|
On July 13 2013 10:18 Umasi wrote:
Does it really matter if we haven't seen things from other players at this point?
It's been two hours since the game began, some people could still be working, etc. The way you popped in, said one thing kinda suspicious, then popped out is what really irks me.
Don't apologize and talk about other forums as an excuse, excuses are bad. Reasons are fine, but that didn't feel like a reason to me.
We don't need to point out no lynching as an option, because it's BAD
No lynching is something that scum would LIKE.
I think I said it in the last game I played (too lazy to dig it up,) but the only tool a townie has is their vote, so don't waste it on something like a no lynch. There should always be someone who is objectively "scummiest" that you'd rather vote for than no lynch, have a little confidence.
Well, this game is majority lynch, so voting for the "scummiest" person could be what causes a lynch not to happen.
I'm pretty sure scum wouldn't mind lynching town either.
|
Kirby, who do you think is scum?
|
Nightcat99, although it may be total coincidence,....it's interesting that you show up right when the conversation is directed at lurkers.
aside from you being on a trip or not and that being hard to believe.
Although props for thinking that lynching every lynch period is a good thing :D
|
On July 13 2013 09:58 Chromatically wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2013 09:25 StiMaDDict wrote:Another thing that is annoying the fuck out of me is that how Rainbow "interpreted" my post. This is what I wrote. On July 13 2013 08:07 StiMaDDict wrote:
I can only look at jrkirby's post as a pressure vote at this point. He didn't seem to be the type to joke around from the pre game though.
Explanation: I find a pressure vote to be a strategy for some people. It works sometimes but not all the times. jrkirby's "case" really is not something of content to be honest. I assumed that it was pressure vote to get some discussions going. So that is what I said. As for the second sentence, his "case" is really fucking bullshit, so there are two possibilities. Either he is joking around or he suck at scumhunting.
So you posted it because you wanted to point out that he's either a townie joking or a bad townie? Why would you post the second sentence at all?
Your point, reasonable. Looking back at it, I see that I made a mistake. Either I should have added my complete thought process as, "He made a bullshit case and voted. This is a pressure vote or joke vote. He does not seem to be a guy who jokes around, therefore it is a pressure vote." or I should not have added the second sentence.
So yes, I wanted to point out that it was pressure vote to everyone and then I was going to ask jkirby for an elaboration and/or his intention for the post to confirm my analysis, but I had to write an elaboration of my own for Rainbow.
|
wait, what do you mean kirby?
am I misunderstanding how the lynch works?
If two players have five votes on them, the first one to five gets lynched, am I wrong? Have I horribly misunderstood something?
|
Chromatically you're confusing me lol.
They're all the same reason juat articulated differently.
|
On July 13 2013 10:25 Umasi wrote:
wait, what do you mean kirby?
am I misunderstanding how the lynch works?
If two players have five votes on them, the first one to five gets lynched, am I wrong? Have I horribly misunderstood something?
please tell me that you know it's majority vote. If not *facepalm
|
Okay i think i understand stims position now
We're flirting too much with subtext atm.
|
On July 13 2013 10:23 Chromatically wrote:
Kirby, who do you think is scum?
Honestly? I have real trouble seeing scum until I see voting patterns. I'm slightly more suspicious of Sponge, Umasi, and Rainbows than the rest. Sponge I've stated my reasons for. I don't really trust my read on Rainbows because [meta here] I thought he was scum last time I played with him and he wasn't. Umasi just reads a bit ornery, so that could be the reason for my weak read.
My vote on hzflank was kinda a combo of joke/pressure as you guys pointed out. It got a bit of discussion, but didn't get much of a rise out of hzflank, who I currently have null read on.
I guess I should unvote him now, since the pressure obviously didn't do too much.
##unvote: hzflank
|
On July 13 2013 10:25 Umasi wrote:
wait, what do you mean kirby?
am I misunderstanding how the lynch works?
If two players have five votes on them, the first one to five gets lynched, am I wrong? Have I horribly misunderstood something?
It's majority lynch, so if we have 13 players, 7 of them need to agree to secure a lynch, I believe. This is correct, right?
|
my bad.
So if two players have equal votes, does it actually just become a no lynch?
that's fucked up.
|
|
|
I play exactly the same as scum and town imo.
Last game was just me being frustrated and correct :p lol. You should fear the Rainbows.
|
Do you have any particular scumreads to nail down Rainbows?
It started to get stagnant and I don't want it to be stagnant t.t
|
On July 13 2013 10:42 Rainbows wrote:
I play exactly the same as scum and town imo.
Last game was just me being frustrated and correct :p lol. You should fear the Rainbows.
Anyone think this could be a scumslip? He seems the kind that might want to subtly brag about it if he were scum.
|
(for your information, I'm pretty null on everybody except for Superfluous and Nightcat, who I think are on the scummier side of the meter.)
|
I don't think it's a scumslip, he's just talking.
|
Ive been on my phone at work this entire time.
Will elaborate when I get home to a computer. Hint: Not stim.
More town reads than scum but thats normal. Ill converse with you if it doesnt involve too much backtracking atm.
|
On July 13 2013 10:24 StiMaDDict wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2013 09:58 Chromatically wrote:On July 13 2013 09:25 StiMaDDict wrote:Another thing that is annoying the fuck out of me is that how Rainbow "interpreted" my post. This is what I wrote. On July 13 2013 08:07 StiMaDDict wrote:
I can only look at jrkirby's post as a pressure vote at this point. He didn't seem to be the type to joke around from the pre game though.
Explanation: I find a pressure vote to be a strategy for some people. It works sometimes but not all the times. jrkirby's "case" really is not something of content to be honest. I assumed that it was pressure vote to get some discussions going. So that is what I said. As for the second sentence, his "case" is really fucking bullshit, so there are two possibilities. Either he is joking around or he suck at scumhunting.
So you posted it because you wanted to point out that he's either a townie joking or a bad townie? Why would you post the second sentence at all? Your point, reasonable. Looking back at it, I see that I made a mistake. Either I should have added my complete thought process as, "He made a bullshit case and voted. This is a pressure vote or joke vote. He does not seem to be a guy who jokes around, therefore it is a pressure vote." or I should not have added the second sentence. So yes, I wanted to point out that it was pressure vote to everyone and then I was going to ask jkirby for an elaboration and/or his intention for the post to confirm my analysis, but I had to write an elaboration of my own for Rainbow.
This makes more sense.
On July 13 2013 10:26 Rainbows wrote:
Chromatically you're confusing me lol.
They're all the same reason juat articulated differently.
This also makes more sense.
|
On July 13 2013 10:47 jrkirby wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2013 10:42 Rainbows wrote:
I play exactly the same as scum and town imo.
Last game was just me being frustrated and correct :p lol. You should fear the Rainbows. Anyone think this could be a scumslip? He seems the kind that might want to subtly brag about it if he were scum.
Nope it's a scumslip im the Godfather.
Srsly that made me lol jkirby :p
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
