EPTNewbie Mini Mafia XLII - Page 43
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Gotard
Poland446 Posts
| ||
|
iVLosK!
Djibouti545 Posts
| ||
|
iVLosK!
Djibouti545 Posts
| ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
On June 09 2013 23:02 iVLosK! wrote: This place is dead whenever I can be on. And makes 8 new pages while I'm at work. Im hear but dont really have much to add at this point. But wanna enlighten us on your conversation? | ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
Here not hear | ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
| ||
|
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
Skanjab1 was a strange choice for NK. | ||
|
iVLosK!
Djibouti545 Posts
| ||
|
iVLosK!
Djibouti545 Posts
| ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
Still think he is scum and he hasnt really changed my mind at this point. | ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
| ||
|
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
On June 09 2013 23:49 Onegu wrote: I am also ok lynching yavanna if she doesnt comeback and isnt modkilled. What are your thoughts about LoneMeow? | ||
|
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
On June 09 2013 13:05 Xzavier wrote: well shit. we lynch mafia day1, they kill blue night1? random question? does this mean that there is no SK? since only 1 person died? why skanjab1? He wasnt outspoken or a main discussion generator. Time to go read his filter What did you learn from his filter? | ||
|
StiMaDDict
Korea (South)313 Posts
anyway, time to die mafia motherfucker.. ##Vote: LoneMeow | ||
|
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
Skanjab1s (0): iVLosK! (0): Spicydinosaur (0): Firere345 (5): Spicydinosaur, Gotard (4): StimmAddict (0): Umasi (1): Onegu As we get more flips we should revisit the bandwagons and their composition. | ||
|
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
On June 10 2013 00:15 StiMaDDict wrote: I didn't find anything particularly out of place from Skanjab1 filter.. anyway, time to die mafia motherfucker.. ##Vote: LoneMeow What would you expect to find out of place in a townie's filter? | ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
On June 10 2013 00:27 fferyllt wrote: What would you expect to find out of place in a townie's filter? Hopefully the reason he was killed that being said I dont think he posted enough for that. Looking at his votes maybe the only clues but that is a reach. | ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
Anyway, I want to revisit StiMaDDict's original case on me: On June 08 2013 04:11 StiMaDDict wrote: First thing that stuck out to me was that in both cases he is eager for someone other than himself to make a case against iVLosK! while holding back himself. He, not exactly encouraged, but led Umasi to go on with his rant on iV (which caused much dilema later on..) but on the very next line said that he disagrees(?) to what Umasi's not existing case.. Also despite the fact his comment on iV's behavior sounds somewhat reasonable, he doesn't make any case or assumption; only going as far as to say that iV's attitude is neither indication of town or scum. How exactly is asking for someone to explain how reasoning behind a scum claim scummy? At the time I asked for Umasi to present a case he seemed to be playing very emotionally instead of thinking logically and I hoped he would either present a logical case that could help me understand his reasoning for the claim or calm down and realize how weak his claim was. On June 08 2013 04:11 StiMaDDict wrote: His second quote asks Firere345 whether he changed his opinion which appears odd as well. Forget the fact that I have no fucking clue what Firere345 is saying or why he is commenting on Umasi, but why is LoneMeow asking Firere345 if he still thinks iVLosK! is scum. I went through Firere345 filter and he never proposed anything like that before. Given it should have been much more reasonable for LoneMeow to ask Umasi or Xzavier such question not Firere345 because they were voting on iVLosK!. The posts you quoted contain Firere345's scum read on iVLosK! which I was asking about, trying to both get a second opinion on my own read on iVLosK! and to see Firere345's reaction to get a better read on him, seeing how little he had posted at the time. On June 08 2013 04:11 StiMaDDict wrote: Once again, he keeps asking for case on iVLosK! that he neither support nor argue. He seems little too eager to hope on a bandwagon given the chance though. This is just a continuation of the earlier, Umasi still hadn't really presented a logically sound case and seemed to only be prepared to drop his attack on iVLosK! based on the "consensus" at the time, not because he had changed his own opinion. On June 08 2013 04:11 StiMaDDict wrote: I can go much more in detail. On fferyllt direct question, he once again slip passes. Nothing definite that will hurt him later. No concrete background to support his claim. Either he is as lazy as I am or he doesn't want to give anything away. I might add who is your top lynch candidate. The question by fferylt isn't a direct question to me if you read the context, and it's just objectively scummy to fish for opinion without even naming the suspect like that. I'm not sure what you meant by "no concrete background to support his claim", as I didn't make a scum claim, I simply pointed out that fishing for opinion is scummy. On June 08 2013 04:11 StiMaDDict wrote: Even though I have no idea what Gotard did but I can guess a little. It seems Xzavier, who is viewed by majority as town, pointed out something minor about Gotard and Gotard, who wasn't as active as Xzavier immediately engaged him with a vote and scum read possibly. (Correct me if I'm completely off the track) So what Lone Meow decides to do is basically say, "Oh this guy (Gotard) is doing something that is suicidal. He is likely a scum. But wait, this is too suicidal to be something a scum would do. He might be a townie after all." Lastly, his scum read on Firere345 is just plain weak. It seems to me as when he was asked he had to make a reply so he picked one of the lurker. He can probably further Essentially you're saying that my case on Firere345 was weak (well, yes, it was, I even said that much myself later) and that my defense of Gotard was scummy - however as it turns out Firere345 was mafia and Gotard seems likely town by the vote distribution, so I'd say this only makes you look slightly suspicious. | ||
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On June 10 2013 00:51 Onegu wrote: Hopefully the reason he was killed that being said I dont think he posted enough for that. Looking at his votes maybe the only clues but that is a reach. Perhaps the reason he was killed was exactly because there wasn't anything special in his posting history? | ||
|
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
On June 10 2013 01:07 LoneMeow wrote: Perhaps the reason he was killed was exactly because there wasn't anything special in his posting history? This posits a subtle scum team. Have you looked at his filter? | ||
| ||
