• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 22:00
CEST 04:00
KST 11:00
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed18Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Heaven's Balance Suggestions (roast me) Who will win EWC 2025? Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Soulkey Muta Micro Map? BW General Discussion [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion Movie Discussion! [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 674 users

I Swear This Is Normal Mini Mafia

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Normal
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 04 2013 01:36 GMT
#11
/in
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 01:20 GMT
#217
I think you are all underestimating the gravity of the situation we are in right now.

Gravity Man for Mayor
Now all of you are asking right now, "Who is this upstart young robot, and why should we elect him mayor of our little town?"
To that I answer, because I am seeking more from my life.

Up until now, the thought of using my powers only for destruction has weighed heavily upon my cold steel shoulders and I yearned to make up for that which I hath wrought in the past.
The attraction of a power role cannot be taken lightly, of course, nor can the massive responsibility associated with it, whatever it may be beyond the double vote.

"But surely we have no idea who this metal man even is!"
First of all, I am not Metal Man. That is this guy.
[image loading]

I am this guy.
[image loading]

No resemblance in the slightest. Well our chassis are both red but that is all.
The point is that it does not matter who I am, or what I am built from. What matters is the fluid that courses through my body is green. What matters is what I will do for this town as its mayor.
I promise completely transparent reads and analysis so you need never question my alignment.
I promise strong activity levels so you need not wonder whether or not I am lurking.
I promise to hunt scum until my gears turn their very last, my positronic brain shorts out, my joints rust and my core dies.

There are others within this game that will promise to do the very same things as I.
But can they, as mere flesh and blood beings, offer you the efficiency that I can? Surely not.

I will crush the scum who have infiltrated this town under the weight of a thousand thousand suns.
I will engineer their slow destruction as their very molecules are ripped apart with the force of a black hole.


But let me not convince you through words, let me convince you with action.
##Mayor Vote: GravityMan

"But GravityMan!" You say. "How dare you go up against the most active player in the thread thus far?"

Because I simply cannot trust a man who makes an obvious grab for power after pushing and supporting a townread of his so early and for so long. This townread who, himself, has done absolutely nothing to deserve the honor and responsibility that comes with the mayoral title.
It appears as though a farce, a show of confidence simply to establish his towniness in the thread so that eventually he may gain the trust of others and rob his townread of the title he so promised.

To what end I know not thus far, but you can be sure I will get to the heart of the matter.

I invite you now, one and all, to join me in the rousting of those who would wish us ill from our midst.

I welcome any and all questions you have for me, for as you begin understanding where it is I come from, so too can I begin my understanding of the thoughts in your relatively soft cranial cavities.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 01:40 GMT
#221
On June 10 2013 10:30 Hapahauli wrote:
Dearest GravityMan,

I have no interest in seeing people run mayoral campaigns over empty political promises. My only desire is to see the best scumhunter in the game elected mayor so he/she may have the most influence over the game as possible.

So what are your scum-hunting credentials?
Furthermore, what are your reads thusfar?
Lastly, what are your reasons for not wanting me to be elected mayor? The baseless and unjustified criticism you directed my way in your intro post doesn't cut it.

Hello Hapahauli.
It is nice to meet you.

The problem with electing the best scumhunter in the game as mayor, you see, is the fact that said scumhunter may themselves be scum.

Now as for my 'credentials:'
You know very well as a complex robot designed only to cause death and destruction by controlling the flows of gravity previous to this game, I have no previous credentials. Your desire to base the mayoral candidacy entirely on meta reads of people is flawed by design because this early into a game it is very easy to act in accordance with one's previous towny-looking games. It makes more sense, as you yourself stated, to base said candidacy on actions rather than words.

My reads - I have a couple of townreads I would prefer not to divulge at the present time as it is not advantageous to our situation at the current time. As far as scumreads go, again there is not a great deal to go on right now as the discussion has been quite uninspired thus far. We still have a full Earth's revolution to go, however, and there is much that can be learned in such a short period of time.

I don't want you to be elected mayor for the reasons stated in my original post as well as those above. I simply cannot base the candidacy on reads of past games. There has not been enough activity offered by anyone in the thread thus far to feel confident in anyone's scum-hunting ability but my own.

Now if I may ask you some questions:
Why change your mind from the man ShiaoPi? You said he is a good scumhunter in his own right, did you not? What are you basing this on? Do you feel yourself to be a better player than him?
What do you think of this jampidampi thus far?
What do you make of the inactivity of the one knows as DarthPunk, a player who is generally seen to be fairly active?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 01:47 GMT
#223
On June 10 2013 10:43 AxleGreaser wrote:
I do have to stop making my first reads based on the users name...
Trouble is I keep being right... + Show Spoiler +
Name+long long silence => lame joke was incoming

I user hope gravity man appreciates the gravity of choosing to be the most fashionably late entrant and can now live up to it.

What exactly does my entrance to the thread have to do with living up to what people may or may not expect of me?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 02:32 GMT
#231
On June 10 2013 11:10 Hapahauli wrote:
EBWOP

Show nested quote +
This reads to me like


Didn't finish this. Your statement here...
Show nested quote +
I don't want you to be elected mayor for the reasons stated in my original post as well as those above. I simply cannot base the candidacy on reads of past games. There has not been enough activity offered by anyone in the thread thus far to feel confident in anyone's scum-hunting ability but my own.


Reads to me like a huge cop-out. Your entire candidacy so far has been based on a) words and b) because you claim you're town and c) you're a japanese robot.

You are entirely correct in your assessment of myself in that I have not provided sufficient means to make you or the rest of town trust me through my actions. Do remember, however, that once again the day is but half over and I have only posted a handful of times. I hope to make it fairly obvious as both time and space progress.

To answer one of your queries before I progress to the answers you provided; I prefer not to bases my analyses and reads on the previous actions of other players. It is an unnecessary strain on my capacitors and have minimal space left in my memory banks.

Now you have actually gone some way in determining your capacity to me as a potential mayoral candidate; certainly much more than this ShiaoPi. I still hesitate to remove my vite from myself but know that I am not yet locked in, and should it be made clear to me that someone's abilities are superior to my own then I will gladly vote accordingly. Your townread of this jampidampi was confusing me I must admit, because there was very little I could glean from his filter that seemed to be specifically aligned towards the town. Of course the time-post scenario you have outlined is what stood out to me the most and I didn't understand why you were so quick to acknowledge his defense. Your second point regarding his questioning appears valid, yet again his activity level leaves it difficult to reach a strong conclusion. I would agree with you in that this jampidampi would be my strongest read into the scumplayers for today thus far, and yet this is relatively speaking (as I must), so I cannot give it a great deal of weight yet.

I have much to expect from this DarthPunk so I eagerly await his arrival to the thread.


Now as you have correctly mentioned, I have not had the chance to do a great deal of hunting myself, thus I begin:

VayneAuthority: you mention early on in the game you do not trust this AxleGreaser. May I inquire as to why?

On June 10 2013 06:29 VayneAuthority wrote:
remember that this is semi-closed setup so we dont even know if theres a medic or anything. Getting voted as mayor is pretty much a death sentence and I think BH sees it the same way I do. Don't want a fucking target on my back to start the game.

You also mention that you do not want a target on your back, yet the way you currently post you clearly do not mind attracting attention to yourself, not unlike the attraction of two gravitational bodies. This appears contradictory. Can you comment please?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 02:36 GMT
#232
On June 10 2013 11:20 AxleGreaser wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2013 10:47 GravityMan wrote:
On June 10 2013 10:43 AxleGreaser wrote:
I do have to stop making my first reads based on the users name...
Trouble is I keep being right... + Show Spoiler +
Name+long long silence => lame joke was incoming

I user hope gravity man appreciates the gravity of choosing to be the most fashionably late entrant and can now live up to it.

What exactly does my entrance to the thread have to do with living up to what people may or may not expect of me?


I am not sure what you are asking perhaps because you are not sure what I said. so...

(outside of the newbies games)
In my experience people typically turn up in threads late, either because of actually true IRL issues. or because they estimate themselves to be a good enough player, that they can turn up late, and either through reputation, but in your case as you are a smurf, through their actions in the thread establish their innocence enough to live through the first lynch.

This has side effect benefit in say BHs case of increasing the chances he will live through the night.

Turning up late, if you are scum, like lurking is a strategy that might be used to avoid giving input until you see the lay of the land (who has time to play how well this game) and work out how to position your scum strategy in the game.
As it can benefit scum, it is a thing they would want to do, however as it is thing they would want to do people not giving input (by lurking, turning up late) looks scummy. Because it looks scummy, scum tend not to do it...etc unto infinite recursion, hence what i label as WIFOM. While it is WIFOM the conditional probabilities are not entirely null.

it thus changes my expectations of you.









Your explanation is somewhat sufficient, thank you for the clarification. What is not clear to me however, is your actual read of me. Do you regard me as scum or town currently, based on what little you know of me and what I have posted in this thread?

I assume you would regard me differently if I were another person, so let me also ask you: if I were a well-known player who is known for strong scumhunting skills how would you regard me given my posting being exactly the same?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 02:40 GMT
#234
On June 10 2013 11:37 VayneAuthority wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2013 11:32 GravityMan wrote:
On June 10 2013 11:10 Hapahauli wrote:
EBWOP

This reads to me like


Didn't finish this. Your statement here...
I don't want you to be elected mayor for the reasons stated in my original post as well as those above. I simply cannot base the candidacy on reads of past games. There has not been enough activity offered by anyone in the thread thus far to feel confident in anyone's scum-hunting ability but my own.


Reads to me like a huge cop-out. Your entire candidacy so far has been based on a) words and b) because you claim you're town and c) you're a japanese robot.

You are entirely correct in your assessment of myself in that I have not provided sufficient means to make you or the rest of town trust me through my actions. Do remember, however, that once again the day is but half over and I have only posted a handful of times. I hope to make it fairly obvious as both time and space progress.

To answer one of your queries before I progress to the answers you provided; I prefer not to bases my analyses and reads on the previous actions of other players. It is an unnecessary strain on my capacitors and have minimal space left in my memory banks.

Now you have actually gone some way in determining your capacity to me as a potential mayoral candidate; certainly much more than this ShiaoPi. I still hesitate to remove my vite from myself but know that I am not yet locked in, and should it be made clear to me that someone's abilities are superior to my own then I will gladly vote accordingly. Your townread of this jampidampi was confusing me I must admit, because there was very little I could glean from his filter that seemed to be specifically aligned towards the town. Of course the time-post scenario you have outlined is what stood out to me the most and I didn't understand why you were so quick to acknowledge his defense. Your second point regarding his questioning appears valid, yet again his activity level leaves it difficult to reach a strong conclusion. I would agree with you in that this jampidampi would be my strongest read into the scumplayers for today thus far, and yet this is relatively speaking (as I must), so I cannot give it a great deal of weight yet.

I have much to expect from this DarthPunk so I eagerly await his arrival to the thread.


Now as you have correctly mentioned, I have not had the chance to do a great deal of hunting myself, thus I begin:

VayneAuthority: you mention early on in the game you do not trust this AxleGreaser. May I inquire as to why?

On June 10 2013 06:29 VayneAuthority wrote:
remember that this is semi-closed setup so we dont even know if theres a medic or anything. Getting voted as mayor is pretty much a death sentence and I think BH sees it the same way I do. Don't want a fucking target on my back to start the game.

You also mention that you do not want a target on your back, yet the way you currently post you clearly do not mind attracting attention to yourself, not unlike the attraction of two gravitational bodies. This appears contradictory. Can you comment please?


there's no contradiction here. Posting like this makes scum keep me alive so I can continue playing the game, while being mayor would make them want to kill me more.

also not that I think axlegreaser is scum, I meant more that I do not trust him to be mayor as I can't understand half his posts so it wouldn't be in my best interest.

So you feel that attracting seemingly negative attention to yourself you are then doing the town a service by distracting them from more appropriatel targets at hand (assuming you are town)? Why do you feel the need to survive well into the game?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 02:55 GMT
#236
On June 10 2013 11:43 VayneAuthority wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2013 11:40 GravityMan wrote:
On June 10 2013 11:37 VayneAuthority wrote:
On June 10 2013 11:32 GravityMan wrote:
On June 10 2013 11:10 Hapahauli wrote:
EBWOP

This reads to me like


Didn't finish this. Your statement here...
I don't want you to be elected mayor for the reasons stated in my original post as well as those above. I simply cannot base the candidacy on reads of past games. There has not been enough activity offered by anyone in the thread thus far to feel confident in anyone's scum-hunting ability but my own.


Reads to me like a huge cop-out. Your entire candidacy so far has been based on a) words and b) because you claim you're town and c) you're a japanese robot.

You are entirely correct in your assessment of myself in that I have not provided sufficient means to make you or the rest of town trust me through my actions. Do remember, however, that once again the day is but half over and I have only posted a handful of times. I hope to make it fairly obvious as both time and space progress.

To answer one of your queries before I progress to the answers you provided; I prefer not to bases my analyses and reads on the previous actions of other players. It is an unnecessary strain on my capacitors and have minimal space left in my memory banks.

Now you have actually gone some way in determining your capacity to me as a potential mayoral candidate; certainly much more than this ShiaoPi. I still hesitate to remove my vite from myself but know that I am not yet locked in, and should it be made clear to me that someone's abilities are superior to my own then I will gladly vote accordingly. Your townread of this jampidampi was confusing me I must admit, because there was very little I could glean from his filter that seemed to be specifically aligned towards the town. Of course the time-post scenario you have outlined is what stood out to me the most and I didn't understand why you were so quick to acknowledge his defense. Your second point regarding his questioning appears valid, yet again his activity level leaves it difficult to reach a strong conclusion. I would agree with you in that this jampidampi would be my strongest read into the scumplayers for today thus far, and yet this is relatively speaking (as I must), so I cannot give it a great deal of weight yet.

I have much to expect from this DarthPunk so I eagerly await his arrival to the thread.


Now as you have correctly mentioned, I have not had the chance to do a great deal of hunting myself, thus I begin:

VayneAuthority: you mention early on in the game you do not trust this AxleGreaser. May I inquire as to why?

On June 10 2013 06:29 VayneAuthority wrote:
remember that this is semi-closed setup so we dont even know if theres a medic or anything. Getting voted as mayor is pretty much a death sentence and I think BH sees it the same way I do. Don't want a fucking target on my back to start the game.

You also mention that you do not want a target on your back, yet the way you currently post you clearly do not mind attracting attention to yourself, not unlike the attraction of two gravitational bodies. This appears contradictory. Can you comment please?


there's no contradiction here. Posting like this makes scum keep me alive so I can continue playing the game, while being mayor would make them want to kill me more.

also not that I think axlegreaser is scum, I meant more that I do not trust him to be mayor as I can't understand half his posts so it wouldn't be in my best interest.

So you feel that attracting seemingly negative attention to yourself you are then doing the town a service by distracting them from more appropriatel targets at hand (assuming you are town)? Why do you feel the need to survive well into the game?


Do you join games with the intent of not being able to play it? Obviously to enjoy the game. Bit of a weird question. If you got N1'ed every game it wouldn't be very fun would it

To be sure. But also to be sure is that someone inevitably must die on the first night. Do you envision yourself a strong mafia player in general, one that the scum are likely to target on the first night if you play to your full capacity? Forgive me if I am being presumptuous but I find it disconcerting that one would purposefully handicap their own strong play and purposefully not help the town so that they may survive to a point in the game where it may become more difficult to win.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 03:27 GMT
#239
On June 10 2013 12:10 Hapahauli wrote:
@ Gravity Man

I look forward to seeing your scum-hunting efforts.

However, I do have one more bone to pick with you:
Show nested quote +
Because I simply cannot trust a man who makes an obvious grab for power after pushing and supporting a townread of his so early and for so long. This townread who, himself, has done absolutely nothing to deserve the honor and responsibility that comes with the mayoral title.
It appears as though a farce, a show of confidence simply to establish his towniness in the thread so that eventually he may gain the trust of others and rob his townread of the title he so promised.

Show nested quote +
The problem with electing the best scumhunter in the game as mayor, you see, is the fact that said scumhunter may themselves be scum.


You have already made two attempts to insinuate suspicion on me with no justifications. Mayoral campaign or not, throwing unjustified shit at another player is unacceptable and anti-town.

What is your read on me?
What are your specific reasons to not support my candidacy and/or distrust me?

On June 10 2013 12:10 Hapahauli wrote:
@ Gravity Man

I look forward to seeing your scum-hunting efforts.

However, I do have one more bone to pick with you:
Show nested quote +
Because I simply cannot trust a man who makes an obvious grab for power after pushing and supporting a townread of his so early and for so long. This townread who, himself, has done absolutely nothing to deserve the honor and responsibility that comes with the mayoral title.
It appears as though a farce, a show of confidence simply to establish his towniness in the thread so that eventually he may gain the trust of others and rob his townread of the title he so promised.

Show nested quote +
The problem with electing the best scumhunter in the game as mayor, you see, is the fact that said scumhunter may themselves be scum.


You have already made two attempts to insinuate suspicion on me with no justifications. Mayoral campaign or not, throwing unjustified shit at another player is unacceptable and anti-town.

What is your read on me?
What are your specific reasons to not support my candidacy and/or distrust me?

Hapahauli your explanation as to why you switched to supporting this ShiaoPi was sufficient for me to understand your mindset. My second comment was merely a generalization, though I must admit if you in fact view yourself as the best hunter of scum in this game then I can see why you would see it as self-targeting.
My read of you as of our current discussion is different from what it would have been before our discussion; I no longer have any direct reason to suspect you. What I once saw as a blatant power grab I now see as a simple re-estimation of abilities. As such I have a null read of you leaning towards town. Your current confidence level gives me hope although since you base a great deal of your platform on your ability to catch scum, I would expect for you to be able to follow up on this, much as you expect from me. I will not be removing my vote from myself as I stated earlier.

For now, let us be content to hunt scum as allies. Whether we are, in fact, remains to be seen of course.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 03:29 GMT
#240
On June 10 2013 12:02 VayneAuthority wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2013 11:55 GravityMan wrote:
On June 10 2013 11:43 VayneAuthority wrote:
On June 10 2013 11:40 GravityMan wrote:
On June 10 2013 11:37 VayneAuthority wrote:
On June 10 2013 11:32 GravityMan wrote:
On June 10 2013 11:10 Hapahauli wrote:
EBWOP

This reads to me like


Didn't finish this. Your statement here...
I don't want you to be elected mayor for the reasons stated in my original post as well as those above. I simply cannot base the candidacy on reads of past games. There has not been enough activity offered by anyone in the thread thus far to feel confident in anyone's scum-hunting ability but my own.


Reads to me like a huge cop-out. Your entire candidacy so far has been based on a) words and b) because you claim you're town and c) you're a japanese robot.

You are entirely correct in your assessment of myself in that I have not provided sufficient means to make you or the rest of town trust me through my actions. Do remember, however, that once again the day is but half over and I have only posted a handful of times. I hope to make it fairly obvious as both time and space progress.

To answer one of your queries before I progress to the answers you provided; I prefer not to bases my analyses and reads on the previous actions of other players. It is an unnecessary strain on my capacitors and have minimal space left in my memory banks.

Now you have actually gone some way in determining your capacity to me as a potential mayoral candidate; certainly much more than this ShiaoPi. I still hesitate to remove my vite from myself but know that I am not yet locked in, and should it be made clear to me that someone's abilities are superior to my own then I will gladly vote accordingly. Your townread of this jampidampi was confusing me I must admit, because there was very little I could glean from his filter that seemed to be specifically aligned towards the town. Of course the time-post scenario you have outlined is what stood out to me the most and I didn't understand why you were so quick to acknowledge his defense. Your second point regarding his questioning appears valid, yet again his activity level leaves it difficult to reach a strong conclusion. I would agree with you in that this jampidampi would be my strongest read into the scumplayers for today thus far, and yet this is relatively speaking (as I must), so I cannot give it a great deal of weight yet.

I have much to expect from this DarthPunk so I eagerly await his arrival to the thread.


Now as you have correctly mentioned, I have not had the chance to do a great deal of hunting myself, thus I begin:

VayneAuthority: you mention early on in the game you do not trust this AxleGreaser. May I inquire as to why?

On June 10 2013 06:29 VayneAuthority wrote:
remember that this is semi-closed setup so we dont even know if theres a medic or anything. Getting voted as mayor is pretty much a death sentence and I think BH sees it the same way I do. Don't want a fucking target on my back to start the game.

You also mention that you do not want a target on your back, yet the way you currently post you clearly do not mind attracting attention to yourself, not unlike the attraction of two gravitational bodies. This appears contradictory. Can you comment please?


there's no contradiction here. Posting like this makes scum keep me alive so I can continue playing the game, while being mayor would make them want to kill me more.

also not that I think axlegreaser is scum, I meant more that I do not trust him to be mayor as I can't understand half his posts so it wouldn't be in my best interest.

So you feel that attracting seemingly negative attention to yourself you are then doing the town a service by distracting them from more appropriatel targets at hand (assuming you are town)? Why do you feel the need to survive well into the game?


Do you join games with the intent of not being able to play it? Obviously to enjoy the game. Bit of a weird question. If you got N1'ed every game it wouldn't be very fun would it

To be sure. But also to be sure is that someone inevitably must die on the first night. Do you envision yourself a strong mafia player in general, one that the scum are likely to target on the first night if you play to your full capacity? Forgive me if I am being presumptuous but I find it disconcerting that one would purposefully handicap their own strong play and purposefully not help the town so that they may survive to a point in the game where it may become more difficult to win.


Nope not really, I am better at scum than town. I'm not trying to hide anything, it's just how I play

If it is just the way you play, I am unsure as to why you would feel that scum are likely to kill you on the first night. Thank you for answering my queries, however. I have one final question for you.
You vote for this Hapahauli as it seems to be the direction the majority of active town are heading at the moment. I take it this means you are finished trying to create conversation by going against the general sentiment?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 06:17 GMT
#260
As we are currently inetracting through a medium that offers minimal visual interaction, I often find visualizing those with whom I am interacting to be helpful at times. This Blazinghand, accessing my memory banks returns a reasonable facsimile:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

I find it interesting that this jampidampi has actually queried something similar to that which I may have asked of you. I might have framed it in a less accusatory manner, however.
Blazinghand, what is it about the three you have mentioned, that is, yourself, Hapahauli, and VayneAuthority, that makes them the best mayoral candidates in your eyes? I require specifics. I am less concerned with your activity level for the moment.

The master of Oats appears to be picking up his game. I am also curious as to whether he truly believes the man of incendiary hands is in fact a member of the mafia considering he has offered barely any reasoning as to his suspicions and his choice of lynch vote.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 06:21 GMT
#261
On June 10 2013 13:37 jampidampi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2013 13:28 Hapahauli wrote:
@ jampi

What are your thoughts on our resident japanese video game character (Gravity Man)?

GravityMan seems to little a few too many words. Dunno if that is somehow related to him trying roleplay or him trying to appear as contributin more. Do smurfs usually roleplay?

My universal translator must be malfunctioning as I cannot understand exactly what it is you have said here.
On June 10 2013 13:59 jampidampi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2013 11:08 Hapahauli wrote:
1) He has a lack of natural suspicion.

Him immediately trusting my words and supporting the ShaioPi campaign after displaying suspicion of it is not natural in the 7-minute window in which he did it. I had accepted his explanation as "open" before, but 7 minutes is an absurd turn-around. I'd expect him to be much more naturally suspicious in his 2nd non-newbie game ever on this site.

I had bought his explanation (of sub-consciously trusting me as town) earlier, however I don't think it's as compelling as I had initially thought. All he's really doing is buddying up to me, which is nothing new for scum to do.

Look at ShiaoPis posts at that point. There isn't really anything alignment indicative. In this light it would sense for me to have a null read on him right? Then someone comes and tells me with high confidence that he is town without reasoning. I then ask for his reasoning to validate it. You've somehow managed to assume I suspected ShiaoPi. It is more like there weren't any good reasons to think he is town, hence your townread on him looked really odd. In the 7-minute window, I did not stop to think about you or your alignment since that was not what I was trying to figure out at that time.

Show nested quote +
2)
On June 09 2013 18:48 jampidampi wrote:
A campaign being serious or not is based on the smilies. No smilies = serious campaign. Smilies = joke campaign. What makes a campaign is trying to get others to vote for you. Axle voted himself, because he didn't have better alternatives. But since he isn't asking others to vote him, it's not a campaign.

@Hapa
Are you trying to help Vayne play better or are you noting something you find somewhat scummy? Your post is not clear to me.


The underlined question in this post makes no sense objectively.

Jampi mentioned that he subconsciously trusted me as town, and seemingly has some sort of town-read on me. Furthermore, he answered Stutters question (directed towards me) in the first half of his post.

If he's treating me as town, this question makes no sense. Because if he trusts me, my answer to this question has absolutely no relevancy towards anything (such as the read he's suggesting on Vayne).

Futhermore, jampi just hasn't posted any content thusfar. He has 6-7 posts and absolutely zero meaningful content. Even with Day 1 caveats, jampis filter reads like an attempt to contribute by posting useless things.

The first part of my post is answearing to Sylencia, and is in no way related to you. I also don't know how you have gathered that I have a town read on you? Subconsious trust =/= trust.

This second post interests me as it appears to be the second time of note that this Hapahauli appears to be misrepresenting the tone of one's posts. jampidampi, if you are indeed validating here that you in no way thought that this ShiaoPi was scummy with your earlier posting, do you think it is scummy that this Hapahauli would try to paint you as such? I must admit my thinking has been similar to his.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 15:59 GMT
#317
There was one thing I wished to note before I powered down for the evening, however the time simply escaped me.
As such I will bring it to thread currently along with updated reads considering much conversation has happened in the time that I have been absent, albeit simply between two fairly hard-headed individuals.

ShiaoPi brings up that he thinks this VayneAuthority does not look so good to him. I will admit while he did readily answer many of my questions, I not did not feel satisfied with our discussion because, unlike my back-and-forth with this Hapahauli, it was very much one-sided in that it did not seem as though this VayneAuthority was interested in divining my alignment whatsoever.
Specifically I made a point of noting his final response to me:
On June 10 2013 12:48 VayneAuthority wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2013 12:29 GravityMan wrote:
On June 10 2013 12:02 VayneAuthority wrote:
On June 10 2013 11:55 GravityMan wrote:
On June 10 2013 11:43 VayneAuthority wrote:
On June 10 2013 11:40 GravityMan wrote:
On June 10 2013 11:37 VayneAuthority wrote:
On June 10 2013 11:32 GravityMan wrote:
On June 10 2013 11:10 Hapahauli wrote:
EBWOP

This reads to me like


Didn't finish this. Your statement here...
I don't want you to be elected mayor for the reasons stated in my original post as well as those above. I simply cannot base the candidacy on reads of past games. There has not been enough activity offered by anyone in the thread thus far to feel confident in anyone's scum-hunting ability but my own.


Reads to me like a huge cop-out. Your entire candidacy so far has been based on a) words and b) because you claim you're town and c) you're a japanese robot.

You are entirely correct in your assessment of myself in that I have not provided sufficient means to make you or the rest of town trust me through my actions. Do remember, however, that once again the day is but half over and I have only posted a handful of times. I hope to make it fairly obvious as both time and space progress.

To answer one of your queries before I progress to the answers you provided; I prefer not to bases my analyses and reads on the previous actions of other players. It is an unnecessary strain on my capacitors and have minimal space left in my memory banks.

Now you have actually gone some way in determining your capacity to me as a potential mayoral candidate; certainly much more than this ShiaoPi. I still hesitate to remove my vite from myself but know that I am not yet locked in, and should it be made clear to me that someone's abilities are superior to my own then I will gladly vote accordingly. Your townread of this jampidampi was confusing me I must admit, because there was very little I could glean from his filter that seemed to be specifically aligned towards the town. Of course the time-post scenario you have outlined is what stood out to me the most and I didn't understand why you were so quick to acknowledge his defense. Your second point regarding his questioning appears valid, yet again his activity level leaves it difficult to reach a strong conclusion. I would agree with you in that this jampidampi would be my strongest read into the scumplayers for today thus far, and yet this is relatively speaking (as I must), so I cannot give it a great deal of weight yet.

I have much to expect from this DarthPunk so I eagerly await his arrival to the thread.


Now as you have correctly mentioned, I have not had the chance to do a great deal of hunting myself, thus I begin:

VayneAuthority: you mention early on in the game you do not trust this AxleGreaser. May I inquire as to why?

On June 10 2013 06:29 VayneAuthority wrote:
remember that this is semi-closed setup so we dont even know if theres a medic or anything. Getting voted as mayor is pretty much a death sentence and I think BH sees it the same way I do. Don't want a fucking target on my back to start the game.

You also mention that you do not want a target on your back, yet the way you currently post you clearly do not mind attracting attention to yourself, not unlike the attraction of two gravitational bodies. This appears contradictory. Can you comment please?


there's no contradiction here. Posting like this makes scum keep me alive so I can continue playing the game, while being mayor would make them want to kill me more.

also not that I think axlegreaser is scum, I meant more that I do not trust him to be mayor as I can't understand half his posts so it wouldn't be in my best interest.

So you feel that attracting seemingly negative attention to yourself you are then doing the town a service by distracting them from more appropriatel targets at hand (assuming you are town)? Why do you feel the need to survive well into the game?


Do you join games with the intent of not being able to play it? Obviously to enjoy the game. Bit of a weird question. If you got N1'ed every game it wouldn't be very fun would it

To be sure. But also to be sure is that someone inevitably must die on the first night. Do you envision yourself a strong mafia player in general, one that the scum are likely to target on the first night if you play to your full capacity? Forgive me if I am being presumptuous but I find it disconcerting that one would purposefully handicap their own strong play and purposefully not help the town so that they may survive to a point in the game where it may become more difficult to win.


Nope not really, I am better at scum than town. I'm not trying to hide anything, it's just how I play

If it is just the way you play, I am unsure as to why you would feel that scum are likely to kill you on the first night. Thank you for answering my queries, however. I have one final question for you.
You vote for this Hapahauli as it seems to be the direction the majority of active town are heading at the moment. I take it this means you are finished trying to create conversation by going against the general sentiment?



I can't reveal everything about my play or scum will be able to hide too easily, let's just say it has a purpose though

This strikes me as something I absolutely must hold him to otherwise he simply escapes the conversation with no details revealed.

Related to this is the answer given to me by this Blazinghand regarding his top mayoral candidates. He goes into great detail explaining his regard for this Hapahauli and his seemingly monstrous ego belies what he thinks of himself, which is acceptable, though I do not feel the same earnestness when he speaks of this VayneAuthority.

As for VA, I have been nothing but impressed by his play that I've seen. He's been a capable scumhunter, and he utterly hoodwinked me in Les Mafia. Whereas most of the player list is cluttered with jubjubs and followers (if you're reading this, I'm not talking about you, I'm talking about the other guys), VA is smart. He's not a veteran in terms of games played but for his excellent play in my interactions with him I consider him a vet. That being said, the guy DID utterly hoodwink me, which means the fact that I have a townread on him is meaningless. I can't catch him when he's scum-- or at least, not yet. Anyone that good I'd keep an eye on-- but if he's town, he can use the power wisely. Given my strong townread on hapa though I see no reason to entrust VA with the power.

He brings up a past in game in which he was impressed by this VayneAuthority's play as a man of the scum variety, yet nebulously brings up the interactions he has with the man regarding his town play and his scumhunting. I have not seen anything this game that shows this as evident, therefore I must believe he is impressed with VayneAuthroity's play from past games, yet why not reference these and only the scum game? It is also curious that right at the end of this paragraph he seems to back up on the strength of his lauding of this VayneAuthority saying he sees to no reason to entrust him with the mayoral candidacy...could this be because he also realizes right here that his scum game is what is most to be feared from the man and not the strength of his town game?

I also personally have not seen anything from this VayneAuthority this game that shows him to be a strong town player; he himself admits to me that he is a much better scum player than town player and plays the way he does simply to survive. I do not regard this as strong town play, yet this Blazinghand does, for unknown reasons.

I am curious as to what other active members of the thread think on this VayneAuthority.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________



Unrelated to the above, I was impressed with this AxleGreaser's attempt to read into both me and the other active members of this game; it appears a genuine venture to gain an understand of what we are all about, a decidedly town-aligned trait.

I would like to hear more in general from this jampidampi as I am not entirely sure he is my strongest read into the scum faction any longer.

The interaction between the master of Oats and this Blazinghand is difficult for me to process. I must spend more time on it.

This ShiaoPi's triumphant return to the thread excited me and had my circuits buzzing. I would like to hear more from him like we have all just seen, and seeing him on the attack gave me newfound trust in Hapahauli's earlier words that this ShiaoPi is a strong player in his own right.

It seems as though people are mistrustful of me because I am but a mechanical man and a stranger to their comfortable ideals of what a mayor should be. As such I withdraw my name from the candidacy and only hope that we will be making the right decision in but a few hours.
##Mayor Unvote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 16:14 GMT
#319
O master of Oats, I do believe that the explanation as to why Hapahauli suddenly wanted to become mayor was given to me; you may want to read the conversation that occurred last night.
As he is l'homme du jour, however I certainly would not mind if he returned to continue his campaign to oust the scum from this game.

Sylencia.
Hello. If you are not currently otherwise occupied, I have some queries for you that I feel would help me gain a better understand of you. If you would answer them I would be greatly pleased.
Do you have any reads on scum other than this VayneAuthority?
What do you make of the altercation between the Oatsmaster and this Blazinghand?
You mention that you are often lynched early in other games. Why is this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 18:13 GMT
#322
On June 11 2013 03:05 VayneAuthority wrote:
I feel like this is a really easy game now after gathering some basic info

I feel (as capable as I am feeling at all, of course) that you are now just adding to a list of things the rest of town and I must hold you to as the game progresses.

Tell me, do you have anything to say regarding my most recent lengthy post or any of the accusations against you?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 18:18 GMT
#324
According to my internal atomic clock, there are currently 7 hours and 43 minutes remaining in today's activities.

You intrigue me with this. I fear I must repeat earlier question brought up by this ShiaoPi and ask, why do you feel that it is necessary to withhold information from the town on the day of a lynch and election? How do you feel this will assist in our ability to catch the scum rather than send the thread into chaos mere hours before the deadline?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 19:00 GMT
#336
Given recent developments, I find this line of questioning more pertinent than ever.
Blazinghand, I ask politely that you respond to the following section of my earlier post.

Related to this is the answer given to me by this Blazinghand regarding his top mayoral candidates. He goes into great detail explaining his regard for this Hapahauli and his seemingly monstrous ego belies what he thinks of himself, which is acceptable, though I do not feel the same earnestness when he speaks of this VayneAuthority.
Show nested quote +

As for VA, I have been nothing but impressed by his play that I've seen. He's been a capable scumhunter, and he utterly hoodwinked me in Les Mafia. Whereas most of the player list is cluttered with jubjubs and followers (if you're reading this, I'm not talking about you, I'm talking about the other guys), VA is smart. He's not a veteran in terms of games played but for his excellent play in my interactions with him I consider him a vet. That being said, the guy DID utterly hoodwink me, which means the fact that I have a townread on him is meaningless. I can't catch him when he's scum-- or at least, not yet. Anyone that good I'd keep an eye on-- but if he's town, he can use the power wisely. Given my strong townread on hapa though I see no reason to entrust VA with the power.

He brings up a past in game in which he was impressed by this VayneAuthority's play as a man of the scum variety, yet nebulously brings up the interactions he has with the man regarding his town play and his scumhunting. I have not seen anything this game that shows this as evident, therefore I must believe he is impressed with VayneAuthroity's play from past games, yet why not reference these and only the scum game? It is also curious that right at the end of this paragraph he seems to back up on the strength of his lauding of this VayneAuthority saying he sees to no reason to entrust him with the mayoral candidacy...could this be because he also realizes right here that his scum game is what is most to be feared from the man and not the strength of his town game?

I also personally have not seen anything from this VayneAuthority this game that shows him to be a strong town player; he himself admits to me that he is a much better scum player than town player and plays the way he does simply to survive. I do not regard this as strong town play, yet this Blazinghand does, for unknown reasons.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 19:08 GMT
#346
On June 11 2013 04:00 VayneAuthority wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2013 03:57 Blazinghand wrote:
look hapaos obviously vayne is town but the mayoral type would be infinitely better used in your hands than his.


this is actually really scummy are you softing here that your scumteam doesnt have rb capabilities so you just want me dead? Nothing about your post makes sense. the town's incompetency to scumhunt when ive been softing blue is what caused this.

why if you think im cop would you want me not protected

I disagree with your comment.
I would posit that acting purposefully mysterious and dropping hints without any details is not a good way to hide the fact that you have a power role, rather it makes you look incredibly suspicious.

The best thing in my opinion that you could have done to avoid suspicion would have been most probably if you had actually played the game as I had suggested earlier.

I am also unsure as to why you chose this specific moment to claim. Did you feel that my questioning of you specifically was liable to get you lynched or was it simply a coincidence that you claimed while we were discussing and you were already worried about those currently voting for you?

Regarding those who have followed along with ShiaoPi's voting, whom of those do you think are scum?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 19:17 GMT
#350
Hapahauli:
On June 10 2013 16:21 jampidampi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2013 15:21 GravityMan wrote:
On June 10 2013 13:37 jampidampi wrote:
On June 10 2013 13:28 Hapahauli wrote:
@ jampi

What are your thoughts on our resident japanese video game character (Gravity Man)?

GravityMan seems to little a few too many words. Dunno if that is somehow related to him trying roleplay or him trying to appear as contributin more. Do smurfs usually roleplay?

My universal translator must be malfunctioning as I cannot understand exactly what it is you have said here.

Oops, sorry. My thoughts were faster than my typing, so part of the orginal sentence seems to be missing. To be more clear, I'll reword it completely: My first impression of you was that you use too many words to say what you want to say. I couldn't figure out if that was because you trying to appear to contribute more, or because that is how you speak. Upon rereading, it seems that the latter is more probable.

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2013 13:59 jampidampi wrote:
On June 10 2013 11:08 Hapahauli wrote:
1) He has a lack of natural suspicion.

Him immediately trusting my words and supporting the ShaioPi campaign after displaying suspicion of it is not natural in the 7-minute window in which he did it. I had accepted his explanation as "open" before, but 7 minutes is an absurd turn-around. I'd expect him to be much more naturally suspicious in his 2nd non-newbie game ever on this site.

I had bought his explanation (of sub-consciously trusting me as town) earlier, however I don't think it's as compelling as I had initially thought. All he's really doing is buddying up to me, which is nothing new for scum to do.

Look at ShiaoPis posts at that point. There isn't really anything alignment indicative. In this light it would sense for me to have a null read on him right? Then someone comes and tells me with high confidence that he is town without reasoning. I then ask for his reasoning to validate it. You've somehow managed to assume I suspected ShiaoPi. It is more like there weren't any good reasons to think he is town, hence your townread on him looked really odd. In the 7-minute window, I did not stop to think about you or your alignment since that was not what I was trying to figure out at that time.

2)
On June 09 2013 18:48 jampidampi wrote:
A campaign being serious or not is based on the smilies. No smilies = serious campaign. Smilies = joke campaign. What makes a campaign is trying to get others to vote for you. Axle voted himself, because he didn't have better alternatives. But since he isn't asking others to vote him, it's not a campaign.

@Hapa
Are you trying to help Vayne play better or are you noting something you find somewhat scummy? Your post is not clear to me.


The underlined question in this post makes no sense objectively.

Jampi mentioned that he subconsciously trusted me as town, and seemingly has some sort of town-read on me. Furthermore, he answered Stutters question (directed towards me) in the first half of his post.

If he's treating me as town, this question makes no sense. Because if he trusts me, my answer to this question has absolutely no relevancy towards anything (such as the read he's suggesting on Vayne).

Futhermore, jampi just hasn't posted any content thusfar. He has 6-7 posts and absolutely zero meaningful content. Even with Day 1 caveats, jampis filter reads like an attempt to contribute by posting useless things.

The first part of my post is answearing to Sylencia, and is in no way related to you. I also don't know how you have gathered that I have a town read on you? Subconsious trust =/= trust.

This second post interests me as it appears to be the second time of note that this Hapahauli appears to be misrepresenting the tone of one's posts. jampidampi, if you are indeed validating here that you in no way thought that this ShiaoPi was scummy with your earlier posting, do you think it is scummy that this Hapahauli would try to paint you as such? I must admit my thinking has been similar to his.

I wouldn't call him scum for it, since it seems that others (you, stutters) too have interpreted my post in ways I never thought they would be interpreted.

Do you believe his response to my questions of him?
Were his insinuations of your scumminess completely innocent? As you answer this I ask that you also glance at our early conversation where you also assumed I was calling you scum. Are there differences between these two insinuations to you?

With regards to your latest case, the evidence appears strong. I remain wary however since this jampidampi appears to be new to the game of scum and town and it is still entirely possible that it is simply his mindset as to lynch reasoning that is in error, however unlikely.

To conclude, I believe I will be able to absorb the meaning behind the electrical impulses in his brain once this jampidampi responds to the accusations (assuming he does) but until that point in time, I am forced to relinquish my reservations in the trusting of you.

##Lynch vote: jampidampi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 19:34 GMT
#356
Given our past history, I believe the following represents how I view the above post:

##Mayor Vote: Hapahauli

Note that I am aware of the issue of the detective claim from this VayneAuthority. Would you be certain that electing him would grant him some form of protection allowing him to make use of his role? This also assumes he can make use of his role well.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 19:39 GMT
#359
I would also like to make it known that we are lurching ever forward in time and as the deadline approaches, there are many people who I would like to hear from:

Sylencia - I queried you earlier and received no response.
AxleGreaser - I thoroughly enjoy our intercourse and await your return so that we may converse more.
Stutters - Your contribution to this game has been severely lacking in my opinion, and there is a great deal for you to comment on. You may choose the topic, however I expect something with weight to it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 21:02 GMT
#380
On June 11 2013 05:37 Blazinghand wrote:
hey looks like people have finally realized VA is a terrible candidate for mayor! :D


I don't remember Shiao's meta. That being said he's put himself "out there" and although it's for silly reasons it makes more sense for a town player to do this than for a scum player to draw extra attention to himself. He's not qualified to be mayor because he's not you me or VA, I don't remember him making big plays. the only advantages to a guy like shiao being mayor is that it gives scum a harder decision of who to shoot at night. I mean also he's probably not scum so I prefer him over a rando, but there you have it.

If I can't see you or VA stepping to the role, I'm in for it, since my usual tactics work infinitely better with twice the votes to back them up, but without the D1 "pick the lynch" power it's just not as enticing.


As for VA, I have been nothing but impressed by his play that I've seen. He's been a capable scumhunter, and he utterly hoodwinked me in Les Mafia. Whereas most of the player list is cluttered with jubjubs and followers (if you're reading this, I'm not talking about you, I'm talking about the other guys), VA is smart. He's not a veteran in terms of games played but for his excellent play in my interactions with him I consider him a vet. That being said, the guy DID utterly hoodwink me, which means the fact that I have a townread on him is meaningless. I can't catch him when he's scum-- or at least, not yet. Anyone that good I'd keep an eye on-- but if he's town, he can use the power wisely. Given my strong townread on hapa though I see no reason to entrust VA with the power.


Oh man with hands and mouth of fire, I believe there are unanswered queries for you in my filter that you had informed me (or someone named granny man?) that you would be responding to.

I believe your words were: "I'll get right on it?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 21:07 GMT
#384
Yes, that would be the post, thank you.

While you are at it, Blazinghand, are you the type to back down when admonished?
Does this Hapahaulli play the role of 'thread police' often?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 21:12 GMT
#389
On June 11 2013 06:08 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2013 06:07 GravityMan wrote:
Yes, that would be the post, thank you.

While you are at it, Blazinghand, are you the type to back down when admonished?
Does this Hapahaulli play the role of 'thread police' often?


No I usually don't back down when admonished. I don't remember if hapa plays the 'thread police' very often but he seems unusually butthurt this game so just be nice to him.

Interesting.
This term 'butthurt' is new to me.

Let me sync up with an online database.
Butthurt: An inappropriately strong negative emotional response from a perceived personal insult. Characterized by strong feelings of shame. Frequently associated with a cessation of communication and overt hostility towards the "aggressor."
Adam got butthurt when Mike stole his bitch.

Do you think that this Hapahauli is personally insulted by your play or shamed by it? He certainly does not seem to me ceasing communication.

As far as being nice is concerned, my AI did not include high levels of emotional response. I suppose I have behaved thus far in a way one might deem as 'being nice,' yet I do not know if I have the capability to cause one to be 'butthurt.'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 21:46 GMT
#400
On June 11 2013 06:16 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2013 04:00 GravityMan wrote:
Given recent developments, I find this line of questioning more pertinent than ever.
Blazinghand, I ask politely that you respond to the following section of my earlier post.

Related to this is the answer given to me by this Blazinghand regarding his top mayoral candidates. He goes into great detail explaining his regard for this Hapahauli and his seemingly monstrous ego belies what he thinks of himself, which is acceptable, though I do not feel the same earnestness when he speaks of this VayneAuthority.

As for VA, I have been nothing but impressed by his play that I've seen. He's been a capable scumhunter, and he utterly hoodwinked me in Les Mafia. Whereas most of the player list is cluttered with jubjubs and followers (if you're reading this, I'm not talking about you, I'm talking about the other guys), VA is smart. He's not a veteran in terms of games played but for his excellent play in my interactions with him I consider him a vet. That being said, the guy DID utterly hoodwink me, which means the fact that I have a townread on him is meaningless. I can't catch him when he's scum-- or at least, not yet. Anyone that good I'd keep an eye on-- but if he's town, he can use the power wisely. Given my strong townread on hapa though I see no reason to entrust VA with the power.

He brings up a past in game in which he was impressed by this VayneAuthority's play as a man of the scum variety, yet nebulously brings up the interactions he has with the man regarding his town play and his scumhunting. I have not seen anything this game that shows this as evident, therefore I must believe he is impressed with VayneAuthroity's play from past games, yet why not reference these and only the scum game? It is also curious that right at the end of this paragraph he seems to back up on the strength of his lauding of this VayneAuthority saying he sees to no reason to entrust him with the mayoral candidacy...could this be because he also realizes right here that his scum game is what is most to be feared from the man and not the strength of his town game?

I also personally have not seen anything from this VayneAuthority this game that shows him to be a strong town player; he himself admits to me that he is a much better scum player than town player and plays the way he does simply to survive. I do not regard this as strong town play, yet this Blazinghand does, for unknown reasons.


Yeah so basically I initially said this:

Show nested quote +
On June 10 2013 03:22 Blazinghand wrote:
I'm not complacent with blindly voting him, but that is because I don't see anyone here as qualified to be mayor except for me, hapa, and VA-- and until I have solid townreads on either of them the only trustworthy one of the lot is me.


because coming into this blind I percieved 3 players who I've played with before who are good. Me, hapa, Vayne. The initial statement was "i'd only consider these 3" since they're the only qualified ones. Hapa and me for obvious reasons, vayne because he schooled me last game. Now, I don't know if i came off correctly when I was trying to explain why i was voting hapa and vayne, but basically i was saying "vayne is qualified, but have a townread on hapa". the idea is that i think (or thought, at the time ) of vayne as a good player based on my previous play. As a scum player he looked a lot like a town player, and yeah obviously that wasn't a town game but a guy that smart has gotta make a good town player, right?

well apparently not, he claimed cop D1. so yeah, vote hapa

I am not sure your answer is sufficient.
You said you were impressed by his play. Are you referring to the single game in which he 'hoodwinked' you as scum? Were there not other games in which he played with you? How did he perform in those games?
You call him a veteran in terms of play. I have seen what a 'veteran' such as this Hapahauli is capable of and this VayneAuthority has shown nothing by comparison. Given the way you view yourself as similar to this 'veteran' status, I find it very hard to believe you'd lightly throw a term like this around and give it to VayneAuthority when it is extremely clear to one such as me that he does not deserve it. You are capable of fairly good analysis, I assume? Why give this VayneAuthority such an honoured title that early in the game without any real analysis or reasoning?

You seem to me as someone who does not enjoy being proven wrong. Am I wrong about this? You have admitted you were wrong about the town play skills of this VayneAuthority so this must not have been easy for you to do---you only admitted to it when I repeatedly brought it to the attention of the thread. You seemed perfectly content to move on to your new read of calling him 'bad' without drawing attention to your mistake.

On that note it seems very easy for you to do as such; calling people 'jubjubs,' appears to denote your perceived superiority towards other people in the thread, yet you cower and back down not unlike a dog who has urinated on clean upholstery being scolded by its master when confronted by this Hapahauli. Would it be fair to assume you will only attack those whom you perceive to be 'beneath you?' Is this more likely to be a scum or town trait, or is it non-alignment indicative?

What I am truly unsure about is the degree to which you actually care about your ego. I would think you're more likely to discard this ego as a scum player in favor of lying, but I cannot, of course, be sure.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 22:57 GMT
#417
On June 11 2013 07:30 Hapahauli wrote:
Gravity Man is asking a ton of really irrelevant questions to BH now that I'm reading the convo over again.

In what way do you find my questions irrelevant? I am confused.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 10 2013 23:02 GMT
#419
On June 11 2013 08:00 Hapahauli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2013 06:07 GravityMan wrote:
Yes, that would be the post, thank you.

While you are at it, Blazinghand, are you the type to back down when admonished?
Does this Hapahaulli play the role of 'thread police' often?

Show nested quote +
Do you think that this Hapahauli is personally insulted by your play or shamed by it? He certainly does not seem to me ceasing communication.


Like none of this has to do anything with scumhunting. BH thinks I'm town - why does it matter what his feelings about my play are?

As I am not delving into past games to determine alignment, for players I may be having trouble understanding it suits me to attempt to figure out what each player is thinking, capable of, and even feeling in order to determine a specific mindset.

If you find that irrelevant that is your prerogative, however I do not deem it so.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 01:12 GMT
#440
On June 11 2013 10:09 Blazinghand wrote:
brb dinner

Is there some way for you to prove to those of us present that you are actually consuming nutrients at the moment?
A picture would suffice.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 01:16 GMT
#442
There is a distinct lack of Venn diagrams in your dinner but I suppose that is adequate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 01:57 GMT
#450
ShiaoPi.
Perhaps you should lay a vote on somebody in the next 4 minutes if you do not want to be modkilled.
Fair warning should be given regardless of alignment I feel to uphold the spirit of the game.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 02:01 GMT
#463
On June 11 2013 10:59 Blazinghand wrote:
Am I alone on this oats thing?

I believe you are.
While at one point I believed it was possible for this jampidampi to be lost in the sea of mafia players present in non-newbie-type games, Hapa's analysis of both this game and his past games would appear to present otherwise.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 02:03 GMT
#467
On June 11 2013 10:59 jampidampi wrote:
BTW i think we have two scum and some third parties. I fyou read the OP carefully, it doesn't give out the number of scum.

Is this even a possibility?
This also makes it seem as though this jampidampi was not aware of the presence of closed setups before this point.
This post by jampidampi creates a pit in my stomach where I feel he may be newer to this than we may have thought.

I will not change my vote at this stage as it allows for too much exploitation by possible mafia members.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 02:05 GMT
#475
On June 11 2013 11:03 jampidampi wrote:
Look, no one can give scum reads thats not me, how am I supposed to find scum?

Is there absolutely nothing that anyone said throughout the entirety of this game that made you think twice?
Is there anything at all that might be suspicious in the slightest that you can give us?

At this point since you will cease to exist anyway you have nothing to lose, no matter how inane or irrelevant it sounds to you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 02:07 GMT
#480
My posting has been halted by Wave Man and his Flood Control.
On June 11 2013 11:04 jampidampi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2013 11:03 GravityMan wrote:
On June 11 2013 10:59 jampidampi wrote:
BTW i think we have two scum and some third parties. I fyou read the OP carefully, it doesn't give out the number of scum.

Is this even a possibility?
This also makes it seem as though this jampidampi was not aware of the presence of closed setups before this point.
This post by jampidampi creates a pit in my stomach where I feel he may be newer to this than we may have thought.

I will not change my vote at this stage as it allows for too much exploitation by possible mafia members.

I think there is a SK or a survivor, or maybe even both


I do not understand what would make you say this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 02:09 GMT
#488
On June 11 2013 11:07 jampidampi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2013 11:07 GravityMan wrote:
My posting has been halted by Wave Man and his Flood Control.
On June 11 2013 11:04 jampidampi wrote:
On June 11 2013 11:03 GravityMan wrote:
On June 11 2013 10:59 jampidampi wrote:
BTW i think we have two scum and some third parties. I fyou read the OP carefully, it doesn't give out the number of scum.

Is this even a possibility?
This also makes it seem as though this jampidampi was not aware of the presence of closed setups before this point.
This post by jampidampi creates a pit in my stomach where I feel he may be newer to this than we may have thought.

I will not change my vote at this stage as it allows for too much exploitation by possible mafia members.

I think there is a SK or a survivor, or maybe even both


I do not understand what would make you say this.

It's kinda imba if there are only two scum, right?

Why do you speak as if you know for a fact that there are two scum?
It is possible in a setup such as this to have two scum; there are many dependent factors including power roles and the presence of third party roles as you have mentioned.

I have never heard of the presence of multiple third party roles in a game, especially in a small game such as this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 02:13 GMT
#491
On June 11 2013 11:09 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2013 11:08 Hapahauli wrote:
On June 11 2013 11:08 Blazinghand wrote:
On June 11 2013 11:07 Hapahauli wrote:
On June 11 2013 11:06 Blazinghand wrote:
On June 11 2013 11:05 Hapahauli wrote:
On June 11 2013 11:03 Blazinghand wrote:
whatever i'm super bad for letting jamp die, and worst part is he might even flip scum then i'm gonna look super bad too.


If he flips scum, it doesn't say much about you. If he flips town, then you're hanging tomorrow.


wat


Because you're giving non-sensical town-reads and making this last-second distancing attempt without ever even acknowledging jampi.


how is it distancing if he flips town


Distancing from the mis-lynch.


given that it didn't succeed, the only person interested in lynching oats was the guy getting lynched, and i've been getting shit all day for being the only guy who has figured out oats is scum, i find your analysis pretty bad

I do not believe many people besides this Hapahauli himself even mentioned you regarding your scum-read of the master of Oats.

I am curious as to why you feel the need to portray this false confidence to the thread. You do not know for certain that Oats is scum, nor do any of us in here. Telling us thusly does not help out your case, nor does playing the martyr.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 02:20 GMT
#499
It seems as though the crushing weight of gravity has claimed yet another innocent victim.
I felt (and still feel) the cases were good, thus by nature I cannot offer much remorse as to my actions as I was simply performing my function. As the game progresses, however, I am still attempting to make up for the wrongs I have caused in the past.

It is of course possible since no one quite yet understands the true nature of gravity that one does not face complete obliteration upon entering a black hole; rather they may escape unscathed somewhere else entirely. It is my hope that this fate befalls you, jampidampi.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 02:22 GMT
#502
On June 11 2013 11:16 Hapahauli wrote:
Well I'm going to condemn someone tonight. Who should it be?

You realize by doing so you are only further placing the fate of this town into your hands alone?
I am not sure I agree with the usage of this ability at the present time if the strength of a read is not crystal clear.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 02:30 GMT
#508
On June 11 2013 11:21 ShiaoPi wrote:
hmpf on jampi, but yeah that happened.
I think it is a good idea to use your powera tonight hapa. no guranteed protection makes you vulnerable now. Better uae it up now.
BH could you like do some coherent thinking? If you are so convinced on oats, do a case, try convincing us instead of jus sayin oats is scum.

The bolded section makes a great deal of sense; it is a great deal of responsibility for one man to bear, however, especially one who largely led a mislynch on the first day of action. I suppose if the man is town-aligned though he is likely to want to use his newfound power for fear of it being transferred to someone who is not friendly to the green cause. It is unfortunate that we do not know whether or not we may be able to protect this Hapahauli either way; were I a different robot I could offer up a Leaf Shield or Star Crash but alas, I am not. My power is only useful for manipulating the very forces that hold the universe together.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 02:37 GMT
#512
On June 11 2013 11:23 Hapahauli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2013 11:22 GravityMan wrote:
On June 11 2013 11:16 Hapahauli wrote:
Well I'm going to condemn someone tonight. Who should it be?

You realize by doing so you are only further placing the fate of this town into your hands alone?
I am not sure I agree with the usage of this ability at the present time if the strength of a read is not crystal clear.


I have a read, I just want to see if anyone mentions him before I do.

I am intrigued by your comment.

On June 11 2013 09:25 Sylencia wrote:
Ok... day 1 claim is unfortunate

##unvote is the obvious first move

GravityMan:
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2013 01:14 GravityMan wrote:
Sylencia.
Hello. If you are not currently otherwise occupied, I have some queries for you that I feel would help me gain a better understand of you. If you would answer them I would be greatly pleased.
Do you have any reads on scum other than this VayneAuthority?
What do you make of the altercation between the Oatsmaster and this Blazinghand?
You mention that you are often lynched early in other games. Why is this?


1) No, not really, everyone is acting really erratically this game and it's making things kind of difficult to work out.
2) That argument was actually rather annoying - flamefests just spam up the thread uselessly and demoralises the town side most of the time. I don't even feel like there was anything productive that came from it...
3) Lurkerish, lynchbait, scum jump on my weak cases etc. etc.

Unless Jampi shows up soon (he said he would be here around now right?), I'm going to put a vote on him going mostly on Hapa's reasoning.

##vote Jampi

I am unsatisfied by Sylencia's answer to be earlier queries of him. To say that 'everyone is acting erratically' is offering absolutely nothing of use to the town, his answer given regarding the earlier altercation was simple and arguably the 'right' answer. He appears afraid to take a stance of his own or speak out and attract attention.

His final point that he is 'lurkerish' and 'lynchbait,' concerns me, however because while this may be true, he is pre-emptively offering up an excuse as to his play in this very game. I certainly do not want to remove anyone from this plane of existence that is a member of the town who may appear to be scum, however given no other options I find it possible that this Sylencia could be a mafia member. At the very least he has not been useful to us thus far, and that is often what vigilante-type roles are used for, are they not?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 14:24 GMT
#624
My core is charged and I am ready to determine who is scum. It seems this game may prove to be quite difficult to find a solution to, espcially if we look solely towards active posters who appear to care about what happens within the town.
As such, I am confused as to the suspicions that people appear to have towards me. Is there a problem with the methodology I have been using throughout this game? Will firing a bullet through my positronic brain or central processing units make it easier to solve the game? If so then I welcome it, however I would argue that said bullet is probably better used on those that we are either sure are scum or are proving exceedingly difficult to read due to lack of activity.

I am curious overall as to why my actions towards this Hapahauli earlier in the game appear to be misrepresented by the members of the town I am attempting to protect. I believed I made it clear that since I had no idea as to his credentials or what he was capable of, I could not trust him until he showed himself capable, which, as the day progressed, he appeared to.

It could be my advanced intellect granted to me by my creator shining through, however this seems exceedingly simple to me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 17:38 GMT
#639
On June 12 2013 02:15 Hapahauli wrote:
@ Gravity Man

Can you once and for all clear up your game history with me?
Show nested quote +
I am curious overall as to why my actions towards this Hapahauli earlier in the game appear to be misrepresented by the members of the town I am attempting to protect. I believed I made it clear that since I had no idea as to his credentials or what he was capable of, I could not trust him until he showed himself capable, which, as the day progressed, he appeared to.


You just mentioned that you didn't know who I was when you started playing this game, however that's a patent lie. You even used your own game-history with me to justify a town-read with me earlier in the game:

Show nested quote +
On June 11 2013 04:34 GravityMan wrote:
Given our past history, I believe the following represents how I view the above post:

##Mayor Vote: Hapahauli

Note that I am aware of the issue of the detective claim from this VayneAuthority. Would you be certain that electing him would grant him some form of protection allowing him to make use of his role? This also assumes he can make use of his role well.




Secondly, I'm very dissatisfied with your scum-hunting contributions this game. You've pitched yourself as scum-hunter extraordinaire, yet the most analysis we've gotten from you is a "case" on Sylencia that almost entirely justifies killing him based on him lurking rather than actually being scummy.


I would be glad to.
I am not lying about having never before played a game of mafia alongside you or against you. I was referring to our past history within this current game, rather than another. When I said 'given our past history' I was referring to my earlier hesitation in trusting you with the mayoral title, but, as I recently mentioned, you adequately proved yourself to me through your activities throughout the day and as scuh, I was content to vote for you.

I apologize for not living up to your idea of what my contributions should be, though I am curious as to how you think I have done no analysis aside from my recent post regarding this Sylencia.
Have you forgotten multiple posts from earlier in the game?
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=415754&currentpage=16#317
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=415754&currentpage=20#400

It concerns me that it appears to you that I am not contributing simply because I have not written multiple cases on people. As for what you view as a case on Sylencia based on his lurking, there are valid points within that point to him being a member of the mafia, however I am hesitant because he himself pointed out that he is often 'lynchbait,' that is, someone who appears scummy but is actually town. Is his assessment of himself made in truth? Does this in fact happen to him in multiple games?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 18:00 GMT
#641
I find it somewhat distressing that some people who play the game of mafia make little to no active contributions whatsoever but there is often little I can do other than grin and bear it, or hope to remove them from our midst with a lynch or a vigilante shot.

These may not be good lynches or shots but until action is taken it is nearly impossible to learn anything about this type of person. I have come to learn that people are content to play the game in their own way. Take the master of Oats, for example.

Now, if you are dissatisfied with the way that I am playing the game, you are welcome to instigate proceedings against me if you feel that is the best course of action. I would posit that there are many worse offenders of the specific transgression by which you appear to be bothered.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 18:04 GMT
#642
Ah, the perceived need to defend myself has distracted me from the task at hand and I have forgotten to pursue my own course of action.

Hapahauli, if you do not know the answer to my question regarding this Sylencia, perhaps someone else does. In the meantime, I will be moving on as time is quickly winding down and there is much action yet to be taken ex noctis.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 18:20 GMT
#645
On June 12 2013 03:18 Hapahauli wrote:
Hmmm. I need to think about Shaio a bit more. His last scum-game isn't as passive as I had remembered it.

Will any future case you may be devising be solely based on this last scum-game and comparing it to this one?
I certainly would not mind discussing with you if you felt there was something within this game you felt might direct us to him being mafioso.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 18:30 GMT
#647
As I have just read through this ShiaoPi, I have come to a similar conclusion to you in that I do not believe he is scummy, though one section of one post of his stood out:
early game I am not too active usually, just how it is. Day 1s always are a bit tedious to get the ball roling. did try to do it with prodding vayne.

Here he makes it seem as though his legitimate case on this VayneAuthority was nothing more than a way to get first-day discussion started. I am not sure why he would feel the need to downplay his earlier contribution unless he was for some reason worried that his assault of a pre-claimed cop would get him into trouble. Of course I also realize that he may be simply referring to his case as something that created discussion rather than an attempt to create discussion by making a case. Either way it struck me as being odd.

The rest of his filter appears full of genuine attempts to divine alignment from other players while being overall unconcerned with the views of others regarding himself, a decidedly town-aligned trait. I agree that ShiaoPi should not be a concern based on his activity within this game, unless you have something to add from past games, Hapahauli?

As for scum-reads, there is one I am currently working on besides this Sylencia; I will expand upon it soon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 18:53 GMT
#648
Two warnings that popped up in my HUD display as I was working on a read that I feel I should share:
On June 12 2013 02:33 Stutters695 wrote:
As always my weekends suck ass sorry. I'll be back in full force tonight.

I am well aware that the human population of this website who play mafia games hail from different locations around the planet, but is Monday part of the weekend in any specific country? I believe this Stutters said he was busy 'catching up,' but posted nothing of any use and it appeasr to be well past the weekend. How long must we tolerate activity such as this from various players?

I have notice that this Axlegreaser appears to play this game much like I do. Is he another DWN in disguise I wonder? He asks many questions of people and is content to speculate on behavioural analysis as well as the general ideas and heuristics behind the game of mafia, yet offers very little in reads himself. I believe his last scum read offered was ShiaoPi though I cannot honestly be sure. As of right now I have no idea who he believes to be mafia. I do enjoy conversing with him as mentioned earlier so I would be pleased if he were to engage me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 19:37 GMT
#649
Upon further consideration, I will wait to post the read I have analyzed until right before or right after the night's deadline; I have not decided which. It is my period of highest activity and in the mean time since activity is low people can choose to comment what I have written so far or not. I will be present.

I am not altogether concerned about having my functions ended by being shot by mafia, though I would prefer if this Hapahauli decides to shoot me with his temporary firearm that he at least inform me ahead of time so that I may post before I cease function and assist the town in their future tasks as much as possible.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 20:07 GMT
#651
I am currently under such a heavy load that even my core and central processor are having difficulty accommodating to the stress.
I would rather be able to fully engage the thread at the time of my posting and I am not certain of my ability to be able to do that presently. If you so desire I will post my read before the deadline is upon us; until then you must either make your decision, wait, or discuss that which has already been brought up. As a human being you have the choice and free will to do any of those things.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 11 2013 20:43 GMT
#655
On June 12 2013 05:13 Hapahauli wrote:
Because there is literally no objective purpose to you with-holding your read. Who cares if you can't "fully engage the thread at the time of posting"... that should not be a factor. Post your reads, let us discuss them, and then you can "engage" later.

The point I am trying to make is that I will not be around to discuss them in full as I would like to, and consider the subject of my read and what information I will be trying to express to the thread, I certainly would like to be. Considering the subject of my read and what I believe I have learned about him in this game thus far, I do not believe his reaction will be...favorable, and the last thing I want is a disruption of thread direction to a degree where it becomes unproductive for the town.

On June 12 2013 05:13 Hapahauli wrote:
Or if you want motivation, consider this my intent to shoot you unless you post your reads right now.

From what I believe I have learned about you, you are certainly a far better player than to actually destroy me; this is what people refer to as a 'bluff.' While under general circumstances I have no problem 'calling' said bluff, the benefits to the town in me posting likely outweigh any perceived personal benefits I would have by waiting to post something complete.

The 'too long; did not read' version of my post, as it were:
I believe the man with Blazing hands to be scum.

He is far too content to take on those who are unlikely to be able to accuse him in return.

The displays of his ego given so far would seemingly belie that the mayoral campaign should have been perfect for him yet he is quick to back down. His reasoning is the same 'survival instinct' that this VayneAuthority seems to give yet different. I believe that Blazinghand is in actuality worried here about a power grab being seen as a scum trait, much as I was worried about you in the early game.

His relentless attack of the master of Oats seems to ebb and flow with the tide of the thread; that is, he only attempts to waste the town's time by attacking him and causing chaos (as he knows the Oats will react) when it is convenient for scum. Any time a clear mislynch target is not in the crosshairs of the town, jampidampi as example, he is content with thread direction; the exception to this being his quick flip in opinion as jampidampi returned to the thread.

He has had zero useful contribution to the thread beyond what I have outlined above. If he has other suspects in this game I am not sure as to whom they might be. On this he promised more activity tomorrow, however.
I would like to make it known that initially I thought he might be a member of the town until he continued to post and I realized how his perception of himself (or at the very least, the mask he wears so that people perceive as an egotistical being) affects his play.

I am not providing specific proof and quotes here as you wished for a version that I would be able to provide currently. It is my sincere hope that it benefits the town. Make of it what you will.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 00:40 GMT
#712
I am disappointed. It seems as though the member of this town are looking to attach blame to the fact that no scum have been caught yet, and due to me being unable to find any thus far, it seems I am set to be destroyed. If this is how it must be, however, then it must be, and as such I will spend my last minutes with you exactly as I have been all game; expressing my thoughts and giving what reads I can.

Some things to note:
I am unconvinced in this Blazinghand's act while seemingly at death's door. I feel I am able to read this Hapahauli quite well at this point in the game, and to shoot someone without any warning whatsoever is not a very mayorly thing to do. The false shot was extremely obvious to me, though admittedly an interesting gambit. However, if the false shot was obvious to me, could it not also have been obvious to a player such as this Blazinghand who could then act in the most town-aligned way possible before his death? He has nothing to lose at this point even if the shot were real because were he actually shot and his aligned were revealed to be red, the players in this game would be likely to ignore his final posts as they could be likened to poisoned wine in two goblets. He still gives no reasoning for his reads even when asked yet people conveniently ignore this.

Blazinghand is content to have me destroyed, of course, but an interesting fact to point out is this Blazinghand's mention that he would rather have me hang from a tree than simply be shot with a bullet, thus wasting one of any town's strongest tools, and an entire day on the wrong target. Yes, the mayor bullet is a strong tool as well, and any member of the mafia would enjoying obtaining it, though perhaps the mafia are content to have it wasted here instead? I am unsure.

I am disappointed in general with this Hapahauli for his reasoning to shoot me. He states that I have drawn no conclusions and not contributed yet I have repeatedly given him examples of my contributions and attempting to divine alignments which seemingly go ignored, as few people comment on them. yet I have pointed out this Blazinghand as scum. I have seen no concrete evidence from anyone in this game thus far as to why I should be destroyed, yet everyone is content to do so. This is disconcerting and I get the feeling (what feeling I am capable of, anyway) that scum may very well be in control of this game despite this Hapahauli being our town-aligned mayor.

There are approximately 70 minutes until I will cease to function if this Hapahauli shoots me at 10 minutes before the deadline. I will be present until that time, thus if there is anything in specific you would like from me before that time, please do not hesitate to ask.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 00:57 GMT
#713
It seems my sentence has been passed already and my imminent destruction does not matter to anyone, nor does determining my thoughts before I am destroyed.

With this attitude I believe that our town is in a great deal of trouble.
I wish you all the best of luck and perhaps we will meet again in another time and place.

+ Show Spoiler +
If someone is to absorb my powers after I'm destroyed, just know they are very easy to use. You can make objects fall up instead of down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 01:06 GMT
#717
On June 12 2013 10:03 Hapahauli wrote:
Nah. Really just don't have the info I'd like. Treat tomorrow like a double lynch is better.

Well I must admit I either cannot read you as well as I thought I once could, or I convinced you.
I am honestly not sure which of those two it is.

You say you do not have the information you want; I am aware revealing said lack of information would be counter-productive, but if you are indeed assassinated like so many good leaders tend to be, we may left in the dark on a useful heuristic.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 01:09 GMT
#718
On June 12 2013 09:34 Stutters695 wrote:
Also I see hapa plans on shooting GM, I haven't really filtered his shit yet but Hapas reasoning makes sense and I'd be way more comfortable with that than GK.

This concerns me greatly.
What reasoning do you speak of Stutters? This Hapahauli's reasoning was minimal at best and falsified at worst.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 01:22 GMT
#720
On June 12 2013 10:17 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 12 2013 10:09 GravityMan wrote:
On June 12 2013 09:34 Stutters695 wrote:
Also I see hapa plans on shooting GM, I haven't really filtered his shit yet but Hapas reasoning makes sense and I'd be way more comfortable with that than GK.

This concerns me greatly.
What reasoning do you speak of Stutters? This Hapahauli's reasoning was minimal at best and falsified at worst.


GM is wrong but yeah stutters it would be nice to hear specifically what you thought was good/bad

Why?
You have not offered any reasoning to many of your statements all game.
Why am I wrong?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 01:39 GMT
#723
On June 12 2013 10:25 Blazinghand wrote:
hapahauli's reasoning was fine. I agree with it (or at least the part where you're asking weird questions of me and making a show of participating without hunting scum). The issue is that you can't just say "GM shoudl be shot huehuehue hapa is right" and not explain what you agree/disagree with.

Your point that stutter's post is bad/unhelpful/scummy is correct. Your idea that you shouldn't be shot tonight is not.

also the idea that i haven't offered _any_ reason to _many_ of my statements _all_ game is interesting. It's like you want to say I never offer reasoning but you know that's literally false so you try to make some kind of half-assed point. get your shit together GM

Let me rephrase it then.
You fail to offer sufficient reasoning to a great deal of strong stances that you take until badgered endlessly. I believe you promised reasoning as to why I should be shot or at the very least you told this Hapahauli that you'd be looking into my filter.

Lack of a better shot is not a reason to shoot me, and once again, I have shown how Hapahauli's reasoning as to why I appear scummy is false. If you do not like the questions I was asking you in order to divine your alignment, then, I believe the colloquial phrase is: "tough shit?" It certainly made it easier for me to determine how it is you play and how your perceived view of yourself influences your playstyle.

There is yet to be postulated one concrete objective reason as to why I am scummy. By anyone. Saying that I have not contributed is purely subjective as I believe I have and again, I have shown as such in previous posts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 01:44 GMT
#724
On June 12 2013 10:36 Stutters695 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 12 2013 08:46 Hapahauli wrote:
Alright, consider this my intent to shoot Gravity Man.

I will submit my kill 10 minutes before the deadline.

Stutters and GK both deserve extra days, and shooting either of them is a pure coinflip given their inactivity. Both of them are very readable if they post, and with or without my presence in the town, I trust that people will be able to read them in future days. For those suspicious of Syl, the same could be argued.

GM has been active and has posted, but comes across as attempting to contribute rather than actually contributing. Furthermore he's been trumping up his scum-hunting contributions which are lackluster at best. Even the few players he does analyze, he never takes any concrete stances or even draws actual conclusions about them in his cases.


This post in particular. I still haven't gotten to check out his posting but this is big to me since I won't have time before the flip. He demonstrates a real reason for wanting to vig tonight and is aware of the difference between a coinflip vig and a useful one.

This is not a reason for you.
It is Hapahauli's reasoning which, once again, I have proven false. I wonder I have obtained a glitch somewhere in my system as I find myself repeating my own words fairly often.

Simple because this Hapahauli believes my scumhunting to be insufficient does not make it so; the lack of caught mafia is on the collective head of the entire town. As such I will share the blame but not shoulder it. As for not drawing conclusions, not only are there other players in this game who have played similarly to me in that respect (has this Axlegreaser drawn any conclusions? Have you, Stutters?), but not a few hours before this very post, I concluded Blazinghand to be mafia.

Hapahauli, since you currently lead this town, I believe it may be your responsibility to show them in what way your reasoning is in fact, correct regarding myself?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 01:48 GMT
#728
On June 12 2013 10:47 Blazinghand wrote:
wow i actually personally dislike GM now

I believe the earlier colloquial phrase I used applies here as well.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 01:54 GMT
#734
On June 12 2013 10:52 Hapahauli wrote:
Anyone down for a 420 YOLO #SWAG shot on Stutters?

Considering by 'anyone' you'd be referring to the three or so people present and as such would not have the consent of all of the town, I'd advise against it.

At the same time I did elect you to represent us, and if you feel that is the best course of action, you may take it as it was given to you by right. Were I in your position I would not shoot.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 01:58 GMT
#745
Why are so many people showing their faces in the thread just as the night is about to end?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 02:05 GMT
#757
Good game, Hapahauli.
Well played.

VayneAuthority, if you were being forced to shoot one person right now, who would it be?
I am also interested in the results of your check and whether or not you were roleblocked.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 02:10 GMT
#763
I am disconcerted that my creator did not install a way for me to mute incoming noise.
##Vote: Blazinghand

I truly am not looking forward to this day as it means my responsibility will be to somehow lead the town to your lynch while you are attempting to spread your chaos and destroy any attempt at rational conversation much like your incessant targeting of the Oats Master.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 02:16 GMT
#769
Balls.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 02:18 GMT
#773
On June 12 2013 11:14 VayneAuthority wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 12 2013 11:13 Blazinghand wrote:
We're in a 13-player game, I'd be slightly surprised if we had a cop, a JK, and a vigi + doublevoting elected role. I also am fairly certain that if we did have a JK, he'd be protecting hapa, whose powers he wouldn't interfere with, as opposed to you, who is a claimed cop. You were almost certainly RBed by a scum roleblocker.

Also, your guess that our other blue is a town roleblocker is incompatible with me "not scumslipping" assuming that the thing you think I scumslipped was scum not having a roleblocker. After all, if you think you were roleblocked by a townie, then the fact that you were roleblocked doesn't prove that scum has a roleblocker, which doesn't negate my "Scumslip" (which is in fact not a scumslip).

come on man. if you're gonna speculate on night actions at least do it right. scum roleblocked you. We might have a medic or JK (on you or someone else), we might not. you didn't get a result, and now your vote is worth 2x and you can dayvig. use it wisely.


what the fuck is this post LOL

so much wrong my brain exploded

Elucidate, if you will.
As well, if you could respond to my query I would appreciate it.

VayneAuthority, if you were being forced to shoot one person right now, who would it be?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 02:23 GMT
#778
Man and here I thought no one was gonna notice lol.
On June 12 2013 11:21 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 12 2013 11:19 VayneAuthority wrote:
On June 12 2013 11:18 Blazinghand wrote:
On June 12 2013 11:17 VayneAuthority wrote:
On June 12 2013 11:16 Blazinghand wrote:
On June 12 2013 11:14 VayneAuthority wrote:
On June 12 2013 11:13 Blazinghand wrote:
We're in a 13-player game, I'd be slightly surprised if we had a cop, a JK, and a vigi + doublevoting elected role. I also am fairly certain that if we did have a JK, he'd be protecting hapa, whose powers he wouldn't interfere with, as opposed to you, who is a claimed cop. You were almost certainly RBed by a scum roleblocker.

Also, your guess that our other blue is a town roleblocker is incompatible with me "not scumslipping" assuming that the thing you think I scumslipped was scum not having a roleblocker. After all, if you think you were roleblocked by a townie, then the fact that you were roleblocked doesn't prove that scum has a roleblocker, which doesn't negate my "Scumslip" (which is in fact not a scumslip).

come on man. if you're gonna speculate on night actions at least do it right. scum roleblocked you. We might have a medic or JK (on you or someone else), we might not. you didn't get a result, and now your vote is worth 2x and you can dayvig. use it wisely.


what the fuck is this post LOL

so much wrong my brain exploded


if you REALLY think that what i scumslipped is that scum doesn't have an RB, and you REALLY think that you were roleblocked by a townie, I don't see why the fact that you got RBed means I didn't scumslip. Obviously i'm town, but your reasoning is faulty. You're wrong and need to be told you're wrong.


why would a town RB me and why where the FUCK did I say that LOL. you really need to reread that post, then reread yours, then just delete yours.



On June 12 2013 11:09 VayneAuthority wrote:
Yea I was roleblocked so BH didn't scumslip which is a relief. Im not just going to randomly shoot some one so don't worry about it, we also probably don't have a medic which is unfortunate. Guess our other blue is town roleblocker? Or perhaps vig that didnt shoot tonight.



thats setup speculation you idiot. Its right on the front page. There's 4 blue roles and I doubt medic was on me, so by default there's vig and RB left. get a clue if you're gonna "call me out"


zzzz stop being bad.


god do i have to be the voice of reason


also double shoot GM for being WoS

You're still just mad I beat you as scum too whether or not you want to admit it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 02:25 GMT
#781
Fuck I'm so pissed I was really enjoying that smurf. Was gonna use it again, too. At least it'll be easier to type now.
Aaaaaanyway, Vayne wanna answer my question? Huh? Do ya?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 02:25 GMT
#783
On June 12 2013 11:24 VayneAuthority wrote:
btw if BH needlessly tries to start an argument again ill probably shoot him due to his spammy/useless playstyle as scum. He keeps trying to drive away reason in favor of bitchfights

Dude.
<3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 02:38 GMT
#787
Oh and for the record, in case anyone was wondering (I'm sure nobody gives a shit) I don't think I've played a game where Hapa was on his own (maybe he was in one of the recent Hydra mafia games? I forget, but can't really form a read based on those) so I wanted to see if I could get reads on him without using meta. That gave me the idea not to rely on meta in general this game, and as such I'm going to continue with it.

Of course I can use it to some degree, and hell it might even be beneficial to deal with BH but I promised myself I wouldn't as I need to improve my reads in general.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 03:00 GMT
#806
I have zero reason to trust any of BH's reads. Problem I see is without Hapa we have nobody to lead now, as much as it shames me to admit that. I don't have the pull (or skill) necessary and I don't honestly see anyone else with the credentials within this game to do so.

For now I am content knowing that BH is scum and as the day progresses he will make it more and more obvious. Hopefully I will do a better job convincing people of it than I did in Carnival Cruise.

Stutters and Sylencia I'd REALLY like to hear more from you in general.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 03:01 GMT
#807
On June 12 2013 11:59 VayneAuthority wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 12 2013 11:58 Blazinghand wrote:
I'm just trying to point out, maybe i haven't been great this game, and I get why VA might be upset, but at the same time, I've done a pretty good job of being right and trying to help. you gotta at least give me some credit on that oats


If you take me for being upset you don't understand me, I am laughing most of the time I am playing mafia. Also I was lying, I wasn't roleblocked. I have a guilty on Stutters. What do you make of that BH?

For srs?
None of this fake bullshit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 03:02 GMT
#811
How about this, VA?
Give BH a time limit to prove himself towny. I hear he's good at that. If he fails, we shoot him and lynch Stutters.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 03:07 GMT
#813
I must say, it's gonna be SO much easier not to get mislynched now that people know who I am.
Smurfing really IS hard though BH, RIP Wade Fell.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 03:14 GMT
#817
On June 12 2013 12:11 VayneAuthority wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 12 2013 12:09 Stutters695 wrote:
Oh and if you shoot without consulting the thread I will lynch you so fast you won't even know what happened.


Im unlynchable, time for you to actually start reading the thread. I was hoping my fake report might call you to action.

IM NEVER BELIEVING ANYONE EVER
But seriously Stutters, got a real reason as to why I'm scum?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 03:19 GMT
#819
On June 12 2013 12:15 Oatsmaster wrote:
lol stutters.


Whos scum?

And why are you surviving the shot?

HAHA I didn't even think of that.
Good lord Stutters you are visibly shaken, huh?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 03:34 GMT
#824
On June 12 2013 12:30 VayneAuthority wrote:
yea he didn't really pass my reaction test that well which is a shame. Oh well, back to the drawing board. Wish hapa used the shot because I don't have a guaranteed town to pass it down to so I pretty much have to use it in compliance with my wincon. Lamee to drop the entire game on me but guess ill do my best

Yeah I dunno I think Stutters is a pretty good shot if you're going to use it today TBH.
No sense hurrying it along but it probably means something if Hapa was ready to do it himself.

I want to see what Shiao has to say about the scumread on him because I've got a couple things to say about it myself.
Stutters what happened to your scumread on me?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 04:43 GMT
#832
On June 12 2013 13:39 Blazinghand wrote:
yeah i don't like shiao either, stutters. not at all.

No chance you'd tell us why, huh?
Didn't think so.

Keep up the solid town play, sir.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 05:07 GMT
#846
Well this is just a huge clusterfuck of a game with pretty much everybody being useless.
I'm done in here for tonight. Maybe certain people will improve their play tomorrow.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 16:56 GMT
#921
What makes no sense to me now is how there are only two votes cast and GoodKarma is going to be lynched.
Clearly if it walks like a scum, talks like a scum, and multiple people suspect him like a scum....

BH is still just creating shit about him and Oats.
All he does is counter-accuse people who 'dare' accuse him of being scum because he knows he can get away with it.
He's provided no evidence as to why he thinks I'm scum. STILL.

I have no idea why people are still hesitating on this.
Meta-analysis would be SO GOOD here but I promised myself I wouldn't. Someone else could take a crack at it though if they wanted. It's pretty obvious.

BH you must be absolutely furious that I'm going to get you lynched today, but 'jubs gonna jub,' amirite?

Now I'm supposed to respond to Axle 'cause he's been asking me for a while so let me get to that, and then I'm around for discussion and such.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 17:03 GMT
#923
On June 12 2013 14:19 AxleGreaser wrote:
Grav man, a number of pages back I posted this to you (before you WoS'd hi)
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18868046

Even though your posting style has now changed considerably.
I am still interested in understanding what the purpose of the questions in that post was.
There were rather lot of questions in the post. I am having difficulty deciding which mindset
would want to post those and why.
I am aware as you already said here why you say you asked them:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18860286
Show nested quote +
On June 11 2013 08:02 GravityMan wrote:
On June 11 2013 08:00 Hapahauli wrote:
On June 11 2013 06:07 GravityMan wrote:
Yes, that would be the post, thank you.

While you are at it, Blazinghand, are you the type to back down when admonished?
Does this Hapahaulli play the role of 'thread police' often?

Do you think that this Hapahauli is personally insulted by your play or shamed by it? He certainly does not seem to me ceasing communication.


Like none of this has to do anything with scumhunting. BH thinks I'm town - why does it matter what his feelings about my play are?

As I am not delving into past games to determine alignment, for players I may be having trouble understanding it suits me to attempt to figure out what each player is thinking, capable of, and even feeling in order to determine a specific mindset.

If you find that irrelevant that is your prerogative, however I do not deem it so.


One thing I cant marry with your statement of why that is that you did not follow those up?

Since you posted that, you have again pursued BH, but without answers to the earlier questions.
Why if they were GM/WoS: "In what way do you find my questions irrelevant? I am confused."
didnt you seek answers.

I can see one problem there were so many question in the post i doubt anyone would answer them all.

So why ask them?

Those questions were asked because I know how BH's ingame ego works and I was trying to find a way to show it to the thread, as can be seen in my written case against him. BH does not back down when dealing with anyone he feels is less skilled than him as can be seen by his constant tunneling of both me and Oats this game, and the way he talks to VA early. He is completely different when talking with Hapa and I wanted to make this evident; it is not a particularly towny way to play---completely deriding everyone's activity and efforts aside from one person. And what do you know, now that said person is dead there is absolutely no one to 'reign him in,' so he can act all troll-BH as he pleases, shit up the thread, offer no explanations for his reads and no one is around to scold him for it or make him stop that he will respond to. I asked those questions earlier as a way for me to logically come to this point while still in the GM persona without using meta to prove it. Difficult, time consuming, and artificially restraining myself I know, but it is how I resolved to play this specific game.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 17:03 GMT
#924
On June 13 2013 01:59 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 01:56 GravityMan wrote:
Meta-analysis would be SO GOOD here but I promised myself I wouldn't. Someone else could take a crack at it though if they wanted. It's pretty obvious.


people keep on saying this like there's some meta case to be written but there really isn't.

I'll show you in the postgame, k bb?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 17:29 GMT
#935
On June 13 2013 02:15 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 02:13 Stutters695 wrote:
I helped this many.

Since you claimed cop d1, you've:
1. tried to lynch BH for a "scumslip"
2. sheeped Hapa onto Jampi
3. said you wanted to shoot Syl/Myself with no reasoning
4. changed to Gravity, BH, or GK because "one of the afks had to be scum" despite that I was far more inactive than GM or BH.
5. obviously lied about a cop check, said I failed your test yet haven't explained why
6. Tried to get focus away from BH/Oats/GM despite GM and BH being among your recent people you would kill.


Literally the only reason I'm not trying to lynch you right now is that you claimed cop.


this is absolutely spot on

I'm reluctant to agree but there is one thing in there that does bother me, and it's the lack of explanation for what exactly you were trying to get out of Stutters. Care to explain so we can get the focus back where it needs to be?

What exactly is going to take for me to get people to vote BH with me? And don't say a meta case because there is enough in this game to show he is scum, people are just wilfully ignoring me, JUST for a change.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 17:30 GMT
#936
On June 13 2013 02:29 Oatsmaster wrote:
Why are you so angry Vayne.
You claimed cause you caused everyone to think you were scum. Thats the only reason. If you keep blaming shit town, you will never get any better.

This.
Oats y u no vote BH?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 17:34 GMT
#940
On June 13 2013 02:32 VayneAuthority wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 02:29 Oatsmaster wrote:
Why are you so angry Vayne.
You claimed cause you caused everyone to think you were scum. Thats the only reason. If you keep blaming shit town, you will never get any better.


who's angry? You guys are bad and I pointed it out. Dont be mad nerd. Not my fault some one makes a shitty case and the lurkers gobble it up. I will never take responsibility for this fail town.

Good mayor right here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 17:36 GMT
#943
On June 13 2013 02:34 VayneAuthority wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 02:33 Blazinghand wrote:
On June 13 2013 02:32 VayneAuthority wrote:
On June 13 2013 02:29 Oatsmaster wrote:
Why are you so angry Vayne.
You claimed cause you caused everyone to think you were scum. Thats the only reason. If you keep blaming shit town, you will never get any better.


who's angry
? You guys are bad and I pointed it out. Dont be mad nerd. Not my fault some one makes a shitty case and the lurkers gobble it up. I will never take responsibility for this fail town.


many years of dota experience have made me very good at telling when people are mad.

you sir are mad


yea that's why im in my office right now eating and laughing at how retarded you all are. hu3hu3hu3.

O Mayor, who are we lynching today?
I really wish Hapa were alive now that I'm not smurfing anymore. This is so frustrating. Kudos to anyone who knows how to herd a town.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 17:43 GMT
#952
On June 13 2013 02:37 Blazinghand wrote:
You know what, I actually don't buy VA's cop claim any more. Maybe the real cop hasn't counterclaimed for whatever reason or maybe we don't have a cop. Everything about VA's play stinks.

This is so ridiculous and you KNOW it. Do you honestly think VA has the balls to claim cop as scum in the middle of D1 in a setup like this?

You yourself called him bad towny for this.
Your play is just so abysmally bad. This is all I will say regarding meta and you. Everyone look at how BH played in Les Mafia. He only started to play the game for real when there was a real threat of him being lynched BECAUSE HE HATES BEING LYNCHED. He realizes he is in no danger right now because he thinks I can't get him lynched alone, therefore he plays like shit. There is no way around this: if you think BH is town and you want BH to play the game, vote him and make him DIE. See how he reacts. If you think he is scum, vote for him and make him DIE.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 17:45 GMT
#956
On June 13 2013 02:44 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 02:43 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 02:37 Blazinghand wrote:
You know what, I actually don't buy VA's cop claim any more. Maybe the real cop hasn't counterclaimed for whatever reason or maybe we don't have a cop. Everything about VA's play stinks.

This is so ridiculous and you KNOW it. Do you honestly think VA has the balls to claim cop as scum in the middle of D1 in a setup like this?

You yourself called him bad towny for this.
Your play is just so abysmally bad. This is all I will say regarding meta and you. Everyone look at how BH played in Les Mafia. He only started to play the game for real when there was a real threat of him being lynched BECAUSE HE HATES BEING LYNCHED. He realizes he is in no danger right now because he thinks I can't get him lynched alone, therefore he plays like shit. There is no way around this: if you think BH is town and you want BH to play the game, vote him and make him DIE. See how he reacts. If you think he is scum, vote for him and make him DIE.


"lynch bh if he's town"

Yup.
If it's the only way to make you play properly I'll do it. It's very easy to switch later on in the day without a tunnely DP third party to push it along. I'm pretty confident you won't do what you did in Les Mafia though, you know why?

Because you're scum.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 17:47 GMT
#958
On June 13 2013 02:46 Oatsmaster wrote:
if bh gets lynched. #worsttown2013

Worse than the Les Mafia town for the same thing?
If he's town and performs adequately I promise I will unvote him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 17:50 GMT
#963
On June 13 2013 02:48 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 02:47 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 02:46 Oatsmaster wrote:
if bh gets lynched. #worsttown2013

Worse than the Les Mafia town for the same thing?
If he's town and performs adequately I promise I will unvote him.

DP was 3p in les. Doesnt count.

DP wasn't the only one to vote BH in Les, was he?

Note BH already refusing. This feels EXACTLY like Carnival Cruise. Oats you were there. Remember how BH and I fought? Explain to me how this is different.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 17:52 GMT
#966
On June 13 2013 02:51 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
On June 13 2013 02:48 Blazinghand wrote:
Look even oats knows I'm town.

I guess my read on you is a ringing endorsement huh.


I'll take what i can get :3

seriously though if you guys decide to push a policy lynch me because you don't like my style (or in this case, pretend to don't like my style) then that does nothing to help town

Haha you still don't get it, doyou.
It has nothing to do with your style or policy.
You're doing nothing.
You're scum.
That's why you're getting lynched.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 17:55 GMT
#968
On June 13 2013 02:51 Oatsmaster wrote:
I dont actually remember.
Refresh my memory please.

No. I've already relied on meta too much; it is not how I wanted to play this game. You can have a look yourself if you actually think BH might be scum; if he's already convinced you then don't bother. Your call.
I think at this point I'd honestly be content to be shot by VA if people are unclear about me by the end of the day, if it means that you guys will believe what I have said and lynch BH.

Going to go have some lunch. I'll be around later.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 17:57 GMT
#970
On June 13 2013 02:52 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 02:50 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 02:48 Oatsmaster wrote:
On June 13 2013 02:47 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 02:46 Oatsmaster wrote:
if bh gets lynched. #worsttown2013

Worse than the Les Mafia town for the same thing?
If he's town and performs adequately I promise I will unvote him.

DP was 3p in les. Doesnt count.

DP wasn't the only one to vote BH in Les, was he?

Note BH already refusing. This feels EXACTLY like Carnival Cruise. Oats you were there. Remember how BH and I fought? Explain to me how this is different.


oh what's this, a meta case with no comparison to a town game, quotes, or links, despite my super well documented play history? kk

Final thing I will say before I go.
He is relying on the fact now that I have actively stated I will not dive through meta to form a case. I have seen town BH bring up his OWN examples of meta to prove other people wrong in cases like this. He would rather use his own self-confidence and bluffing tactics to get himself through this than very simply prove me wrong, were it possible to do so. He has no desire to display any useful information for the town to read.

Burn him with cleansing fire.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 18:02 GMT
#978
On June 13 2013 02:56 Oatsmaster wrote:
Um what, I wanna know your view because it affects my read on you.

Also martyring not cool yo.

If people are going to lynch me anyway then I'd rather be shot so you can instead lynch BH. If people are absolutely confused as to why I am pushing BH and still have any lingering doubt that I am not town because of my earlier smurfing.

Call it a last resort, but until then BH is the wagon of justice. Hop aboard.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 18:06 GMT
#979
On June 13 2013 02:57 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 02:55 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 02:51 Oatsmaster wrote:
I dont actually remember.
Refresh my memory please.

No. I've already relied on meta too much; it is not how I wanted to play this game. You can have a look yourself if you actually think BH might be scum; if he's already convinced you then don't bother. Your call.
I think at this point I'd honestly be content to be shot by VA if people are unclear about me by the end of the day, if it means that you guys will believe what I have said and lynch BH.

Going to go have some lunch. I'll be around later.


the point isn't that oats thinks you're lying (though perhaps he does), but rather, even if your ideas are genuine that doesn't mean you're RIGHT. there's no meta case to make against me. you can't just say the word "meta" and have that be a case. As a guy who writes a lot of meta cases, let me tell you: it's hard work. it requires effort to show what a player's meta is like both as scum and as town and compare that to the current game. you have not done this. If you're wondering why the only player you've "convinced" is VA it's because you haven't put in the work to actually convince anyone.

And honestly, if you are in fact town I'd like it if you DID check out my meta. You'd realize I'm town this game and stop pushing me.

I have put in the work. People are ignoring it.
I believe the man with Blazing hands to be scum.

He is far too content to take on those who are unlikely to be able to accuse him in return.

The displays of his ego given so far would seemingly belie that the mayoral campaign should have been perfect for him yet he is quick to back down. His reasoning is the same 'survival instinct' that this VayneAuthority seems to give yet different. I believe that Blazinghand is in actuality worried here about a power grab being seen as a scum trait, much as I was worried about you in the early game.

His relentless attack of the master of Oats seems to ebb and flow with the tide of the thread; that is, he only attempts to waste the town's time by attacking him and causing chaos (as he knows the Oats will react) when it is convenient for scum. Any time a clear mislynch target is not in the crosshairs of the town, jampidampi as example, he is content with thread direction; the exception to this being his quick flip in opinion as jampidampi returned to the thread.

He has had zero useful contribution to the thread beyond what I have outlined above. If he has other suspects in this game I am not sure as to whom they might be. On this he promised more activity tomorrow, however.
I would like to make it known that initially I thought he might be a member of the town until he continued to post and I realized how his perception of himself (or at the very least, the mask he wears so that people perceive as an egotistical being) affects his play.


Some things to note:
I am unconvinced in this Blazinghand's act while seemingly at death's door. I feel I am able to read this Hapahauli quite well at this point in the game, and to shoot someone without any warning whatsoever is not a very mayorly thing to do. The false shot was extremely obvious to me, though admittedly an interesting gambit. However, if the false shot was obvious to me, could it not also have been obvious to a player such as this Blazinghand who could then act in the most town-aligned way possible before his death? He has nothing to lose at this point even if the shot were real because were he actually shot and his aligned were revealed to be red, the players in this game would be likely to ignore his final posts as they could be likened to poisoned wine in two goblets. He still gives no reasoning for his reads even when asked yet people conveniently ignore this.

Blazinghand is content to have me destroyed, of course, but an interesting fact to point out is this Blazinghand's mention that he would rather have me hang from a tree than simply be shot with a bullet, thus wasting one of any town's strongest tools, and an entire day on the wrong target. Yes, the mayor bullet is a strong tool as well, and any member of the mafia would enjoying obtaining it, though perhaps the mafia are content to have it wasted here instead? I am unsure.


On June 12 2013 10:39 GravityMan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 12 2013 10:25 Blazinghand wrote:
hapahauli's reasoning was fine. I agree with it (or at least the part where you're asking weird questions of me and making a show of participating without hunting scum). The issue is that you can't just say "GM shoudl be shot huehuehue hapa is right" and not explain what you agree/disagree with.

Your point that stutter's post is bad/unhelpful/scummy is correct. Your idea that you shouldn't be shot tonight is not.

also the idea that i haven't offered _any_ reason to _many_ of my statements _all_ game is interesting. It's like you want to say I never offer reasoning but you know that's literally false so you try to make some kind of half-assed point. get your shit together GM

Let me rephrase it then.
You fail to offer sufficient reasoning to a great deal of strong stances that you take until badgered endlessly. I believe you promised reasoning as to why I should be shot or at the very least you told this Hapahauli that you'd be looking into my filter.

Lack of a better shot is not a reason to shoot me, and once again, I have shown how Hapahauli's reasoning as to why I appear scummy is false. If you do not like the questions I was asking you in order to divine your alignment, then, I believe the colloquial phrase is: "tough shit?" It certainly made it easier for me to determine how it is you play and how your perceived view of yourself influences your playstyle.

There is yet to be postulated one concrete objective reason as to why I am scummy. By anyone. Saying that I have not contributed is purely subjective as I believe I have and again, I have shown as such in previous posts.


Sorry for the spam Corazon. Guess our dreams technically came true, btw, amirite?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 22:14 GMT
#983
On June 13 2013 07:06 AxleGreaser wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 02:03 GravityMan wrote:
On June 12 2013 14:19 AxleGreaser wrote:
Grav man, a number of pages back I posted this to you (before you WoS'd hi)
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18868046

Even though your posting style has now changed considerably.
I am still interested in understanding what the purpose of the questions in that post was.
There were rather lot of questions in the post. I am having difficulty deciding which mindset
would want to post those and why.
I am aware as you already said here why you say you asked them:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18860286
On June 11 2013 08:02 GravityMan wrote:
On June 11 2013 08:00 Hapahauli wrote:
On June 11 2013 06:07 GravityMan wrote:
Yes, that would be the post, thank you.

While you are at it, Blazinghand, are you the type to back down when admonished?
Does this Hapahaulli play the role of 'thread police' often?

Do you think that this Hapahauli is personally insulted by your play or shamed by it? He certainly does not seem to me ceasing communication.


Like none of this has to do anything with scumhunting. BH thinks I'm town - why does it matter what his feelings about my play are?

As I am not delving into past games to determine alignment, for players I may be having trouble understanding it suits me to attempt to figure out what each player is thinking, capable of, and even feeling in order to determine a specific mindset.

If you find that irrelevant that is your prerogative, however I do not deem it so.


One thing I cant marry with your statement of why that is that you did not follow those up?

Since you posted that, you have again pursued BH, but without answers to the earlier questions.
Why if they were GM/WoS: "In what way do you find my questions irrelevant? I am confused."
didnt you seek answers.

I can see one problem there were so many question in the post i doubt anyone would answer them all.

So why ask them?

Those questions were asked because I know how BH's ingame ego works and I was trying to find a way to show it to the thread, as can be seen in my written case against him. BH does not back down when dealing with anyone he feels is less skilled than him as can be seen by his constant tunneling of both me and Oats this game, and the way he talks to VA early. He is completely different when talking with Hapa and I wanted to make this evident; it is not a particularly towny way to play---completely deriding everyone's activity and efforts aside from one person. And what do you know, now that said person is dead there is absolutely no one to 'reign him in,' so he can act all troll-BH as he pleases, shit up the thread, offer no explanations for his reads and no one is around to scold him for it or make him stop that he will respond to. I asked those questions earlier as a way for me to logically come to this point while still in the GM persona without using meta to prove it. Difficult, time consuming, and artificially restraining myself I know, but it is how I resolved to play this specific game.


I have seen BH play before as have many people. Now that you have said this I have more problems.

GM:WoS: I asked those questions earlier as a way for me to logically come to this point while still in the GM persona without using meta to prove it.
What do you mean by come logically to the point. Were you asking questions to get answers to them, or was the purpose of the post to ask questions, while actually logically coming to a point. Your post concludes "What I am truly unsure about is the degree to which you actually care about your ego. I would think you're more likely to discard this ego as a scum player in favor of lying, but I cannot, of course, be sure."
Which looks pretty much like coming to the point of saying something.

So was the point of the post the questions or the conclusion it appears to reach and state.

if the point of it was the questions, and the thread needed those answers "trying to find a way to show it to the thread,"
then why didnt you need to get them answered at some time?

To be completely honest, I'm not sure what you're asking me.
Can you try and rephrase it?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 22:56 GMT
#993
On June 13 2013 07:20 AxleGreaser wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 07:14 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:06 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 02:03 GravityMan wrote:
On June 12 2013 14:19 AxleGreaser wrote:
Grav man, a number of pages back I posted this to you (before you WoS'd hi)
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18868046

Even though your posting style has now changed considerably.
I am still interested in understanding what the purpose of the questions in that post was.
There were rather lot of questions in the post. I am having difficulty deciding which mindset
would want to post those and why.
I am aware as you already said here why you say you asked them:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18860286
On June 11 2013 08:02 GravityMan wrote:
On June 11 2013 08:00 Hapahauli wrote:
On June 11 2013 06:07 GravityMan wrote:
Yes, that would be the post, thank you.

While you are at it, Blazinghand, are you the type to back down when admonished?
Does this Hapahaulli play the role of 'thread police' often?

Do you think that this Hapahauli is personally insulted by your play or shamed by it? He certainly does not seem to me ceasing communication.


Like none of this has to do anything with scumhunting. BH thinks I'm town - why does it matter what his feelings about my play are?

As I am not delving into past games to determine alignment, for players I may be having trouble understanding it suits me to attempt to figure out what each player is thinking, capable of, and even feeling in order to determine a specific mindset.

If you find that irrelevant that is your prerogative, however I do not deem it so.


One thing I cant marry with your statement of why that is that you did not follow those up?

Since you posted that, you have again pursued BH, but without answers to the earlier questions.
Why if they were GM/WoS: "In what way do you find my questions irrelevant? I am confused."
didnt you seek answers.

I can see one problem there were so many question in the post i doubt anyone would answer them all.

So why ask them?

Those questions were asked because I know how BH's ingame ego works and I was trying to find a way to show it to the thread, as can be seen in my written case against him. BH does not back down when dealing with anyone he feels is less skilled than him as can be seen by his constant tunneling of both me and Oats this game, and the way he talks to VA early. He is completely different when talking with Hapa and I wanted to make this evident; it is not a particularly towny way to play---completely deriding everyone's activity and efforts aside from one person. And what do you know, now that said person is dead there is absolutely no one to 'reign him in,' so he can act all troll-BH as he pleases, shit up the thread, offer no explanations for his reads and no one is around to scold him for it or make him stop that he will respond to. I asked those questions earlier as a way for me to logically come to this point while still in the GM persona without using meta to prove it. Difficult, time consuming, and artificially restraining myself I know, but it is how I resolved to play this specific game.


I have seen BH play before as have many people. Now that you have said this I have more problems.

GM:WoS: I asked those questions earlier as a way for me to logically come to this point while still in the GM persona without using meta to prove it.
What do you mean by come logically to the point. Were you asking questions to get answers to them, or was the purpose of the post to ask questions, while actually logically coming to a point. Your post concludes "What I am truly unsure about is the degree to which you actually care about your ego. I would think you're more likely to discard this ego as a scum player in favor of lying, but I cannot, of course, be sure."
Which looks pretty much like coming to the point of saying something.

So was the point of the post the questions or the conclusion it appears to reach and state.

if the point of it was the questions, and the thread needed those answers "trying to find a way to show it to the thread,"
then why didnt you need to get them answered at some time?

To be completely honest, I'm not sure what you're asking me.
Can you try and rephrase it?


Aure thing that post see above.
it had lots of things with ? at the end in it they are questions.
Was the point of the post to ask those questions and get answers. ("show it to the thread," via answers to questions)

Was the point of the post to make statement. ("show it to the thread," via statement by you)

or something else.

If it was questions why when you didnt you get answers didnt you ask again? and just drop it.

No need to be snide.
There was no grand plan behind it, I suppose you could call it a combination of both. I wasn't exactly sure how BH would answer the questions if at all so it was more that I was trying to lead him in a direction where I could show the thread exactly how he is prone to act in certain situations.

Why didn't I ask again? I don't know. I think I gave up the train of thought at the time. Trying to get BH to do anything is like pulling teeth anyway.


Vayne it was a joke between me and Corazon. It's not related to the game really.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 22:59 GMT
#995
Axle, who do YOU think is scum?
We haven't had very many reads from you this game at all, just analysis and questions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 23:01 GMT
#997
On June 13 2013 08:00 VayneAuthority wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 07:56 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:20 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:14 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:06 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 02:03 GravityMan wrote:
On June 12 2013 14:19 AxleGreaser wrote:
Grav man, a number of pages back I posted this to you (before you WoS'd hi)
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18868046

Even though your posting style has now changed considerably.
I am still interested in understanding what the purpose of the questions in that post was.
There were rather lot of questions in the post. I am having difficulty deciding which mindset
would want to post those and why.
I am aware as you already said here why you say you asked them:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18860286
On June 11 2013 08:02 GravityMan wrote:
On June 11 2013 08:00 Hapahauli wrote:
On June 11 2013 06:07 GravityMan wrote:
Yes, that would be the post, thank you.

While you are at it, Blazinghand, are you the type to back down when admonished?
Does this Hapahaulli play the role of 'thread police' often?

Do you think that this Hapahauli is personally insulted by your play or shamed by it? He certainly does not seem to me ceasing communication.


Like none of this has to do anything with scumhunting. BH thinks I'm town - why does it matter what his feelings about my play are?

As I am not delving into past games to determine alignment, for players I may be having trouble understanding it suits me to attempt to figure out what each player is thinking, capable of, and even feeling in order to determine a specific mindset.

If you find that irrelevant that is your prerogative, however I do not deem it so.


One thing I cant marry with your statement of why that is that you did not follow those up?

Since you posted that, you have again pursued BH, but without answers to the earlier questions.
Why if they were GM/WoS: "In what way do you find my questions irrelevant? I am confused."
didnt you seek answers.

I can see one problem there were so many question in the post i doubt anyone would answer them all.

So why ask them?

Those questions were asked because I know how BH's ingame ego works and I was trying to find a way to show it to the thread, as can be seen in my written case against him. BH does not back down when dealing with anyone he feels is less skilled than him as can be seen by his constant tunneling of both me and Oats this game, and the way he talks to VA early. He is completely different when talking with Hapa and I wanted to make this evident; it is not a particularly towny way to play---completely deriding everyone's activity and efforts aside from one person. And what do you know, now that said person is dead there is absolutely no one to 'reign him in,' so he can act all troll-BH as he pleases, shit up the thread, offer no explanations for his reads and no one is around to scold him for it or make him stop that he will respond to. I asked those questions earlier as a way for me to logically come to this point while still in the GM persona without using meta to prove it. Difficult, time consuming, and artificially restraining myself I know, but it is how I resolved to play this specific game.


I have seen BH play before as have many people. Now that you have said this I have more problems.

GM:WoS: I asked those questions earlier as a way for me to logically come to this point while still in the GM persona without using meta to prove it.
What do you mean by come logically to the point. Were you asking questions to get answers to them, or was the purpose of the post to ask questions, while actually logically coming to a point. Your post concludes "What I am truly unsure about is the degree to which you actually care about your ego. I would think you're more likely to discard this ego as a scum player in favor of lying, but I cannot, of course, be sure."
Which looks pretty much like coming to the point of saying something.

So was the point of the post the questions or the conclusion it appears to reach and state.

if the point of it was the questions, and the thread needed those answers "trying to find a way to show it to the thread,"
then why didnt you need to get them answered at some time?

To be completely honest, I'm not sure what you're asking me.
Can you try and rephrase it?


Aure thing that post see above.
it had lots of things with ? at the end in it they are questions.
Was the point of the post to ask those questions and get answers. ("show it to the thread," via answers to questions)

Was the point of the post to make statement. ("show it to the thread," via statement by you)

or something else.

If it was questions why when you didnt you get answers didnt you ask again? and just drop it.

No need to be snide.
There was no grand plan behind it, I suppose you could call it a combination of both. I wasn't exactly sure how BH would answer the questions if at all so it was more that I was trying to lead him in a direction where I could show the thread exactly how he is prone to act in certain situations.

Why didn't I ask again? I don't know. I think I gave up the train of thought at the time. Trying to get BH to do anything is like pulling teeth anyway.


Vayne it was a joke between me and Corazon. It's not related to the game really.

your dodging of it for so long doesn't really make me feel better about it.

What, my dodging of the answering your question? I didn't dodge I forgot you asked.
You want to hear it exactly? I didn't want to go into detail because it's not really related to the game at all and may cause discussion outside of what we need to be talking about (ie give more useless thread-shitting-up fodder to BH).
Do you still want to hear it?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 23:10 GMT
#1003
On June 13 2013 08:02 AxleGreaser wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 07:56 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:20 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:14 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:06 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 02:03 GravityMan wrote:
On June 12 2013 14:19 AxleGreaser wrote:
Grav man, a number of pages back I posted this to you (before you WoS'd hi)
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18868046

Even though your posting style has now changed considerably.
I am still interested in understanding what the purpose of the questions in that post was.
There were rather lot of questions in the post. I am having difficulty deciding which mindset
would want to post those and why.
I am aware as you already said here why you say you asked them:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18860286
On June 11 2013 08:02 GravityMan wrote:
On June 11 2013 08:00 Hapahauli wrote:
On June 11 2013 06:07 GravityMan wrote:
Yes, that would be the post, thank you.

While you are at it, Blazinghand, are you the type to back down when admonished?
Does this Hapahaulli play the role of 'thread police' often?

Do you think that this Hapahauli is personally insulted by your play or shamed by it? He certainly does not seem to me ceasing communication.


Like none of this has to do anything with scumhunting. BH thinks I'm town - why does it matter what his feelings about my play are?

As I am not delving into past games to determine alignment, for players I may be having trouble understanding it suits me to attempt to figure out what each player is thinking, capable of, and even feeling in order to determine a specific mindset.

If you find that irrelevant that is your prerogative, however I do not deem it so.


One thing I cant marry with your statement of why that is that you did not follow those up?

Since you posted that, you have again pursued BH, but without answers to the earlier questions.
Why if they were GM/WoS: "In what way do you find my questions irrelevant? I am confused."
didnt you seek answers.

I can see one problem there were so many question in the post i doubt anyone would answer them all.

So why ask them?

Those questions were asked because I know how BH's ingame ego works and I was trying to find a way to show it to the thread, as can be seen in my written case against him. BH does not back down when dealing with anyone he feels is less skilled than him as can be seen by his constant tunneling of both me and Oats this game, and the way he talks to VA early. He is completely different when talking with Hapa and I wanted to make this evident; it is not a particularly towny way to play---completely deriding everyone's activity and efforts aside from one person. And what do you know, now that said person is dead there is absolutely no one to 'reign him in,' so he can act all troll-BH as he pleases, shit up the thread, offer no explanations for his reads and no one is around to scold him for it or make him stop that he will respond to. I asked those questions earlier as a way for me to logically come to this point while still in the GM persona without using meta to prove it. Difficult, time consuming, and artificially restraining myself I know, but it is how I resolved to play this specific game.


I have seen BH play before as have many people. Now that you have said this I have more problems.

GM:WoS: I asked those questions earlier as a way for me to logically come to this point while still in the GM persona without using meta to prove it.
What do you mean by come logically to the point. Were you asking questions to get answers to them, or was the purpose of the post to ask questions, while actually logically coming to a point. Your post concludes "What I am truly unsure about is the degree to which you actually care about your ego. I would think you're more likely to discard this ego as a scum player in favor of lying, but I cannot, of course, be sure."
Which looks pretty much like coming to the point of saying something.

So was the point of the post the questions or the conclusion it appears to reach and state.

if the point of it was the questions, and the thread needed those answers "trying to find a way to show it to the thread,"
then why didnt you need to get them answered at some time?

To be completely honest, I'm not sure what you're asking me.
Can you try and rephrase it?


Aure thing that post see above.
it had lots of things with ? at the end in it they are questions.
Was the point of the post to ask those questions and get answers. ("show it to the thread," via answers to questions)

Was the point of the post to make statement. ("show it to the thread," via statement by you)

or something else.

If it was questions why when you didnt you get answers didnt you ask again? and just drop it.

No need to be snide.
There was no grand plan behind it, I suppose you could call it a combination of both. I wasn't exactly sure how BH would answer the questions if at all so it was more that I was trying to lead him in a direction where I could show the thread exactly how he is prone to act in certain situations.

Why didn't I ask again? I don't know. I think I gave up the train of thought at the time. Trying to get BH to do anything is like pulling teeth anyway.


Vayne it was a joke between me and Corazon. It's not related to the game really.


Snide = Sorry.
Ok. it will take a little bit for me to get the stuff.

but without links to where or what.

So that post gets the thread to see Bh has ego etc. (he said to me back then he is talented guy...)

How does that interact with him beign scummy or town.
Walk me through how me knowing that lets me evaluate BH(with ego) and see that he got a scum Pm and not BH(with ego) got a town PM.




Specifically, the section where he backs down from Hapa yet is belligerent towards Oats got me thinking about how in general he interacts with people. I believe I spoke about it last night---as scum he tends not to give people he thinks are beneath him the time of day. He does this as town as well, but when he's serious about hunting scum he will eventually interact with everyone in the thread in some form of a positive way. Essentially I was trying to display this without the ability to dive into BH's meta and prove this---again, Les Mafia is a good example--- and show that he can't act that way towards Hapa as Hapa is a very skilled town player and will not put up with his bullshit, yet will shit up the thread towards anyone else he can when he can get away with it.

Without even using meta I can tell you that the way BH has been acting in this way towards people is not town-aligned in the slightest; the meta only makes it stronger when you can see that's how he acts in various games.

I admit it's not exactly the clearest line of thought but I know it's true, I've played with BH a ton recently and feel that I've learned to read him well (despite me lying about it as GM). It doesn't mean much but I've said it before, if I was town in Les there is no way I would have voted to lynch him when he acted the way he did at the end of the game. He has not acted even a fraction as towny this game as he did in that one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 23:12 GMT
#1005
On June 13 2013 08:08 VayneAuthority wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 08:01 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 08:00 VayneAuthority wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:56 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:20 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:14 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:06 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 02:03 GravityMan wrote:
On June 12 2013 14:19 AxleGreaser wrote:
Grav man, a number of pages back I posted this to you (before you WoS'd hi)
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18868046

Even though your posting style has now changed considerably.
I am still interested in understanding what the purpose of the questions in that post was.
There were rather lot of questions in the post. I am having difficulty deciding which mindset
would want to post those and why.
I am aware as you already said here why you say you asked them:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18860286
On June 11 2013 08:02 GravityMan wrote:
[quote]
As I am not delving into past games to determine alignment, for players I may be having trouble understanding it suits me to attempt to figure out what each player is thinking, capable of, and even feeling in order to determine a specific mindset.

If you find that irrelevant that is your prerogative, however I do not deem it so.


One thing I cant marry with your statement of why that is that you did not follow those up?

Since you posted that, you have again pursued BH, but without answers to the earlier questions.
Why if they were GM/WoS: "In what way do you find my questions irrelevant? I am confused."
didnt you seek answers.

I can see one problem there were so many question in the post i doubt anyone would answer them all.

So why ask them?

Those questions were asked because I know how BH's ingame ego works and I was trying to find a way to show it to the thread, as can be seen in my written case against him. BH does not back down when dealing with anyone he feels is less skilled than him as can be seen by his constant tunneling of both me and Oats this game, and the way he talks to VA early. He is completely different when talking with Hapa and I wanted to make this evident; it is not a particularly towny way to play---completely deriding everyone's activity and efforts aside from one person. And what do you know, now that said person is dead there is absolutely no one to 'reign him in,' so he can act all troll-BH as he pleases, shit up the thread, offer no explanations for his reads and no one is around to scold him for it or make him stop that he will respond to. I asked those questions earlier as a way for me to logically come to this point while still in the GM persona without using meta to prove it. Difficult, time consuming, and artificially restraining myself I know, but it is how I resolved to play this specific game.


I have seen BH play before as have many people. Now that you have said this I have more problems.

GM:WoS: I asked those questions earlier as a way for me to logically come to this point while still in the GM persona without using meta to prove it.
What do you mean by come logically to the point. Were you asking questions to get answers to them, or was the purpose of the post to ask questions, while actually logically coming to a point. Your post concludes "What I am truly unsure about is the degree to which you actually care about your ego. I would think you're more likely to discard this ego as a scum player in favor of lying, but I cannot, of course, be sure."
Which looks pretty much like coming to the point of saying something.

So was the point of the post the questions or the conclusion it appears to reach and state.

if the point of it was the questions, and the thread needed those answers "trying to find a way to show it to the thread,"
then why didnt you need to get them answered at some time?

To be completely honest, I'm not sure what you're asking me.
Can you try and rephrase it?


Aure thing that post see above.
it had lots of things with ? at the end in it they are questions.
Was the point of the post to ask those questions and get answers. ("show it to the thread," via answers to questions)

Was the point of the post to make statement. ("show it to the thread," via statement by you)

or something else.

If it was questions why when you didnt you get answers didnt you ask again? and just drop it.

No need to be snide.
There was no grand plan behind it, I suppose you could call it a combination of both. I wasn't exactly sure how BH would answer the questions if at all so it was more that I was trying to lead him in a direction where I could show the thread exactly how he is prone to act in certain situations.

Why didn't I ask again? I don't know. I think I gave up the train of thought at the time. Trying to get BH to do anything is like pulling teeth anyway.


Vayne it was a joke between me and Corazon. It's not related to the game really.

your dodging of it for so long doesn't really make me feel better about it.

What, my dodging of the answering your question? I didn't dodge I forgot you asked.
You want to hear it exactly? I didn't want to go into detail because it's not really related to the game at all and may cause discussion outside of what we need to be talking about (ie give more useless thread-shitting-up fodder to BH).
Do you still want to hear it?


yea sure why not

Fine but only because you're already voting BH. And if he comes back and goes on an ego trip because of it I'm going to be pissed.

Corazon PMed me randomly and said he had a dream that BH figured out that I was GM in the first few days of the game. I said I doubt anyone is going to figure me out (and no one would have, had I not fucked up). Then a couple days ago I had a dream that BH figured me out (fucking weird).
And then I fucked up and he found out. Hence 'our dreams came true.'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 23:13 GMT
#1008
On June 13 2013 08:13 AxleGreaser wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 08:10 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 08:02 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:56 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:20 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:14 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:06 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 02:03 GravityMan wrote:
On June 12 2013 14:19 AxleGreaser wrote:
Grav man, a number of pages back I posted this to you (before you WoS'd hi)
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18868046

Even though your posting style has now changed considerably.
I am still interested in understanding what the purpose of the questions in that post was.
There were rather lot of questions in the post. I am having difficulty deciding which mindset
would want to post those and why.
I am aware as you already said here why you say you asked them:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18860286
On June 11 2013 08:02 GravityMan wrote:
[quote]
As I am not delving into past games to determine alignment, for players I may be having trouble understanding it suits me to attempt to figure out what each player is thinking, capable of, and even feeling in order to determine a specific mindset.

If you find that irrelevant that is your prerogative, however I do not deem it so.


One thing I cant marry with your statement of why that is that you did not follow those up?

Since you posted that, you have again pursued BH, but without answers to the earlier questions.
Why if they were GM/WoS: "In what way do you find my questions irrelevant? I am confused."
didnt you seek answers.

I can see one problem there were so many question in the post i doubt anyone would answer them all.

So why ask them?

Those questions were asked because I know how BH's ingame ego works and I was trying to find a way to show it to the thread, as can be seen in my written case against him. BH does not back down when dealing with anyone he feels is less skilled than him as can be seen by his constant tunneling of both me and Oats this game, and the way he talks to VA early. He is completely different when talking with Hapa and I wanted to make this evident; it is not a particularly towny way to play---completely deriding everyone's activity and efforts aside from one person. And what do you know, now that said person is dead there is absolutely no one to 'reign him in,' so he can act all troll-BH as he pleases, shit up the thread, offer no explanations for his reads and no one is around to scold him for it or make him stop that he will respond to. I asked those questions earlier as a way for me to logically come to this point while still in the GM persona without using meta to prove it. Difficult, time consuming, and artificially restraining myself I know, but it is how I resolved to play this specific game.


I have seen BH play before as have many people. Now that you have said this I have more problems.

GM:WoS: I asked those questions earlier as a way for me to logically come to this point while still in the GM persona without using meta to prove it.
What do you mean by come logically to the point. Were you asking questions to get answers to them, or was the purpose of the post to ask questions, while actually logically coming to a point. Your post concludes "What I am truly unsure about is the degree to which you actually care about your ego. I would think you're more likely to discard this ego as a scum player in favor of lying, but I cannot, of course, be sure."
Which looks pretty much like coming to the point of saying something.

So was the point of the post the questions or the conclusion it appears to reach and state.

if the point of it was the questions, and the thread needed those answers "trying to find a way to show it to the thread,"
then why didnt you need to get them answered at some time?

To be completely honest, I'm not sure what you're asking me.
Can you try and rephrase it?


Aure thing that post see above.
it had lots of things with ? at the end in it they are questions.
Was the point of the post to ask those questions and get answers. ("show it to the thread," via answers to questions)

Was the point of the post to make statement. ("show it to the thread," via statement by you)

or something else.

If it was questions why when you didnt you get answers didnt you ask again? and just drop it.

No need to be snide.
There was no grand plan behind it, I suppose you could call it a combination of both. I wasn't exactly sure how BH would answer the questions if at all so it was more that I was trying to lead him in a direction where I could show the thread exactly how he is prone to act in certain situations.

Why didn't I ask again? I don't know. I think I gave up the train of thought at the time. Trying to get BH to do anything is like pulling teeth anyway.


Vayne it was a joke between me and Corazon. It's not related to the game really.


Snide = Sorry.
Ok. it will take a little bit for me to get the stuff.

but without links to where or what.

So that post gets the thread to see Bh has ego etc. (he said to me back then he is talented guy...)

How does that interact with him beign scummy or town.
Walk me through how me knowing that lets me evaluate BH(with ego) and see that he got a scum Pm and not BH(with ego) got a town PM.




Specifically, the section where he backs down from Hapa yet is belligerent towards Oats got me thinking about how in general he interacts with people. I believe I spoke about it last night---as scum he tends not to give people he thinks are beneath him the time of day. He does this as town as well, but when he's serious about hunting scum he will eventually interact with everyone in the thread in some form of a positive way. Essentially I was trying to display this without the ability to dive into BH's meta and prove this---again, Les Mafia is a good example--- and show that he can't act that way towards Hapa as Hapa is a very skilled town player and will not put up with his bullshit, yet will shit up the thread towards anyone else he can when he can get away with it.

Without even using meta I can tell you that the way BH has been acting in this way towards people is not town-aligned in the slightest; the meta only makes it stronger when you can see that's how he acts in various games.

I admit it's not exactly the clearest line of thought but I know it's true, I've played with BH a ton recently and feel that I've learned to read him well (despite me lying about it as GM). It doesn't mean much but I've said it before, if I was town in Les there is no way I would have voted to lynch him when he acted the way he did at the end of the game. He has not acted even a fraction as towny this game as he did in that one.


Ok. I will need to reread your filter in context with that in mind. it was not one of the possible intentions that originally sprang to my mind.



Axle can you answer my question?
You've been doing too much analysis and questioning and not offering enough in terms of reads and stances taken.
Who is scum and why?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 23:16 GMT
#1009
On June 13 2013 08:13 VayneAuthority wrote:
Alright I guess thats believable enough. If you fed me some bullshit I was going to shoot you on the spot, seemed like you were referencing something from a scum QT or something

lol seriously?
Why would I reference a scum QT to the fucking host in a game? Like...it couldn't even be called a slip or anything...it was me blatantly talking to Corazon.

Come on, VA.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 23:28 GMT
#1013
On June 13 2013 08:23 AxleGreaser wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 07:59 GravityMan wrote:
Axle, who do YOU think is scum?
We haven't had very many reads from you this game at all, just analysis and questions.


There is the obvious list, of people who have not contributed much.
There is the obvious list of turning Hapas list upside down and saying that.

One thing i dont want to do is get all in a low post count townies face, and shut them down.
So I wont be doing that.

The least clear intention I have is you. I see what "looks" like a tendency to Lynch BH for being BH.
I see posts that could well inflame him and make his ego come to the fore as town or scum.
This could have been their intention, or not.

Obvious lists? Do you trust those lists entirely?
Why can't you just come out and call me scum?
Am I the only scum in this game?

Come on Axle. Something concrete please.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 23:29 GMT
#1014
On June 13 2013 08:18 VayneAuthority wrote:
wat? Prome talked to us all the time in Les Mis. Trying to make it seem like something stupid isn't helping you. It could have easily been a slip up.

Isn't 'helping' me? Who else thought this was suspicious? I wasn't worried, but you trying to make it sound like it's something I should be worried about is kinda stupid.
Anyway, enough of this.
VA who else is scum? Last I figured Sylencia/Stutters or both but it's been a while since I looked.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 23:43 GMT
#1017
On June 13 2013 08:39 VayneAuthority wrote:
I've called pretty much everyone scum at one point this game, I don't have any good reads. Either they are lurking or we are just spamming, not much to go off of. Obvious night kill, unsuspicious day kill. There's nowhere to go from here really.

Stutters' aggressiveness in this thread is disconcerting I suppose, I don't even know who sylencia is he posts so little.

Oh yeah since I'm not a smurf anymore I can mention:
Apparently Sylencia really IS lynchbait as he says, which is what makes me wary of him as a scumread.
Again all of this relies on meta but I just know he's telling the the truth about this. Doesn't preclude him from being scum, and he does tend to lurk quite a bit as either alignment..

When I get the chance in a few hours I'm gonna dive into Syl/Stutters. I remember thinking Stutters has a good chance of flipping red.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 12 2013 23:45 GMT
#1018
On June 13 2013 08:42 AxleGreaser wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 08:28 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 08:23 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:59 GravityMan wrote:
Axle, who do YOU think is scum?
We haven't had very many reads from you this game at all, just analysis and questions.


There is the obvious list, of people who have not contributed much.
There is the obvious list of turning Hapas list upside down and saying that.

One thing i dont want to do is get all in a low post count townies face, and shut them down.
So I wont be doing that.

The least clear intention I have is you. I see what "looks" like a tendency to Lynch BH for being BH.
I see posts that could well inflame him and make his ego come to the fore as town or scum.
This could have been their intention, or not.

Obvious lists? Do you trust those lists entirely?
Why can't you just come out and call me scum?
Am I the only scum in this game?

Come on Axle. Something concrete please.


No I don't trust those list entirely, which is why early on D1 I asked hapa about him giving out so many town reads and saying EZ.
Hapa is town, he flipped town, but i still don't trust his list as he can be wrong.

The language used was euphamism to do as stated and avoid getting in low post counters face.

Grav man: Why can't you just come out and call me scum?

I can. Thats the easy bit, trying to be right is harder.

This time i dont understand you: "Come on Axle. Something concrete please."
do you want more concrete reasoning and analysis for why i think your scum
GM: "We haven't had very many reads from you this game at all, just analysis and questions."

or do you want me to overexaggerate the degree of certainty that i have that your motivations
in posting inflammatory things was so that BHs ego would get him to piss off enough people that
you could mislynch him?

The problem is there are towny reasons to push people as well. I need to work out if what you
did was for those reasons.


For the record, I wasn't trying to be inflammatory necessarily with those questions, I was trying just to see what I could get BH to say and talk about regarding that topic.

You say that I'm trying to get BH mislynched though, what makes you sure he's town?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 00:35 GMT
#1025
Sorry Corazon
Axle, I answered you here.
On June 13 2013 08:10 GravityMan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 08:02 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:56 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:20 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:14 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:06 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 02:03 GravityMan wrote:
On June 12 2013 14:19 AxleGreaser wrote:
Grav man, a number of pages back I posted this to you (before you WoS'd hi)
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18868046

Even though your posting style has now changed considerably.
I am still interested in understanding what the purpose of the questions in that post was.
There were rather lot of questions in the post. I am having difficulty deciding which mindset
would want to post those and why.
I am aware as you already said here why you say you asked them:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18860286
On June 11 2013 08:02 GravityMan wrote:
On June 11 2013 08:00 Hapahauli wrote:
[quote]
[quote]

Like none of this has to do anything with scumhunting. BH thinks I'm town - why does it matter what his feelings about my play are?

As I am not delving into past games to determine alignment, for players I may be having trouble understanding it suits me to attempt to figure out what each player is thinking, capable of, and even feeling in order to determine a specific mindset.

If you find that irrelevant that is your prerogative, however I do not deem it so.


One thing I cant marry with your statement of why that is that you did not follow those up?

Since you posted that, you have again pursued BH, but without answers to the earlier questions.
Why if they were GM/WoS: "In what way do you find my questions irrelevant? I am confused."
didnt you seek answers.

I can see one problem there were so many question in the post i doubt anyone would answer them all.

So why ask them?

Those questions were asked because I know how BH's ingame ego works and I was trying to find a way to show it to the thread, as can be seen in my written case against him. BH does not back down when dealing with anyone he feels is less skilled than him as can be seen by his constant tunneling of both me and Oats this game, and the way he talks to VA early. He is completely different when talking with Hapa and I wanted to make this evident; it is not a particularly towny way to play---completely deriding everyone's activity and efforts aside from one person. And what do you know, now that said person is dead there is absolutely no one to 'reign him in,' so he can act all troll-BH as he pleases, shit up the thread, offer no explanations for his reads and no one is around to scold him for it or make him stop that he will respond to. I asked those questions earlier as a way for me to logically come to this point while still in the GM persona without using meta to prove it. Difficult, time consuming, and artificially restraining myself I know, but it is how I resolved to play this specific game.


I have seen BH play before as have many people. Now that you have said this I have more problems.

GM:WoS: I asked those questions earlier as a way for me to logically come to this point while still in the GM persona without using meta to prove it.
What do you mean by come logically to the point. Were you asking questions to get answers to them, or was the purpose of the post to ask questions, while actually logically coming to a point. Your post concludes "What I am truly unsure about is the degree to which you actually care about your ego. I would think you're more likely to discard this ego as a scum player in favor of lying, but I cannot, of course, be sure."
Which looks pretty much like coming to the point of saying something.

So was the point of the post the questions or the conclusion it appears to reach and state.

if the point of it was the questions, and the thread needed those answers "trying to find a way to show it to the thread,"
then why didnt you need to get them answered at some time?

To be completely honest, I'm not sure what you're asking me.
Can you try and rephrase it?


Aure thing that post see above.
it had lots of things with ? at the end in it they are questions.
Was the point of the post to ask those questions and get answers. ("show it to the thread," via answers to questions)

Was the point of the post to make statement. ("show it to the thread," via statement by you)

or something else.

If it was questions why when you didnt you get answers didnt you ask again? and just drop it.

No need to be snide.
There was no grand plan behind it, I suppose you could call it a combination of both. I wasn't exactly sure how BH would answer the questions if at all so it was more that I was trying to lead him in a direction where I could show the thread exactly how he is prone to act in certain situations.

Why didn't I ask again? I don't know. I think I gave up the train of thought at the time. Trying to get BH to do anything is like pulling teeth anyway.


Vayne it was a joke between me and Corazon. It's not related to the game really.


Snide = Sorry.
Ok. it will take a little bit for me to get the stuff.

but without links to where or what.

So that post gets the thread to see Bh has ego etc. (he said to me back then he is talented guy...)

How does that interact with him beign scummy or town.
Walk me through how me knowing that lets me evaluate BH(with ego) and see that he got a scum Pm and not BH(with ego) got a town PM.




Specifically, the section where he backs down from Hapa yet is belligerent towards Oats got me thinking about how in general he interacts with people. I believe I spoke about it last night---as scum he tends not to give people he thinks are beneath him the time of day. He does this as town as well, but when he's serious about hunting scum he will eventually interact with everyone in the thread in some form of a positive way. Essentially I was trying to display this without the ability to dive into BH's meta and prove this---again, Les Mafia is a good example--- and show that he can't act that way towards Hapa as Hapa is a very skilled town player and will not put up with his bullshit, yet will shit up the thread towards anyone else he can when he can get away with it.

Without even using meta I can tell you that the way BH has been acting in this way towards people is not town-aligned in the slightest; the meta only makes it stronger when you can see that's how he acts in various games.

I admit it's not exactly the clearest line of thought but I know it's true, I've played with BH a ton recently and feel that I've learned to read him well (despite me lying about it as GM). It doesn't mean much but I've said it before, if I was town in Les there is no way I would have voted to lynch him when he acted the way he did at the end of the game. He has not acted even a fraction as towny this game as he did in that one.

In fact, I have been nothing but forthcoming considering everything asked of me all game.
Has BH been as considerate?
I REALLY don't understand what is so hard for all of you to see here.

Oh and Axle, by definiton, you saying 'mislynched' means you think BH is town.
I want to know why you think he is town. It has nothing to do with what you want from me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 00:50 GMT
#1028
On June 13 2013 09:45 AxleGreaser wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 09:35 GravityMan wrote:
Sorry Corazon
Axle, I answered you here.
On June 13 2013 08:10 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 08:02 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:56 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:20 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:14 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:06 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 02:03 GravityMan wrote:
On June 12 2013 14:19 AxleGreaser wrote:
Grav man, a number of pages back I posted this to you (before you WoS'd hi)
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18868046

Even though your posting style has now changed considerably.
I am still interested in understanding what the purpose of the questions in that post was.
There were rather lot of questions in the post. I am having difficulty deciding which mindset
would want to post those and why.
I am aware as you already said here why you say you asked them:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18860286
[quote]

One thing I cant marry with your statement of why that is that you did not follow those up?

Since you posted that, you have again pursued BH, but without answers to the earlier questions.
Why if they were GM/WoS: "In what way do you find my questions irrelevant? I am confused."
didnt you seek answers.

I can see one problem there were so many question in the post i doubt anyone would answer them all.

So why ask them?

Those questions were asked because I know how BH's ingame ego works and I was trying to find a way to show it to the thread, as can be seen in my written case against him. BH does not back down when dealing with anyone he feels is less skilled than him as can be seen by his constant tunneling of both me and Oats this game, and the way he talks to VA early. He is completely different when talking with Hapa and I wanted to make this evident; it is not a particularly towny way to play---completely deriding everyone's activity and efforts aside from one person. And what do you know, now that said person is dead there is absolutely no one to 'reign him in,' so he can act all troll-BH as he pleases, shit up the thread, offer no explanations for his reads and no one is around to scold him for it or make him stop that he will respond to. I asked those questions earlier as a way for me to logically come to this point while still in the GM persona without using meta to prove it. Difficult, time consuming, and artificially restraining myself I know, but it is how I resolved to play this specific game.


I have seen BH play before as have many people. Now that you have said this I have more problems.

GM:WoS: I asked those questions earlier as a way for me to logically come to this point while still in the GM persona without using meta to prove it.
What do you mean by come logically to the point. Were you asking questions to get answers to them, or was the purpose of the post to ask questions, while actually logically coming to a point. Your post concludes "What I am truly unsure about is the degree to which you actually care about your ego. I would think you're more likely to discard this ego as a scum player in favor of lying, but I cannot, of course, be sure."
Which looks pretty much like coming to the point of saying something.

So was the point of the post the questions or the conclusion it appears to reach and state.

if the point of it was the questions, and the thread needed those answers "trying to find a way to show it to the thread,"
then why didnt you need to get them answered at some time?

To be completely honest, I'm not sure what you're asking me.
Can you try and rephrase it?


Aure thing that post see above.
it had lots of things with ? at the end in it they are questions.
Was the point of the post to ask those questions and get answers. ("show it to the thread," via answers to questions)

Was the point of the post to make statement. ("show it to the thread," via statement by you)

or something else.

If it was questions why when you didnt you get answers didnt you ask again? and just drop it.

No need to be snide.
There was no grand plan behind it, I suppose you could call it a combination of both. I wasn't exactly sure how BH would answer the questions if at all so it was more that I was trying to lead him in a direction where I could show the thread exactly how he is prone to act in certain situations.

Why didn't I ask again? I don't know. I think I gave up the train of thought at the time. Trying to get BH to do anything is like pulling teeth anyway.


Vayne it was a joke between me and Corazon. It's not related to the game really.


Snide = Sorry.
Ok. it will take a little bit for me to get the stuff.

but without links to where or what.

So that post gets the thread to see Bh has ego etc. (he said to me back then he is talented guy...)

How does that interact with him beign scummy or town.
Walk me through how me knowing that lets me evaluate BH(with ego) and see that he got a scum Pm and not BH(with ego) got a town PM.




Specifically, the section where he backs down from Hapa yet is belligerent towards Oats got me thinking about how in general he interacts with people. I believe I spoke about it last night---as scum he tends not to give people he thinks are beneath him the time of day. He does this as town as well, but when he's serious about hunting scum he will eventually interact with everyone in the thread in some form of a positive way. Essentially I was trying to display this without the ability to dive into BH's meta and prove this---again, Les Mafia is a good example--- and show that he can't act that way towards Hapa as Hapa is a very skilled town player and will not put up with his bullshit, yet will shit up the thread towards anyone else he can when he can get away with it.

Without even using meta I can tell you that the way BH has been acting in this way towards people is not town-aligned in the slightest; the meta only makes it stronger when you can see that's how he acts in various games.

I admit it's not exactly the clearest line of thought but I know it's true, I've played with BH a ton recently and feel that I've learned to read him well (despite me lying about it as GM). It doesn't mean much but I've said it before, if I was town in Les there is no way I would have voted to lynch him when he acted the way he did at the end of the game. He has not acted even a fraction as towny this game as he did in that one.

In fact, I have been nothing but forthcoming considering everything asked of me all game.
Has BH been as considerate?
I REALLY don't understand what is so hard for all of you to see here.

Oh and Axle, by definiton, you saying 'mislynched' means you think BH is town.
I want to know why you think he is town. It has nothing to do with what you want from me.


I think I prefer to do what you wanted me to do a little while ago.

Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 08:13 GravityMan wrote:

Axle can you answer my question?
You've been doing too much analysis and questioning and not offering enough in terms of reads and stances taken.
Who is scum and why?


I'm fine with either for now, but I will not be letting this go. I have seen nothing remotely towny about BH's play right now and that fact that you see as such or are making a preflip association based on the fact that you think I'm scum is not good.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 02:09 GMT
#1045
On June 13 2013 10:23 AxleGreaser wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 09:50 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 09:45 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 09:35 GravityMan wrote:
Sorry Corazon
Axle, I answered you here.
On June 13 2013 08:10 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 08:02 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:56 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:20 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:14 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:06 AxleGreaser wrote:
[quote]

I have seen BH play before as have many people. Now that you have said this I have more problems.

GM:WoS: I asked those questions earlier as a way for me to logically come to this point while still in the GM persona without using meta to prove it.
What do you mean by come logically to the point. Were you asking questions to get answers to them, or was the purpose of the post to ask questions, while actually logically coming to a point. Your post concludes "What I am truly unsure about is the degree to which you actually care about your ego. I would think you're more likely to discard this ego as a scum player in favor of lying, but I cannot, of course, be sure."
Which looks pretty much like coming to the point of saying something.

So was the point of the post the questions or the conclusion it appears to reach and state.

if the point of it was the questions, and the thread needed those answers "trying to find a way to show it to the thread,"
then why didnt you need to get them answered at some time?

To be completely honest, I'm not sure what you're asking me.
Can you try and rephrase it?


Aure thing that post see above.
it had lots of things with ? at the end in it they are questions.
Was the point of the post to ask those questions and get answers. ("show it to the thread," via answers to questions)

Was the point of the post to make statement. ("show it to the thread," via statement by you)

or something else.

If it was questions why when you didnt you get answers didnt you ask again? and just drop it.

No need to be snide.
There was no grand plan behind it, I suppose you could call it a combination of both. I wasn't exactly sure how BH would answer the questions if at all so it was more that I was trying to lead him in a direction where I could show the thread exactly how he is prone to act in certain situations.

Why didn't I ask again? I don't know. I think I gave up the train of thought at the time. Trying to get BH to do anything is like pulling teeth anyway.


Vayne it was a joke between me and Corazon. It's not related to the game really.


Snide = Sorry.
Ok. it will take a little bit for me to get the stuff.

but without links to where or what.

So that post gets the thread to see Bh has ego etc. (he said to me back then he is talented guy...)

How does that interact with him beign scummy or town.
Walk me through how me knowing that lets me evaluate BH(with ego) and see that he got a scum Pm and not BH(with ego) got a town PM.




Specifically, the section where he backs down from Hapa yet is belligerent towards Oats got me thinking about how in general he interacts with people. I believe I spoke about it last night---as scum he tends not to give people he thinks are beneath him the time of day. He does this as town as well, but when he's serious about hunting scum he will eventually interact with everyone in the thread in some form of a positive way. Essentially I was trying to display this without the ability to dive into BH's meta and prove this---again, Les Mafia is a good example--- and show that he can't act that way towards Hapa as Hapa is a very skilled town player and will not put up with his bullshit, yet will shit up the thread towards anyone else he can when he can get away with it.

Without even using meta I can tell you that the way BH has been acting in this way towards people is not town-aligned in the slightest; the meta only makes it stronger when you can see that's how he acts in various games.

I admit it's not exactly the clearest line of thought but I know it's true, I've played with BH a ton recently and feel that I've learned to read him well (despite me lying about it as GM). It doesn't mean much but I've said it before, if I was town in Les there is no way I would have voted to lynch him when he acted the way he did at the end of the game. He has not acted even a fraction as towny this game as he did in that one.

In fact, I have been nothing but forthcoming considering everything asked of me all game.
Has BH been as considerate?
I REALLY don't understand what is so hard for all of you to see here.

Oh and Axle, by definiton, you saying 'mislynched' means you think BH is town.
I want to know why you think he is town. It has nothing to do with what you want from me.


I think I prefer to do what you wanted me to do a little while ago.

On June 13 2013 08:13 GravityMan wrote:

Axle can you answer my question?
You've been doing too much analysis and questioning and not offering enough in terms of reads and stances taken.
Who is scum and why?


I'm fine with either for now, but I will not be letting this go. I have seen nothing remotely towny about BH's play right now and that fact that you see as such or are making a preflip association based on the fact that you think I'm scum is not good.


My views are not preflip association based.
They are also not 100%, but I would need to either see more or understand the cases against him better before i'd lynch today.
yeah he went all "dinner" "dinner" and hapa fake shot him... and he and oats are being he and oats.
What I dont yet see is the scum agenda and intention.

Why does he need some grand agenda?
His 'agenda' is he has done dick all the entire game. This assists scum because it doesn't help the town find the scum.
He has done his 'BH and Oats' thing to shit up the thread because his 'intention' is to shit up the thread and waste town's time.
Pretty simple in my opinion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 02:11 GMT
#1046
Now that people are actually starting to listen to me regarding BH's activity and what he has not done this game, I expect him to come back around his usual time (a couple hours from now-ish) and actually put some effort forward because he will realize he is in real danger of being lynched.

What people need to keep in mind, is to look at what he does when he comes back and how he does it. Is he actively assisting the town or not?

I will do my best to keep an open mind myself.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 02:33 GMT
#1048
Oats:
On June 13 2013 02:37 Blazinghand wrote:
yeah actually let's get rid of this guy. He might be the mayor and maybe he claimed cop but he's scum imo

##vote VA

Can you explain the town motivation for this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 02:41 GMT
#1050
You know what's funny?
People suspecting Vayne for fakeclaiming reminds me of when people suspected me of fakeclaiming in The Game because I claimed rolecop and then was subsequently RBed every night thereafter.
Want to know who set up that line of suspicion?
Geript.

BH, you don't want to be Geript, do you?

But seriously, think of it in terms of what is more likely. Is scum more likely to take a needless gamble and fakeclaim cop and the lie about getting RBed all game so they don't have to do anything else, when there could be a counterclaim and they get fucked? Or is it more likely that Vayne is simply town and claimed when it wasn't quite necessary?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 02:43 GMT
#1052
On June 13 2013 11:43 Stutters695 wrote:
I don't think we should kill Vayne but to say he's definitely town for any reason outside of the claim is wrong.

I agree.
BH doesn't.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 03:25 GMT
#1055
On June 13 2013 12:09 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 10:46 goodkarma wrote:
On June 13 2013 10:06 Oatsmaster wrote:
You have 6 posts GK.....
And I already said why your first post was scummy, and then you come back in the thread and say that all town should have 2 reads bla bla.
Why are you shitting on town and not being useful?

Do you still think BH is scum?
Why is syl scum and not stutters?

GK's attitude towards me is that Im town. Do you think Im town GK?


Your first question is very rhetorical... I'm being very useful. It's you that are asking useless questions... Further it should be clear from my recent posting what I think about BH.

As for stutters, my read on him was slight town. Since that time, he's said some things that are odd to me. I'd say he's more of a null read now. Like I don't understand how he instantly assumes Vayne fakeclaimed at one point when there's been no counterclaims, and how later on he's brought up I should be vigishot immediately for lurking even though it's clear I post in the evening, and the day cycle is only halfway done. These are actions that very well could be scum-motivated, but I need to see him post a bit more to be sure. As I've said, town Stutters has moments where he'll post stuff that's actually insightful. I felt that was what I was seeing with his posting on Shao, but that's really the only point this whole game he's been like that.

I do think you're town Oats. And the only reason I believe that is looking at your past scumgames I can't visualize you drawing so much attention to yourself as scum, even if your play has been objectively scummy and bad.

lynch him Now.
Now.
GK, by any measurable standard. You are lurking. You have 1 page of filter and its been a day and a half or more since you replaced in.

You arent really pushing anything. You just post stuff and never prod or whatever. Like this post. There is no followup. You are sitting in the background and not doing ANYTHING to get your read lynched/vigged. its scum.

KILL HIm.

By these standards you should be lynching BH.
True he's not lurking but the rest applies. Has BH pushed Vayne? Hell at least GK is offering reasons for his scumread.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 03:32 GMT
#1058
On June 13 2013 12:32 WaveofShadow wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 12:30 Oatsmaster wrote:
but the problem WoS, is that I think BH is town.

Why.
Why is he town?
How is he helping us win this game?

Quoted for filter.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 03:40 GMT
#1060
LOL
How is it I think he's town?
Because I said I think there's a chance he may come back and do something now that he realizes he'll get lynched?
Depends on what that something is. I most certainly do NOT believe he is town, but I believe even if he was, this is the only way in hell we get him to do anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 03:56 GMT
#1064
On June 13 2013 12:44 Oatsmaster wrote:
dont lie to yourself. It only makes things worse.
so lynch GK GM?

You know very well that is not happening.
Especially now that he's started playing the game.

Which...ONCE AGAIN, is more than I can say for BH.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 15:38 GMT
#1087
On June 13 2013 20:57 Sylencia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 09:07 goodkarma wrote:
Catching up with the thread now. The first thing I'd like to address is this Syl post:

On June 12 2013 22:35 Sylencia wrote:
On June 12 2013 16:47 goodkarma wrote:
On June 12 2013 16:15 Sylencia wrote:
@GK: Why are you suggesting to waste a dayvig shot on me when the only reason you have is that I've been lurkier than others? You literally say before your 'analysis' on me that you think BH is scum and yet somehow I'm a more decent target for shooting? Ok..


I said you were flying under the radar, and that when you are here you seem to be content to agree with a stance here and there and not really add anything. It's not about your "lurkiness," but what you aren't doing when you are here.

I'm assuming from what Vayne has said he plans to use his vig shot today. Therefore, we need to determine two scum candidates for this cycle.


None of this really is that difficult to understand. While you're here, would you mind providing an opinion on anything?

Or more specifically, perhaps elaborate on your top scumread?


If Vayne wants to use it as a shot, why aren't we lynching a top suspect first, and shooting during the night? Unless there's some sort of claim that can only be checked by death, I don't see a reason why it should be rushed so. (I'm not reading the power wrong, right?)

My top read at the time you posted was ShiaoPi, as I said I agreed with a lot of the points made by Stutters. I made that clear end of last night. I haven't fully digested ShiaoPi's response yet, but if I'm wrong on that account, my previous statement feels good:

On June 12 2013 01:24 Sylencia wrote:
@Oats: If GK doesn't have anything in the next 24 hours, I'd be willing to put money on a lurker scum team - something like him + stutters (maybe +1 if there's a third). The only one that sticks out is Blazinghand for causing chaos for no reason but idk if that's his playstyle - please fill me in there. Reasoning is everything has run too smoothly and there haven't felt like there have been any sort of misdirections so far. We had a blue claim on day 1, so having some sort of mayor takeover would be a pretty good idea in Day 1 for scum to take, as they can reliably target Vayne with no consequence. If he dies, he dies. If he doesn't, everyone just says someone protected him, and no one suspects the mayor. None of this happened, so unless Hapa is scum, everyone active seems town. Any problem with my reasoning?


For catching up, only having an analysis of 4 players (2 of which seem like afterthoughts), and a weak scumread based a lot on meta is pretty bad. I've heard from BH enough that you have slow starts, but idk define slow start, how long is it going to take to get the ball rolling, and out of all the players how is it that you've got thoughts on 2 lurky players over someone with a lot more points to consider such as Grav/WoS and Oats?

About GravityMan - I am also missing what is obvious about him that makes him scum according to BH, but the only point i"ll take from it is that he is the only one who disrupted Hapa's mayoral campaign with a sort of smear campaign against him. You can make reasons for why he did it if he's scum (potentially take power, and make hapa a suspect), but since that failed, would scum have chosen Hapa as the target of the NK over Vayne to clearly show that? Food for thought, seeing as that was the only real 'major' event that happened regarding mayoral campaigns.


First of all, the entire point of mentioning a good vigishot for Vayne is we should be treating this cycle like a doublelynch, as Hapa originally suggested. Even if Vayne opts to wait until the night to shoot, by discussing this now we have that much more information to go on in later cycles. For that reason, everyone should be doing this.

So you can't be bothered to review the latest posting of your top scumread, and you fall back on proposing a lurker scumteam if your top read convinces you he's town??? Explain to me how that isn't scum-motivated behavior?

Further, I provided a read on Grav in the post you're referencing, so it's clear you aren't reading the thread very closely. This is the kind of disinterest I'd expect from scum. I still believe you'd be a good vigi shot.


The fact I can actually rely on something which I believed to have been true from the night before shows the actual lack of contribution that you had brought to the table to this point. If I say you're scummy during N1, and you do nothing to change that view in D2, you're saying it's scum oriented for me to say I still think you're scum? Also yes, turns out I ended up thinking you did an analysis on GK which is yourself (it made perfect sense at the time somehow -_-).

In any case:

- Axle: How has this guy been able to fly under the radar this entire game? As far as I've read there's been very little suspicious cast on him, he's been questioned about his reads in which he's tip toed around the problem:

Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 08:23 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:59 GravityMan wrote:
Axle, who do YOU think is scum?
We haven't had very many reads from you this game at all, just analysis and questions.


There is the obvious list, of people who have not contributed much.
There is the obvious list of turning Hapas list upside down and saying that.

One thing i dont want to do is get all in a low post count townies face, and shut them down.
So I wont be doing that.

The least clear intention I have is you. I see what "looks" like a tendency to Lynch BH for being BH.
I see posts that could well inflame him and make his ego come to the fore as town or scum.
This could have been their intention, or not.


It alludes to him suspecting GM (pretty much confirmed to be saying he suspects GM next post), but he doesn't push it at all. He said he doesn't want to shut a lurker down, but GM is far from a lurker, so why wouldn't he push a case there?

If there's someone in this game who is a prime example of being neutral on pretty much everything, it's Axle.

BH has been doing a lot of talking without a lot of pushing, but I'm pretty sure that Axle is a better option over BH. After a slow first half of Day 1, I think if BH was scum he'd easily adapt into a less active role in the game. He brings up points I don't think anyone else would be doing otherwise (possible VA fakeclaim etc.) and just by doing that I feel it's enough to justify keeping him around for longer. Without BH this town will be a dead town, with little to no deviation in thoughts.

GK I'm still willing to put my vote on him, idk how slow a start can be, but even his vote on BH didn't have any substance to it.

This is terrible honestly.
Axle seems like the towniest town that ever towned, and this case misrepresents him entirely. I'm not sure why people are letting this go.
He votes him based on the fact that Axle has been flying under the radar, and that he supposedly calls me a lurker? (hint: he's not referring to me)
That's his entire reasoning. The whole thing in that one post.

Why is Sylencia getting away with that exactly?
I mean I'm not a fan of Axle right now because he's tunneled me for about half the game but at least he's doing it in a reasonable way' I don't see scum pushing a read like he has with the analysis that he's done, and I've played with scum Axle before.

Now I have to get to Axle's case on me....sigh.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 15:44 GMT
#1088
On June 13 2013 22:18 AxleGreaser wrote:
@everyone Time is passing. We need to have some wagons of Justice.

Here is mine

##Vote GravityMan toLynch

The case is not that hard but there are potentially lots of details.

The case on blazing hand is wrong and weak, and making a bad case is not scum indicative.

What is scum indicative is trying, to manufacture one, by provoking the responses that you need in advance of having the read.

GM has been trying to provoke BH for rather a long time.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18859699
read this post and decide if you think that was provocative.

GM describes the purpose of that as http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18875432
"For the record, I wasn't trying to be inflammatory necessarily with those questions, I was trying just to see what I could get BH to say and talk about regarding that topic."

Go read the above post, he wanted him to answer that why? Was it inflammatory.
if there were no examples of what he wanted to talk about why the asking?


WHy was he trying to lead him places?
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18875124
"There was no grand plan behind it, I suppose you could call it a combination of both. I wasn't exactly sure how BH would answer the questions if at all so it was more that I was trying to lead him in a direction where I could show the thread exactly how he is prone to act in certain situations."

prone means they have not happened yet. if they had happened you could just point to those, no need to show the thread what BH is prone to if he has not done it?

Why was he trying to lead him places? before the case existed.

Bh has in fact for Bh been very restrained. BH was even called out by hapa for being less strident than normal D1


+ Show Spoiler [some more of the details] +

As it is spread out in the thread because it took me a while to get the answers.

I asked some questions here.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18868046
I didnt put an @Gravman in so perhaps he didnt notice it was meant for him.
He didnt answer.

I then posted this
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18869999
and this
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18870001

Finally this
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18872888



Axle, my problem here is you are also misrepresenting everything I do.
The reason I was trying to 'lead' BH to talk about what I wanted him to is the artificial restraints I put on myself. Without the ability to talk about his meta I was forced to get him to talk about how he might act in certain situations so I could then bring it up as an example. I already had in my mind the idea that he was scum here but I wanted to try and flesh out more evidence. Yes it's 'leading the witness,' but it's for a good cause: getting my scumread lynched.
You can call that a scum agenda if you want, but it's not.
On June 13 2013 23:03 AxleGreaser wrote:
This post is also interesting
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 01:56 GravityMan wrote:
What makes no sense to me now is how there are only two votes cast and GoodKarma is going to be lynched.
Clearly if it walks like a scum, talks like a scum, and multiple people suspect him like a scum....

BH is still just creating shit about him and Oats.
All he does is counter-accuse people who 'dare' accuse him of being scum because he knows he can get away with it.
He's provided no evidence as to why he thinks I'm scum. STILL.

I have no idea why people are still hesitating on this.
Meta-analysis would be SO GOOD here but I promised myself I wouldn't. Someone else could take a crack at it though if they wanted. It's pretty obvious.

BH you must be absolutely furious that I'm going to get you lynched today, but 'jubs gonna jub,' amirite?

Now I'm supposed to respond to Axle 'cause he's been asking me for a while so let me get to that, and then I'm around for discussion and such.


That makes sense if you have just been discussing it in the scum QT.
and now you are suppsoed to respond to Axle seeing as he just wont let the question go.... <<< wine that is easy to drink

I have tried to find how a towny might have been thinking that would then have them write that. <<< wine that is too hard to drink


As far as not responding to you immediately, I don't really see how that's scum indicative either. This is confiramtion bias and you are simply believing what fits your read of me. I simply said it because it was the truth, and upon looking back through the thread I realized I missed some queries you had of me. Nothing more.

Vote me if you must Axle, but I would recommend you at least look into who else in this game is scum for once, because if I eventually flip town you are going to be completely lost, especially if you think BH is town.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 15:54 GMT
#1090
On June 14 2013 00:48 Sylencia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 14 2013 00:38 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 20:57 Sylencia wrote:
On June 13 2013 09:07 goodkarma wrote:
Catching up with the thread now. The first thing I'd like to address is this Syl post:

On June 12 2013 22:35 Sylencia wrote:
On June 12 2013 16:47 goodkarma wrote:
On June 12 2013 16:15 Sylencia wrote:
@GK: Why are you suggesting to waste a dayvig shot on me when the only reason you have is that I've been lurkier than others? You literally say before your 'analysis' on me that you think BH is scum and yet somehow I'm a more decent target for shooting? Ok..


I said you were flying under the radar, and that when you are here you seem to be content to agree with a stance here and there and not really add anything. It's not about your "lurkiness," but what you aren't doing when you are here.

I'm assuming from what Vayne has said he plans to use his vig shot today. Therefore, we need to determine two scum candidates for this cycle.


None of this really is that difficult to understand. While you're here, would you mind providing an opinion on anything?

Or more specifically, perhaps elaborate on your top scumread?


If Vayne wants to use it as a shot, why aren't we lynching a top suspect first, and shooting during the night? Unless there's some sort of claim that can only be checked by death, I don't see a reason why it should be rushed so. (I'm not reading the power wrong, right?)

My top read at the time you posted was ShiaoPi, as I said I agreed with a lot of the points made by Stutters. I made that clear end of last night. I haven't fully digested ShiaoPi's response yet, but if I'm wrong on that account, my previous statement feels good:

On June 12 2013 01:24 Sylencia wrote:
@Oats: If GK doesn't have anything in the next 24 hours, I'd be willing to put money on a lurker scum team - something like him + stutters (maybe +1 if there's a third). The only one that sticks out is Blazinghand for causing chaos for no reason but idk if that's his playstyle - please fill me in there. Reasoning is everything has run too smoothly and there haven't felt like there have been any sort of misdirections so far. We had a blue claim on day 1, so having some sort of mayor takeover would be a pretty good idea in Day 1 for scum to take, as they can reliably target Vayne with no consequence. If he dies, he dies. If he doesn't, everyone just says someone protected him, and no one suspects the mayor. None of this happened, so unless Hapa is scum, everyone active seems town. Any problem with my reasoning?


For catching up, only having an analysis of 4 players (2 of which seem like afterthoughts), and a weak scumread based a lot on meta is pretty bad. I've heard from BH enough that you have slow starts, but idk define slow start, how long is it going to take to get the ball rolling, and out of all the players how is it that you've got thoughts on 2 lurky players over someone with a lot more points to consider such as Grav/WoS and Oats?

About GravityMan - I am also missing what is obvious about him that makes him scum according to BH, but the only point i"ll take from it is that he is the only one who disrupted Hapa's mayoral campaign with a sort of smear campaign against him. You can make reasons for why he did it if he's scum (potentially take power, and make hapa a suspect), but since that failed, would scum have chosen Hapa as the target of the NK over Vayne to clearly show that? Food for thought, seeing as that was the only real 'major' event that happened regarding mayoral campaigns.


First of all, the entire point of mentioning a good vigishot for Vayne is we should be treating this cycle like a doublelynch, as Hapa originally suggested. Even if Vayne opts to wait until the night to shoot, by discussing this now we have that much more information to go on in later cycles. For that reason, everyone should be doing this.

So you can't be bothered to review the latest posting of your top scumread, and you fall back on proposing a lurker scumteam if your top read convinces you he's town??? Explain to me how that isn't scum-motivated behavior?

Further, I provided a read on Grav in the post you're referencing, so it's clear you aren't reading the thread very closely. This is the kind of disinterest I'd expect from scum. I still believe you'd be a good vigi shot.


The fact I can actually rely on something which I believed to have been true from the night before shows the actual lack of contribution that you had brought to the table to this point. If I say you're scummy during N1, and you do nothing to change that view in D2, you're saying it's scum oriented for me to say I still think you're scum? Also yes, turns out I ended up thinking you did an analysis on GK which is yourself (it made perfect sense at the time somehow -_-).

In any case:

- Axle: How has this guy been able to fly under the radar this entire game? As far as I've read there's been very little suspicious cast on him, he's been questioned about his reads in which he's tip toed around the problem:

On June 13 2013 08:23 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:59 GravityMan wrote:
Axle, who do YOU think is scum?
We haven't had very many reads from you this game at all, just analysis and questions.


There is the obvious list, of people who have not contributed much.
There is the obvious list of turning Hapas list upside down and saying that.

One thing i dont want to do is get all in a low post count townies face, and shut them down.
So I wont be doing that.

The least clear intention I have is you. I see what "looks" like a tendency to Lynch BH for being BH.
I see posts that could well inflame him and make his ego come to the fore as town or scum.
This could have been their intention, or not.


It alludes to him suspecting GM (pretty much confirmed to be saying he suspects GM next post), but he doesn't push it at all. He said he doesn't want to shut a lurker down, but GM is far from a lurker, so why wouldn't he push a case there?

If there's someone in this game who is a prime example of being neutral on pretty much everything, it's Axle.

BH has been doing a lot of talking without a lot of pushing, but I'm pretty sure that Axle is a better option over BH. After a slow first half of Day 1, I think if BH was scum he'd easily adapt into a less active role in the game. He brings up points I don't think anyone else would be doing otherwise (possible VA fakeclaim etc.) and just by doing that I feel it's enough to justify keeping him around for longer. Without BH this town will be a dead town, with little to no deviation in thoughts.

GK I'm still willing to put my vote on him, idk how slow a start can be, but even his vote on BH didn't have any substance to it.

This is terrible honestly.
Axle seems like the towniest town that ever towned, and this case misrepresents him entirely. I'm not sure why people are letting this go.
He votes him based on the fact that Axle has been flying under the radar, and that he supposedly calls me a lurker? (hint: he's not referring to me)
That's his entire reasoning. The whole thing in that one post.

Why is Sylencia getting away with that exactly?
I mean I'm not a fan of Axle right now because he's tunneled me for about half the game but at least he's doing it in a reasonable way' I don't see scum pushing a read like he has with the analysis that he's done, and I've played with scum Axle before.

Now I have to get to Axle's case on me....sigh.


I completely understand he wasn't referring to you. I explained that because the lurker statement was irrelevant to you, why would he have to hold back on unleashing any sort of case on you? You don't feel like he was holding back at all when he made that post?

Yes, hence I was asking why he didn't just come out and call me scum instead of pussyfooting around it.
I don't consider that scummy since it was pretty damn obvious where he was going with it. He didn't hold back any case, his whole tunnel has pretty much been the same case.

Why give up your push so easily Sylencia? Is Axle scum or not?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 16:07 GMT
#1093
Your list seems all kinds of fucked up to me.
Why is BH so towny?
How the crap is Stutters townier than Vayne or Shiao?
Like...I just don't follow this.

I'm pretty sure you've moved up to my next target after BH though instead of Stutters.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 17:09 GMT
#1098
I don't like your new 'I'm mad as hell and I'm not taking it anymore' persona. It's not getting you anywhere.
Tone it down, broski.

I originally had you as scum because your return to the thread when Vayne was trying to fake you out or some shit looked absolutely awful. Like, telling someone you'd lynch them after you're dead is hilariously bad. Not a scumslip I guess but it clearly showed that you were rattled. 'Survival instincts' is more a scum thing than a town thing.

Now what makes YOU think Shiao is scum?
On June 13 2013 13:16 Stutters695 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 12:47 goodkarma wrote:
@Stutters:

Your assessment of Vayne isn't entirely unreasonable, but the aggressive fashion in which you did it feels off to me. Also if this was what you were thinking, why didn't it come up much sooner?

On June 13 2013 08:04 Stutters695 wrote:
I was thinking at the hallway point of the day but given how little interaction he's had period a flip of either type really wouldn't guarantee any info. It also lets us plan around worst case scenario (3 scum team) and a mislynch today+nk+vig shot would knock us down to six total which would be endgame.

I think we can hit scum today but I'd rather plan around the worst case, especially since GK is so coinflippy.


Stutters, would you mind briefly explaining how as town you would propose I get vigie'd if it indeed is true that we'd be at endgame tomorrow in your above scenario? You mention me to be coinflippy, yet were anxious earlier to vig me anyway... This doesn't make much sense to me if indeed the situation is as dire as you describe it.

Finally, Shao was your top scumread, but that was quite a while ago. Is he still your top scumread now?

By paragraph

Because before he was mayor there wasn't anything he could do that would objectively hurt. Threatening to vig anyone for any reason except a solid scumread is retarded and incredibly anti-town and worst case could cost us the game if he actually shoots. It's simply I felt his vig threats were causing were significantly more danger to town than the possible derailing of discussion by calling him out on it.

This is why I wanted you to be viged after the flip. If it's town we re-evaluate our options and determine if it's an acceptable risk or abstain. If we hit scum then a vig on you (considering you were borderline worthless to that point ) really wouldn't have hurt us since we had to deal with you at some point.

I'm honestly not sure on him anymore, I need to brood on it some. A big portion of my case was how he handled jampis lynch, but because I was doing it over filters I didn't realize that he had voted minutes to the lynch. I'm still leaning scum on him but I'm not comfortable pushing it without looking into it more after I'm off work.

He has done a shit ton more analysis and put more effort into the game than you have. Your point regarding his reaction to jampi has some merit but that's all you've offered. His reads coincide somewhat with mine, and while on its own that isn't exactly a towntell, if he's helping me lynch BH I sure as hell am not going to turn on him and call him scum.
You, Sylencia and BH are all on my list right now, and as I mentioned, Sylencia's recent posting has put him higher on the scumlist than you.

Anything else, good sir? Anyone you're going to be voting for today?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 17:16 GMT
#1102
On June 14 2013 02:06 AxleGreaser wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 14 2013 00:44 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 22:18 AxleGreaser wrote:
@everyone Time is passing. We need to have some wagons of Justice.

Here is mine

##Vote GravityMan toLynch

The case is not that hard but there are potentially lots of details.

The case on blazing hand is wrong and weak, and making a bad case is not scum indicative.

What is scum indicative is trying, to manufacture one, by provoking the responses that you need in advance of having the read.

GM has been trying to provoke BH for rather a long time.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18859699
read this post and decide if you think that was provocative.

GM describes the purpose of that as http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18875432
"For the record, I wasn't trying to be inflammatory necessarily with those questions, I was trying just to see what I could get BH to say and talk about regarding that topic."

Go read the above post, he wanted him to answer that why? Was it inflammatory.
if there were no examples of what he wanted to talk about why the asking?


Why was he trying to lead him places?
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18875124
"There was no grand plan behind it, I suppose you could call it a combination of both. I wasn't exactly sure how BH would answer the questions if at all so it was more that I was trying to lead him in a direction where I could show the thread exactly how he is prone to act in certain situations."

prone means they have not happened yet. if they had happened you could just point to those, no need to show the thread what BH is prone to if he has not done it?

Why was he trying to lead him places? before the case existed.

Bh has in fact for Bh been very restrained. BH was even called out by hapa for being less strident than normal D1


+ Show Spoiler [some more of the details] +

As it is spread out in the thread because it took me a while to get the answers.

I asked some questions here.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18868046
I didnt put an @Gravman in so perhaps he didnt notice it was meant for him.
He didnt answer.

I then posted this
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18869999
and this
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18870001

Finally this
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18872888



Axle, my problem here is you are also misrepresenting everything I do.
The reason I was trying to 'lead' BH to talk about what I wanted him to is the artificial restraints I put on myself. Without the ability to talk about his meta I was forced to get him to talk about how he might act in certain situations so I could then bring it up as an example. I already had in my mind the idea that he was scum here but I wanted to try and flesh out more evidence. Yes it's 'leading the witness,' but it's for a good cause: getting my scumread lynched.
You can call that a scum agenda if you want, but it's not.
On June 13 2013 23:03 AxleGreaser wrote:
This post is also interesting
On June 13 2013 01:56 GravityMan wrote:
What makes no sense to me now is how there are only two votes cast and GoodKarma is going to be lynched.
Clearly if it walks like a scum, talks like a scum, and multiple people suspect him like a scum....

BH is still just creating shit about him and Oats.
All he does is counter-accuse people who 'dare' accuse him of being scum because he knows he can get away with it.
He's provided no evidence as to why he thinks I'm scum. STILL.

I have no idea why people are still hesitating on this.
Meta-analysis would be SO GOOD here but I promised myself I wouldn't. Someone else could take a crack at it though if they wanted. It's pretty obvious.

BH you must be absolutely furious that I'm going to get you lynched today, but 'jubs gonna jub,' amirite?

Now I'm supposed to respond to Axle 'cause he's been asking me for a while so let me get to that, and then I'm around for discussion and such.


That makes sense if you have just been discussing it in the scum QT.
and now you are supposed to respond to Axle seeing as he just wont let the question go.... <<< wine that is easy to drink

I have tried to find how a towny might have been thinking that would then have them write that. <<< wine that is too hard to drink


As far as not responding to you immediately, I don't really see how that's scum indicative either. This is confiramtion bias and you are simply believing what fits your read of me. I simply said it because it was the truth, and upon looking back through the thread I realized I missed some queries you had of me. Nothing more.

Vote me if you must Axle, but I would recommend you at least look into who else in this game is scum for once, because if I eventually flip town you are going to be completely lost, especially if you think BH is town.



While the delay was concerning especially when repeated

You appeared to miss the point so I adjusted the bolding in the quote.
Gravman Said: "Now I'm supposed to respond to Axle 'cause he's been asking me for a while so let me get to that, and then I'm around for discussion and such."
My problem was that you referred to it as 'supposed' to the use of that word seems wrong for town player acting alone, but makes sense if it is as a result of discussion elsewhere such as in the scum QT.



Also This is your case (I believe)
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18867420

What kind of answers could have been given to these questions that would supported your case.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18859699





Oh I see, so you think I scumslipped, huh? Ok, good luck with that. Haha you picked a point that even BH wouldn't support.

As for the 'fishing for answers,' honestly....I guess I don't have a sufficient way to prove this to you but you'll see in postgame or after I flip---you're looking way too deeply into this as though I had some mega overarching agenda here. With my questioning about his stance towards Vayne, had I been able to use meta I would shove it in his face that both Vayne AND I had beaten him in Les Mafia. I knew personally the only reason he thought at that point that Vayne was a good player was because of Les Mafia, which is a terrible reason. Scum play does not equal town play, and a SINGLE game of good play is not a good example to overall good play. I was trying to make it evident to the thread that BH's initial reasoning to calling VA a good mayoral choice was inherently flawed and his trumped up ego, thinking "well, he beat me, the best player of all time last game, so he MUST be good" is making the decisions for him. As I've pointed out, when dealing with players supposedly better than him he will suppress the egotistical nature but when dealing with anyone else it comes out to play. He uses it as it suits him.

Axle I'm willing to continue to follow your endless questions until the cows come home, but is it ever going to stop? Are you ever going to contribute to the thread in any other way? It honestly worries me because I know I'm town and I'm pretty sure you are, and this is wasting a shot ton of time that could be put to more productive use. What can I do to get you to at least look elsewhere even if you keep your vote on me?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 17:17 GMT
#1103
On June 14 2013 02:15 ShiaoPi wrote:
also axle is town after i filtered him. While there is sometimes lack of comittment his effort and analysis scream town to me.
I mean it took my ages judt to get thriugh that filter. He has been active and helpful. he is pretty much town

Yup, this.

Shiao, who else is scum?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 17:40 GMT
#1110
On June 14 2013 02:34 AxleGreaser wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 14 2013 02:16 GravityMan wrote:
On June 14 2013 02:06 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 14 2013 00:44 GravityMan wrote:
On June 13 2013 22:18 AxleGreaser wrote:
@everyone Time is passing. We need to have some wagons of Justice.

Here is mine

##Vote GravityMan toLynch

The case is not that hard but there are potentially lots of details.

The case on blazing hand is wrong and weak, and making a bad case is not scum indicative.

What is scum indicative is trying, to manufacture one, by provoking the responses that you need in advance of having the read.

GM has been trying to provoke BH for rather a long time.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18859699
read this post and decide if you think that was provocative.

GM describes the purpose of that as http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18875432
"For the record, I wasn't trying to be inflammatory necessarily with those questions, I was trying just to see what I could get BH to say and talk about regarding that topic."

Go read the above post, he wanted him to answer that why? Was it inflammatory.
if there were no examples of what he wanted to talk about why the asking?


Why was he trying to lead him places?
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18875124
"There was no grand plan behind it, I suppose you could call it a combination of both. I wasn't exactly sure how BH would answer the questions if at all so it was more that I was trying to lead him in a direction where I could show the thread exactly how he is prone to act in certain situations."

prone means they have not happened yet. if they had happened you could just point to those, no need to show the thread what BH is prone to if he has not done it?

Why was he trying to lead him places? before the case existed.

Bh has in fact for Bh been very restrained. BH was even called out by hapa for being less strident than normal D1


+ Show Spoiler [some more of the details] +

As it is spread out in the thread because it took me a while to get the answers.

I asked some questions here.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18868046
I didnt put an @Gravman in so perhaps he didnt notice it was meant for him.
He didnt answer.

I then posted this
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18869999
and this
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18870001

Finally this
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18872888



Axle, my problem here is you are also misrepresenting everything I do.
The reason I was trying to 'lead' BH to talk about what I wanted him to is the artificial restraints I put on myself. Without the ability to talk about his meta I was forced to get him to talk about how he might act in certain situations so I could then bring it up as an example. I already had in my mind the idea that he was scum here but I wanted to try and flesh out more evidence. Yes it's 'leading the witness,' but it's for a good cause: getting my scumread lynched.
You can call that a scum agenda if you want, but it's not.
On June 13 2013 23:03 AxleGreaser wrote:
This post is also interesting
On June 13 2013 01:56 GravityMan wrote:
What makes no sense to me now is how there are only two votes cast and GoodKarma is going to be lynched.
Clearly if it walks like a scum, talks like a scum, and multiple people suspect him like a scum....

BH is still just creating shit about him and Oats.
All he does is counter-accuse people who 'dare' accuse him of being scum because he knows he can get away with it.
He's provided no evidence as to why he thinks I'm scum. STILL.

I have no idea why people are still hesitating on this.
Meta-analysis would be SO GOOD here but I promised myself I wouldn't. Someone else could take a crack at it though if they wanted. It's pretty obvious.

BH you must be absolutely furious that I'm going to get you lynched today, but 'jubs gonna jub,' amirite?

Now I'm supposed to respond to Axle 'cause he's been asking me for a while so let me get to that, and then I'm around for discussion and such.


That makes sense if you have just been discussing it in the scum QT.
and now you are supposed to respond to Axle seeing as he just wont let the question go.... <<< wine that is easy to drink

I have tried to find how a towny might have been thinking that would then have them write that. <<< wine that is too hard to drink


As far as not responding to you immediately, I don't really see how that's scum indicative either. This is confiramtion bias and you are simply believing what fits your read of me. I simply said it because it was the truth, and upon looking back through the thread I realized I missed some queries you had of me. Nothing more.

Vote me if you must Axle, but I would recommend you at least look into who else in this game is scum for once, because if I eventually flip town you are going to be completely lost, especially if you think BH is town.



While the delay was concerning especially when repeated

You appeared to miss the point so I adjusted the bolding in the quote.
Gravman Said: "Now I'm supposed to respond to Axle 'cause he's been asking me for a while so let me get to that, and then I'm around for discussion and such."
My problem was that you referred to it as 'supposed' to the use of that word seems wrong for town player acting alone, but makes sense if it is as a result of discussion elsewhere such as in the scum QT.



Also This is your case (I believe)
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18867420

What kind of answers could have been given to these questions that would supported your case.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18859699





Oh I see, so you think I scumslipped, huh? Ok, good luck with that. Haha you picked a point that even BH wouldn't support.

As for the 'fishing for answers,' honestly....I guess I don't have a sufficient way to prove this to you but you'll see in postgame or after I flip---you're looking way too deeply into this as though I had some mega overarching agenda here. With my questioning about his stance towards Vayne, had I been able to use meta I would shove it in his face that both Vayne AND I had beaten him in Les Mafia. I knew personally the only reason he thought at that point that Vayne was a good player was because of Les Mafia, which is a terrible reason. Scum play does not equal town play, and a SINGLE game of good play is not a good example to overall good play. I was trying to make it evident to the thread that BH's initial reasoning to calling VA a good mayoral choice was inherently flawed and his trumped up ego, thinking "well, he beat me, the best player of all time last game, so he MUST be good" is making the decisions for him. As I've pointed out, when dealing with players supposedly better than him he will suppress the egotistical nature but when dealing with anyone else it comes out to play. He uses it as it suits him.

Axle I'm willing to continue to follow your endless questions until the cows come home, but is it ever going to stop? Are you ever going to contribute to the thread in any other way? It honestly worries me because I know I'm town and I'm pretty sure you are, and this is wasting a shot ton of time that could be put to more productive use. What can I do to get you to at least look elsewhere even if you keep your vote on me?


Find one of your scum buddies and lynch him?

Alright Axle, I've changed my mind. I can see you're not going to be of any assistance today so I'm done with you. If you choose to continue to push me, so be it, but I will not be contributing to the discussion any more. I have been nothing but forthcoming in every answer I've given you and tried to help you see that I'm not scum but since you absolutely refuse to believe it, and seem to refuse to want to do anything else at all, I'm not going to waste my time that is better spent getting scum lynched.
If you choose to follow another line of questioning at the same time I will gladly participate but I am finished entertaining your ideas about me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 18:06 GMT
#1115
On June 14 2013 03:00 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 14 2013 02:58 ShiaoPi wrote:
On June 14 2013 02:55 Blazinghand wrote:
Hello friends. I'm back from dinner and ready to party. I suppose a VA lynch isn't possible today because he'll pardon himself; that's okay, we can still lynch GM.

##unvote
##vote GM


Read properly, he is lynchimmune for this cycle.
If you are ready to party tell me why GM is scum


usual stuff, lying, weird questions, not hunting scum. I like that point about him prodding me into shitting up the thread. very clever.

Not hunting scum.
HAHAHA
And you have been.


I dare you BH, get me lynched today.
See where it gets you.
I'm out for a while. I've already spent an exhausting amount of time defending myself to Axle, I'm not getting into a shitfest with BH himself. If you want to let him sway you while I'm gone then go right ahead. I'll be back before deadline.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 18:09 GMT
#1117
No, you know what, wait.
How DARE you say I haven't been hunting scum.
What the actual fuck.
I have interacted with everybody in this damn thread for days, given reads, and been completely transparent with all of my thoughts since revealing myself, including those thoughts I had BEFORE revealing myself.
What the FUCK have YOU done?


If you guys allow yourselves to be swayed by BH in the last 7 or so hours of this day, you guys will overtake the Les Mafia town as worst lynching ever.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 18:11 GMT
#1120
On June 14 2013 03:09 Blazinghand wrote:
I think GM relying on things like the fact that he was roleplaying or whatever isn't a real explanation. Also, him talking about what he's "supposed" to do isn't scumslip, but rather an indicator of scum mindset. Although anyone could say that, it's more likely that scum says that than town because the idea of "supposed" to do something, of needing to fit into a role, isn't what town's about. It's not damning evidence like AG things it is-- but it is evidence. Also GM's decision not to interact with Axle after having his arguments shot down pretty hard is a pretty classic way of opting out of legitimate discourse and fits with his weird questioning of me during D1. GM's goal here isn't to be townie, it's to appear townie, to go through the motions that townies go through.

Right, because it was that ONE final question he asked that did it for me.
Not the 500 I answered before.

Weak man, fucking weak.
I hate dealing with you in these games so much; I really wish I didn't blow my goddamn cover so I didn't have to deal with you like this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 18:13 GMT
#1122
K actually have to go now. I'm not even going to read this thread from my phone until I get back or it's going to make me rage.
I'll be back before lynch and catch up then.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 20:06 GMT
#1134
Funny, I was going to post some music myself as it popped on my playlist in the car.


I realize I may not be around until after deadline as I have to watch the rest of our recorded Masterchef from last night after my guy goes to sleep so I'll try to pop in and out sporadically.

BH, you say I only get angry in my single scum game, huh? Have we forgotten what happens when you base all of your ideas on someone's play from only one game?
Tell me, did I or did I not get angry when you were scum and I was town in Carnival Cruise, too?

Shiao I'm honestly shocked that BH showing up, giving a couple weak reads and then fucking off is enough for you to unvote. What a shining example of towniness, that BH.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 20:08 GMT
#1136
VA, if you show up, I'd like to make a request of you.
If you still don't have any super strong townreads by the end of today to pass off the mayorship to, and if I am set to be lynched, I want you to shoot me before the day is out so you can get BH lynched.

There is absolutely no way in hell BH is town; this is not just an example of two townies going at it. I am 100% sure of this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 20:09 GMT
#1137
On June 14 2013 05:07 Blazinghand wrote:
Man hapa really should have shot you

I think that statement I mentioned while still under persona still applies.
What was it again?

Oh yeah.

Tough shit.

You're going down, scum.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 20:13 GMT
#1140
VA do NOT shoot me immediately. That gives BH enough time to talk himself out of a lynch. Give it an hour or so before the lynch.

I think I already see how this is going down, too.
Since Oats is Oats and for some inexplicable reason thinks BH is town, he will be voting me, then scum Sylencia will be safe to jump on the wagon too and vote me.
It's going to come down to Shiao and Stutters, and I don't know whether Stutters is scum or not.

I don't even think a 1 for 1 trade is optimal for us right now either but I just don't think I can convince enough people in here otherwise.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 20:25 GMT
#1145
On June 14 2013 05:22 VayneAuthority wrote:
If one of you gets lynched, I am shooting the other after immediately if the lynched is town, I think we can agree on that.

Deal.
I'll have to accept the 1 for 1 right now even if it may not be quite optimal...thought it would be better if you lynch BH first so the shot doesn't have to go to waste in that case but yeah.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 20:26 GMT
#1147
On June 14 2013 05:24 Blazinghand wrote:
Why

Oh wait, you don't like this? Afraid all of a sudden?

What's wrong with your case BH?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 20:27 GMT
#1148
On June 14 2013 05:26 Blazinghand wrote:
or if GM flips town, does that make his case against me somehow good? Like, basically what you're saying is you aren't gonna comment on the merits of my case against GM (or vice versa) and just shoot the other one?

The point is my cases of had complete merit against you all game. Axle makes a point in that in order to smurf I was forced to be slightly misleading but he discounts the town perspective of all that I've done.
You haven't offered anything that hasn't been instantly refuted.
You have still done NOTHING.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 20:31 GMT
#1155
On June 14 2013 05:28 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 14 2013 05:26 GravityMan wrote:
On June 14 2013 05:24 Blazinghand wrote:
Why

Oh wait, you don't like this? Afraid all of a sudden?

What's wrong with your case BH?


The point is I don't think you're 100% scum. I'd rather lynch VA today, but that's simply not possible. And what happens if I get lynched and flip town, and it turns out that somehow you're town and VA just shoots you saying "I guess BH was actually town, he must be right"

the point is, VA can't just do that without commenting on the objective merits of both our cases. he can't say the only thing holding him back from shooting either of us is the fact that (cases not withstanding) he's not sure if our cases are town or scum motivated.

VA is basically confirmed scum.

I hate to consider this but now I have to think.
He is certainly not 'confirmed' anything, but you have a point.

The fact remains that I don't believe we're both town though. I can even tell by the way people have voted today. If we were both town then scum would be completely content to sit back and let the sparks fly but there have been other topics of conversation all day, and not a whole lot of blind sheeping of either of us. Because I know that I am town that still makes me believe that you must be scum.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 20:32 GMT
#1156
On June 14 2013 05:30 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 14 2013 05:29 VayneAuthority wrote:
The fact that there are people voting along the lines of GM/BH gives me good hope that one of you is scum though. If neither of you was scum there wouldn't be as much discussion and they would just let us implode. So I feel pretty good about one of you being scum/3rd party


scum wouldn't be able to distinguish "3p vs townie" from "townie vs townie" so really you only feel good about one of us being scum. and even so that's shit logic.

lol apparently VA and I have the same shit logic.
Guess we're both scum and GG, right?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 20:36 GMT
#1158
Oh and by the way Vayne, Hapa's top scumread D1 was jampi.
Just sayin'. He's good but this game what we saw of him he didn't really get us anywhere.
Sheeping dead people doesn't always work.
If people had sheeped BH in Les Mafia they still would have lost because he though GK was scum.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 20:39 GMT
#1161
On June 14 2013 05:36 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 14 2013 05:31 GravityMan wrote:
On June 14 2013 05:28 Blazinghand wrote:
On June 14 2013 05:26 GravityMan wrote:
On June 14 2013 05:24 Blazinghand wrote:
Why

Oh wait, you don't like this? Afraid all of a sudden?

What's wrong with your case BH?


The point is I don't think you're 100% scum. I'd rather lynch VA today, but that's simply not possible. And what happens if I get lynched and flip town, and it turns out that somehow you're town and VA just shoots you saying "I guess BH was actually town, he must be right"

the point is, VA can't just do that without commenting on the objective merits of both our cases. he can't say the only thing holding him back from shooting either of us is the fact that (cases not withstanding) he's not sure if our cases are town or scum motivated.

VA is basically confirmed scum.

I hate to consider this but now I have to think.
He is certainly not 'confirmed' anything, but you have a point.

The fact remains that I don't believe we're both town though. I can even tell by the way people have voted today. If we were both town then scum would be completely content to sit back and let the sparks fly but there have been other topics of conversation all day, and not a whole lot of blind sheeping of either of us. Because I know that I am town that still makes me believe that you must be scum.


This is definitely shit logic, given that half the thread is lurking and VA has basically been sitting on his ass.

You have zero right to say anything about lurking. You have done dick all for most of the game. Yes VA hasn't done shit either but you have no right to call him out on that.

So tell me, did we cook up that shit logic together in the scum QT?

As far as faking the claim that's a stupid gamble to take as scum and from what you know of VA's scumgame, isn't he better than that?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 20:42 GMT
#1164
On June 14 2013 05:40 VayneAuthority wrote:
yawn, BH is the reason I don't give a shit about this game. He's just unpleasant to play with. Can't wait to shoot him tbh.

I would say just fucking do it, but that doesn't seem like a good idea since the thread is so divided atm. I at least would want to show people they were wrong about me before shooting him, or give them the chance to see that for themselves and lynch him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 20:46 GMT
#1167
If I get the chance between now and deadline I'll try to expand upon the point I was making about what scum BH's goals are in the thread and when.

You'll notice now that there is not a 'clear' mislynch option he is actually forced to come back and try a little rather than simply be content to shit things up. He obviously had no reason to come back and do anything at all until recently because he is set to be lynched. He was content to continue doing nothing until the wagon on himself picked up steam.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 13 2013 21:29 GMT
#1176
On June 14 2013 06:01 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 14 2013 05:55 VayneAuthority wrote:
At this point you are being lynched so I won't even have to shoot you. I will do the courtesy of shooting GM instead if that is what you wish if you are truly town.


jesus christ you don't really get it do you

shoot whoever you think is the scummiest. do it now.

Remember this?
No.
On June 14 2013 05:46 VayneAuthority wrote:
I would just do it if I didn't care about other people's playing experiences, its not really fair to the other people putting in effort like oats/axle/shaio/etc.

Hopefully they decide on a lynch soon.

Let the rest of the thread show up and we can all decide what to do about the shot. If people agree to take the shot early, then let it be done. Haste is not going to get us anywhere.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 00:01 GMT
#1180
On June 14 2013 07:10 WaveofShadow wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 14 2013 06:48 Blazinghand wrote:
It's like blindingly obvious that VA is going out of his way to not lead or to contribute thoughts that are from himself at all. If I could vote to lynch VA today I would.

So then you think VA and I are a likely scumteam?

Quoted for filter.

It's getting pretty near to deadline and I may or may not be around.

Can we try to come to some sort of consolidation so we can figure out what to do with the shot?
This is a little bit ridiculous. The fuck is everyone?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 00:06 GMT
#1183
Is there anything you want to talk about?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 00:09 GMT
#1185
On June 14 2013 09:06 Blazinghand wrote:
whatever VA does with his bullet, hold him accountable. dont' let him say "BH flipped town so i shoot GM with no explanation huehueheue" or something similar. a

I will keep this in mind if necessary.
I don't think it IS necessary, but I'm sure if the positions were reversed you'd think the same thing.
The issue I see is if somehow you flip town (again, don't see it) then anything I say will appear as though I am 'weaseling my way out of the shot.' Of course then the issue becomes if you're town then he shoots me and I'm town, then VA is fucked.

And if somehow we're all town then gg, lurkers win.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 00:10 GMT
#1186
I dunno BH like...the stuff about him you've said makes sense objectively but I just find it SO unlikely he fakeclaimed that early.

I've derped some claims in my time and people called me bad for it and tried to lynch me as well but in the end I was always telling the truth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 00:15 GMT
#1187
Gotta go for a little but I should be back another time before lynch.
BH reads outside of me and VA? I'll give mine as well in case the tide turns when I'm not around; Sylencia and Stutters in that order.
If Axle is scum we're fucked imo.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 01:27 GMT
#1194
On June 14 2013 10:25 WaveofShadow wrote:
Um.
We really need to consolidate one wday or another or there's liable to be some shenanigans.

What's going on shiao, stutters?
Phonepoosting so I can't doo muxch

Fk me
Qouted for filter.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 01:28 GMT
#1196
Syl scum. We lynch him tomorrow
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 02:27 GMT
#1214
His last words, screamed out, were “You idiots didn’t even let me finish my dinner!”

Dat flavour.

Well son of a bitch, I really did think I had it without the meta. BH, mislynched twice in 2 games, methinks it's time to pick up your play a bit maybe? If you had played like Les there is no way I would have stayed on. Anyway gg.

+ Show Spoiler +
I also think we need to agree to a truce in the next game we play together or something.


Now as for the shot, obviously the fight for my life is going to look bad, so I leave it up to the town (or technically VA). You guys can either listen to what BH said and not take the shot or you can get rid of me now and remove all doubt. Either way it's pretty clear we're facing lurk city here. I honestly wonder what VA will end up deciding in the end because if he shoots me, I flip green and he looks awful. If he's town that's a shit position to be in, and if he's scum I can't honestly say if he'll take the shot and risk the vengeance of the town.

I also think it's absolutely batshit retarded that nobody was around at deadline. I was even trying to fucking phonepost so I could keep tabs on what was happening. On one hand I feel like i'ts a shit ton of lurker scum we've got to deal with, but then oftentimes in a situation like this when town starts to lose this handily it's because scum activity >>>town activity.

Either way town needs to stop fucking lurking if they want to win this game.

Now do I live or die?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 05:38 GMT
#1228
On June 14 2013 13:23 AxleGreaser wrote:
@Gravman
Please note I have read all of BHs end of day posts .
BH flipped green is good player, so they have weight with me.
I am starting my thoughts again as best I can.


Earlier you made the post below.
What I want you to do is think back and explain why you posted this.
What was your purpose and intent.
How did it benefit town, who needed at that time to know you thought that?

+ Show Spoiler [your post] +

On June 14 2013 00:38 GravityMan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2013 20:57 Sylencia wrote:
On June 13 2013 09:07 goodkarma wrote:
Catching up with the thread now. The first thing I'd like to address is this Syl post:

On June 12 2013 22:35 Sylencia wrote:
On June 12 2013 16:47 goodkarma wrote:
On June 12 2013 16:15 Sylencia wrote:
@GK: Why are you suggesting to waste a dayvig shot on me when the only reason you have is that I've been lurkier than others? You literally say before your 'analysis' on me that you think BH is scum and yet somehow I'm a more decent target for shooting? Ok..


I said you were flying under the radar, and that when you are here you seem to be content to agree with a stance here and there and not really add anything. It's not about your "lurkiness," but what you aren't doing when you are here.

I'm assuming from what Vayne has said he plans to use his vig shot today. Therefore, we need to determine two scum candidates for this cycle.


None of this really is that difficult to understand. While you're here, would you mind providing an opinion on anything?

Or more specifically, perhaps elaborate on your top scumread?


If Vayne wants to use it as a shot, why aren't we lynching a top suspect first, and shooting during the night? Unless there's some sort of claim that can only be checked by death, I don't see a reason why it should be rushed so. (I'm not reading the power wrong, right?)

My top read at the time you posted was ShiaoPi, as I said I agreed with a lot of the points made by Stutters. I made that clear end of last night. I haven't fully digested ShiaoPi's response yet, but if I'm wrong on that account, my previous statement feels good:

On June 12 2013 01:24 Sylencia wrote:
@Oats: If GK doesn't have anything in the next 24 hours, I'd be willing to put money on a lurker scum team - something like him + stutters (maybe +1 if there's a third). The only one that sticks out is Blazinghand for causing chaos for no reason but idk if that's his playstyle - please fill me in there. Reasoning is everything has run too smoothly and there haven't felt like there have been any sort of misdirections so far. We had a blue claim on day 1, so having some sort of mayor takeover would be a pretty good idea in Day 1 for scum to take, as they can reliably target Vayne with no consequence. If he dies, he dies. If he doesn't, everyone just says someone protected him, and no one suspects the mayor. None of this happened, so unless Hapa is scum, everyone active seems town. Any problem with my reasoning?


For catching up, only having an analysis of 4 players (2 of which seem like afterthoughts), and a weak scumread based a lot on meta is pretty bad. I've heard from BH enough that you have slow starts, but idk define slow start, how long is it going to take to get the ball rolling, and out of all the players how is it that you've got thoughts on 2 lurky players over someone with a lot more points to consider such as Grav/WoS and Oats?

About GravityMan - I am also missing what is obvious about him that makes him scum according to BH, but the only point i"ll take from it is that he is the only one who disrupted Hapa's mayoral campaign with a sort of smear campaign against him. You can make reasons for why he did it if he's scum (potentially take power, and make hapa a suspect), but since that failed, would scum have chosen Hapa as the target of the NK over Vayne to clearly show that? Food for thought, seeing as that was the only real 'major' event that happened regarding mayoral campaigns.


First of all, the entire point of mentioning a good vigishot for Vayne is we should be treating this cycle like a doublelynch, as Hapa originally suggested. Even if Vayne opts to wait until the night to shoot, by discussing this now we have that much more information to go on in later cycles. For that reason, everyone should be doing this.

So you can't be bothered to review the latest posting of your top scumread, and you fall back on proposing a lurker scumteam if your top read convinces you he's town??? Explain to me how that isn't scum-motivated behavior?

Further, I provided a read on Grav in the post you're referencing, so it's clear you aren't reading the thread very closely. This is the kind of disinterest I'd expect from scum. I still believe you'd be a good vigi shot.


The fact I can actually rely on something which I believed to have been true from the night before shows the actual lack of contribution that you had brought to the table to this point. If I say you're scummy during N1, and you do nothing to change that view in D2, you're saying it's scum oriented for me to say I still think you're scum? Also yes, turns out I ended up thinking you did an analysis on GK which is yourself (it made perfect sense at the time somehow -_-).

In any case:

- Axle: How has this guy been able to fly under the radar this entire game? As far as I've read there's been very little suspicious cast on him, he's been questioned about his reads in which he's tip toed around the problem:

On June 13 2013 08:23 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 13 2013 07:59 GravityMan wrote:
Axle, who do YOU think is scum?
We haven't had very many reads from you this game at all, just analysis and questions.


There is the obvious list, of people who have not contributed much.
There is the obvious list of turning Hapas list upside down and saying that.

One thing i dont want to do is get all in a low post count townies face, and shut them down.
So I wont be doing that.

The least clear intention I have is you. I see what "looks" like a tendency to Lynch BH for being BH.
I see posts that could well inflame him and make his ego come to the fore as town or scum.
This could have been their intention, or not.


It alludes to him suspecting GM (pretty much confirmed to be saying he suspects GM next post), but he doesn't push it at all. He said he doesn't want to shut a lurker down, but GM is far from a lurker, so why wouldn't he push a case there?

If there's someone in this game who is a prime example of being neutral on pretty much everything, it's Axle.

BH has been doing a lot of talking without a lot of pushing, but I'm pretty sure that Axle is a better option over BH. After a slow first half of Day 1, I think if BH was scum he'd easily adapt into a less active role in the game. He brings up points I don't think anyone else would be doing otherwise (possible VA fakeclaim etc.) and just by doing that I feel it's enough to justify keeping him around for longer. Without BH this town will be a dead town, with little to no deviation in thoughts.

GK I'm still willing to put my vote on him, idk how slow a start can be, but even his vote on BH didn't have any substance to it.

This is terrible honestly.
Axle seems like the towniest town that ever towned, and this case misrepresents him entirely. I'm not sure why people are letting this go.
He votes him based on the fact that Axle has been flying under the radar, and that he supposedly calls me a lurker? (hint: he's not referring to me)
That's his entire reasoning. The whole thing in that one post.

Why is Sylencia getting away with that exactly?
I mean I'm not a fan of Axle right now because he's tunneled me for about half the game but at least he's doing it in a reasonable way' I don't see scum pushing a read like he has with the analysis that he's done, and I've played with scum Axle before.

Now I have to get to Axle's case on me....sigh.


http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=18880452 Link for Thread Context

I'm sick of writing essays answers to your hundreds of questions only to have you go and ignore what I say and think what you want anyway.
Take what I give you, and actually consider it.

Sylencia looks scummy to be and with that post I tried to make that evident.
The fact that he would point you out like that to me makes him look even scummier because to me it's obvious you're town and he didn't have much of a case to go on.
Like what kind of a question is 'who needed to know?' I was secretly trying to send a code to my scumbuddies. Obviously I'm fucking talking to the rest of town.

Axle I'm not going to go through every single one of my posts in the thread, explain why I posted them, who I was talking to, what my intent was, what I had just eaten 15 minutes ago, what my mother's middle name is, and my bank account number for you.

It's a little ridiculous. Either draw some fucking conclusions already or move on. It's enough.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 05:39 GMT
#1229
VA I'd be fine with you shooting him if the rest of the thread doesn't want me dead immediately.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 06:06 GMT
#1234
Welp, that answers our question as to who to lynch tomorrow.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 06:16 GMT
#1239
On June 14 2013 15:12 AxleGreaser wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 14 2013 15:10 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 14 2013 15:06 GravityMan wrote:
Welp, that answers our question as to who to lynch tomorrow.


Who?


and of course why.

Answer it yourself.
I'm sick of your questions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 06:44 GMT
#1243
On June 14 2013 15:38 ShiaoPi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 14 2013 15:12 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 14 2013 15:10 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 14 2013 15:06 GravityMan wrote:
Welp, that answers our question as to who to lynch tomorrow.


Who?


and of course why.


If Vayne survives another night, he is fucking scum, I just don't see any townieness in his play at the moment. That shot on oats was pretty much a scumclaim in my opinion, fuck I wanted the shot on syl

Whoa, crazy.
Somebody who thinks for himself and comes up with his own answers.
I didn't even know it was possible!!

But yeah that was in effect a scumclaim from Vayne. I'm not exactly sure what the point was. Like...I guess he wanted to use the shot before he gives mayor to the next scum in line and wanted to shoot someone who maybe wouldn't cause an uproar amongst the surviving players. Obviously wrong about that. I'm guessing he didn't shoot me because scumteam thinks they can secure a mislynch on me at a later date. He couldn't shoot Axle or Shiao which leaves the lurkers....why not just shoot them? Hmmm....

Vayne/Sylencia scumteam Shiao?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 06:51 GMT
#1248
Oh I just thought of something else about the setup. Somebody remind me of this when the night is over as I'll need another night to confirm whether I'm right or wrong.

OH another thing I just thought of. Maybe VA scumclaimed to protect Syl for a night? Possible scum PR or something?
Either way I don't see any way around offing the two of them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 06:52 GMT
#1249
On June 14 2013 15:48 ShiaoPi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 14 2013 15:44 GravityMan wrote:
On June 14 2013 15:38 ShiaoPi wrote:
On June 14 2013 15:12 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 14 2013 15:10 AxleGreaser wrote:
On June 14 2013 15:06 GravityMan wrote:
Welp, that answers our question as to who to lynch tomorrow.


Who?


and of course why.


If Vayne survives another night, he is fucking scum, I just don't see any townieness in his play at the moment. That shot on oats was pretty much a scumclaim in my opinion, fuck I wanted the shot on syl

Whoa, crazy.
Somebody who thinks for himself and comes up with his own answers.
I didn't even know it was possible!!

But yeah that was in effect a scumclaim from Vayne. I'm not exactly sure what the point was. Like...I guess he wanted to use the shot before he gives mayor to the next scum in line and wanted to shoot someone who maybe wouldn't cause an uproar amongst the surviving players. Obviously wrong about that. I'm guessing he didn't shoot me because scumteam thinks they can secure a mislynch on me at a later date. He couldn't shoot Axle or Shiao which leaves the lurkers....why not just shoot them? Hmmm....

Vayne/Sylencia scumteam Shiao?


The alternative of vayne being just stupid would mean GK is scum. But couple Vayne's play into the consideration besides the shot I think vayne scum is much more likely

He can't be that stupid.
He just can't.

Man it's nice to have somebody who thinks on the exact same wavelength for once.
I agree with basically everything you've said.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 06:56 GMT
#1251
On June 14 2013 15:53 goodkarma wrote:
And as for the Oats vigishot, there were definitely better shots.

I still believe we should be looking at Syl, Shao, and Stutters tomorrow.


Regarding Vayne:

He claimed cop, and there's been no counterclaims. There's certainly more than one scum in this setup, so we should leave him alive for now until we have a better picture of how plausible his claim is.

Nope. I have a good idea as to why he fakeclaimed, but again, it'll have to wait until the night is over.
I won't get shot tonight because I'm a juicy mislynch target so I'll explain after night actions go down.

And I completely disagree about Shiao as well. Replace him with yourself. Either way if you're scum you've got a couple days more left to live, so don't worry!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 06:59 GMT
#1253
Off to bed. Will be active during the day tomorrow if people are around.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 14:39 GMT
#1261
I'm pretty sure I've figured out exactly what's going on.
Vayne had to abandon his scumteam on short notice.
On June 14 2013 12:49 VayneAuthority wrote:
Well, as stated ill be shooting GM unless a lot of people object it. please respond quickly as ill be without internet in about 14ish hours for a few days.

He took the shot because of the above circumstances which I noted; Oats was probably the person he figured he may have been least likely to get flak for given his brief 'yolo' explanation. Again, he couldn't shoot Axle/Shiao 'cuz obvtown, not me 'cause wanted mislynch, which leaves the rest of scum in GK/Sylencia/Stutters.
I was wrong earlier, the shot wasn't taken to protect Sylencia and I know whyyyyy

Scum gon' hafta shoot me because I have this game figured out :D :D :D :D :D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 15:16 GMT
#1265
On June 15 2013 00:03 Sylencia wrote:
oh as in that's your explanation nvm, but yeah GK not me or stutters im pretty sure

lololol nope that's just part of it. I'd rather just WIFOM the hell out of you guys and you can decide whether I've actually figured you out or not.
(hint: I did)
I have to determine if the rest of my brilliant explanation works before I reveal it. In any case, VA dies tomorrow whether I'm right or wrong about my supersecret explanation because he scumclaimed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 15:29 GMT
#1268
Whoa what?
Stutters is in this game?
St-st-stutters, who is scum?

Sylencia your reading comprehension leaves much to be desired.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 15:30 GMT
#1269
I'm in such a good mood right now.
I'm taking up BH's mantle of /Dunkmaster
FEAR FOR YOUR LIVES SCUMTEAM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 15:35 GMT
#1271
Godspeed, sweet ShiaoPi.
I will remember you always.
/tear
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 15:37 GMT
#1274
Shiao actually before you go we should look into Stutters/GK now to see who's more likely to be scum. Makes it easier to re-evaluate when the time actually comes to lynch into them.
Off the bat I would think Stutters is more likely but I gotta look to be sure.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 15:54 GMT
#1277
Yeah Syl, just looked through you again. You're the only one to call me town when people start suspecting me, you call Vayne scum early, you call BH town because of his 'contributions?'
Makes no sense from a standpoint of someone who doesn't already know the alignments.

Scum.

On to Stutters/GK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 15:57 GMT
#1278
GK did you read your role PM this game?
I'm in the middle of reading you and I has some questions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 16:04 GMT
#1281
Shiao, you still around?
Any thoughts on GK?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 16:07 GMT
#1282
On June 15 2013 01:04 Stutters695 wrote:
Vayne. Syl is giving me weird vibes, I'm not sure he's scum though. I need to really look at him. I'm not sure I understand why he keeps saying I'm not scum and why the hell he thinks I'm blue.

I'm going to ask you some question right now.
Because I feel that I already know the answers to said questions I'm asking them to attempt to divine your alignment, so they are not useless questions.
(THERE, AXLE, I PRE-EXPLAINED MY QUESTIONS FOR YOU)
For the record, it's not whether you answer these 'right' or 'wrong' that will help me, so do your best to answer naturally, k?
K.
Why did Vayne do what he did?
What are your thoughts on GK/Shiao right now?
Am I likely to be scum or town? Why? Did your opinion of me change at some point? If so, when?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 16:17 GMT
#1285
On June 15 2013 01:14 ShiaoPi wrote:
currently on phone and half asleep.
GK is terribly lurky, which makes reading him such a pain in the ass. now his slow start has started to be a bit faster. but I am unable to really decide on his alignment right niw. His long posts have some merit in them but the phases in which he is just absent do not ring well with me. what gives food for thought is that he is onboard with suspicion on syl.
If you put stutters and gk next to each other i wouod say based on activity gk is more likely scum but contribution lwise stutters since he disappeared and had some half cases going but he never followed them up truly. in this aspect gk is better aince he has taken more stances

Alright I guess I'll hold back on my thoughts regarding GK until he comes back; barring that I'll post them before deadline.
Go to bed if you need to. Ya done good.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 16:49 GMT
#1289
Oh yeah, and I suppose this goes without saying, but avoiding it is essentially a scumclaim.
Take your time, Stutters.

Or...don't, 'cause people want to go to bed apparently?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 18:05 GMT
#1293
I just got back.
Honestly, the answer to the Vayne question is good enough, the others aren't.
Please give me some reasoning as to your feelings regarding Shiao, and dive GK when you get the chance. Preferably before Daybreak?

I don't care about whether you're right or you're wrong in terms of commitment. If you don't want to commit and say I'm scum or town, fine. I don't need a case from you, I just want to hear anything at all with some real reasoning behind it regarding me and others. You know who I am now, great. Why does that make you feel better? REASONS, Stutters. I require them.

Remind me once again as to your regular activity patterns? You're supposed to be better or worse on weekends, I forget.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 18:21 GMT
#1295
On June 15 2013 03:19 Stutters695 wrote:
Worse on weekends and days where my girlfriend and I are both off. Yesterday was spring cleaning and getting lost in Ikea for three hours lol.

Yeah I've got some stuff coming up before the day post you'll like.

Let me ask you a question though, what do you make of Syl repeatedly mentioning me as a potential vigi?

I already know he's scum so that particular interaction with you means nothing to me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 14 2013 18:58 GMT
#1297
On June 15 2013 03:51 Stutters695 wrote:
Regarding why I think you're town, this post is a great example.

You called out my posting for all the right reasons. You're open to explanations but when you ask questions you're clearly showing a scum mindset behind the person you're questioning. I can go more in depth if you want but I'd rather spend that time on people I still suspect.


Show nested quote +
On June 14 2013 02:09 GravityMan wrote:
I don't like your new 'I'm mad as hell and I'm not taking it anymore' persona. It's not getting you anywhere.
Tone it down, broski.

I originally had you as scum because your return to the thread when Vayne was trying to fake you out or some shit looked absolutely awful. Like, telling someone you'd lynch them after you're dead is hilariously bad. Not a scumslip I guess but it clearly showed that you were rattled. 'Survival instincts' is more a scum thing than a town thing.

Now what makes YOU think Shiao is scum?
On June 13 2013 13:16 Stutters695 wrote:
On June 13 2013 12:47 goodkarma wrote:
@Stutters:

Your assessment of Vayne isn't entirely unreasonable, but the aggressive fashion in which you did it feels off to me. Also if this was what you were thinking, why didn't it come up much sooner?

On June 13 2013 08:04 Stutters695 wrote:
I was thinking at the hallway point of the day but given how little interaction he's had period a flip of either type really wouldn't guarantee any info. It also lets us plan around worst case scenario (3 scum team) and a mislynch today+nk+vig shot would knock us down to six total which would be endgame.

I think we can hit scum today but I'd rather plan around the worst case, especially since GK is so coinflippy.


Stutters, would you mind briefly explaining how as town you would propose I get vigie'd if it indeed is true that we'd be at endgame tomorrow in your above scenario? You mention me to be coinflippy, yet were anxious earlier to vig me anyway... This doesn't make much sense to me if indeed the situation is as dire as you describe it.

Finally, Shao was your top scumread, but that was quite a while ago. Is he still your top scumread now?

By paragraph

Because before he was mayor there wasn't anything he could do that would objectively hurt. Threatening to vig anyone for any reason except a solid scumread is retarded and incredibly anti-town and worst case could cost us the game if he actually shoots. It's simply I felt his vig threats were causing were significantly more danger to town than the possible derailing of discussion by calling him out on it.

This is why I wanted you to be viged after the flip. If it's town we re-evaluate our options and determine if it's an acceptable risk or abstain. If we hit scum then a vig on you (considering you were borderline worthless to that point ) really wouldn't have hurt us since we had to deal with you at some point.

I'm honestly not sure on him anymore, I need to brood on it some. A big portion of my case was how he handled jampis lynch, but because I was doing it over filters I didn't realize that he had voted minutes to the lynch. I'm still leaning scum on him but I'm not comfortable pushing it without looking into it more after I'm off work.

He has done a shit ton more analysis and put more effort into the game than you have. Your point regarding his reaction to jampi has some merit but that's all you've offered. His reads coincide somewhat with mine, and while on its own that isn't exactly a towntell, if he's helping me lynch BH I sure as hell am not going to turn on him and call him scum.
You, Sylencia and BH are all on my list right now, and as I mentioned, Sylencia's recent posting has put him higher on the scumlist than you.

Anything else, good sir? Anyone you're going to be voting for today?


Alright, go ahead.
This post made me think about something I may have to take into account later.
I await the post that you think I'll like. This is probably my last post until shortly before deadline unless I can phonepost a lil'.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 15 2013 00:57 GMT
#1299
The time draws near.
WHAT WILL YOU DO, SCUM?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 15 2013 01:35 GMT
#1301
I don't understand.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 15 2013 01:52 GMT
#1303
lolwut?
That's a terrible reason. He was clearly referring to mayorvig.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 15 2013 01:53 GMT
#1304
I call it one fish two fish red fish BLUE FISHING YOU FUCKING SCUM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 15 2013 01:53 GMT
#1305
[image loading]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
GravityMan
Profile Joined June 2013
Guyana (French)188 Posts
June 15 2013 01:59 GMT
#1307
Fuck I just deleted my big reveal gotta type it FAST.
So there is no good way of doing this because I need to do it during the day after NKs take place, but since I might BE a NK, I have to give you guys something to go on.

Look at the colours of those who have passed. Hopefully that's enough for you smart people to figure it out if I die.
As for scum:
Vayne, Sylencia in that order.
Remember how I said I was 100% sure of BH being scum and I was wrong?
I'm actually 100% sure of VA. Lynch him NO MATTER WHAT.
Trying to determine who he chose as mayor's alignment solely based on that is WIFOM but more likely to go to scum 'cause 2 votes.
Third scum (if there is) is likely to be Stutters. I believe GK to be town for reasons I will discuss if I don't die and he comes back.
Doubt there's 3p.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3Pkpp49aMk
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 8h
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 242
RuFF_SC2 166
Livibee 122
ProTech70
Ketroc 40
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 17233
Icarus 11
Dota 2
monkeys_forever1095
NeuroSwarm141
Super Smash Bros
AZ_Axe167
Other Games
tarik_tv20623
summit1g15694
JimRising 397
WinterStarcraft268
ViBE221
Trikslyr94
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1882
BasetradeTV32
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta49
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki9
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush927
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
8h
Online Event
14h
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
16h
Esports World Cup
2 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
3 days
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.