|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 08 2013 08:41 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On October 08 2013 08:38 marvellosity wrote: -shortest filter in the game (love dem activity tells bro) Yeah this is true especially since he was kinda scumhunting when he was being pressured. I really liked his case on sloosh tho
so what?
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
what i wrote is way more than there is on anyone else.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
can't really be bothered arguing with you clarity.
you've not provided one compelling argument why anyone is mafia.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 08 2013 08:45 Holyflare wrote: Just want to point out that rayn was very adament in his argument with me about talking about oats. Disregarding all the dirkzor stuff.
what do you take from that exactly?
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
Anyways, lynching the dude with the shortest filter is 100% a pro tactic.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
yeah whoever the 2nd mafia is has played decently.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 08 2013 08:49 Holyflare wrote: Well, just skimming through the rayn filter, his entire first page is oats and then his whole conversation with me is about oats etc etc. It just seems pretty selective when he was trying to apply pressure to other people. It seems like something a scum would do - see all the arguments on their ally and then pick them apart while applying pressure elsewhere.
meh. i don't really buy this argument. i just don't think it's actually true as a general principle.
assuming i'm alive tomorrow i'll go over oats a lot more than i have already. i've had town feels and they might be wrong. just his argument with me seemed so townie to me because it was so fucking retarded. usually fucking retarded is, contrary to risen's opinion, a towntell. see me on BH, see Mocsta in LXII, see countless other examples. if you're gonna lynch oats for being "objectively" scummy you're going to lynch him every single game.
So, not precisely sure what i'm going to be looking for there.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 08 2013 08:54 Holyflare wrote: Re-read rayns filter and count the number of times he mentions oats, especially at times when the topic of conversation was not on oats.
On October 08 2013 08:52 marvellosity wrote:
meh. i don't really buy this argument. i just don't think it's actually true as a general principle.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
like it's possible Oats is mafia, but i don't think that's a reason for it.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
although I would like to say "i told you so" at this point
but wtf
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
not going to think about this kill tonight.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
this is some big play.
why, is the question.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
i was the only one who had a decent townread on oats.
so whoever the mafia is, purposefully killed oats while professing suspicion of him.
that was a conscious decision by the mafia.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
it implicates Dirk *so* heavily
because surely anyone non-Dirk makes a normal night-kill and lynches into dirk/oats?
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
but that seems so simple.
That's like Dirk signing his own death warrant.
that's extremely confusing.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
yes it's the wifom argument
but even WITH the wifom argument, is the wifom argument removing one of the realistic lynches?
would we really lynch 2 non-dirk people with oats dead just based on wifom? feels really unlikely.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
EBWOP: *is the wifom argument WORTH removing... etc
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 08 2013 09:10 Holyflare wrote: now i have to read up on the people I considered town...........
why would the people you consider(ed) town make that kill?
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
that's not an answer, holy
why would me or clarity make that kill instead of me, you, clarity?
|
|
|
|