I Swear This Is Normal Mini Mafia - Page 30

On June 11 2013 17:49 Hapahauli wrote:
"Oats starting it" is not justification to shoot him.

He starts these spats all the time as town, true or false?

On June 11 2013 17:49 Blazinghand wrote:


im just saying you can't say i started it

On June 11 2013 17:50 Hapahauli wrote:


Ok, so why should I be shooting Oats then? Still no reasoning.

On June 11 2013 17:51 Blazinghand wrote:
but basically you should shoot oats because nothing he's said all game has made any sense or belied any town perspective on anything. the fact he's backed off from me actually makes me think he might be town, but his constant goading and irrational unprovoked flaming makes me think he's trying to shit up the thread: so scum

On June 11 2013 17:54 Blazinghand wrote:
Look like seriously the for realz answer is that scattered throughout D1 I laid out some fairly reasonable reasons for oats being scum. I don't think it was properly refuted. What you want me to do isn't to provide a reason (I've given plenty of reasons), what you want me to do is convince you and that will require a second look at oat's filter, analysis of his meta, and so on. I really don't have time for that right now, I'm about to sit down to dinner. After dinner I'll be glad to help out, but until then little snippets is all I can manage.

On June 11 2013 17:58 Hapahauli wrote:


Your main rationale seems to be that you disagree with Oats logic and reasoning. However this rings incredibly hollow since Oats being illogical is part of both his scum and town play.

[Insert BH venn diagram here]
[Insert comment about "IGNORE THE ORANGE PART"]

The second main part of your reason to lynch Oats is that you couldn't track his rationale for thinking that you are scum whilst simultaneously doubting your town-read on me. However this relies on the assumption of logic, which isn't always present in Oats town games. Also, I don't see anything fundamentally illogical about Oats position on the matter, since he was pretty clear that he was suspicious of us both but thought that only one of us was scum.

On June 11 2013 17:59 Blazinghand wrote:
1) there's literally zero chance we're lynching hapa tomorrow
2) the idea that we'll lynch GK for not formulating a scumread on a 20+ page game within minutes of replacing in is utterly preposterous

On June 11 2013 18:01 Oatsmaster wrote:

so why do you think he posted if he has nothing to contribute besides
"I have no reads, kill lurkers"?

On June 11 2013 18:01 Oatsmaster wrote:
Was it prompted by anything? I dont recall any questions specifically to GK.

On June 11 2013 18:01 Oatsmaster wrote:
So in what situation do you lynch Hapa BH? Do you think you might be biased in calling him town?