On November 01 2013 10:35 Oatsmaster wrote:
All JJD has basically talked about is Random lynching. Which anyone, scum or town can talk confidently about because its unlikely to be implemented anyway. So its just empty words.

JJD actually confidently pushes hzflank and reconsiders his opinion later. When people question why he would rather vote people other people are also voting for he sticks up for his opinion. hzflank mostly just posts a bunch of fluff in a confident manner.

Grackaroni

United States9857 Posts

November 01 2013 01:40 GMT

#223

On November 01 2013 10:37 Oatsmaster wrote:
Lol ok, who do you think is scum Grack?

My 2nd favorite master. Kush gets first dibs on my love.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

November 01 2013 01:52 GMT

#224

He reconsiders his opinion because he got shit on it.

Grackaroni

United States9857 Posts

November 01 2013 01:55 GMT

#225

On November 01 2013 10:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
He reconsiders his opinion because he got shit on it.

Mkfuba supported what he said...

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

November 01 2013 01:56 GMT

#226

And like everyone else said it was bad.
1 person does not make a lot of people.

Grackaroni

United States9857 Posts

November 01 2013 02:14 GMT

#227

I think we are talking about 2 different things. I am talking about this exchange:

On November 01 2013 03:03 JarJarDrinks wrote:

Show nested quote +

On November 01 2013 02:37 hzflank wrote:

On November 01 2013 02:34 JarJarDrinks wrote:

On October 31 2013 12:53 hzflank wrote:

On October 31 2013 12:37 Grackaroni wrote:

On October 31 2013 12:24 Bereft wrote:
grack, if you really wanted to throw weight behind that vote, why not at least RNG it? instead of picking your favorite singaporean, that is. which has tons of favoritism bias. since we have extra mafia this game, RNG gives us a 31% chance of hitting scum, instead of the typical ~25%. we're all reasonable and rational people here, logic appeals to us [i'd hope].

On October 31 2013 12:13 Grackaroni wrote:

On October 31 2013 12:10 Asinine wrote:

On October 31 2013 12:07 Pandain wrote:

On October 31 2013 11:53 Asinine wrote:
Hello comrades. I will be doing an ASA (Ask Smurf Anything) today. It starts now. I cannot guarantee that I will answer any questions that seem to be fishing for my real TL account.

What is Qatar like?

Another thought elicits it's
familiars
Crowding their weight into the
chamber
Of my weary, doleful mind

What right does he possess
To exhaust my idle time
By way of his enslaving image.

I have come to the conclusion that this man is Palmar.
There will be no further questions!

no, i want to ask a question -- why does pandain only get to ask one.
asinine, what's your reason for smurfing? i can think of only 2 reasons. which one is yours:
[a] you have a reputation known throughout the land of being an excellent scum hunter, and you don't want to die night 1.
you believe your meta is so obvious people would be able to read your play day 1.
[c] other (please expand)

Those are some pretty good odds. I'm not against RNG if people are up for it.

I would think my chances of actually identifying scum on day one are less than 31%, therefore RNG would yield better results for me. Ofcourse, We would need to decide on who rolls the dice. How should we do that? I suggest we vote on it.

How could anyone read this post and not think you were for random lynching?

Because the whole point of that was that I did not like the idea of random lynching because I was worried that scum might control the random.

This is exactly my point. You pretend like you're ok w/ random lynching when you are clearly concerned about it. First you say that you're worried about who gets to choose the random person. Then when it's pointed out to you that there is indeed a way for a random selection to be chosen, you change your stance to: If we lynch randomly then we wont get any discussion.

If that was your stance then what was the point of suggesting that we vote for someone to pick the random person?

On November 01 2013 04:15 JarJarDrinks wrote:

Show nested quote +

OK, you're saying that you were being sarcastic in that post as well as the following one. Didn't understand that's what you were saying. If that's the case then it didn't come across that way to me at all but I can definately see it that way now.

Since that was the bulk of my case:

##unvote hzflank

It's true that he was attacked for his confusing RNG logic where he said hzflank was scum for pretending to be unafraid of random lynches, but when he brought this point up the only thing that happened between the change of mind was mkfuba agreeing with it.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

November 01 2013 02:27 GMT

#228

huh yeah actually. I guess I projected my thoughts to me everyone.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

November 01 2013 02:36 GMT

#229

Thoughts on Mig Grack?

JarJarDrinks

United States1302 Posts

November 01 2013 02:37 GMT

#230

2 things

- I thought I already explained this but: I never said my reason for voting hzflank was because other people suspected him. I voted for him because I felt he was scummy for my own reason and the fact that other people also suspected him made it so I felt comfortable putting my vote there because I thought there was a decent chance that he would get lynched. If everyone in the thread thought he was like super town then I probably don't vote for him because I don't want to waste time voting for someone that has no chance of being lynched.

- I didn't reconsider my opinion because it got shit on. I changed my opinion because I believe I misinterpreted what hzflank was saying. I wasn't the only person that missed his sarcasm but now that he pointed it out I think it's very likely that he was indeed against a random lynch from the getgo.

Grackaroni

United States9857 Posts

November 01 2013 02:40 GMT

#231

On November 01 2013 11:36 Oatsmaster wrote:
Thoughts on Mig Grack?

I don't have a strong feel either way yet.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

November 01 2013 02:41 GMT

#232

On November 01 2013 11:40 Grackaroni wrote:

Show nested quote +