|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On September 25 2013 21:52 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2013 21:47 marvellosity wrote: yamato, on post volume alone I'm slightly concerned about lynching Sentinel. Do you seriously buy his explanations for why he decided to vote Ray? It just smells like BS to me.
Here's that post:
+ Show Spoiler +On September 24 2013 05:05 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Alright so there seems to be a lot of people sheeping this assumption that because I flipped my read on Chairman Ray, I must be scum and must be disposed of. Guess I'll start by refuting that. So this whole thing starts with yamato calling me scum and then sending out this: Show nested quote +On September 23 2013 21:47 yamato77 wrote:RE: SentinelHis read on Ray goes from this: On September 23 2013 07:17 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On September 23 2013 07:11 yamato77 wrote: I think if you read his posts, he has a clear understanding of what's happening in the game. I just read his entire filter and he looks exactly like a guy who's playing his second (second? can't be more than fourth since he was previously in a newbie, someone confirm this) game. I don't see what would make him scummy. To this, 2 hours later: On September 23 2013 09:39 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: After reviewing Chairman's filter, I have to agree that something is up here. Maybe a little south of neutral in my eyes. Might it be a product of coaching in the newbie game and nothing in this one? To this, yet one more hour later: On September 23 2013 10:43 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: I'm reading Ray's filter from newbie, he seems a lot more restricted here than there which is weird. Unless coaches were really on meth (holy shit I was coaching? nobody sent me any questions, I forgot all about it), I can't really say why he would regress in his ability to post substance.
Better than yamato I guess.
##Vote: Chairman Ray With basically nothing in between except filler posts. Like I said, he is mafia. So what happened in those two hours was a realization - during my 07:27 post, I was going off of solely Chairman's current filter in the game, a constricted play that mirrors the attitude I had during my own first game, Hammer Mini. My mentality was this: He wanted to do something without attracting attention. Yes that's a scum tell under normal conditions, but as someone in his second third game that's someone who doesn't want to stick out because he doesn't want to get either a) shot, if he is town, or b) lynched, as any role. That's what I see when I look at a post like this. You can argue that I'm biased towards townie while yamato is biased towards scum, so we just saw both sides of a different coin. This is also why I voted for him, because I believed that tunneling someone who I believed (correctly, as we later saw) to be town, while having posted several other good reads, is scumworthy - yamato, being biased towards scumreads, was pushing town players and twisting their cases to look scummy. Then marv comes along and posts this three minutes later: Show nested quote +On September 23 2013 07:30 marvellosity wrote: Good grief, Ray's posts looked constructed in his newbie game. That's kinda disappointing. Now this was the point where I started to question my position on Chairman. I actually ended up discarding my read on Coagulation once I became aware of his meta (I believe marv pointed that one out too), and so I checked out Ray's filter from his other game, Newbie Mafia XLVII. Much more relaxed and intelligent posting. He pushes a case on LordVelocity which was only stopped by his mislynch. From what I'm able to gather, since I've only read his filter and not the rest of the game, Ray seems to be stirring up discussion, poking at what he believes to be a scumslip and also participating in a discussion pertaining to Umasi, something unrelated to his defense or his immediate target. His play contracted in style and in Newbie he showed to be capable of doing things (to some extent) that a good townie should - discussing, clarifying, and bringing out things he finds scummy so that others defended them. I actually skimmed Ver's analysis of XXX and remember something in the back of my mind about new blues being very secretive so they don't accidentally get shot or mislynched. I didn't remember it well enough to consider it, but did once I saw Ray flip blue. But at this point I was unaware, so I was beginning to agree with yamato - this guy might have been red after all. Koshi you never answered my question about the 1/5 lurkersSo here's my mentality at this point, right? Show nested quote +On September 23 2013 09:39 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: After reviewing Chairman's filter, I have to agree that something is up here. Maybe a little south of neutral in my eyes. Might it be a product of coaching in the newbie game and nothing in this one? At this point I was also slated to die, but with 3 hours plus I would have some time to contribute to the scumhunt and either push my reads or prolong my own. I was off of yamato, so if I wanted to push, I'd need some time. Then this happened: Show nested quote +On September 23 2013 10:38 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On September 23 2013 10:35 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: Deadline is in approximately 30 minutes OP said deadline was at 10 PST? And this is where I shifted into panic mode. I didn't have 3 hours, I had 30 minutes, and the votecount said I was going to die. I'd rather find a red player to lynch than get mislynched myself. So what do I do? I can't construct a persuasive case in 30 minutes, so might as well sheep someone who I think is scum. Cue me convincing myself through rereads of Chairman's filter that he's playing unusually restrictive, and with my previous defense of him ruled out with the Newbie filter, he must be red. (##Vote Chairman Ray) Then he flips blue, I remember Ver's post, and the rest is history. Show nested quote +On September 23 2013 21:51 marvellosity wrote: And also, Sentinel has been added to the shitlist. It's not so much that he changed his mind, but the manner is just awful. The same content goes from "nothing looks scummy" to "he is the best chance to flip mafia today" with nothing in between. There's nothing to indicate why the massive change. Ironic, your post inspired me to do it
And yes, I can see it coming from a townie.
Am I sold on Sentinel being town? Not by a long shot. In the two games in the mafia database where he rolled mafia, he was quite willing to call people stupid for voting him. Here not so much - in this post he just explains his thought process in depth. Added to this is the fact he's posting at a higher rate than he did in those games as mafia, and he's posting more than he usually does as town too.
It's enough to make me doubt that he's the *best* lynch today.
|
|
11589 Posts
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
I think I might prefer a Pandain lynch to Cephiro. Musing.
|
I am okay with lynching the pandabearguy too.
|
But does lynching the pandabearguy lose you the game? ^_^
|
On September 25 2013 21:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2013 21:56 Mocsta wrote:On September 25 2013 21:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2013 21:46 Mocsta wrote:On September 25 2013 21:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2013 21:44 Mocsta wrote:On September 25 2013 21:36 marvellosity wrote: lol.
You're cute when you're annoyed. Anyways, I asked for a replacement. Treat my fillin as confirmed town will you K thnx, bye. ............ I havent quit.. fuck.. i learnt my lesson in GoT.. jeez louise. Guess it was a joke in poor taste. Just wanted to throw out confirmed town. Well it doesn't prove your towniness. Can you look at marv's list and tell what you think about those people? Mattchew is not here and me/marv/yamato have given our opinions already. List on what? I dont like pandain at all, never have. Cephiro im against, feels like a lurker lynch. and even if he is scum i think hes being pushed for the wrong reasons. theres 5 others guys, surely they can be found over him. JAT, i filter dived and personally I like him and dont have a problem he wants to be asked where to focus.. i mean, if he was scum.. and mattchew is town (which is what marv is proposing).. jat shoulda jumped all over the mattchew lynch as it was a free ride What do you think about what i said about Cephiro? And didn't JAT jump on the Mattchew lynch a while ago? If by Cephiro you mean this
On September 25 2013 20:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
##Vote: Cephiro
That being said. I am done with Cephiro. Every single post he makes ends up with "i am soon caught up, then i will prove my towniness and find scum!" and every time he fails to deliver anything at all. He's scum. [/b]
I already said it. Its a lurker lynch.. activity isnt a metric for scum. I dont care for that lynch and will not support it at all for this cycle. but I am only 1 vote of 26.
As for JAT, he joined because I kept pressuring him to take a stance. I will admit its odd that he said the case was logical, but would not vote.. but then, yam had the same reaction too. Like i said, i dont have a problem with him, i haven't read titantic, and dont plan to either.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
Alright, for the people in the thread, and anyone else. Let's play a little game.
Open Pandain's filter and try to find coherent suspicions on people.
Things I've found: Suspicious of FT, but mysteriously doesn't want to lynch him today, but wants to lynch him later Was suspicious of Sentinel, now less so.
I literally cannot find anyone he currently wants to lynch right now.
Gogogo!
|
On September 25 2013 22:09 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2013 21:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2013 21:56 Mocsta wrote:On September 25 2013 21:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2013 21:46 Mocsta wrote:On September 25 2013 21:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2013 21:44 Mocsta wrote:On September 25 2013 21:36 marvellosity wrote: lol.
You're cute when you're annoyed. Anyways, I asked for a replacement. Treat my fillin as confirmed town will you K thnx, bye. ............ I havent quit.. fuck.. i learnt my lesson in GoT.. jeez louise. Guess it was a joke in poor taste. Just wanted to throw out confirmed town. Well it doesn't prove your towniness. Can you look at marv's list and tell what you think about those people? Mattchew is not here and me/marv/yamato have given our opinions already. List on what? I dont like pandain at all, never have. Cephiro im against, feels like a lurker lynch. and even if he is scum i think hes being pushed for the wrong reasons. theres 5 others guys, surely they can be found over him. JAT, i filter dived and personally I like him and dont have a problem he wants to be asked where to focus.. i mean, if he was scum.. and mattchew is town (which is what marv is proposing).. jat shoulda jumped all over the mattchew lynch as it was a free ride What do you think about what i said about Cephiro? And didn't JAT jump on the Mattchew lynch a while ago? If by Cephiro you mean this Show nested quote +On September 25 2013 20:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
##Vote: Cephiro
That being said. I am done with Cephiro. Every single post he makes ends up with "i am soon caught up, then i will prove my towniness and find scum!" and every time he fails to deliver anything at all. He's scum. I already said it. Its a lurker lynch.. activity isnt a metric for scum. I dont care for that lynch and will not support it at all for this cycle. but I am only 1 vote of 26. As for JAT, he joined because I kept pressuring him to take a stance. I will admit its odd that he said the case was logical, but would not vote.. but then, yam had the same reaction too. Like i said, i dont have a problem with him, i haven't read titantic, and dont plan to either. [/b] The thing with Cephiro is not that he is lurking. It's that he promises something in every post of his and then doesn't deliver.
Did you look at marv's post about JAT? There are some relevant quotes from JAT in Titanic.
|
On September 25 2013 22:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2013 22:09 Mocsta wrote:On September 25 2013 21:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2013 21:56 Mocsta wrote:On September 25 2013 21:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2013 21:46 Mocsta wrote:On September 25 2013 21:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 25 2013 21:44 Mocsta wrote:On September 25 2013 21:36 marvellosity wrote: lol.
You're cute when you're annoyed. Anyways, I asked for a replacement. Treat my fillin as confirmed town will you K thnx, bye. ............ I havent quit.. fuck.. i learnt my lesson in GoT.. jeez louise. Guess it was a joke in poor taste. Just wanted to throw out confirmed town. Well it doesn't prove your towniness. Can you look at marv's list and tell what you think about those people? Mattchew is not here and me/marv/yamato have given our opinions already. List on what? I dont like pandain at all, never have. Cephiro im against, feels like a lurker lynch. and even if he is scum i think hes being pushed for the wrong reasons. theres 5 others guys, surely they can be found over him. JAT, i filter dived and personally I like him and dont have a problem he wants to be asked where to focus.. i mean, if he was scum.. and mattchew is town (which is what marv is proposing).. jat shoulda jumped all over the mattchew lynch as it was a free ride What do you think about what i said about Cephiro? And didn't JAT jump on the Mattchew lynch a while ago? If by Cephiro you mean this On September 25 2013 20:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
##Vote: Cephiro
That being said. I am done with Cephiro. Every single post he makes ends up with "i am soon caught up, then i will prove my towniness and find scum!" and every time he fails to deliver anything at all. He's scum. I already said it. Its a lurker lynch.. activity isnt a metric for scum. I dont care for that lynch and will not support it at all for this cycle. but I am only 1 vote of 26. As for JAT, he joined because I kept pressuring him to take a stance. I will admit its odd that he said the case was logical, but would not vote.. but then, yam had the same reaction too. Like i said, i dont have a problem with him, i haven't read titantic, and dont plan to either. The thing with Cephiro is not that he is lurking. It's that he promises something in every post of his and then doesn't deliver. Did you look at marv's post about JAT? There are some relevant quotes from JAT in Titanic. [/b]Cephiro is meant to be decent. And he promised to post. Him not being present intentionally would arouse suspicious. So as scum it defeats the purpose.
I would rather lynch deconduo over cephiro. Full stop.
The JAT quotes are markedly different from titantic. So where does this put ObviousOne? He gave JAT a clear before and said his d1 play was reactionary..
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
lol no way are we lynching decon.
|
On September 25 2013 22:11 marvellosity wrote: Alright, for the people in the thread, and anyone else. Let's play a little game.
Open Pandain's filter and try to find coherent suspicions on people.
Things I've found: Suspicious of FT, but mysteriously doesn't want to lynch him today, but wants to lynch him later Was suspicious of Sentinel, now less so.
I literally cannot find anyone he currently wants to lynch right now.
Gogogo! +1
##Unvote: ##Vote: Pandain
|
Pandain's supicions:
D1: Sentinel, doesn't push the lynch at all.
D2:
I would check Shutters, LM, Marv, Rayn, and Mattchew for likely scum. I'm probably going to vote and push for Stutters tomorrow as I think he's actually the best vote choice above Mattchew and Sentinel. Then, about Stutters: "I feel bad because he's probably genuinely sick so I don't know if I want to give him more time. " -- Sounds like a real push.
Votes for marv, why? No mention about others. Oh, but Mattchew was "not the best lynch" or "not necessarily scum". To be exact:
Definitely feel we can find someone better than Mattchew, that's my goal for tommorow.
|
I am here for like an hour before I have to travel. First: The case on me is just pure meta, no? And you are deliberately using ONLY my very first game on this site where I played horribly. Marv I directed you to look at my last game which is a newbie game and you will see parallels to this game. It weirds me out you did obviously not do that or if you did you did not feel the need to include it in your case. I am pretty sure this is also the game where OO got his read on me.
|
On September 25 2013 22:46 justanothertownie wrote: I am here for like an hour before I have to travel. First: The case on me is just pure meta, no? And you are deliberately using ONLY my very first game on this site where I played horribly. Marv I directed you to look at my last game which is a newbie game and you will see parallels to this game. It weirds me out you did obviously not do that or if you did you did not feel the need to include it in your case. I am pretty sure this is also the game where OO got his read on me. The problem is you did not play horribly in Titanic. Compared to this game your play in Titanic was far better.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On September 25 2013 22:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2013 22:46 justanothertownie wrote: I am here for like an hour before I have to travel. First: The case on me is just pure meta, no? And you are deliberately using ONLY my very first game on this site where I played horribly. Marv I directed you to look at my last game which is a newbie game and you will see parallels to this game. It weirds me out you did obviously not do that or if you did you did not feel the need to include it in your case. I am pretty sure this is also the game where OO got his read on me. The problem is you did not play horribly in Titanic. Compared to this game your play in Titanic was far better.
yes, just this.
It's the wrong way round. You went from proactive and suspicious into waffly and non-suspicious.
|
On September 25 2013 21:18 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2013 20:04 marvellosity wrote:justanothertownie? This is a pure meta post. His Titanic (town) filter for reference: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=422720&user=justanothertownieGoing to spoiler it because it'll probably involve a lot of quotes and not a lot of me saying anything :p + Show Spoiler +Here's his suspicions from the first few pages of Titanic: Titanic MafiaIs justanothertownie a suspicious little townie?On July 27 2013 20:13 justanothertownie wrote:Hey guys, just caught up. First impressions: I don't like Paperscraps. First he joins the lurker discussion without adding any content, then he starts to jump on exarezee without any good reason (I'm not really convinced that it was just a joke) and when he gets a little heat for it he totally backs off. I really hate this: Show nested quote +TLDR; Besides the first question on my first post, I haven't been serious at all. So this is not serious at all? Show nested quote + Lurkers are liabilities later in the game. I don't have a problem with taking them out sooner, rather than later. If you are stuck in a potential mylo/lylo situation with a lurker, it is no fun. Of course, if some one is overly scummy we should lynch them first.
Add to this how he didn't post anything since he noticed people getting suspicious. To me he is the scummiest player so far. Also I'm annoyed by CJS. Going through his filter I can't find anything valuable - he just didn't say anything until this point (apart from fluff). This is jat's very first post. He already has a scumread on Paperscraps, and he's suspicious of CJS. On July 28 2013 01:51 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 01:42 hzflank wrote:On July 28 2013 01:39 exarezee wrote: I'm really lost as to who's trolling. I've been trolled by captain sparrow, oatsmaster, and paper so far. Are you guys all just joking right now or can i take your posts seriously. The thread got really shitty. Working out why would be an interesting exercise. Oats is really doing his best in this regard... So, oats which part of your case do you want me to adress? As for scumreads: Paper still looks scummy to me for the same reasons i mentioned before. You start to look scummy to me because you are killing town atmosphere and keeping tunneling me with that joke of a case. I don't have any other scumreads as of yet. There are plenty of people who didn't contribute nearly enough to really judge them based on their posts. Paperscraps scummy, hz starting to be scummy. On July 28 2013 01:57 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 01:52 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 28 2013 01:51 justanothertownie wrote:On July 28 2013 01:42 hzflank wrote:On July 28 2013 01:39 exarezee wrote: I'm really lost as to who's trolling. I've been trolled by captain sparrow, oatsmaster, and paper so far. Are you guys all just joking right now or can i take your posts seriously. The thread got really shitty. Working out why would be an interesting exercise. Oats is really doing his best in this regard... So, oats which part of your case do you want me to adress? As for scumreads: Paper still looks scummy to me for the same reasons i mentioned before. You start to look scummy to me because you are killing town atmosphere and keeping tunneling me with that joke of a case. I don't have any other scumreads as of yet. There are plenty of people who didn't contribute nearly enough to really judge them based on their posts. OMGUS? nice response. How is me tunneling you scummy? Sigh. Because you try to make it look like you are really contributing and scumhunting while you just repeat the same things all over again without bringing any good points. Let's just assume i was not in the game - who would you want to lynch? Oats' tunnel on jat is scummy. On July 28 2013 20:43 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 15:35 FirmTofu wrote:
No, I didn't say JAT having a town read on me is a town tell. That's simply untrue. I said he has me as a town read. Now, scum usually have some town as town reads. That is not meaningful in itself, however, when it's coupled with the fact that he has a lot of posts that indicate that his town read on me is somewhat justifiable from a town perspective. If you would like, I'll quote them for you.
I'm not going to sheep you if you make a good case. I'll consider voting him if you make a good case. There's a big difference there. Yes, my read on you was justifiable at that point but where do you see a lot of posts that would indicate this? Sounds weird to me. I would love to lynch VA for his attitude towards the game but if he always plays like this then there is nothing about him that indicates any alignment. But I would like to know why Vayne thinks Oats voting Tofu is good? Also I'm still not content with Koshis explanation of his reads. So you actually don't have any scumread anymore besides the troll and the lurkers? For now I still think Paper is a good lynch. His reads do not impress me. Show nested quote +Oats leaning town - I am really hoping Oats is town, his reads and post so far have been great. His comprehension of what is going on is probably the best so far. What? Please explain this. Show nested quote +Vayne leaning town - not sure what to think of vayne as of yet, he comes in every so often and drops some knowledge. I think his vote on clarity is pretty bad though. His filter strikes me as town though. I don't know if we read the posts of the same person... Show nested quote + Koshi leaning town - Koshi is a odd ball so far. I like that he town reads me, haha. I mostly agree with the lists he has made so far.
Yeah, that's because you both don't have any real scumreads.... or do you really think Vivax is scum? Or that I am? ##Vote: Paperscraps Jat is also suspicious of Koshi. On July 29 2013 09:19 justanothertownie wrote: fml...
I really have to reevaluate most of my reads now. I will do so tomorrow. Vivax doesn't look good for this unvote btw. Can't see a good town reason to do it but scum could try to get town cred. Vivax is suspicous. On July 29 2013 19:34 justanothertownie wrote: But to answer your question: gut-wise and without thinking it through very well the 4 persons I would probably lynch are:
koshi, hzflank, maybe stutters/vayne and you
Take this with a grain of salt. Suspicious of lots of people. On July 30 2013 08:23 justanothertownie wrote: So, I thought about it and I came to the conclusion that you are absolutely right, hz. Koshi and you are not both scum - it's just you. If I had read Koshis case on you closely before I posted this 4 lynch candidates I wouldn't have put him in there. His case against you makes a shitton of sense and I can and will add content to that shortly. I underestimated Koshi because I read a game he played in where his play was extremely weird and because of his lazy play (lynch-lists with only lurkers) D1. Koshi suspicious. On July 31 2013 03:06 justanothertownie wrote: First there is Tofu who I still don't like (still think he is scum) but to be fair I have to look into what happened last night again before I am 100% content saying he is scum. The same goes for hzflank (in his case there is even more new information to consider). Besides there is this clarity thing. Depends totally on my idea to be correct though. I also have to look into vayne again but currently I have no opinion on him. Firm and hzflank suspicious. Answer to question: yes, yes he is.TL Mafia LXIIis jat a suspicious little townie?On September 22 2013 00:07 justanothertownie wrote: Hi guys...
Mocsta do you think Koshi is town or scum?
Btw. if anybody wants me to comment on something specific feel free to point me to it. Included this just as a comparison to Titanic. On September 23 2013 10:32 justanothertownie wrote:Ok, this is where I stand: LoneMeow: I can see him being discouraged town. The only thing I really don't like is how he just left after voting himself. He is definitely not dumb and knows that this is horrible. But I don't see how it really makes sense as scum either. Ray: I don't get this guy. His posting is extremely unintuitive but he obviously posted like this in his last game, too. I am struggling to form an opinion on him. FirmTofu: Show nested quote +On September 22 2013 19:10 FirmTofu wrote:On September 22 2013 19:00 DarthPunk wrote:On September 22 2013 18:58 FirmTofu wrote:On September 22 2013 18:50 DarthPunk wrote:On September 22 2013 18:47 Mocsta wrote: DP.
Do you find FT backing down indicative of a townie prodding for information and diverting course as they are satisfied.
Or scum prodding around, and diverting as shits about to get started? I find it odd that FT thought I was scummy for being defensive. And then when I am defensive towards him he thinks I am townie. There is a real inconsistency in his narrative IMO. I think a scum Firm Tofu would ABSOLUTELY not want to get into it with me. Further his originally thread summary was really really off. Actually I have had some thoughts. I may construct a longer post shortly about this if you'll give me some time. I would like to clarify my intentions here. The inconsistent narrative was deliberate. Why? You are active. Accusing you allows me to read you better. Think rayn's style of play. By posting an inconsistent narrative, I can gauge your response as being townie or scummy in a quick, direct, and efficient fashion. Furthermore, I can assess the extent to which you are actually scumhunting. The fact that you noticed the inconsistency makes you look more town to me. You want to find scum. You're looking for inconsistencies.
I can assure you, scum FirmTofu would buddy you until you die. You'll just have to take my word on that bit. So, what you are saying is that you accused me falsely based on some really bad meta read. and this whole time it was, in fact, a ploy in order to read me better? is that it? No, I accused you on a legitimate meta read that I "flavored" with some inconsistencies about your prior defensive behavior. This looks so unbelievable to me. There are 2 possibilities (I don't buy his explanation): (1) He is town and to proud to admit he made a mistake. (2) He is scum trying to cover up inconsistencies. He had this weird discussion with DP and he walked us through him reading the thread for a while (a good way to seem active and invested without necessarily doing too much of value). Then he just disappeared. If I was in his shoes and my time was limited I would try to catch up to the thread asap and not comment on things (without presenting some sort of critical information) that happened ages ago and I especially wouldn't try to discuss those comments with people instead of reading the rest of the thread. Of those 3 people I like this lynch the most and I have to vote someone now because I have to sleep. ##Vote: FirmTofu This is halfway down the third page of jat's filter, and is the first time I can find marked suspicion on anybody. And it's because he needs to vote someone before he sleeps. On September 24 2013 03:38 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On September 24 2013 03:13 raynpelikoneet wrote: Btw JAT, if you are still here. Who are your scumreads? I still don't have very strong reads. There are a few people I am relatively confident are town but noone I am sure is scum. People that look bad and come to mind are FT (no improvement and the lynch doesn't make him look better), Risen (I have to admit I don't know this guy at all so maybe he is just a player who doesn't give a fuck at all? - really anti town though), kush (as you said he can do better we will see Day2). I am also slightly suspicious of Mocsta because of his voting behaviour yesterday and because he obviously has a quite strong townread on me (I mean there is nothing wrong with it but the last player who read me town strongly while nobody else did was scum). I wouldn't lynch him though. Ok, still suspicious of FT, Risen for being "anti-town", kush "can do better", and Mocsta "although I wouldn't lynch him". Bear in mind this post was prompted by rayn, not given voluntarily. On September 25 2013 09:17 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2013 00:44 Mocsta wrote:@Rayn: Regarding - MattchewOP links are NOT updated. Mattchew filter http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=423071&user=Mattchew
Im just going to list things that stick out to me whether pro/con and then summarise + Show Spoiler +- Not sure why his first action is to filter dive 4 specific players
- Gut read on rayn is meh.. would have expected something more substatial
- Gives an odd read on Chariman Ray.. almost as if he knows he is town (this stuck out to me a while back).. could just be poor phrasing
- Where is outcome of his filter dive on 4 specific players?
- Cuddles Mocsta... via gut again.. none of his posts have any in-game substance
- Is OK with yam, based on others vote critera; but then later gives a wishywashy comment on yam that implies he only has a soft scum lean.. very odd
- Asks for opinions on Stutters multiple times, but doesn't flesh out why he is interested (very scummy)
- Rational of keeping voting on yam is odd... suggests he didnt have a scum read on him when he cast the vote in the first place....which is not consistent with prior comments
- later puts a scum team which includes stutters.... why the fuck did he not vote stutters instead of yam.. OR prove stutters himself.. (VERY SCUMMY)
- Really odd comments about marv.... not sure what it means
Overall. I have a few problems with him (1) Tries to insinuate stutters is scum through others, but provides no insight of his own. In fact, he doesnt even probe stutters directly to ascertain his alignment. Exacerbated when he confirms he didnt have a scum read on yamato when voting him... but lists stutters on his scum team (His vote should have been on stutters !!) (2) When speaking about chariman_ray opener; the phrasing is really odd. Its almost as if he knows the guy is town.. i actually cant pinpoint my issue with it, its just really odd. (3) I have played voice mafia with this guy twice now. As town, matt is easily able to establish himself. He speaks freely and with confidence, is to the point, and doesn't listen to bullshit. I'm not getting an iota of that this game.
I actually can't see how this guy can be town. His actions are very scummy/deceitful, and I can't picture the motive for a town to keep asking about stutters, without providing personal insight, or querying stutters directly. Im actually really happy with this guy to be voted. And willing to vote him above anyone else I discussed prior this cycle. ##Unvote ##Vote: Mattchew Ok, I read his filter again and your case. Still the same feeling about it. Sounds logical - guy might be scum. Is it compelling enough to convince me 100%? No, it is not. On the other hand Mattchews reaction to the case is pretty damning in my eyes. He doesn't even try to defend himself or present better targets. Has to be shat on to give a scumread on Mattchew. Originally I read how he posted around here as town, but now, meh. Answer to question: no, it really doesn't look like it.jat never attempts to engage or develop his read on his only other main scumread, Firm, either. Justanothertownie: Thanks for the Titanic compilation, that was what i was supposed to look for today. Remember my read on JAT earlier? It was "angry". It's the odd feeling i got from him in comparsion to Titanic (yeah i thought at some point he was scum in Titanic, but i had never played with him before that). You are right marv, he is very different here in comparsion to this game. Things i especially don't like: 1) His repeatedly saying "if you got questions to me, go ahead and ask". This does not necessarily make him scum but he's not being proactive, and in Titanic he was proactive. 2) His comeback in thread on D2. First there is this: Show nested quote +On September 25 2013 01:18 justanothertownie wrote: ... I'm catching up right now. Open for questions as usal. Whe he has caught up this is ALL he has to say: Show nested quote +On September 25 2013 02:50 justanothertownie wrote: Risen, as far as I understand the set up there are no goons. We have 6 scummers and the possible roles are RB, GF and Framer. We also had only one player claiming roleblock (as far as I have seen). I think it is pretty reasonable to assume there are Framer/GF maybe even more than one per role. Stupid comment to Risen. Show nested quote +On September 25 2013 04:25 justanothertownie wrote: Wow, how come there is nothing going on right now?
Kush I am eagerly awaiting your announced contribution. Also I would like to know yamatos, geripts, sentinels, marvs, rayns and kushs current opinion on FT if you have the time (not only because they were on rays wagon but for various different reasons). I mean everyone elses comments are welcome too but the opinions of those people are especially interesting to me.
Apart from that - I'm getting tired of saying this but if you want me to contribute so you can read me ask me stuff... I am currently struggling to find useful things to say. I will be here for several hours reading the thread and occasionally a filter. Doesn't seem right to me.. 1) I don't get how it makes me scum to urge people to ask me questions. 2) The comment to Risen was while I was catching up if I remember that correctly and what the hell is dumb about it? Explain. 3) So, what's scum about me noting there was total silence in the thread?
Response to marv comes next...
|
On September 25 2013 22:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2013 22:46 justanothertownie wrote: I am here for like an hour before I have to travel. First: The case on me is just pure meta, no? And you are deliberately using ONLY my very first game on this site where I played horribly. Marv I directed you to look at my last game which is a newbie game and you will see parallels to this game. It weirds me out you did obviously not do that or if you did you did not feel the need to include it in your case. I am pretty sure this is also the game where OO got his read on me. The problem is you did not play horribly in Titanic. Compared to this game your play in Titanic was far better. Well I got only negative opinions about my play right there and people scolded me for my Day1 behaviour for the whole game and afterwards. I especially think it is weird that you of all people think I played well there when during the game I got a very different feeling until the last Day.
|
mattchews defense looks real i would say town on him plus it wasnt just defense he gave some reads and seems like he is trying to put 2 and 2 together.
Cephiro lynch would be ok maybe like 55 60 percent. Shity way for him to play as scum but i could definitely see a scum using his constant ill totes contribute later and just never do it.
panda bear guy im not so hot on for his lynch. Basically it isnt super clear who he wants to lynch the most right now even though he said he aims to do that today. like with mattchews defense i don't really know who i want to lynch either so i don't think that's a smoking gun. best course of action would be just to see what he does today.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
who do you want to push, iamp?
|
|
|
|