|
regarding N0 lords...
Rayn and Acro were gonna be lords of their house regardless of their alignment. Rayn had two newbs and a player just returning from a long hiatus. Acro had the passive johnny and passive sharrant, and kush.
Chrom was lord only because DI and I were so volatile early on. He played well, but he didn't do anything special to get our lordship. It was thrust upon him more than taken.
|
On August 20 2013 15:03 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2013 14:50 s0Lstice wrote: yea chrom fooled the shit out of me. worst read I had this game. good job chrom.
going into today I was gonna be on rayn and acro. that last cycle was bad for us. not much I/we could do to keep the votes out of acro and rayn's hands. The game was basically over then...but truthfully it was over when Mocsta modkilled himself.
wtf dude.
really just took the wind out of my sails.
This is such a sore loser attitude. I was a replacement. My slot was effectively dead. I'm not condoning the modkill. Merely stating to blame a loss based on what the replacement did is poor play. I lynched scum and pushed 4/5 of them in the thread..yet was requested to be shot...what did u do?
how about shut up?
I'm not blaming you for the loss. I'm blaming you for taking enjoyment out of the game for me.
|
On August 20 2013 15:03 DrParnassus wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2013 15:01 s0Lstice wrote: regarding N0 lords...
Rayn and Acro were gonna be lords of their house regardless of their alignment. Rayn had two newbs and a player just returning from a long hiatus. Acro had the passive johnny and passive sharrant, and kush.
Chrom was lord only because DI and I were so volatile early on. He played well, but he didn't do anything special to get our lordship. It was thrust upon him more than taken. you'd be surprised at exactly how much planning went into house baratheon's lord elections...
i'm sure they talked. what I'm saying is what they decided didn't matter. DI and I would have reached that impasse no matter who else was in the house with us.
|
yea post it, then I can go to bed ;D
|
On August 20 2013 15:14 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2013 15:04 s0Lstice wrote:On August 20 2013 15:03 Mocsta wrote:On August 20 2013 14:50 s0Lstice wrote: yea chrom fooled the shit out of me. worst read I had this game. good job chrom.
going into today I was gonna be on rayn and acro. that last cycle was bad for us. not much I/we could do to keep the votes out of acro and rayn's hands. The game was basically over then...but truthfully it was over when Mocsta modkilled himself.
wtf dude.
really just took the wind out of my sails.
This is such a sore loser attitude. I was a replacement. My slot was effectively dead. I'm not condoning the modkill. Merely stating to blame a loss based on what the replacement did is poor play. I lynched scum and pushed 4/5 of them in the thread..yet was requested to be shot...what did u do? how about shut up? I'm not blaming you for the loss.* I'm blaming you for taking enjoyment out of the game for me. yeah ok. But why? Modkills happen each and everygame. My slot was dead before replacing. I really don't understand the reaction in comparison to everyday modkills.
If you can't understand how you suiciding as town in a critical situation and in a particularly stupid fashion is upsetting for others in the game then there is no answer that will satisfy you. Drop it.
|
its because of how you attacked iamp over the manner of gumshoe's death
like, scum should be thinking that it was town kp/vigi, but you were arguing so hard against that. very convincing.
|
anyway I'm off to bed, back tomorrow.
I do want to congratulate scum for a good game.
I was at my stupidest around Sharrants cop claim. 100% record for derping blue claims continues...
|
Gmarshal had a wisdom of the crowds rule in his games where people could vote out someone who signed up. That's a good idea.
With the state of the forum right now though...something that makes signups slower is gonna be excruciating in its own right.
Clarity..I told you in a PM and ill tell you again. Lots of eurozone folks in this game made it really difficult to be involved in thread discussion. The thread was most active during business hours over here. I felt like a lurker to you because we rarely were posting at the same time. When I got back and had time to play there usually wasn't anyone around that really would have helped to talk to.
|
On August 21 2013 00:13 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On August 21 2013 00:03 s0Lstice wrote: Gmarshal had a wisdom of the crowds rule in his games where people could vote out someone who signed up. That's a good idea.
With the state of the forum right now though...something that makes signups slower is gonna be excruciating in its own right.
Clarity..I told you in a PM and ill tell you again. Lots of eurozone folks in this game made it really difficult to be involved in thread discussion. The thread was most active during business hours over here. I felt like a lurker to you because we rarely were posting at the same time. When I got back and had time to play there usually wasn't anyone around that really would have helped to talk to. Are you saying that NA is worse than EU in Mafia as well as in RTS or what?  ![[image loading]](http://www.gosugamers.net/starcraft2/images/2013/february/wcs-na-roundof16.png)
LOL. Nope, just that this game was harder to be tapped into than a typical game around here due to most of the thread development happening when I couldn't post.
On August 21 2013 00:14 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On August 21 2013 00:03 s0Lstice wrote: Gmarshal had a wisdom of the crowds rule in his games where people could vote out someone who signed up. That's a good idea.
With the state of the forum right now though...something that makes signups slower is gonna be excruciating in its own right.
Clarity..I told you in a PM and ill tell you again. Lots of eurozone folks in this game made it really difficult to be involved in thread discussion. The thread was most active during business hours over here. I felt like a lurker to you because we rarely were posting at the same time. When I got back and had time to play there usually wasn't anyone around that really would have helped to talk to. I realize that, but some piece of analysis that you put in thread won't be ignored because it was posted when we weren't around. You were basically a vet with your 11 hp, seems like a waste to only post when others are around and therefore not post much at all. I'm not saying have a conversation with yourself and post 6x in a row, but a concise post with your thoughts of people and the goings on would have made things a bit better for town. For Sharrant it's the same story, he's basically a nearly confirmed town but he doesn't abuse it in thread.
This is a nice sentiment, but not true. Your problem with me wasn't that my viewpoint on things wasn't unclear, just that I wasn't around enough from your point of view. What difference would it really have made for me to make a summation post every time I got to the thread and found it slow? Ideas and reads are great, but being right means nothing if you can't push them all the way home. You need to be in the thread with the other active people to align your thinking.
|
haha you guys were trading account info to log and and vote for eachother?!
so much seedy stuff in this game. strangely, that fits well with the theme.
|
also to the host...what's the chances of a round 2 of this happening at some point?
|
Are you planning on doing a blog post on this one kita?
|
|
|
|