| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 08 2013 08:41 Clarity_nl wrote: Yeah this is true especially since he was kinda scumhunting when he was being pressured. I really liked his case on sloosh tho so what? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
you've not provided one compelling argument why anyone is mafia. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 08 2013 08:45 Holyflare wrote: Just want to point out that rayn was very adament in his argument with me about talking about oats. Disregarding all the dirkzor stuff. what do you take from that exactly? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 08 2013 08:49 Holyflare wrote: Well, just skimming through the rayn filter, his entire first page is oats and then his whole conversation with me is about oats etc etc. It just seems pretty selective when he was trying to apply pressure to other people. It seems like something a scum would do - see all the arguments on their ally and then pick them apart while applying pressure elsewhere. meh. i don't really buy this argument. i just don't think it's actually true as a general principle. assuming i'm alive tomorrow i'll go over oats a lot more than i have already. i've had town feels and they might be wrong. just his argument with me seemed so townie to me because it was so fucking retarded. usually fucking retarded is, contrary to risen's opinion, a towntell. see me on BH, see Mocsta in LXII, see countless other examples. if you're gonna lynch oats for being "objectively" scummy you're going to lynch him every single game. So, not precisely sure what i'm going to be looking for there. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 08 2013 08:54 Holyflare wrote: Re-read rayns filter and count the number of times he mentions oats, especially at times when the topic of conversation was not on oats. On October 08 2013 08:52 marvellosity wrote: meh. i don't really buy this argument. i just don't think it's actually true as a general principle. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
you are joking me? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
but wtf | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
why, is the question. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
so whoever the mafia is, purposefully killed oats while professing suspicion of him. that was a conscious decision by the mafia. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
because surely anyone non-Dirk makes a normal night-kill and lynches into dirk/oats? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
That's like Dirk signing his own death warrant. that's extremely confusing. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
but even WITH the wifom argument, is the wifom argument removing one of the realistic lynches? would we really lynch 2 non-dirk people with oats dead just based on wifom? feels really unlikely. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 08 2013 09:10 Holyflare wrote: now i have to read up on the people I considered town........... why would the people you consider(ed) town make that kill? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
why would me or clarity make that kill instead of me, you, clarity? | ||
| ||
|
|
The PondCast
WardiTV Summer Champion…
Replay Cast
LiuLi Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
RSL Revival
RSL Revival
SC Evo League
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
CSO Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
