|
On May 27 2013 03:44 Blazinghand wrote:no offense of course geript Show nested quote +On May 27 2013 03:43 Vivax wrote:
We lynch the guys using encryption, anything else is stupid.
Mention a reason to not do it. there's a million reasons including like they might have to do it due to their roles. I know that my role has given me some shit limitations including posting limitations, I could easily see igrok thinking it's hilarious to force guys to like encrypt their shit (or bang randomly on the keyboard)
You're suspiciously not suspicious of stuff in the thread you couldn't possibly understand if you were town.
Anyone concealing something is hiding something, that tautology is even simple enough for you.
|
On May 27 2013 03:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Oats, like who "other lurkers"?
Scamp
Mr. Cheesecake
jampidampi
Ange777
|
On May 27 2013 03:36 Ange777 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2013 01:31 Oatsmaster wrote:On May 27 2013 01:29 Ange777 wrote:On May 27 2013 01:21 Oatsmaster wrote:I never said his play sucks. Are you intentionally misrepresenting the facts?
No. But you are mentioning things that are bad plays and not scummy plays. Where has he voiced suspicions on other major targets? And why lynch yamato if he thinks yamato is town. It seems like you think that dropping yamato as a target is scummy. No, no its not. No, I don't think dropping yamato as a target is scummy. I have a town read on yamato right now so I can totally understand it if he feels like yamato has gone from a scum to a town read. But Vivax' vote is still on him. Votes not important, actually I tend to leave my votes on dudes as town more than scum cause I dont care until I find another person I think is scum. Treat that as non alignment indicative. Is Vivax still scum after all I said? Wait a minute. You first explain that Vivax going after the lurkers is fine because everyone wants to pressure lurkers into contributing. But if he does not cast his vote on them, how will they feel any pressure at all? Why are you so keen on defending Vivax anyway? It does not look like anyone else cares about my questions on him and he surely does not look like a lynchable person right now.
Because what you say doesnt make sense.
And votes are not the only way to apply pressure.
So if you dont think Vivax is gonna get lynched, are you gonna waste your vote?
|
Other stuff I'm seeing:
Ange777 says I "dropped a case against yamato"
I voted him after seeing his slip, I already voiced that I could buy his explanation for it cause there's no way for me knowing which version is right, then I saw the weird reasoning he used for calling you and BH out, he said it was jokey.
I don't know what your reasoning is.Are you asking me to push a case against every player I voice suspicions against? I am entitled to change my mind and be inconclusive whenever I please, and I don't need to hang onto every little thing to make a full blown case out of it, I will mention it if I don't like something, and I will push someone if I think his lynch is useful, yes useful, be it cause he's dead weight to town and just doesn't give us any information or cause I think he's scum.
You look like you're pushing a whole load of poop based off little things that don't matter at all. Try harder
|
And don't forget that I would lynch kita.
Why is nobody except Dandel talking about kita.
|
On May 27 2013 03:50 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2013 03:43 Ange777 wrote:
@Vivax: You mentioned you had suspicions against other players? BH and iamp? What about them??? I don't care about them atm, I want to lynch the mopsies using encryption in front of our faces and not explaining what they're doing. Set priorities and stuff. Counterquestion: How is it relevant that I voiced suspicions against them when I made clear who I want to lynch?
So you aren't suspicious of them anymore?
You claim you made it clear but it was not clear for me at all. Your vote is still on yamato.
|
On May 27 2013 03:55 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2013 03:36 Ange777 wrote:On May 27 2013 01:31 Oatsmaster wrote:On May 27 2013 01:29 Ange777 wrote:On May 27 2013 01:21 Oatsmaster wrote:I never said his play sucks. Are you intentionally misrepresenting the facts?
No. But you are mentioning things that are bad plays and not scummy plays. Where has he voiced suspicions on other major targets? And why lynch yamato if he thinks yamato is town. It seems like you think that dropping yamato as a target is scummy. No, no its not. No, I don't think dropping yamato as a target is scummy. I have a town read on yamato right now so I can totally understand it if he feels like yamato has gone from a scum to a town read. But Vivax' vote is still on him. Votes not important, actually I tend to leave my votes on dudes as town more than scum cause I dont care until I find another person I think is scum. Treat that as non alignment indicative. Is Vivax still scum after all I said? Wait a minute. You first explain that Vivax going after the lurkers is fine because everyone wants to pressure lurkers into contributing. But if he does not cast his vote on them, how will they feel any pressure at all? Why are you so keen on defending Vivax anyway? It does not look like anyone else cares about my questions on him and he surely does not look like a lynchable person right now. Because what you say doesnt make sense. And votes are not the only way to apply pressure. So if you dont think Vivax is gonna get lynched, are you gonna waste your vote?
It makes sense! + Show Spoiler +But apparently only in my own head ;_;
No, I do not want to waste my vote. I am reading through rayn right now to understand why people want to lynch him. I won't be here for the deadline btw so I hope that we can find a good compromise earlier than shortly before deadline.
|
@Vivax, the only thing pointing to Kita being scum is filter length. But as he consistently has low filter length as scum, I doubt with 3 pages already he's scum. You on the other hand...
|
|
|
On May 27 2013 03:58 Vivax wrote:
Other stuff I'm seeing:
Ange777 says I "dropped a case against yamato"
I voted him after seeing his slip, I already voiced that I could buy his explanation for it cause there's no way for me knowing which version is right, then I saw the weird reasoning he used for calling you and BH out, he said it was jokey.
I don't know what your reasoning is.Are you asking me to push a case against every player I voice suspicions against? I am entitled to change my mind and be inconclusive whenever I please, and I don't need to hang onto every little thing to make a full blown case out of it, I will mention it if I don't like something, and I will push someone if I think his lynch is useful, yes useful, be it cause he's dead weight to town and just doesn't give us any information or cause I think he's scum.
You look like you're pushing a whole load of poop based off little things that don't matter at all. Try harder
Just to be clear, I am not suspicious of you for dropping the case on yamato. That's perfectly fine with me. It's the fact that you had voiced suspions on other players besides yamato but decided to push a lurker lynch instead of going after your other targets after you dropped your case against yamato.
So who do you want to lynch now? Kita or a lurker? And if a lurker, which one?
|
On May 27 2013 04:01 Ange777 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2013 03:50 Vivax wrote:On May 27 2013 03:43 Ange777 wrote:
@Vivax: You mentioned you had suspicions against other players? BH and iamp? What about them??? I don't care about them atm, I want to lynch the mopsies using encryption in front of our faces and not explaining what they're doing. Set priorities and stuff. Counterquestion: How is it relevant that I voiced suspicions against them when I made clear who I want to lynch? So you aren't suspicious of them anymore? You claim you made it clear but it was not clear for me at all. Your vote is still on yamato.
I am still suspicious of them. herp a derp.
On May 27 2013 01:28 strongandbig wrote:
Why are bad people playing like they are good? What the fuck is going on? None of you have earned the right to play like this. Marv and palmar have been setting a bad example but you gotta earn it.
That said the pressure on ange seems better than the pressure on any of the other people with votes on them, except yammo and maybe rayne?
Question for sentinel, Kita, and vivax - could you explain to me why you think he's the right person to be lynching right now?
I mentioned ange77 for lynch when I said we should lynch lurkers cause she didn't post anything substantial by then.
Same post where I said we could lynch her. The schwartz is strong with this one.
On May 27 2013 02:03 kitaman27 wrote:
Something I've been wondering about Vivax:
Back when you voted for yamato, but still appeared to be suspicious of me, why did you not attempt to explain how I was voting for your scumread with you. Did you think I was attempting to bus my scumbuddy day one? It seems weird that you would ignore the connection.
I did notice it. I also was weighing it in, but I wasn't sure enough about either of you to be able to trust a connection.
It's like having a 50 50 chance of someone being scum but if one is scum it excludes the other. You have to consider the 50 50 not the 100 or 0, if you get the analogy, I could still be wrong about both of you and the connection goes all like byebye.
|
Kita is kind weird for me.
In the scumgames I've seen him play, he has done enough stuff to be reasonably not scummy.
This game, is kinda different. Like some of his play is scummy, and some of it is just stuff I dont like.
|
On May 27 2013 04:13 Ange777 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2013 03:58 Vivax wrote:
Other stuff I'm seeing:
Ange777 says I "dropped a case against yamato"
I voted him after seeing his slip, I already voiced that I could buy his explanation for it cause there's no way for me knowing which version is right, then I saw the weird reasoning he used for calling you and BH out, he said it was jokey.
I don't know what your reasoning is.Are you asking me to push a case against every player I voice suspicions against? I am entitled to change my mind and be inconclusive whenever I please, and I don't need to hang onto every little thing to make a full blown case out of it, I will mention it if I don't like something, and I will push someone if I think his lynch is useful, yes useful, be it cause he's dead weight to town and just doesn't give us any information or cause I think he's scum.
You look like you're pushing a whole load of poop based off little things that don't matter at all. Try harder Just to be clear, I am not suspicious of you for dropping the case on yamato. That's perfectly fine with me. It's the fact that you had voiced suspions on other players besides yamato but decided to push a lurker lynch instead of going after your other targets after you dropped your case against yamato. So who do you want to lynch now? Kita or a lurker? And if a lurker, which one?
I want to lynch the encrypters now. I could also lynch kita but I'd prefer to give him more time so I can think a little more about it, check teh filter.
Lynch Zealos or Sentinel and see what's up with their roles. If their roles are related we will know what it means for the other.
Also, Sentinel was like 300 % more active during the trolling phase,.
|
Ok, Im pretty confident with the rayn lynch, im gonna sleep now.
GLGLGL
Make kita and BH talk more.
|
|
|
On May 27 2013 04:20 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2013 04:13 Ange777 wrote:On May 27 2013 03:58 Vivax wrote:
Other stuff I'm seeing:
Ange777 says I "dropped a case against yamato"
I voted him after seeing his slip, I already voiced that I could buy his explanation for it cause there's no way for me knowing which version is right, then I saw the weird reasoning he used for calling you and BH out, he said it was jokey.
I don't know what your reasoning is.Are you asking me to push a case against every player I voice suspicions against? I am entitled to change my mind and be inconclusive whenever I please, and I don't need to hang onto every little thing to make a full blown case out of it, I will mention it if I don't like something, and I will push someone if I think his lynch is useful, yes useful, be it cause he's dead weight to town and just doesn't give us any information or cause I think he's scum.
You look like you're pushing a whole load of poop based off little things that don't matter at all. Try harder Just to be clear, I am not suspicious of you for dropping the case on yamato. That's perfectly fine with me. It's the fact that you had voiced suspions on other players besides yamato but decided to push a lurker lynch instead of going after your other targets after you dropped your case against yamato. So who do you want to lynch now? Kita or a lurker? And if a lurker, which one? I want to lynch the encrypters now. I could also lynch kita but I'd prefer to give him more time so I can think a little more about it, check teh filter. Lynch Zealos or Sentinel and see what's up with their roles. If their roles are related we will know what it means for the other. Also, Sentinel was like 300 % more active during the trolling phase,.
Why the fuck are you lynching for info day 1?
Why the fuck are you not drawing any conclusions about their alignment from the 'encrypters'
Why the fuck is this post so stupid?
|
Oats... wtf? Vivax is so obviously scum. He's not trying to do anything. He's not trying to make sense. He's not doing anything. Vivax is better than this. Vivax is scum just vote for him goddammit.
|
On May 27 2013 04:23 geript wrote:
Oats... wtf? Vivax is so obviously scum. He's not trying to do anything. He's not trying to make sense. He's not doing anything. Vivax is better than this. Vivax is scum just vote for him goddammit.
Or he had a brain fart. .
Why not Rayn geript?
|
|
|
Because I don't think he's scum. I'm willing to give BH a day because people don't seem to actively be willing to lynch him so I'll settle for my #2 who is very lynchable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
