|
From HF's post
"You were scum partners with risen in heavyweight. You know he is crazy and will literally do anything or write anything to win. How can you be so quick to have a town read on him based off of a post? He has won world champs and also has the "best mafia play" award or whatever. To quite openly say you will not read him for the rest of day 1 is making me apprehensive to say the least."
Good point. I like you.
|
On November 15 2013 12:01 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2013 11:54 Grackaroni wrote:On November 15 2013 11:47 Mocsta wrote:On November 15 2013 11:38 Grackaroni wrote:On November 15 2013 11:35 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 15 2013 11:29 Grackaroni wrote:
Mocsta can you explain more simply why Storrzerg is scum. what is the difference between hunting for scum and wanting to hunt scum?
What's so compelling about Mocsta's StorrZerg suspicion that you should comment on that and not any of the other suspicions being flown around? This might be the first post in which you don't mention Kush. It's the worst accusation I've seen. O really..... Storrzerg could be town making a selfish play for mayor. I can dig that, been there done that. I actually acknowledged this in my post. However, what I identified after a filter dive is that aside from a game plan to campaign for mayor his choice of play is pro town. Every game I have played in, it has always been scum pushing rng... Myself included in that increasingly larger subset. Storrzerg positions himself as a reliable scum hunter, asserting that unknowns yamato and VE would vote for him. Then spins this around proposing RNG on the basis of forcing activity. Yeah... I don't buy this, and neither should anyone else. It's a cheap cop out and I can not imagine a town person would approach a mayor game in this fashion. So.. your town. Why is this such a bad accusation that you are willing to delurk to voice concern. Actually fuck that Grack. If you are so certain it is bad play I want him lynched... Who do YOU want lynched as of now. I don't think that's true at all. Lots of townies push RNG normally including myself. You posted a long fluffy post with 3 weak points. Storrzerg played the noob card- It's not scummy for newbs to use the noob card. He added the word for between hunt scum - wat? He thinks it would be a good idea to suggest RNG to raise activity - How does that make him scum? Damn auto correct some of the above came out wrong. Ohh well. Storrzerg isn't a noob. Anyways. This is pointless. I have identified my grievances with storrzerg and am somewhat surprised that you and oats are trying to cockblock storrzerg from having to respond. I don't like this from either of you. My suggestion is to shut up and let storrzerg respond. You can reassess your reads from there. In the meantime. Grack. You dodged my question. Who do YOU want to lynch, cos all I'm hearing is who you don't.
lol the fuck are you talking about. I'm not preventing Storrzerg from responding; All I had originally intended to do was question you about your case before VE started complaining about me playing the game.
I agree with Pandain's scum reads.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Also slam has been 10000000000% different to any other game I have played with him/seen him in.
|
On November 15 2013 12:00 Oatsmaster wrote:
well yeah you called me bad VE.
Well you were being bad! And you call me bad all the time wtf?! If it means more coming from me because you perceive me to be good then why do you call me bad? Why do you antagonize?
It's a game of give and take - and you can only take what you give. You give hardly anything Oats - keeping up and commenting is barely giving. It's more than people who don't post anything, but barely. The way you play, it's how scum generally play man. That's why you catch a lot of shit and why people call you bad. I give you a lot of shit because I've seen you play better and when you don't I get salty and call you bad.
|
On November 15 2013 12:07 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2013 12:03 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 15 2013 10:53 Alakaslam wrote:On November 15 2013 09:05 supersoft wrote:
By the way.: Everyone who votes outside voting for mig, BC, BlazingHand, or myself is playing antitown.
At least, I don't even consider giving my vote anyone else. I fixed this for you, retaining all of your true intent, adding some compatible intent in te form of an inside joke, and containing equally flawed logic. Wouldn't it be convenient if this was the scum team? Highly unlikely, but then it is highly unlikely that any single player is scum- yet there is a guarantee of at least one. Therefore, you should elect players based on what they say, being WARY of those who have shown exceptional skill as well as those who have little or no skill. In fact, we want an absolute moderate with regard to meta until a veteran has sufficiently shown themselves to be town to earn our trust- in which case a veteran becomes ideal. This point is why I usually talk about Svengali at some point. However, that is just an attempt to sound laughable- a meta I plan to give one last ditch effort to destroy here before turning wholly to co/hosting games with the very occasional /in. Therefore, I will from now on refer to it thus; "The Peid Piper Problem". The pied piper mislead a bunch of rats through skill; so also can forum vets who rolled scum. I'm not an Assassin, therefore I'm not running for mayor. That was the only case in which I actually planned to run. I am still catching up. On November 15 2013 11:05 Alakaslam wrote:On November 15 2013 09:19 supersoft wrote:On November 15 2013 09:18 yamato77 wrote:On November 15 2013 09:17 supersoft wrote:lol VE and yamato are pissed, because they're not considered to be serious candidates... No surpise. And not exactly protown. On November 15 2013 09:01 yamato77 wrote:
electing someone so they don't get shot is not my idea of how D1 should play out That is exactly how we should play. And your ideas are exactly the reason, why you're no serious candidate. Who guarantees me that you not just fold and leave the game after d1 if we elect you? Seriously yamato... Yeah, super's mafia. oh god, you're reatarded. I disagree. Either: He is right, you are scum, Or: He is wrong, you both interact poorly here Or: He is not only wrong, but he is intentionally wrong and actually Pied-Pipering you. Or: something else. But VE is far from idiocy, I can give you am example of idiocy in a heartbeat and in fact will do so. Game: Newbie Mini Mafia XLVIII Filter: Alakaslam Game: Aperture Mafia 2: Part 2 Filter: Alakaslam For alignment specific idiocy. Do not insult needlessly. On November 15 2013 11:46 Alakaslam wrote:Caught up. I don't trust VE but I don't think he is scum yet. I don't claim to be able to read him; this is just a pair of Lincoln coppers I used to own. Coag, I will probably do that, in inside jokes dispersed here an  Blazinghand d there, if you want to waste your tunnel on me over that know that it is a waste, therefore antitown unless there are reasons to think I would THE GREAT bloody cobbler as scum- so give reasons why that is a valid reason to tunnel me if that is an honest threat. That being said, I'm moving on to the vote thread after a bit more deliberation looks the same to me. The last one is the only one I could conceivably see as being similar Did you even understand me before? Or do I still fail to get my thoughts across?
I never understood you.
|
On November 15 2013 12:07 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2013 12:01 Mocsta wrote:On November 15 2013 11:54 Grackaroni wrote:On November 15 2013 11:47 Mocsta wrote:On November 15 2013 11:38 Grackaroni wrote:On November 15 2013 11:35 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 15 2013 11:29 Grackaroni wrote:
Mocsta can you explain more simply why Storrzerg is scum. what is the difference between hunting for scum and wanting to hunt scum?
What's so compelling about Mocsta's StorrZerg suspicion that you should comment on that and not any of the other suspicions being flown around? This might be the first post in which you don't mention Kush. It's the worst accusation I've seen. O really..... Storrzerg could be town making a selfish play for mayor. I can dig that, been there done that. I actually acknowledged this in my post. However, what I identified after a filter dive is that aside from a game plan to campaign for mayor his choice of play is pro town. Every game I have played in, it has always been scum pushing rng... Myself included in that increasingly larger subset. Storrzerg positions himself as a reliable scum hunter, asserting that unknowns yamato and VE would vote for him. Then spins this around proposing RNG on the basis of forcing activity. Yeah... I don't buy this, and neither should anyone else. It's a cheap cop out and I can not imagine a town person would approach a mayor game in this fashion. So.. your town. Why is this such a bad accusation that you are willing to delurk to voice concern. Actually fuck that Grack. If you are so certain it is bad play I want him lynched... Who do YOU want lynched as of now. I don't think that's true at all. Lots of townies push RNG normally including myself. You posted a long fluffy post with 3 weak points. Storrzerg played the noob card- It's not scummy for newbs to use the noob card. He added the word for between hunt scum - wat? He thinks it would be a good idea to suggest RNG to raise activity - How does that make him scum? Damn auto correct some of the above came out wrong. Ohh well. Storrzerg isn't a noob. Anyways. This is pointless. I have identified my grievances with storrzerg and am somewhat surprised that you and oats are trying to cockblock storrzerg from having to respond. I don't like this from either of you. My suggestion is to shut up and let storrzerg respond. You can reassess your reads from there. In the meantime. Grack. You dodged my question. Who do YOU want to lynch, cos all I'm hearing is who you don't. lol the fuck are you talking about. I'm not preventing Storrzerg from responding; All I had originally intended to do was question you about your case before VE started complaining about me playing the game. I agree with Pandain's scum reads.
I'm not complaining I love it! Please continue! ^^
|
On November 15 2013 12:08 VisceraEyes wrote:Well you were being bad! And you call me bad all the time wtf?! If it means more coming from me because you perceive me to be good then why do you call me bad? Why do you antagonize? It's a game of give and take - and you can only take what you give. You give hardly anything Oats - keeping up and commenting is barely giving. It's more than people who don't post anything, but barely. The way you play, it's how scum generally play man. That's why you catch a lot of shit and why people call you bad. I give you a lot of shit because I've seen you play better and when you don't I get salty and call you bad.
You called me bad when I was best scum in game.
Lol I dont think you understood me the fist time.
|
On November 15 2013 12:09 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2013 12:07 Grackaroni wrote:On November 15 2013 12:01 Mocsta wrote:On November 15 2013 11:54 Grackaroni wrote:On November 15 2013 11:47 Mocsta wrote:On November 15 2013 11:38 Grackaroni wrote:On November 15 2013 11:35 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 15 2013 11:29 Grackaroni wrote:
Mocsta can you explain more simply why Storrzerg is scum. what is the difference between hunting for scum and wanting to hunt scum?
What's so compelling about Mocsta's StorrZerg suspicion that you should comment on that and not any of the other suspicions being flown around? This might be the first post in which you don't mention Kush. It's the worst accusation I've seen. O really..... Storrzerg could be town making a selfish play for mayor. I can dig that, been there done that. I actually acknowledged this in my post. However, what I identified after a filter dive is that aside from a game plan to campaign for mayor his choice of play is pro town. Every game I have played in, it has always been scum pushing rng... Myself included in that increasingly larger subset. Storrzerg positions himself as a reliable scum hunter, asserting that unknowns yamato and VE would vote for him. Then spins this around proposing RNG on the basis of forcing activity. Yeah... I don't buy this, and neither should anyone else. It's a cheap cop out and I can not imagine a town person would approach a mayor game in this fashion. So.. your town. Why is this such a bad accusation that you are willing to delurk to voice concern. Actually fuck that Grack. If you are so certain it is bad play I want him lynched... Who do YOU want lynched as of now. I don't think that's true at all. Lots of townies push RNG normally including myself. You posted a long fluffy post with 3 weak points. Storrzerg played the noob card- It's not scummy for newbs to use the noob card. He added the word for between hunt scum - wat? He thinks it would be a good idea to suggest RNG to raise activity - How does that make him scum? Damn auto correct some of the above came out wrong. Ohh well. Storrzerg isn't a noob. Anyways. This is pointless. I have identified my grievances with storrzerg and am somewhat surprised that you and oats are trying to cockblock storrzerg from having to respond. I don't like this from either of you. My suggestion is to shut up and let storrzerg respond. You can reassess your reads from there. In the meantime. Grack. You dodged my question. Who do YOU want to lynch, cos all I'm hearing is who you don't. lol the fuck are you talking about. I'm not preventing Storrzerg from responding; All I had originally intended to do was question you about your case before VE started complaining about me playing the game. I agree with Pandain's scum reads. I'm not complaining I love it! Please continue! ^^
You have yet to see the Grackaroni in action.
|
On November 15 2013 12:09 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2013 12:08 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 15 2013 12:00 Oatsmaster wrote:
well yeah you called me bad VE. Well you were being bad! And you call me bad all the time wtf?! If it means more coming from me because you perceive me to be good then why do you call me bad? Why do you antagonize? It's a game of give and take - and you can only take what you give. You give hardly anything Oats - keeping up and commenting is barely giving. It's more than people who don't post anything, but barely. The way you play, it's how scum generally play man. That's why you catch a lot of shit and why people call you bad. I give you a lot of shit because I've seen you play better and when you don't I get salty and call you bad. You called me bad when I was best scum in game. Lol I dont think you understood me the fist time.
Oh...well, I was calling you bad because I was representing that I thought you were town. It would have been preferable if you'd gone with me on Prom and ended the game more assuredly, but you opposing me wasn't strictly speaking "bad" play.
I certainly disagree that you were the best scum in the game I HAD THAT SHIT LOCKED DOWN. But no, I don't think you played that poorly at all in Resistance.
|
On November 15 2013 12:05 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +fml I had to write this out twice because I had so many tabs open ~_~ @ rayn's post earlier: HereYou claim that my case was in fact bad but then you agree with everything that I had specifically laid out within it, what gives? Did you just not read it? Clearly there were no good reads at that present time and for a mayor to be established reads must be thrown around, which is exactly what I was saying. Your choice of mayor is based entirely off if you agree with their reads? Why? You also debase the entirety of it because of the one line that said if "I failed to lynch my top scum read S". The plurality in reads assumes that one would live past day 1 and be able to use their double voting power as you cannot lynch multiple reads on day 1. There is also: On November 15 2013 10:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Okay ignoring Risen for the rest of D1. You were scum partners with risen in heavyweight. You know he is crazy and will literally do anything or write anything to win. How can you be so quick to have a town read on him based off of a post? He has won world champs and also has the "best mafia play" award or whatever. To quite openly say you will not read him for the rest of day 1 is making me apprehensive to say the least. ____________________________________________________________________________ @rest of the town Also some other things that struck me as odd; Hopeless' start to the game: On November 15 2013 08:26 Hopeless1der wrote:
VE you got some credentials? How many successful mayor campaigns have you run? I've played one game with this guy and in that game (he was town) at the very start he was trying to contribute to current conversations and get things talking. This games start has been very lackluster from him. After asking VE about his past mayor games VE responds that he has been mayor once and he died night 1. By no means are they solid credentials in any terms. His contributions were just useless "won't vote for kush" posts. He then drops his mayor vote onto VE after hearing about his 1 game experience and leaves the thread. _____________________________________________________________________________________ I'm actually leaning a bit more suspiciously towards rayn right now; however I thought it was interesting to see these 2 posts just as I refreshed. + Show Spoiler +On November 15 2013 11:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2013 11:05 Risen wrote:
I'll vote anyone who makes their platform lynching rayn. You get modkilled for not voting. :p
What's wrongwith Oats this game? He's like a bit more dick than usually. On November 15 2013 11:55 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2013 11:42 Oatsmaster wrote:
So what I dont like about Mocsta's mayor post is that its very staged and rehearsed. Which obviously is scummy because town dont need to make up shit and make sure it sounds nice.
The thing with Storrzerg, like the stuff he says is objectively scummy. Sure. Noob claiming and all that. But town do it too.
On the other hand, he doesnt normally post so reservedly.
So in conclusion, I am null on Storrzerg and null on Mocsta. Oats baby. Read my case again I gave one of stores first posts from Hogwarts. A similar sized game. He came out guns blazing. The analysis was wrong. But more importantly it was there, unlike this game.
Oats, shy are you so prickly this game.
Normally you are obnoxious, but tidY you feel venomous.Why so angry? P.s. I'm more referring to your interactions with V.E Obviously no associative tells between unflipped players yada yada but I find it "psychologically intriguing" when people bring up similarities like that. Obviously if you are scum, the posts that stick out to you the most are your scum partners and so you can subconsciously repeat them etc. However, this is a lackluster point to say the least just something I'd thought I'd note.
I would say at the least, yes. At most that sort of thinking should make you take WIFOM to even deeper levels than I find myself doing. Which is a waste of thought.
I'm only replying to the very end of your post.
|
rayn, risen, and sharrant, I want to sit down and chat with you guys. Individually, for the most part.
rayn
(1) Are you town?
(2) Please unpack this statement:On November 15 2013 10:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yo Pandain i like that you didn't like Sharrant. Dat post you brought up was pretty bad. What, in particular, did you not like about that post? Does the rest of sharrant's filter do anything for you?
risen
(1) Honest question, you believe this entirely or is it half for poops and giggles?On November 15 2013 10:23 Risen wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2013 10:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Oh Risen was really funny but it doesn't make him anything alignment-wise. :p I'm pretty clearly not anything alignment-wise. So why say this? It's a continuation of a list post? Cool. In that case... Read as: soft pushing a VE who has an open town read on me in thread. Rayn knows he can't come out with a town read on me because I would pounce on him. From rayn's PoV what do you do with a town Risen prone to jumping on those who support him? Try and direct his attention to the person in the thread who has called him town without actually being the one pointing the finger. TL;DR: Lynch rayn. VE is null because my ego says he's town. I like being nominated for things and I'm still salty no one thought to nominate me for my dominant play in World Heavyweight Championship.
(2) Beyond that, plox to tell me about Hiro's followup plan: + Show Spoiler +On November 15 2013 09:35 hiro protagonist wrote:
Ok, well, out side of my policy lynch, how bout we talk about the positives of a pardner lynch:
*We kill off a pro scum role.
*It gets people to vote for not just the mayor, but who should be lynched. this means there will be more scumhunting day 1 and less dick wagging.
Sharrant
(1) Please unpack this statement:On November 15 2013 09:17 Sharrant wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2013 09:14 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 15 2013 09:12 hiro protagonist wrote:My FOOLPROOF mayor candidacy Plan™: step 1: Vote for me for mayor ^__^ step 2: Vote OOHCHILD* for pardner. + Show Spoiler +Sorry VE, I lied about you being my running mate  step 3: I lynch OOHCHILD, taking out a polrizing player, and a pro-scum role day 1. + Show Spoiler +*I reserve the right to lynch someone other than OHHCHILD should a better target apper
*I reserve the right to vote for a strong scumhunter for mayor who follows this plan.
##Vote: hiro protagonist Ewwww...aww hiro why? WHY?! You remember prplhz right? Dude. Policy-lynch is my scum-tell for him. AND YOU GUYS PLAY WITH A SIMILAR MINDSET!!! I THINK I WANT TO LYNCH HIRO PROTAGONIST!!!! I actually kind of like the thought going into the plan. How serious are you about wanting to lynch him? Specifically what thoughts do you see, and what do you like about them. I don't care about VE wanting to lynch hiro here, just your thoughts on hiro's thoughts, and on hiro's plan.
(2) What do you think about Hiro's followup, voting such that the D1 mayoral lynch would be 2nd in votes, would get the pardoner role, and would get whacked?
|
Also, hi everyone and whatnot.
|
On November 15 2013 12:11 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2013 12:09 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 15 2013 12:08 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 15 2013 12:00 Oatsmaster wrote:
well yeah you called me bad VE. Well you were being bad! And you call me bad all the time wtf?! If it means more coming from me because you perceive me to be good then why do you call me bad? Why do you antagonize? It's a game of give and take - and you can only take what you give. You give hardly anything Oats - keeping up and commenting is barely giving. It's more than people who don't post anything, but barely. The way you play, it's how scum generally play man. That's why you catch a lot of shit and why people call you bad. I give you a lot of shit because I've seen you play better and when you don't I get salty and call you bad. You called me bad when I was best scum in game. Lol I dont think you understood me the fist time. Oh...well, I was calling you bad because I was representing that I thought you were town. It would have been preferable if you'd gone with me on Prom and ended the game more assuredly, but you opposing me wasn't strictly speaking "bad" play. I certainly disagree that you were the best scum in the game I HAD THAT SHIT LOCKED DOWN. But no, I don't think you played that poorly at all in Resistance.
Im gonna quote this again.
[quote="DonBixlerZavala"]Oats gets the "worst player of the game" award though for essentially claiming scum this last day when he could have instead easily set up a DBZ/Oats dichotomy for the last team by just shutting the hell up.[/quote]
And this was postgame.
Grack why arent you catching scum?
Actually yeah grack shot to the top of the LYNCH HIM WITH FIRE list. Remember in White flag mafia? yeah totally different,
|
On November 15 2013 12:08 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2013 12:07 Alakaslam wrote:On November 15 2013 12:03 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 15 2013 10:53 Alakaslam wrote:On November 15 2013 09:05 supersoft wrote:
By the way.: Everyone who votes outside voting for mig, BC, BlazingHand, or myself is playing antitown.
At least, I don't even consider giving my vote anyone else. I fixed this for you, retaining all of your true intent, adding some compatible intent in te form of an inside joke, and containing equally flawed logic. Wouldn't it be convenient if this was the scum team? Highly unlikely, but then it is highly unlikely that any single player is scum- yet there is a guarantee of at least one. Therefore, you should elect players based on what they say, being WARY of those who have shown exceptional skill as well as those who have little or no skill. In fact, we want an absolute moderate with regard to meta until a veteran has sufficiently shown themselves to be town to earn our trust- in which case a veteran becomes ideal. This point is why I usually talk about Svengali at some point. However, that is just an attempt to sound laughable- a meta I plan to give one last ditch effort to destroy here before turning wholly to co/hosting games with the very occasional /in. Therefore, I will from now on refer to it thus; "The Peid Piper Problem". The pied piper mislead a bunch of rats through skill; so also can forum vets who rolled scum. I'm not an Assassin, therefore I'm not running for mayor. That was the only case in which I actually planned to run. I am still catching up. On November 15 2013 11:05 Alakaslam wrote:On November 15 2013 09:19 supersoft wrote:On November 15 2013 09:18 yamato77 wrote:On November 15 2013 09:17 supersoft wrote:lol VE and yamato are pissed, because they're not considered to be serious candidates... No surpise. And not exactly protown. On November 15 2013 09:01 yamato77 wrote:
electing someone so they don't get shot is not my idea of how D1 should play out That is exactly how we should play. And your ideas are exactly the reason, why you're no serious candidate. Who guarantees me that you not just fold and leave the game after d1 if we elect you? Seriously yamato... Yeah, super's mafia. oh god, you're reatarded. I disagree. Either: He is right, you are scum, Or: He is wrong, you both interact poorly here Or: He is not only wrong, but he is intentionally wrong and actually Pied-Pipering you. Or: something else. But VE is far from idiocy, I can give you am example of idiocy in a heartbeat and in fact will do so. Game: Newbie Mini Mafia XLVIII Filter: Alakaslam Game: Aperture Mafia 2: Part 2 Filter: Alakaslam For alignment specific idiocy. Do not insult needlessly. On November 15 2013 11:46 Alakaslam wrote:Caught up. I don't trust VE but I don't think he is scum yet. I don't claim to be able to read him; this is just a pair of Lincoln coppers I used to own. Coag, I will probably do that, in inside jokes dispersed here an Blazinghand d there, if you want to waste your tunnel on me over that know that it is a waste, therefore antitown unless there are reasons to think I would THE GREAT bloody cobbler as scum- so give reasons why that is a valid reason to tunnel me if that is an honest threat. That being said, I'm moving on to the vote thread after a bit more deliberation looks the same to me. The last one is the only one I could conceivably see as being similar Did you even understand me before? Or do I still fail to get my thoughts across? I never understood you.
So do you now? How the hell am I supposed to word things? I have stopped trolling and my head hurts with the assumption of -_- during my leisure time. It's like working a 16 hour day for kicks but I'm thinking it will pay off irl to become more serious here.
|
On November 15 2013 12:14 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2013 12:08 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 15 2013 12:07 Alakaslam wrote:On November 15 2013 12:03 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 15 2013 10:53 Alakaslam wrote:On November 15 2013 09:05 supersoft wrote:
By the way.: Everyone who votes outside voting for mig, BC, BlazingHand, or myself is playing antitown.
At least, I don't even consider giving my vote anyone else. I fixed this for you, retaining all of your true intent, adding some compatible intent in te form of an inside joke, and containing equally flawed logic. Wouldn't it be convenient if this was the scum team? Highly unlikely, but then it is highly unlikely that any single player is scum- yet there is a guarantee of at least one. Therefore, you should elect players based on what they say, being WARY of those who have shown exceptional skill as well as those who have little or no skill. In fact, we want an absolute moderate with regard to meta until a veteran has sufficiently shown themselves to be town to earn our trust- in which case a veteran becomes ideal. This point is why I usually talk about Svengali at some point. However, that is just an attempt to sound laughable- a meta I plan to give one last ditch effort to destroy here before turning wholly to co/hosting games with the very occasional /in. Therefore, I will from now on refer to it thus; "The Peid Piper Problem". The pied piper mislead a bunch of rats through skill; so also can forum vets who rolled scum. I'm not an Assassin, therefore I'm not running for mayor. That was the only case in which I actually planned to run. I am still catching up. On November 15 2013 11:05 Alakaslam wrote:On November 15 2013 09:19 supersoft wrote:On November 15 2013 09:18 yamato77 wrote:On November 15 2013 09:17 supersoft wrote:lol VE and yamato are pissed, because they're not considered to be serious candidates... No surpise. And not exactly protown. On November 15 2013 09:01 yamato77 wrote:
electing someone so they don't get shot is not my idea of how D1 should play out That is exactly how we should play. And your ideas are exactly the reason, why you're no serious candidate. Who guarantees me that you not just fold and leave the game after d1 if we elect you? Seriously yamato... Yeah, super's mafia. oh god, you're reatarded. I disagree. Either: He is right, you are scum, Or: He is wrong, you both interact poorly here Or: He is not only wrong, but he is intentionally wrong and actually Pied-Pipering you. Or: something else. But VE is far from idiocy, I can give you am example of idiocy in a heartbeat and in fact will do so. Game: Newbie Mini Mafia XLVIII Filter: Alakaslam Game: Aperture Mafia 2: Part 2 Filter: Alakaslam For alignment specific idiocy. Do not insult needlessly. On November 15 2013 11:46 Alakaslam wrote:Caught up. I don't trust VE but I don't think he is scum yet. I don't claim to be able to read him; this is just a pair of Lincoln coppers I used to own. Coag, I will probably do that, in inside jokes dispersed here an Blazinghand d there, if you want to waste your tunnel on me over that know that it is a waste, therefore antitown unless there are reasons to think I would THE GREAT bloody cobbler as scum- so give reasons why that is a valid reason to tunnel me if that is an honest threat. That being said, I'm moving on to the vote thread after a bit more deliberation looks the same to me. The last one is the only one I could conceivably see as being similar Did you even understand me before? Or do I still fail to get my thoughts across? I never understood you. So do you now? How the hell am I supposed to word things? I have stopped trolling and my head hurts with the assumption of -_- during my leisure time. It's like working a 16 hour day for kicks but I'm thinking it will pay off irl to become more serious here.
I still dont really understand you.
Its ok, just play the game and dont care about whether I can read properly.
|
On November 15 2013 12:14 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2013 12:11 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 15 2013 12:09 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 15 2013 12:08 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 15 2013 12:00 Oatsmaster wrote:
well yeah you called me bad VE. Well you were being bad! And you call me bad all the time wtf?! If it means more coming from me because you perceive me to be good then why do you call me bad? Why do you antagonize? It's a game of give and take - and you can only take what you give. You give hardly anything Oats - keeping up and commenting is barely giving. It's more than people who don't post anything, but barely. The way you play, it's how scum generally play man. That's why you catch a lot of shit and why people call you bad. I give you a lot of shit because I've seen you play better and when you don't I get salty and call you bad. You called me bad when I was best scum in game. Lol I dont think you understood me the fist time. Oh...well, I was calling you bad because I was representing that I thought you were town. It would have been preferable if you'd gone with me on Prom and ended the game more assuredly, but you opposing me wasn't strictly speaking "bad" play. I certainly disagree that you were the best scum in the game I HAD THAT SHIT LOCKED DOWN. But no, I don't think you played that poorly at all in Resistance. Im gonna quote this again. [quote="DonBixlerZavala"]Oats gets the "worst player of the game" award though for essentially claiming scum this last day when he could have instead easily set up a DBZ/Oats dichotomy for the last team by just shutting the hell up.
And this was postgame.
Grack why arent you catching scum?
Actually yeah grack shot to the top of the LYNCH HIM WITH FIRE list. Remember in White flag mafia? yeah totally different,[/QUOTE]
It's different this game Oats. JJD in that game was pretty clear lynch bait. Storrzerg this game is more null.
|
1) All gut feeling. Not a very logical read. Has some basis in the potential for a scum rayn to think like that, but honestly it's just gut. Still think he should be lynched, my gut is usually right.
2) I honestly don't know. I don't even know what hiro is talking about.
|
Yeah that was leftover rage - understand that that post directly followed the endgame post which directly followed the situation I'm referring to. Having gone over the situation I fully admit to a bit of bias where that bit is concerned. I'm sorry Oats, I didn't mean to upset you. You know I love you. Here, come lie beside me. I won't let anyone hurt you anymore.
|
Date night, peace for now folks.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Can we get back to the actual game and not postgame of another one? :/
|
|
|
|
|
|
32011
322
214
EPT
