of thing which can be argued against in the first place (not because it's good, just because it's mostly interpretation and feelings) - a bit of suspicion thrown at Mocsta re. Mocsta's suspicions of him - defending himself now Answer: no real pushing. | ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
And when you lynch me actually read the fucking case on mocsta, I stayed up until 5am writeing that thing and all of you dont even read it. Also cora when he links shit for slam to read he didnt even link my mocsta case. And I didnt cherrypick anything, read the damn case, then read mocsta filter and tell me what relevant info I left out. Back to sleep ##lawlaiddown | ||
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
##Unvote ##Vote: JarJarDrinks | ||
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
On November 25 2013 10:40 cDgCorazon wrote: If I "scum claimed" as I have been attested to do so about 15 times this game, why aren't you voting for me? After mocsta your next dont worry. | ||
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Onegu's fooled me before though. Which is why I need to think some more. | ||
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
##unvote: ##Vote: JJD | ||
Alakaslam
United States17324 Posts
##Vote: Jar Jar Drinks | ||
| ||