|
On October 03 2013 21:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Clarity, why exactly is your read on BH what it is? What are the good things he has done, especially early on in this game?
My read on BH this game so far has been "I dunno but he's contributing"
His activity and involvement (especially in the early hours of this cycle) gives me a slight town lean on him but it's hardly anything. There are far far better lynches, though.
Now excuse me while I drown in Holyflare's post
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I realise I wrote that but as I got to writing the actual content it seemed aparent people were fucking scummy
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On October 03 2013 21:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:Holyflare. First of all, this is bullshit: Show nested quote +Dirkzor, Risen, Sloosh, Rayn and Oats (clarity has been mentioned too) should be eliminated 1 by 1 in terms of rating of their overall posting to determine who is the optimal lynch for day 1 and ultimately who will be most useful in an endgame lylo scenario. Why would you say this? Also why did you hide your vote on Oats behind RNG as it was not RNG for you?
I did not hide it on Oats, I've explained this countless times. I do not know anyone here, so I would rather sit on an RNG determined vote, barring anything obviously striking. Which it turns out has happened and now I've switched my vote.
|
On October 03 2013 21:43 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2013 21:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:Holyflare. First of all, this is bullshit: Dirkzor, Risen, Sloosh, Rayn and Oats (clarity has been mentioned too) should be eliminated 1 by 1 in terms of rating of their overall posting to determine who is the optimal lynch for day 1 and ultimately who will be most useful in an endgame lylo scenario. Why would you say this? Also why did you hide your vote on Oats behind RNG as it was not RNG for you? I did not hide it on Oats, I've explained this countless times. I do not know anyone here, so I would rather sit on an RNG determined vote, barring anything obviously striking. Which it turns out has happened and now I've switched my vote.
Do you understand when Blazinghand says "RNG = Oats" it's no more a random lynch. It's a lynch on Oats that Blazinghand randomized?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Also, as it progressed I kept it on oats because his play was tunneled and did not bother with questioning other people.
|
You know the target, it's no more a random lynch for you.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On October 03 2013 21:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2013 21:43 Holyflare wrote:On October 03 2013 21:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:Holyflare. First of all, this is bullshit: Dirkzor, Risen, Sloosh, Rayn and Oats (clarity has been mentioned too) should be eliminated 1 by 1 in terms of rating of their overall posting to determine who is the optimal lynch for day 1 and ultimately who will be most useful in an endgame lylo scenario. Why would you say this? Also why did you hide your vote on Oats behind RNG as it was not RNG for you? I did not hide it on Oats, I've explained this countless times. I do not know anyone here, so I would rather sit on an RNG determined vote, barring anything obviously striking. Which it turns out has happened and now I've switched my vote. Do you understand when Blazinghand says "RNG = Oats" it's no more a random lynch. It's a lynch on Oats that Blazinghand randomized?
That's the same fucking thing??
|
On October 03 2013 21:45 Holyflare wrote:
Also, as it progressed I kept it on oats because his play was tunneled and did not bother with questioning other people.
So what did you expect Oats to do when people in thread were you, BH and him (and to some extent Risen)?
How was his play tunneled?
|
Ok HF is like confirmed town. Cool shit.
Rayn, it is a random lynch.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
The fact that I know the name of the target does not equate to it not being random anymore. I know nothing of anyone in this thread, the numbers were random, the name was random to me. It was RNG.
|
Like should Oats be trying to develop a read on Sloosh or what?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On October 03 2013 21:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2013 21:45 Holyflare wrote:
Also, as it progressed I kept it on oats because his play was tunneled and did not bother with questioning other people. So what did you expect Oats to do when people in thread were you, BH and him (and to some extent Risen)? How was his play tunneled?
Have you read this shit? I've made at least 1-2 cases on oats that explained all this. You aren't helping my view of you.
|
On October 03 2013 21:47 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok HF is like confirmed town. Cool shit.
Rayn, it is a random lynch.
No it's not. It is not. If you know the target before you say if you agree/not with a random lynch it's no more a random lynch.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On October 03 2013 21:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2013 21:47 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok HF is like confirmed town. Cool shit.
Rayn, it is a random lynch.
No it's not. It is not. If you know the target before you say if you agree/not with a random lynch it's no more a random lynch.
Oh, now I know where you're coming from. While, yes, that makes sense for other people. However, since I do not know anybody here it is in fact random for me.
|
On October 03 2013 21:48 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2013 21:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 03 2013 21:45 Holyflare wrote:
Also, as it progressed I kept it on oats because his play was tunneled and did not bother with questioning other people. So what did you expect Oats to do when people in thread were you, BH and him (and to some extent Risen)? How was his play tunneled? Have you read this shit? I've made at least 1-2 cases on oats that explained all this. You aren't helping my view of you.
Your cases were bad.
Now, again, how was Oats' play tunneled and what he should have done instead of trying to figure out people's alignment that were actually posting at that time?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 03 2013 21:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2013 21:47 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok HF is like confirmed town. Cool shit.
Rayn, it is a random lynch.
No it's not. It is not. If you know the target before you say if you agree/not with a random lynch it's no more a random lynch.
I was about to tell you you're being silly, then I suddenly understood what you meant. The fact that I was confused for a moment suggests to me that there isn't that much to be made of the point, though.
|
On October 03 2013 21:49 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2013 21:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 03 2013 21:47 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok HF is like confirmed town. Cool shit.
Rayn, it is a random lynch.
No it's not. It is not. If you know the target before you say if you agree/not with a random lynch it's no more a random lynch. Oh, now I know where you're coming from. While, yes, that makes sense for other people. However, since I do not know anybody here it is in fact random for me.
If you are scum and Oats is town you can safely agree with the randomizing.
If you are both scum you can either agree with it or disagree, randomlynch was never gonna go through. It was a stupid suggestion in the first place.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On October 03 2013 21:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2013 21:48 Holyflare wrote:On October 03 2013 21:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 03 2013 21:45 Holyflare wrote:
Also, as it progressed I kept it on oats because his play was tunneled and did not bother with questioning other people. So what did you expect Oats to do when people in thread were you, BH and him (and to some extent Risen)? How was his play tunneled? Have you read this shit? I've made at least 1-2 cases on oats that explained all this. You aren't helping my view of you. Your cases were bad. Now, again, how was Oats' play tunneled and what he should have done instead of trying to figure out people's alignment that were actually posting at that time?
Then you've read jack shit.
On October 02 2013 14:05 Holyflare wrote:
Stop posting long posts??? It's called analysis of a player. The fact that even after I've posted that you aren't asking me anything, aren't trying to discover whether I am in fact town or not and aren't trying to decipher other peoples motives is just rubbing me the wrong way. It's easy to jump on a player because he played the noob card but there are 2 scum in this game not just one. If i were to be lynched and did indeed flip town then wouldn't you regret not pressuring other people on why they think i'm a sure fire scum?
On October 02 2013 14:08 Holyflare wrote:
The fact you can't just click my profile (you can even see my post count??) and see that I've only been in newbie games is just more testament to your alignment. Shouldn't you be discerning these answers before you know that "He's surely scum".?
My case before all these things said things similar to all this. Please don't insult things you haven't been bothered to actually read.
|
On October 03 2013 21:49 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2013 21:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 03 2013 21:47 Oatsmaster wrote:
Ok HF is like confirmed town. Cool shit.
Rayn, it is a random lynch.
No it's not. It is not. If you know the target before you say if you agree/not with a random lynch it's no more a random lynch. I was about to tell you you're being silly, then I suddenly understood what you meant. The fact that I was confused for a moment suggests to me that there isn't that much to be made of the point, though.
Now do you think Blazinghand is stupid enough to not know this in the first place? As he proposed the shit.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
He didn't question anything. He stuck to his guns and didn't bother discerning if I was actually town or not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
