|
On April 05 2013 11:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 09:21 WaveofShadow wrote: Phew. Real happy I rolled town this time around; I feel really bad for whoever is on my scumteam when I roll mafia for the first time.
Scib, is there no limit in this game as to how long a cycle lasts? If so I could see extending the day being a benefit to town but it really depends on the activity level in general. And Palmar one entry-post example does not a meta-case make. I'll go with marv on this one: I hear scum Ace is terrifying and last game he was town we wasted a lot of time on him and mislynched him in the end anyway.
##Vote: Ace He is voting for Ace because if Ace is scum he is scary... Does it make him scum? What more do you need?? isn't marv doing the exact same thing?
|
i don't like how rayn just ignored my question
|
does axlegreaser always play like a dwerp?
|
can anybody tell me why axlegreaser is town
|
##Vote WaveofShadow
busy might post more later. palmar and marv both on this one so it's probably good. skimmed tunkeg's case and it looked alright though i didn't really get all of it.
|
|
just read WoS' filter and i think i understand tunkeg's case better now. he looks like an alright lynch but i'm going through some other people now starting with sciberbia.
|
how long can we extend the day for? will you just end the day at some point in no lynch if we don't manage to get a majority within like 72-96 hours?
|
why did you guys dislike sci's iamp/oats post? it might seem a little out of touch with the thread but it's decent analysis and he seems like he actually wants to do something with oats.
|
i haven't a clue what's going on
|
i never understand ace but in this game it's even harder. he seems to be arguing about stuff that's really not going to help anybody out like the oats-is-scum-if-he-doesn't-stop-being-all-over-the-place debate with whoever. i don't like that and i think it's scummy.
WoS is apparently being unvoted because he did something when he was about to get lynched, alright.
btw, i think the claim he was referring to was his claim in the beginning of the game, when he claimed town.
|
i don't see the part where WoS acted in some way that he wouldn't get lynched, he wrote a few small posts and then he just left the thread. that's not really fighting for your life or anything that i think most people usually do. it seems much more collected.
|
|
On April 07 2013 10:20 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 07 2013 10:17 prplhz wrote: i don't see the part where WoS acted in some way that he wouldn't get lynched, he wrote a few small posts and then he just left the thread. that's not really fighting for your life or anything that i think most people usually do. it seems much more collected. I don't want to misunderstand here. Are you surprised that WoS didn't get lynched? well if i think about it i'm a little surprised. i didn't think so before considering it now that you just asked me though.
|
i never really thought anybody would hammer today since in these majority lynch games you usually have 72 hours and there's hardly any reason not to use them all.
|
On April 07 2013 10:18 Ace wrote: @prp what don't you understand? I think my thought process this game is easy to follow but I'll clear anything up you have questions about. i don't see why WoS "lying" about having claimed makes him in any way scum and you seem like you want marv to vote him for just that in this and this post.
|
On April 07 2013 11:12 WaveofShadow wrote: Prlphz: who do you find scummy right now and why? internally debating whether i should answer that i don't really have any scum reads or just ignore the question.
On April 07 2013 11:07 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On April 07 2013 10:18 Ace wrote: @prp what don't you understand? I think my thought process this game is easy to follow but I'll clear anything up you have questions about. i don't see why WoS "lying" about having claimed makes him in any way scum and you seem like you want marv to vote him for just that in this and this post. and at the same time it looks like you also know that WoS is lying here but that doesn't move you to vote him. i still don't see why WoS lying about that would make him scum and like i already pointed out, i don't think he was lying.
meh
|
On April 07 2013 09:11 Ace wrote: I don't know, maybe I'm not good at explaining my thoughts here. I completely understand he made no claim. He said he did. Which is why I asked right after for him to point it out to me. Does this part make sense? can you please explain why this is in any way interesting
|
like i don't claim to fully understand everything that goes on in every game, far from it, but mostly i can see where people are going with something even if i don't fully understand it or think it's useful.
i just don't understand why this claim thing is in any way interesting to you and it must be because you've spent a great deal of time with it.
|
On April 08 2013 02:54 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2013 02:50 prplhz wrote:On April 07 2013 09:11 Ace wrote: I don't know, maybe I'm not good at explaining my thoughts here. I completely understand he made no claim. He said he did. Which is why I asked right after for him to point it out to me. Does this part make sense? can you please explain why this is in any way interesting I posted this yesterday to explain my requested roleclaim of WoS. I don't see what's uninteresting about this, or why you just pulled this one post out of no where. Where are you going with this? here's the timeline the way i see it:
WoS does his silly town claim huh WoS says he's already claimed muh you ask WoS where it is bah marv said that he never claimed you attack marv for not voting for WoS even though marv should know that WoS is a liar oof
you never vote WoS despite saying that marv should vote WoS because marv thinks that WoS is a liar (i still don't see how the lie has anything to do with his alignment). at the same time it's pretty clear that you also know that WoS is lying meh.
i don't understand why this whole claim thing is interesting, i already pointed out that he was talking about his town claim and nobody else thought he had actually claimed (people would of course have noticed if he had). can you explain to me why it is interesting because i can't really explain why it's uninteresting, i just simply don't see how this will help us deduce any alignment at all that some dude posted an offhand remark about something he said earlier.
i don't see why you think i'm pulling this out of nowhere since i complained about it yesterday after you told me to ask you questions if i didn't understand your play and you never answered my question. the place i am going with this is the place where you answer me why this is in any way interesting, what were you hoping to get out of this? it seems to me from you "shhhh" post that there was some sort of semisecret plan here so maybe tell me about that.
|
|
|
|