Figurative vote goes on Echelon
Hogwarts Mafia - Page 3
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
Figurative vote goes on Echelon | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
| ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
On October 18 2013 06:30 I-be-Pro wrote: it's not about him being to scummy to be scum. It's about Palmar being incredibly stubborn ever since the-game-before-L and L happened and he completly lost it when trying to change his meta to the point that he doesn't give a crap if he's not getting his way. He's not getting his way in this game either. If this was palmar refusing to play for no reason yeah sure lynch him but that's not what's happening. If your waiting for the reason to be for no reason you won't find scum. Your voting Ceph despite clearly having time to go through some filters and while that's an okay choice it's definitely not a town choice or what I would expect from you. | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
| ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
| ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
| ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
Agree with Stutters and Palmar. | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
On October 18 2013 10:09 raynpelikonoshi wrote: Stutters is capable of making good posts as town. We should lynch him if he does not contribute. Palmar's "apathy" seems like town!Palmar. I can't really explain that better at this point. I have no idea of Sno, i always want to lynch him. Need to see more from him. -rayn My basic problem with this is that even though there is a possibility that he just doesn't give a shit about the thread right now,
Hope that explains my view on that. Also agree on Mattchew of course. | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
On October 18 2013 10:10 raynpelikonoshi wrote: So HF (or anyone else) what do you make of Cephiro making one post here and 7 posts in our house QT explaining why he has not posted or why he posted what he did or what he is about to post next? -rayn He basically summarized what he wrote in the QT and then added actual analysis which I liked. It doesn't prove him town in itself but it's definitely significant and means we shouldn't lynch him. | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
| ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
Any thoughts on any discussion, people are retarded, or the such? | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
1. When do you plan to start contributing more? 2. What differentiates your town play from scum play? 3. Who are your town reads? 4. Is there anyone you find suspicious now, even if you're not sure. You stated that Mocsta would've made the "correct" play to claim SAM as town, but then you ask if it's policy to lynch any such SAMS indicating a desire to or at least acceptance of. What would be your stance on the issue. | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
Holy, who are your town reads. You say you will pressure people later, why not pressure them now and lay out the questions so we can see what you're thinking? Anything interesting from your QT? | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
| ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
On October 18 2013 13:02 Mattchew wrote: i answered this and you are skewing my order. Do you mean this? On October 18 2013 00:02 Mattchew wrote: lol what because i asked if it was standard policy to lynch miller claims? or because i called his play correct from a town point of view? because they are 2 completely separate thoughts having nothing to do with one another What I get from this is that you don't see the connection. If it was correct in your opinion to claim SAM as town, then why would you ask if its standard policy to lynch him if Mocsta made a possible town move. | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
| ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
Here was mine I didn't submit: + Show Spoiler + I'm Harry Potter, the boy who fucks good | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
| ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
![]() | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
It looks nice on you! | ||
| ||