|
United States9305 Posts
On August 31 2013 05:36 marvellosity wrote: Like, actually look at his POSTING, hapa, not some terrible reason about hosts letting a demoralised townie replace out which never actually happens.
Idunno. I just tend to give replacements a lot of leeway to prove themselves.
|
United States9305 Posts
The problem is that everyone I'm suspicious of decided to fuck off and not post in the thread >>
|
United States9305 Posts
On August 31 2013 05:40 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On August 31 2013 05:36 Hapahauli wrote:On August 31 2013 05:34 marvellosity wrote: that's not even meta-gaming. do you have anything to support that hunch other than gut? Given 75% of replacements will be town anyway? Would a host even let a townie replace out for being 'demoralised'? I don't think so, do you? I'm not saying those are the reasons that Hopeless gave. I'm more suggesting that a scum would be more likely to stick it out (regardless of what RL things are happening), where as a town would be more demoralized and such suspicion would be the tipping point for a replacement. At this point, I'm more waiting on what slam has to say. But you're suggesting that Hopeless lied to get a replacement then? Because no host lets someone replace out because they're demoralised. Come on Hapa.
Fair point. I'm just over-thinking this I guess. Regardless, I'm waiting for Slam to finish catching up.
|
United States9305 Posts
I'm really not sure what you mean by that last paragraph. What do you mean by "Hopeless came completely out of the blue."
|
United States9305 Posts
On August 31 2013 05:55 marvellosity wrote: As in, his strong desire to lynch him, having previously agreed with his lynch target of Tuten.
Oats changing his mind is a plausible story. More the problem I have is how absurdly convenient all his reads are, and how little conviction he's had this game. Oats has been chillingly passive this game.
|
United States9305 Posts
@ FirmTofu
Where in the shitbags are you?
|
United States9305 Posts
On August 31 2013 05:59 Oatsmaster wrote:I play better and Im scum  Sad fact man. I just didnt have the time to TUNNEL this game.
Will you have time in the next few days?
|
United States9305 Posts
On August 31 2013 06:01 Oatsmaster wrote: I mean, like appearing to sheep town sentiment isnt exactly what only scum do, its TOWN sentiment for a reason. And nothing else is even close to being scummy that Hapa has explained. Why are you trying your best to lynch me cause I didnt tunnel someone Hapa???? ? Horrific reasons. Is hapa this bad? I gotta think about this man.
I really just don't know what to make of this more inactive version of you.
|
United States9305 Posts
On August 31 2013 06:01 marvellosity wrote: I dunno how much leeway to give Firm timingwise, his posts since he got back have been terribad.
I'm approaching the point of policy lynching FT.
|
United States9305 Posts
On August 31 2013 06:04 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On August 31 2013 06:02 Hapahauli wrote:On August 31 2013 06:01 Oatsmaster wrote: I mean, like appearing to sheep town sentiment isnt exactly what only scum do, its TOWN sentiment for a reason. And nothing else is even close to being scummy that Hapa has explained. Why are you trying your best to lynch me cause I didnt tunnel someone Hapa???? ? Horrific reasons. Is hapa this bad? I gotta think about this man. I really just don't know what to make of this more inactive version of you. uh read the posts? Do what you do normally? Forget meta? I DUNNO MAN.
I guess I'm just annoyed that you're not an obvious spammy paranoid townie by this stage in the game =/
Probs not lynching you today regardless though.
|
United States9305 Posts
Stop with pointless antagonism. We need to lynch someone, and not bitch amongst ourselves.
|
United States9305 Posts
On August 31 2013 06:16 sciberbia wrote: @hapa Why do you not want to lynch oats? He's my strongest scum read right now.
Idunno man. I'm just confused right now. I think I'm going to step outside for a half-hour and reread this.
|
United States9305 Posts
On August 31 2013 06:17 yamato77 wrote: Caught up. Totally fine with killing FT.
Hapa, sheep me.
Please give me more scum-reads than the practically non-posting lurker .
|
United States9305 Posts
##Vote Sylencia
I think that's our vote for today. He is a bit more active than usual, however there are things about his game that don't line up. In addition to the FT thing that Onegu pointed out, there was him completely dodging commenting on the Hopeless case, putting his vote on Onegu (who has had virtually no chance of getting lynched), then peacing out.
Syl's just playing a lot different than I've seen him do in his past town-games. He lacks the articulation and confidence that I've seen him display in recent memory.
I'd say he's our best chance at scum today.
|
United States9305 Posts
On August 31 2013 06:41 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On August 31 2013 06:38 Hapahauli wrote: ##Vote Sylencia
I think that's our vote for today. He is a bit more active than usual, however there are things about his game that don't line up. In addition to the FT thing that Onegu pointed out, there was him completely dodging commenting on the Hopeless case, putting his vote on Onegu (who has had virtually no chance of getting lynched), then peacing out.
Syl's just playing a lot different than I've seen him do in his past town-games. He lacks the articulation and confidence that I've seen him display in recent memory.
I'd say he's our best chance at scum today. Hapa, can you elaborate on this? Is what Syl did with Onegu really out of character? His lynch makes me squirmy right now.
I would say him not commenting on Hopeless (when Hopeless was clearly the main focus of the thread) to be completely out of character. Usually Syl does a better job of keeping up with the thread, even though he doesn't always end up on the main wagon.
Who is your alternative to Syl though?
|
United States9305 Posts
On August 31 2013 06:44 Sn0_Man wrote: Both alakaslam and FT are mega-sheeping rayn and peaceing. I prefer their lynches to syl for that reason atm. +1 to marv's "squirm".
##Unvote
Bleh changed my mind. I agree with this sentiment a lot. I re-read through Syl's filter just now, and I'm not feeling super happy about it. It reads relatively normal (even if Syl seems kinda... sad about everything).
|
United States9305 Posts
On August 31 2013 06:57 Sn0_Man wrote: In hindsight maybe blue discussion is a mistake but at least I'd like to hear rayn's "scumteam" now since he is so certain of everythign.
I don't think we need to give Rayn more of a platform at this stage. Let him rant during the night cycle, but we only have 1 hour to come up with something right now.
|
United States9305 Posts
Sciberia - lend me your wisdom/calmness a bit. Is Oats still your strongest read?
|
United States9305 Posts
On August 31 2013 07:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On August 31 2013 07:00 Sn0_Man wrote: rayn has a history of faking blue roles in-thread :/ But i am not faking now.
You probably are. Makes very little sense for you to not shoot TK ya know.
|
United States9305 Posts
On August 31 2013 07:08 Tutankoopa wrote: Has Oats explained his 180 yet? Is that the main point of contention regarding him?
Yeah, Oats basically said he "changed his mind" during his absence. It's still remarkably convenient of a 180 though.
|
|
|
|