Doctor Who Mafia - Page 2
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
| ||
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
| ||
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
| ||
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
On May 17 2013 23:31 Zephirdd wrote: I want to see everyone's reaction to this oats thing. @phagga on the counterside, Sharranth talked a lot about Vivax but only defending him. Like, defending hard. I think I made an earlier post about that, before the whole "slip" thing. @Oatsmaster if you're town, don't feel demotivated. You are not dead yet and we can still let you live no problem. Use this moment to your advantage, and pressure people who you think are scum. good morning. Sharrant is weirder and weirder(need more posts from him); fferyllt looks better than at day 1; ghost had a cool post on sharranth; sentinel and deconduo are pretty set on what they are doing; blazinghand loves saying I'm town; mkfuba asked a nice question but he seems lurky; phagga is greenpeace yet to comment on oatsmaster thing: fferyllt, sharrath If you are town remember that the day is not over Your observation about me looks like bullshit. | ||
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
On May 17 2013 23:37 Sharrant wrote: Good morning everyone, glad to see I was wrong about Vivax. I don't buy into the whole "hosts let him get away with using cardinal directions because he is scum", that could've been an honest mistake, I don't particularly buy into the host WIFOM. What I believe makes it a scum slip is that he said "I wanted to move here". A townie would have no idea who they are, so how could they have a specific destination in mind? On the board I am most certainly L, all I did was an about face, didn't figure anyone else would do anything similar, and I didn't want to potentially move myself into a worse position by blindly moving. (about 70-30 chance of picking the right direction versus not) It seems to me that the optimal movement for town is as follows: Form into large groups as quickly as possible, and gather up stragglers as we move around the board. The trick here, is that once we are into a group, we do not want our specific move patterns known. It's been revealed to us through Vivax's PM that the angels have a "leap" mechanic, where they match a players movement within a certain range. We can use this to our advantage in the following way: Once we are in groups of 3-4 people, the group will set a direction of up to 3 spaces. The players in the group will all keep their moves hidden but will do their best to follow the assigned direction and distance. (optimal distance is probably 1 or 2) The people on the outside of the group always move inwards, and the people on the insides always move outwards. I believe this would make the leaps ineffective in the clutter because of bodyblocking. It also means if an angel does get inside the group, we can pretty much guarantee at least someone will have their flashlight on the angel, after that it's just coordination. [green]If an angel encounters an obstacle, say a town character, that is not their intended target during a leap what will happen? If a player ends the night beside an Angel, does that Angel feed automatically, or does the Angel have to specify the target in advance and then get close to them?[green] ##Vote: Oatsmaster The host wifom has made me leery of the Oatsmaster wagon. I think your paragraph 2 makes sense, though. | ||
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
I'm talking about the questions swirling over whether the host would accept and process a messed up move depending on the alignment of the player, and the fact that at least some of the votes on that wagon appear to be predicated on an answer of "yes, they would if the player were an Angel". | ||
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
On May 18 2013 01:00 phagga wrote: Ok, I understand that I asked the question wrong, because that's not what I wanted to know. Is there anyone specific on the Oats wagon that you are leery of? Also, quite generally, who would you like to lynch currently? Who looks like scum to you and why? Gut says Ghost is the most questionable on the Oats wagon. I need to find time to figure out what my gut is worried about. Zeph freaked my out when he said my sole day 2 post (pretty sure it was one post at that point, where I said which letter I think is mine) looked better than my day 1 body of work. I want to dig some more before answering your last questions. Probably in an hour or so. | ||
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
| ||
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
But I really don't feel like I have a handle on the game today. Had planned to vote for decunduo before I caught up. | ||
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
| ||
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
On May 19 2013 03:37 Blazinghand wrote: Honestly your non-contribution imo is a big lead. I'm willing to eat my hat on that, etc etc. For what it's worth, if you are in fact a townie, you should share your thoughts with the thread before you flip. I drew a lot of my analysis from reading marv's filter etc knowing that he was town. I'd like you to leave behind, if not something comparably useful for us, something at least non-useless. of course, if you're scum, feel free to ignore this and continue lurking! My thoughts are that I'm an easy lynch and analyzing my bandwagon may fruitful. I still feel pretty confident of my town reads. And I still don't care much for Sentinal's WKing. | ||
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
2. Sharrant - null 4. deconduo - no counterclaim, tentative town 5. Zephirdd - town 7. ghost_403 - null 8. [UoN]Sentinel - leaning scum 9. Blazinghand - town 11. mkfuba07 - null 12. phagga - town I doubt that all my town reads are accurate. But I bet there is at least one scum in my nulls. Possibly Sharrant. mkfuba07 has really not made any impression at all on me and that's probably a bad sign. | ||
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
On May 19 2013 03:44 Blazinghand wrote: ugh, whatever, i'll be checking in via phone if we need to do shenannies. everyone vote fferyllt. I don't see any point in maintaining the uncertainty I obviously represent another game day, unless somebody has a strong argument for another player being scum. | ||
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
On May 19 2013 03:52 Blazinghand wrote: You have one scum read, it's "leaning scum", and it's on sentinel entirely because he defended you and nothing else in possibly the least interesting post of his filter He hasn't made a positive impression in most of his posts IMO. I'm not going to produce a wall of defense or a lengthy case on him. The interface is just too cumbersome to make that an easy task right now. I should have spent some time prior to the game getting more comfortable with this format. | ||
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
| ||
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
| ||
fferyllt
United States317 Posts
I'm VT. | ||
| ||