Aperture Mafia 2: Episode 2 - Page 5

On August 31 2013 03:37 VayneAuthority wrote:
don't worry, the fact that cephiro even felt the need to respond to that case gives you back some points

On August 31 2013 03:53 Onegu wrote:



Sorry I am just catching up and I am a member of black mesa and am town, I was the only person dumb enough to use my own name in the qt though.

On August 31 2013 05:12 Hassybaby wrote:


The roleclaim that came out of nowhere :D

On August 31 2013 05:23 Hassybaby wrote:


Onegu dude. It was a joke because of VE's habit of roleclaiming at weird times

On August 31 2013 04:45 VisceraEyes wrote:
EVERYONE SHOULD BE LYNCHING GERIPT THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE AND UNDERSTANDING IN THIS MATTER.

On August 31 2013 05:38 Dandel Ion wrote:

I'm not so sure.
I'd be careful.

I mean onego and stotters already did it, but it may not be the smartest thing.
Identities staying unknown may serve for their own protection as much as the others'

On August 31 2013 05:39 Dandel Ion wrote:

kitaman the mad sk that has to kill his mason partners for example?

On August 31 2013 05:52 Koshi wrote:
Also, why the fuck are you saying I am town in Persona? Who the fuck are you and please stfu about ongoing games.

On August 31 2013 06:00 Felkyr wrote:


I have read parts of it as it was a running game at the moment. Might not have been a good idea. However, it seemed Koshi was acknowledged as town there and he said a lot. That's why I remembered his name.

On August 31 2013 06:00 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Scumslip by felky, called VE town. DIE SCUM

On August 31 2013 07:44 HiroPro wrote:
I think geript has no idea what he's doing (yes I'm well aware that he's played a number of games). He's seen other people do nothing, antagonize other players in the games, yet not be lynched and thinks that he can do the same. The post where he claims "unlynchable" strikes me in the same vein - it's a joke post just designed to annoy. I don't see anything about his play that suggests specifically that he's mafia other than that he hasn't attempted to scumhunt in any manner (which can honestly be said about half the thread).

Furthermore, BH's play right now is striking me as very opportunistic:
This post in particular appears very suspicious. There's no evidence to indicate that BH had any prior suspicion of geript and he doesn't even attempt to offer any sort of reason for lynching geript. Think about this carefully - what's the first reaction that a town player would likely have when they see someone claim "unlynchable". They'd either think that it's a ludicrous claim or they'd start wondering why someone would claim this (as either alignment).

Why is BH's first response to simply just throw down a vote? Why is he so quick to abandon a case on Cephiro that has some sort of reasoning to just blindly go "he said to vote him, LET'S DO IT!"

Think about what I said earlier about BH's play (if you haven't read my earlier post on him, go back and do it, think about what I'm saying, read between the lines, and don't just go "oh he's roleplaying, guess I should ignore him").

Be Strong. Be Brown. Vote BH.

On August 31 2013 08:00 strongandbig wrote:

what?

On August 31 2013 08:04 HiroPro wrote:

Because neither of you have actually voted for geript, haven't completely abandoned your big case on someone else, and haven't struck me as suspicious before this? Come on clarity, think -_-

On August 31 2013 08:04 HiroPro wrote:
<snip>
Think about this carefully - what's the first reaction that a town player would likely have when they see someone claim "unlynchable". They'd either think that it's a ludicrous claim or they'd start wondering why someone would claim this (as either alignment).
<snip>

On August 31 2013 06:56 Clarity_nl wrote:
I think we should try to lynch the unlynchable, worst case we nolynch which might have happened anyway in such a big game.

On August 31 2013 07:01 WaveofShadow wrote:

I agree with this completely.