EPTAperture Mafia 2: Episode 2 - Page 3
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
I don't mind his policy vote though, although I'm gonna wait to see what dandel does when he comes back. WoS, if Dandel wasn't in this game, is there anyone that you think deserving of your vote? And why. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On August 30 2013 21:38 yamato77 wrote: I see people mentioning Cora; worth looking at? Cora = dandel. Why are you not reading the thread. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
yamato activity is cool though. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On August 30 2013 22:28 Oatsmaster wrote: VA playing game properly. Its scummy CAn totally lynch WoS too. And Kita for going after the easiest target in the thread Cora I <3 you. REALLY!! + Show Spoiler + uh no not really  Kita isn't going for the easiest target, he just policy voted him. He's talking about other stuff. Why exactly would you wanna lynch kita? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On August 30 2013 22:46 kitaman27 wrote: By the way, I think people need to strongly consider multiple large mafia factions based on the OP and the fact that GreYMisT didn't want to rebalance from 31. A 6 man mafia team and 1-2 third party is really easy to rebalance, but something like 5-4-1 is much more difficult. Well that's an odd thing to say. What exactly do you want us to consider? Like, what changes in the way we're playing based on this possibility? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On August 30 2013 22:48 kitaman27 wrote: The trap of giving too much town cred to a scum player who kills or lynches another scum faction. Oh that's a fair point I guess. But surely later in the game it'll be revealed to us in the flipped role pms? I've never played in a game with multiple mafia factions before, but they have their own wincons and flavor, right? Anyway this is all stuff we don't need to concern ourselves with yet. @Oats please explain why you say kita is going for the easiest target (dandel) when he policy voted him and then went on to other things immediately? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On August 30 2013 22:56 Oatsmaster wrote: what Clarity? How does kita calling it a policy lynch nullify my point? I dont understand. He's not pushing him and he went to scumhunt elsewhere. It's a policy vote. Do you disagree with his policy and therefore think he's scum? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On August 30 2013 23:09 Oatsmaster wrote: Kita wants dandel dead and so far not much objection. WHAT PUSHING IS THERE TO DO CLARITYU?? ?? ? ? ? kita scum mate So you disagree with his policy that people who clearly troll on purpose should be lynched? On August 30 2013 22:34 Oatsmaster wrote: dandel hasnt done jack shit. And his scum meta is trolling the shit out of the thread. How is he not the easiest target. You're scum for not doing shit It doesn't seem like you do...? How is your conclusion that kita is scum out of this? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On August 30 2013 23:16 Koshi wrote: Hey Clarity, I made that case first! Oats just not replying to me. sorreh He's replying to me though so maybe we'll both get what we want? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On August 30 2013 23:20 Oatsmaster wrote: I didnt see BH as trying to pick a fight kita, it felt to me like he was trying to get Cora to play the game properly. Clarity, it wasnt a policy vote for dandel cause hes trolling, like that means when Dandel stops he would unvote. I dont see any of that. Im not taking it as a policy lynch, im taking it as intent to kill Dandel specifically because of his play. So you're saying dandel has stopped trolling? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On August 30 2013 23:33 Oatsmaster wrote: I dont think you know what trolling is... Think yamato after he got redchecked. I don't understand what you're doing Oats. Do you believe Dandel is being purposefully useless, is the point. I don't care what your definition of trolling is right now. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On August 30 2013 23:38 yamato77 wrote: Clarity, what if I told you that kita's vote of Dandel is both reasonable and also a completely scummy way to enter the thread? I get that, but that's not what oats has said. I also think that right after that post kita immediately did other stuff which I give towniepoints for. Why not just tunnel dandel for a bit after voting like that? Why even call it a policy vote. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On August 30 2013 23:44 Oatsmaster wrote: Clarity why are you defending Kita? You dont seemed all that convinced that he's town anyway... I'm not. But I'm definitely not convinced that he's scum like you seem to be. What do you think about the way he's interacted with WoS? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On August 30 2013 23:57 raynpelikoneet wrote: I do not see any point in bringing up a speculation of multiple scumteams, especially from kita, as the game OP clearly states there are multiple scumteams. No it doesn't? Unless you consider Black Mesa a scumteam. But we know nothing of them @Koshi, Turns out the amulet wouldn't be SUPER awesome on me, but it would still be good. Turns out I can't attempt to do stuff for which I don't have the resources | ||
| ||
