|
On August 18 2013 01:28 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 01:17 Alakaslam wrote: Good morning everyone. I agree with Holyflare's stance first of all ##Vote: Xzavier As a placeholder.
However the squibbles voting is intriguing. It is a policy lynch based on what may be IRL circumstances. Is there actually something wrong with his posting, other than the lack of it?
If not, may want to reconsider... ... As according to his own deadlines, he will likely be modkilled. It is 9:15 on the west coast.
Any better reasons though? As the same goes for Xzavier... So if squib is preferable guess what I'm definetly willing to switch if Squibbles posts something useful or a better target appears. It mostly is his lack of posting but the 2 posts he made also added nothing to the thread. Yeah, I guess iVlosk should explain himself - doesn't look to good. *too
|
On August 18 2013 01:30 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2013 16:08 LoneMeow wrote:On August 17 2013 09:49 Alakaslam wrote: That being said yes he could go about it differently. But iVLosk is not aLaKaSLaM or Umasi or Hurricane sponge or Hzflank, he is iVLosk!
The butt doctor
And discrediting a player's statements can be a good thing to do. (Eg HolyFlare being scum- haven't ruled that out). If the statement hasn't got merit it should be discredited, right?
Disclaimer: do I agree with iVLosk? Possibly. I need to weigh it all. Why are you softly defending (and buddying up to) another player again? Didn't you learn from what happened in the last game with Umasi? Please keep an open mind, so far anyone in this game could be scum. I still think you're town though. Who's your current best scum read? Yaknow what? I'm gonna answer this soon, but I could vote iVLosk. I just realized my meta has been pretty stupid because one game I was scum and not paying as much attention to him and the other... Dude he was the cohost xD So him looking badass as a cohost helped me think him being badass and bombastic here was townie. Also, he has been invoking House of Chezinu upon me; talked about Kansas and gun in the truck & stuff & Chezinu had me totes swindled with his bank and his Father being Ace and needing psychoanalysis & etc., such as I refused vote him Shall not fall for that mistake again IVLosk what hast thou to say?
You're the second or third TLer to call me House of Chezinu and I don't know what it means.
|
On August 18 2013 03:36 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 03:33 iVLosK! wrote:On August 18 2013 01:28 justanothertownie wrote:On August 18 2013 01:17 Alakaslam wrote: Good morning everyone. I agree with Holyflare's stance first of all ##Vote: Xzavier As a placeholder.
However the squibbles voting is intriguing. It is a policy lynch based on what may be IRL circumstances. Is there actually something wrong with his posting, other than the lack of it?
If not, may want to reconsider... ... As according to his own deadlines, he will likely be modkilled. It is 9:15 on the west coast.
Any better reasons though? As the same goes for Xzavier... So if squib is preferable guess what I'm definetly willing to switch if Squibbles posts something useful or a better target appears. It mostly is his lack of posting but the 2 posts he made also added nothing to the thread. Yeah, I guess iVlosk should explain himself - doesn't look to good. *too So, now you are here? At least you have valuable things to say. /s I'm at work. Cute wagon attempt though.
|
On August 18 2013 03:46 DeusXmachina wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 03:40 iVLosK! wrote:On August 18 2013 03:36 justanothertownie wrote:On August 18 2013 03:33 iVLosK! wrote:On August 18 2013 01:28 justanothertownie wrote:On August 18 2013 01:17 Alakaslam wrote: Good morning everyone. I agree with Holyflare's stance first of all ##Vote: Xzavier As a placeholder.
However the squibbles voting is intriguing. It is a policy lynch based on what may be IRL circumstances. Is there actually something wrong with his posting, other than the lack of it?
If not, may want to reconsider... ... As according to his own deadlines, he will likely be modkilled. It is 9:15 on the west coast.
Any better reasons though? As the same goes for Xzavier... So if squib is preferable guess what I'm definetly willing to switch if Squibbles posts something useful or a better target appears. It mostly is his lack of posting but the 2 posts he made also added nothing to the thread. Yeah, I guess iVlosk should explain himself - doesn't look to good. *too So, now you are here? At least you have valuable things to say. /s I'm at work. Cute wagon attempt though. iV do you think JAT is scum because he wagoned? What are you trying to say? I don't even think JAT is the one who manufactured the wagon. The "Cute wagon" comment was directed at the game as a whole.
|
|
On August 18 2013 02:59 justanothertownie wrote: I thought he wasn't as antagonistic as I would expect according to the description of others about his play. He also didn't defend himself at all... It's important to note that JAT's read on me is based on the fact that he's HEARD (though, he hasn't gone and read) that I am a bigger dick than this and the fact that I was offline while you guys put together that little 1 hour wagon on me.
|
On August 18 2013 05:59 Koshi wrote: Ok, so seriously. Those 3 people on Xzavier. Why the fuck would you vote on a 0-poster? He did flip scum. Umadbro?
|
|
On August 18 2013 06:53 Koshi wrote:Nothing more to say? Not particularly.
|
On August 18 2013 08:34 Koshi wrote:guis guis guis. No worries. Just remember. Need to kill Alaksalam,Holyflare, DeusXmachina or iVLosK. Just kill the one that is the most useless day 2. Alaksalam knows better than to create such a shit environment and to do 0 scumhunting the entire game. And I am certain he knows that voting a 0 poster is horrible. His biggest contribution were giving out general advice. It is a newbie game but I don't like it. Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 01:26 Holyflare wrote:On August 18 2013 01:22 Alakaslam wrote: Indeed, iVLosK! Looks bad after reading up on HolyFlare, but are there enough reasons to voteswitch? Shall he defense hisself? I would rather get rid of the guy that says nothing than the person who can defend himself and (hopefully) contribute. You need to get rid of scum. Not of guys that can't defend themselves. Especially when they flip town most likely. Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 06:17 iVLosK! wrote:On August 18 2013 05:59 Koshi wrote: Ok, so seriously. Those 3 people on Xzavier. Why the fuck would you vote on a 0-poster? He did flip scum. Umadbro? This guy is trying to WIFOM me and I don't like it. 5 spamposts in the same minute these are 3 of it. He knows he shouldn't vote for a modkill. He votes for the modkill. And then he says it is majority lynch when it is plurality. So bad it hurts my soul. iV and Alaksalam should be lynched next time unless magic happens on day 2. The other 2 follow closely. Hi new guy. Welcome to the game.
You should refresh your understanding of the phrase "WIFOM."
With all my love, iVlosK!
|
On August 18 2013 10:14 Koshi wrote:I am still wondering why you guys voted iVLosK. Please also redirect me to the scumhunting you guys did. I have trouble finding it. Setup Information: Show nested quote +This set-up is based off of the 2of4 setup. It will be a semi-open set-up meaning that while all of the roles possible will be displayed, the amount of each hold will be hidden. This means there are 2 scums right?It's fair to say that town will have 1 power role and 6 VT and then scum 1 power role and 1 goon. Gameplan for town is simple. We find 4 confirmed townies and we win the game. Confirmed townie status: Koshi Close to confirmed townie status: OmniEulogy Probably town: JAT, Meowie Dis nigga talkin bout confirmed towns in the middle of a night phase.
|
On August 18 2013 14:57 LoneMeow wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2013 08:37 Koshi wrote: Also. I am town. OmniEulogy is also town because he got replaced after me. Because Cora isn't going to replace a townie first and then replace a scum in a 7 vs 2 game.
So we got 2 confirmed townies already. This game will be easy. Host WIFOM, the best kind of WIFOM. I'd recommend against this kind of talk if you want to not be on my scum list. It r teh hoomer. Say ha ha ha.
|
On August 18 2013 23:43 cDgCorazon wrote: 3 hours and 17 minutes left for those night actions! All of them sent so far have been confirmed. I didn't receive a confirmation on the NK I sent.
|
Pages 27-29 are almost exclusively filled with connection theories. And poor ones. A connection theory where the theorist doesn't know the alignment of both subjects is complete shit.
|
I'm actually kind of sorry I logged on if this is all I was going to find.
|
On August 19 2013 10:51 iVLosK! wrote: Pages 27-29 are almost exclusively filled with connection theories. And poor ones. A connection theory where the theorist doesn't know the alignment of both subjects is complete shit. ... And useless fluff used to appear contributory.
Also, apparently I'm supposed to respond to something. If you quote it, I might.
|
I want you to pop it and dip, then upswing your hips Back it up and don't trip, let your back bone slip Spin around and get a grip of the pole, then flip Baby that's the way you strip. Here's your tip. Not on the lips.
|
On August 20 2013 01:06 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2013 00:50 justanothertownie wrote:On August 20 2013 00:24 OmniEulogy wrote:just got on the computer, read through things quickly and I'll give a more detailed answer to everything in a little bit but I've played with a lot of people who play like LosK has been doing, all of them have been town. Most of what he's said and done has largely just messed with town, and although he is my weakest town read he is still town imo. All of the association cases against him are useless till we know Slam/Deus's alignment. Also from what I quickly read it looks like Deus didn't actually address anything in JAT's case and tried to brush it off and then redirect suspicion at others. I'd be fine with him trying to give his scum reads if he actually tried to clear up his mess and explain his own posts. Also Deus from how I read it, the inconsistency isn't the constantly changing reads town has, the inconsistency is you saying one thing, and then doing another immediately after with no reason behind it. Did you even care who you voted for D1? I can't tell. Also cases don't need to be long and lengthy, having a short case with a ton of incriminating posts doesn't make it weak. How about you actually talk about those posts instead. I'm going to grab some lunch / late breakfast and then get back to the questions directed at me ![](/mirror/smilies/smile.gif) I expect more of you. In this post you only repeat what has been said earlier (by me). The most important question for me is: Why do you think scum Deus or slam voted like that if you think iVLosk is town? Why should they make themselves look bad if they could just stay on the active townie instead of the completely useless one? Just clarifying, is this FoS on iVLosK!? Or clearing of Deus, Me, Holy? ?!
|
On August 20 2013 01:14 justanothertownie wrote: For now it is just a question I want answered. Said question can only be answered when you know the alignments of all 3 involved. See you on D4, then.
|
On August 20 2013 02:33 justanothertownie wrote:IVLosk since you are here: Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 22:22 justanothertownie wrote:This has to be one hell of a post... On August 19 2013 13:18 iVLosK! wrote:On August 19 2013 10:51 iVLosK! wrote: Pages 27-29 are almost exclusively filled with connection theories. And poor ones. A connection theory where the theorist doesn't know the alignment of both subjects is complete shit. ... And useless fluff used to appear contributory. Also, apparently I'm supposed to respond to something. If you quote it, I might. Why don't we start with some reads? Would you tell us your current scumreads and give a short reasoning for them? Or even a townread? You didn't contribute anything since Day1 (there isn't much Day1 too) apart from trolling. As much as I hate making any excuses for behavior. Will probably get around to this after class.
|
|
|
|