|
@poofter You haven't said anything all game until these last two posts.
Here are some of the highlights I particulary dislike.
This whole post is saying nice things without actually saying anything. You say you don't want to clog up the thread while that's exactly what you are doing. Why would you not be comfortable voting if you're not trying to keep the thread from progressing.
"I like van, i like ball because he calls me out. Posting more is better, go team! Then the excuse, I'm new blah blah."
On October 30 2013 15:28 Tehpoofter wrote: @Van I don't have anything too strong but I do like the way you have been approaching things from multiple angles as opposed to just tunnel visioning on one person or thing I feel like that is a pro town move. My other read thus far is on Balla I liked that she was calling me out for not posting for awhile when I had previously given some input that seems pro town to me posting more is always better!
Also I'd like to know what you(van) think about the July vote from store/obzy? Too soon? I'm new so the timing may be fairly typical but seems early too me I'm just starting to build up some reads here not sure I feel comfortable voting yet.
Either post or don't post. Why be defensive.
On October 31 2013 01:35 Tehpoofter wrote: I'm trying to get some posts in before I head to class in a half hour so going to try to make this quick and not spam the thread to hard
Again.
On October 30 2013 16:17 Tehpoofter wrote: just an fyi I'm playing in daily mafia so concentrating on that for the next bit will check in here if things get going but if I'm not around thats where I went.
Where is this post???
On October 31 2013 06:45 Tehpoofter wrote: On cake I made a post last night about how I felt about him and his early accusations which don't need to be rehashed now as its nothing new to go on.
Do you mean this?? Because in this post all you say is it's been discussed. You're trying to hide under the cover of being pro town while you say nothing and follow the easier reads other people have made for you.
On October 30 2013 15:07 Tehpoofter wrote:I have to say thus far the biggest read I have so far is on Cake. I know its been discussed (but i was afk) my two cents is that his read of storr as being suspicious is off and I have to say he has been accused of being scummy by balla but has yet to address balla in her posts, I find that odd. @Cake what do you think of balla accussing you of being scummy? You seem to address the other people coming hard on you and I feel like you have gotten a fair bit of heat for day one so maybe it was just something you missed idk just want to hear what you had to say on that. (On a side not balla I feel like you should change your name to "Bella" because I had it typed in that way in here and on all my notes before realizing my mistake and having to change it all data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" )
|
On October 31 2013 09:02 Balla24 wrote: You mean as lurker lynch targets JonnyLaw? Or is there another reason you'd be ok with lynching them?
Exactly Balla, they're hardly active and are certainly not contributing to the town at this point regardless of their alignment. I think going through their filters it's possible to make an educated guess and hope for the best. As I said there's 24 hours to go so we have some time to see improvement out of their play.
|
Stupid bottom of the page. I want responses to my post on the bottom of page 14 about poofter!
Until we're closer to the deadline I'm not voting storrzerg. He has time to contribute as do the other lurkers. If nothing by then I'll listen to any and all arguments for the four players who have not contributed a lot.
For now, lets stick to discussing active players please.
|
Looked over his filter and storr contributed and tried to move the conversation forward in nearly every post. I don't mind his play at all but I want to see what else he has to offer or if he sits on his july vote and does nothing else.
|
On October 31 2013 11:34 OdinOfPergo wrote: Ok holy crap. Actually you know what, I'm not sorry. I work really freaking hard to support my lifestyle. If anyone wants to call me out for it... Well let's dance baby. Anyway, I need to re-read this thread again but on first glance I don't like Cake, July, or Jonny at all. Their post offer little content or crumby arguments. I need to persue these leads obv since I haven't been here. But give me like an hour. Maby two. I will type up an explanation for my reads.
If you don't have time to play a game why join? I work hard as well to "support my life style" but I don't cry about it. Join the working world.
|
Honestly I'm so tired of these I work too much, school too much can't contribute posts. Why do you start something you cannot finish. The same applies to work or school. When you take too much on you hurt yourself I don't understand and am honestly getting frustrated.
Contribute what you can and stop fucking whining.
|
Good. Read my filter. I've said since before the game started I hate people who don't participate and there is still time left until we have to vote for them to add something.
You com ein here so angry
|
Huh, why are you so mad man?
I've been in this game the entire time and said nothing to you except stop making excuses. And again, stop making excuses. Enter the thread and post something useful. Don't come in so defensive then cry about work. We don't know you. No one cares. You've still added nothing.
|
[QUOTE]On October 31 2013 13:29 OdinOfPergo wrote:
JonnyLaw I don't like any of your post. I'm willing to let post like these + Show Spoiler +On October 30 2013 11:29 JonnyLaw wrote: I'll be out for a couple hours but I'll check the thread before I head to sleep. I don't want to clog up the thread with useless posts.
I like storr's abrasiveness early. It moves our discussion along. I want to hear the response to balla's question.
Looking at the TL profiles nyxnyxnyx is the only player clearly marked outside of North America. Make your presence known here town. Otherwise you're going to end up lynched and that's not a great start to the game. slip by early since we are still only a few hours into D1. What can I say? Oh well... he probably has nothing to go on.. This was my exact train of thought when I read these. I didn't agree with them but I also had a lot more to work with since I am coming into D1 half way through.But the problem is you make a lot of them. Like these; + Show Spoiler +On October 30 2013 13:48 JonnyLaw wrote: @cake Nah, I'm keeping that opinion to myself for a while. I'm not telling anyone how to play on day one.
Nyxnyxnyx is active in lol subforum. I expect to see him post in the next few hours. It's an awkward time for him.
@storr If you've played or obs'd newb games you'd understand his concern. This thread looks active and that's an oddity from what i've seen in the last two games. On October 30 2013 10:21 JonnyLaw wrote: I disagree that length of posts matter but posting actively and participating in the game does matter. That could be what he meant just phrased differently. That's exactly what we should be talking about at this point in order to form a plan for finding the scum in the game.
What does this add to the game? Nothing. Also Nyx wasn't active... So you're plainly just fucking lying. Ontop of that, you bring arguements like this in; [QUOTE]On October 30 2013 16:45 JonnyLaw wrote: ##vote Vanesco
Here's the beginning of the long posts.
Vanesco repeatedly apologizes and brings nothing new to the table. Jumping on with Storr.
+ Show Spoiler +On October 30 2013 10:15 Vanesco wrote: Or maybe Storr is trying to pressure Balla or see if someone decides to jump on it...
You seem very defensive of Balla, especially since nothing of importance has been given by anybody as of yet. I think pressuring people to talk is a good thing on the start of Day 1 since nobody is confirmed (apart from Obzy ofc). In this post he apologized where? And you outright lie about Nyx? K. Give me a # or I'm going to go ahead and tag you as scum since you called me out on PG 16.
+ Show Spoiler +On October 30 2013 10:15 Vanesco wrote: Or maybe Storr is trying to pressure Balla or see if someone decides to jump on it...
You seem very defensive of Balla, especially since nothing of importance has been given by anybody as of yet. I think pressuring people to talk is a good thing on the start of Day 1 since nobody is confirmed (apart from Obzy ofc). Ok, so you re-post the SAME QUOTE in your post twice. I don't even understand. Why don't you just add your "early bandwagon" crap earlier when you posted this? Why do you feel the need to quote it twice? Remember he jumped on an EARLY bandwagon.
+ Show Spoiler +On October 30 2013 11:40 Vanesco wrote: @cakemanofdoom All I'm saying is that onlywonderboy didn't really respond to StorrZ comment other than saying he doesn't agree. You on the other hand just talk about Storr trying to pressure Balla with no evidence (which is in my opinion is a justified play on page 1 of day 1). It just seems to me like you are trying to redirect off of Balla. I don't see any hint of a an apology in these post. I can only see Vanesco trying to reason out who his first lynch should be. Where the hell do you see any hint of hesitation or apology? All his post seem to be on point so far. You're pretty much trying to just drag up an empty argument against him and hoping that people don't read your screw-ball post. Well, short luck for you pal. I always break down post to the best of my ability. And your's look like crap. And again so apologetic. If you're not mafia what do you have to hide?
+ Show Spoiler +On October 30 2013 11:46 Vanesco wrote: @Obzy In my mind I play by thinking everybody is potential mafia at the start(except for me and you). Maybe defending was a wrong word to use, instead maybe redirecting would be better. If Balla and cakeman are mafia together, then it seems like cakeman is trying to redirect off of Balla by saying that there is no concrete evidence (like I have said many times before, there shouldnt be on page 1 of day 1). It just seems very scummy since the only way to get people to talk at the start of the day is to put a bit of pressure and he is trying to take it off Balla.
There are a couple more apologizing posts then this one jumping on poofter. I'm saying poofter/vanesco are both scum.
+ Show Spoiler +QUOTE]On October 30 2013 14:17 Vanesco wrote: Exactly Balla, I was just about to post about Tehpoofter. I would like to hear from him, even if he thinks he has nothing to add, it would help town. [/QUOTE]
And you follow with.. FLUFF! You're only defense is Balla. And that's only the case because I have a strong town read on him atm. + Show Spoiler +On October 30 2013 16:47 JonnyLaw wrote: I want responses poofter and Vanesco. Sleeping and another game are fine since we still have some time before votes are tallied and we lynch. You really didn't even mention Poof in your post, why expect some responce from him after it?
Nyx I don't think we should lynch Nyx yet. He played even worse the last game. I'm like 90% sure he's just playing a bad townie. + Show Spoiler +On October 31 2013 02:36 Vonthin wrote: Not sure Nyx is mafia, he did the same exact thing last game, hardly posted here and never gave good reasons on why he thought people were scum/voting for people. I want to see him post more to see if anything is different but so far seems like standard Nyx. The point Cake has though about posting on the LoL forums is valid though. And I'm not the only one to notice it. The only post he makes that makes me question it is the call for Vane lynch along with Cake. Cake looks terrible. Vane looks pretty townie to me.
[spoiler][QUOTE]On October 31 2013 03:07 onlywonderboy wrote: nyx - I want to avoid a nyx lynch on day 1 at least. I really want to hear more from him to see if he learned anything from last game. My point earlier about him wasn't that he was quiet, it was that he's quiet so I can't really judge if he's trying to improve his play from last game
[/QUOTE]
|
ah shit hit post instead of preview I'm an idiot. Ignore that post, I'm formatting another one.
|
Just caught up from my last post yesterday. Odin managed to spam and clog up the the thread while directly contradicting himself a couple times.
On October 31 2013 12:18 OdinOfPergo wrote: Sadly for you, while I haven't read your filter, I have read this thread two time now..
So if he read the thread twice already how did he miss my large post on poofter or the entire rehashing of what I said about nyx actively posting in hours that work with him timezone? Also, he wants to label me as scum because I said he's making excuses for not contributing to the game?
On October 31 2013 13:29 OdinOfPergo wrote: What does this add to the game? Nothing. Also Nyx wasn't active... So you're plainly just fucking lying.
In this post he apologized where? And you outright lie about Nyx? K. Give me a # or I'm going to go ahead and tag you as scum since you called me out on PG 16.
Except now he's read the thread FOUR TIMES
On October 31 2013 13:29 OdinOfPergo wrote: I've read this entire thead probably four times now to get everything that has happen since I was gone for so long.
If he's read the thread four times by that point why is he so quick to say he's ready to change his mind at any moment?
On October 31 2013 13:31 OdinOfPergo wrote: I came in late. I didn't have a ton of time to compile that post. I picked everyone who looked really scummy to me and made a case. I am subject to change said cases at a moments notice.
So uhh he still hasn't read the thread in detail. This is in reference to balla asking him about my read on poofter
On October 31 2013 14:06 OdinOfPergo wrote: @ Balla I can compile a post agaist Poof. I read his filter when I pieced together my argument on my scum reads. What is happening so far (bear in mind he only had like half a page so far. So I don't have a lot to work with.) He post almost entirely contentless post and trains on Cake. The content issue I have a problem with. The Cake train... meh not so much. I have big problems with Cake myself. But since you pointed it out.. Poof, explain your reasoning or I might change my vote.
Still hasn't read the thread.
On October 31 2013 14:20 OdinOfPergo wrote: I didn't see Nyx pop up on the LoL sub.
Who stood out more than storr in the first few pages? Storr has a very unique formatting style. I'm just not buying this guy. He came in here with the intention of causing drama, flooding the thread with spam and throwing town into chaos.
On October 31 2013 14:38 OdinOfPergo wrote: Give me a few minutes, I will try to get a post up on my reads on Storr with like 45-60 minutes. I don't remember much of him threw my initial reads. That does not boad well for him. But I can't say anything one way or the other until I go through the filter and build a case for/against.
HE HASN'T READ THE THREAD
On October 31 2013 15:09 OdinOfPergo wrote: So far I'm not sold on Storr. bear in mind I'm only at like PG 12. so far in the thread so maby he slips. Right now though from what I've seen is like a light townie read. I'm making a post on it right now actually. If you guys give me a few minutes it will be up for viewing pleasure.
Quick summary. Odin is all over the place. He blatantly contradicts himself and pressures, then votes cake who will clearly not be lynched if he read the thread. He skimmed the posts and formed general opinions because he doesn't give a fuck who gets lynched. By his own admission he won't be here for another 24 hrs. So we have a spamming lurker on our hands. Kill the bastard.
##vote OdinofPergo
|
Of note, I will vote poofter if we can get a majority.
E00e I'm really not ready to lynch but it's better than no lynch. Same applies to July and nyx or even owb to a lesser degree.
|
Odin also randomly cast suspicion on a number of players before going awol for his 24-30 hours.
Can you think of a better method to throw the town into chaos than supporting lynching a few players who already have mild suspicion on them? He's backing up claims so people keep their votes spread and we do nothing.
If the guy is town he is clearly not helping the town to any degree of the word. He's counter productive and worse, he's a liar who cannot be trusted to have our interests in mind during this game.
|
Yes, I do believe it 100%. He hadn't posted anything of note until last night. He is far and away the most scummy player we have seen any content from this game. I don't like lynching people we have no good reads on and you know that from the last game we played.
Van's fine and my post on him, though poor brought up a nice discussion. Is yet another in reference to poofter? Because I don't see him getting 7 votes man.
|
July who are you? You have eight posts in this game and all of them barring one is 1-2 lines. You've done nothing to help. Post something of substance rather than your shit flinging.
|
We have 5-6 people here. Read what I just posted and tell me how Odin's posting helped or why you think it will help the town to win this game?
If you cannot then vote odin.
|
I think storr will post before the deadline. He will not get a majority. Even if he does, we learn nothing.
Odin is actively hurting the town play. I am convinced this is our best choice and we can get a lynch.
July I'm not even responding to you until you post something worth reading.
None of you responded to what I wrote.
|
On November 01 2013 02:06 cakemanofdoom wrote: While I was also wondering about how much of the thread Odin has actually read, I think that it's too hard to lynch him right now. He can only post in bursts, which makes him hard to analyze... I'd rather wait a while so we can get a better read on him.
Cakeman that's my whole point! Even if he is town he's not helping us at all. He actually hurting the town either way. Why do we need a better read when it's a win/win situation to lynch someone.
|
How is calling people out without reading the thread and lying about it helping the town at all?
He clearly did not even read the thread and yet he posts as though what he is saying is a fact. How can that possibly help us to win the game?
|
Really? He claims to have read it four times. You don't forget on your fourth time through.
|
|
|
|