| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On July 05 2013 23:36 marvellosity wrote: Who said you had a guarantee? It's just basic logic that if it's MYLO compared to not-MYLO, we have very little incentive to lynch in to you. I've already explained the incentive. There are people who still doubt that I'm survivor. That's incentive enough, and not-MYLO makes that much easier. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 05 2013 23:36 WaveofShadow wrote: I'm well aware. Technically both teams should be ignoring me right now but I can't exactly count on either of you guys to make the mathematically right play now, can I? The mathematically right play is for scum to shoot town. If scum get their shot through, mathematically it's a pretty decent play to lynch you. If scum don't, mathematically it isn't. | ||
|
Lazermonkey
Sweden2176 Posts
On July 05 2013 23:35 WaveofShadow wrote: Just tell us during the last hour of the night who you saved. But really you are just being stupid now. Just save someone you think is town. Not me ofc but then again I'm not sure you even think that I am town. Well you'll see what my decision was in a few hours anyway, won't you? lol I could lie about my protecting someone as well since people don't get notified by RB and it would be the exact same thing as if I 'missed' the NK target. I could agree to protect someone and you guys could just say that I lied anyway if you wanted to lynch me. Don't act like I have some sort of guarantee from town either. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On July 05 2013 23:37 marvellosity wrote: The mathematically right play is for scum to shoot town. If scum get their shot through, mathematically it's a pretty decent play to lynch you. If scum don't, mathematically it isn't. But is it the BEST play? No, it isn't. That's why I can't trust either of you guys right now. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 05 2013 23:39 WaveofShadow wrote: But is it the BEST play? No, it isn't. That's why I can't trust either of you guys right now. It is the best play if we don't have a guaranteed scum lynch. You're spouting bullshit on the basis that you expect agents to act irrationally. That's just nonsense. Rationally scum will not shoot you, and town will definitely not lynch you if you make a save, but could well lynch you if you don't. There's only one scenario where YOUR action makes a difference. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On July 05 2013 23:41 marvellosity wrote: It is the best play if we don't have a guaranteed scum lynch. You're spouting bullshit on the basis that you expect agents to act irrationally. That's just nonsense. Rationally scum will not shoot you, and town will definitely not lynch you if you make a save, but could well lynch you if you don't. There's only one scenario where YOUR action makes a difference. I'm not spouting bullshit. You don't speak for the town; there are 7 other people who can vote right now other than you and me. And who's to say if I start acting for town scum don't shoot me even if it's irrational 'cuz dey mad at me and wanna be all vindictive? 'If we don't win neither do you!' It's an impossible scenario for me, marv. If people acted rationally in mafia all of the time the game just wouldn't be as fun now, would it? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 05 2013 23:44 WaveofShadow wrote: I'm not spouting bullshit. You don't speak for the town; there are 7 other people who can vote right now other than you and me. And who's to say if I start acting for town scum don't shoot me even if it's irrational 'cuz dey mad at me and wanna be all vindictive? 'If we don't win neither do you!' It's an impossible scenario for me, marv. If people acted rationally in mafia all of the time the game just wouldn't be as fun now, would it? Again, you're spouting bullshit based on agents acting irrationally. This is mafia, there's no guarantees of anything, but there's pretty clearly defined payoffs based on events occurring. The fact you keep arguing against this makes you look stupid at the very least. "who's to say scum won't jeapordise their chances of winning for giggles?" - noone, but it's dumb. "there are 7 other people who can vote right now other than you" - and only one wants to lynch you. Again, you have one action that could qualitatively improve your chances of winning, and that's making a save. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Carry on. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
JJD, where you at bro? Is this my scumgame???? | ||
|
Lazermonkey
Sweden2176 Posts
| ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On July 05 2013 23:50 Lazermonkey wrote: WoS, just shut up please, nothing you say makes sense. <3 u 2 qt | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
 | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
What would you like me to talk about qtpi? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On July 06 2013 00:25 Stutters695 wrote: Nah, dog. That's just the beginning. I was actually typing up a post on this subject but I didn't want to give scum a guideline to actually winning if they were dumb enough to take the n1 shots they did. What would you like me to talk about qtpi? ohai Stutters, welcome to da game! | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
I dunno marv, the thing with me about JJD, is that all his stuff is REALLY BLATANT. Like its a hard defence of fuba and hard attack on WoS. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 06 2013 01:07 Oatsmaster wrote: Come stutters, show us whos scum! I dunno marv, the thing with me about JJD, is that all his stuff is REALLY BLATANT. Like its a hard defence of fuba and hard attack on WoS. No that's the thing, he didn't hard-defend fuba at all. He was attacking fuba for much of the day before suddenly dropping him in favour of WoS. | ||
| ||
|
|
OSC
GSL
Monday Night Weeklies
Replay Cast
WardiTV Weekly
The PondCast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
