|
On April 30 2013 00:39 Stutters695 wrote: I'm back from French so I'll be here until for the next 7 hours. I'm caught up but working on piecing together the shit that went down before the lynch.
|
On April 30 2013 03:11 Sharrant wrote: GiygaS, what's your current read on Ace? I'd like you to explain what you draw on as your evidence as explicitly as possible.
VE, are you around? Do you want to like... talk about stuff or something. Let's talk about someone you think isn't getting as much attention as their play deserves. When I get home I will.
|
I like how there's now a discussion about my nickname being suspicious or not.
|
Hey guys? How about GiygaS?
|
On April 30 2013 06:07 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2013 06:04 WaveofShadow wrote:On April 30 2013 06:02 Ace wrote:On April 30 2013 05:55 Stutters695 wrote:On April 30 2013 05:35 Ace wrote:On April 30 2013 05:26 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Something tells me based on what im reading I would be yelling as much as you Ace -_- Palmar has a guilty on you tho - thoughts? @stutters: what exactly are you referring to is being based on assumptions and should be done another way? I'm in my phone now so can't pull the exact quote but I remembered a detailed post about how people on the oats &ships wagons probably had a scum among them. Then your posts about cop claims and what they mean is all dependanrt on assumptions and thus could just be conjecture to appear active without giving out as much as you would with your earlier play which felt more solid to me. Since I'm a prime vig target and could easily die before or with Shiao i felt it worth bringing up because you're clearly able to pull off such a play. you have to start with some assumptions and go back to read each cops' posts. I dont see what else you expect us to do to figure this out - just take every claim at face value? You are like 4 days late with the Oats wagon analysis. It's been done to death and generally accepted by now. When you get off your phone just point out where the assumptions dont hold up and if it hasn't already been addressed I'll be here to talk about it. It's pretty simple isn't it? If Shiao and Clarity both scum then any wagon analysis you did comparing the Shiao/Oats wagons when you did are useless. we already said shiao could still be scum. We covered this like 20 times - go back and read it. Shioa WAS on the Oats wagon. Thats how we brought him up in the first place. It came down to which of the 2 was more likely Scum - Clarity or Shiao? Clarity flipped Vigilante Scum. Shiao is still alive and was on the wagon. Multiple players on the wagon are also still alive. Hence, the analysis holds. read it carefully. But Shiao wasn't on the wagon, he voted VE, not clarity.
|
Anyway, on Ace: Acted disinterested on day 1, and I still think what he said was a contradiction. His day 1 was anti-town. Since then, he's been a pro-town force. For his day 1, I still think he's 3p (not scum) for his day 1, but he could easily be town as well. Definitely not worth a lynch or vig at this point when we have the whole triple cop claim caper going on.
|
EBWOP: I meant he wasn't on the clarity lynch, like he was trying to avoid offing his scummate.
|
Ah, we were just talking about different things, ok.
|
On April 30 2013 06:27 WaveofShadow wrote: Ace, you compared the D1 and D2 wagons though in the middle of Day 2. Was Shiao on the Clarity wagon at any point during the day? No he only voted for VE and then basically peace'd
|
On April 30 2013 06:27 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2013 06:26 GiygaS wrote: Anyway, on Ace: Acted disinterested on day 1, and I still think what he said was a contradiction. His day 1 was anti-town. Since then, he's been a pro-town force. For his day 1, I still think he's 3p (not scum) for his day 1, but he could easily be town as well. Definitely not worth a lynch or vig at this point when we have the whole triple cop claim caper going on. what did I do anti-town Day 1? can you point this stuff out? !wos: what slip? im not scum I cant slip I've said this before, you only seemed to be interested in town discussion to post memes, and there was that contradiction I brought up a while ago that everyone seems to disagree with me on (the one where you told everyone to take their time and then 30 minutes later got everyone to get their votes on oats to hammer him, right after he actually started cooperating).
|
On April 30 2013 06:42 Ace wrote: In trouble for what? lynching 1 scum and not the other? are you seriously this slow?
quickly: How did clarity and ShiaoPi get brought up? Clarity got brought up by Vivax (sure of this one), I think Shiao was sort of everyone having similar suspicions at around the same time. I don't think there was one singular person that sort of spearheaded Shiao, but Clarity originated from Vivax for sure.
|
ShiaoPi is the best lynch today no question. The check is just the cherry on top of the rest of his behavior.
# #Vote ShiaoPi
|
I think Palmar is the liar out of the cop claims, but it could easily be a just a town gambit. I just don't understand why he did that first claim, was it purely to get a BC lynch that day? I'll read it over again when I get home to get a better grasp on it, as I'm on my phone atm.
|
On April 30 2013 23:43 ShiaoPi wrote: yo guys, kill gigyas, stutters and VE thats the scum team and kush or the cobbler are 3rd party.... ...wtf? No im not.
|
I'll be rereading filters and the thread, and make a post once I'm done a few games of LoL (Lissandra looks too awesome to wait)
|
On May 01 2013 09:17 BloodyC0bbler wrote: He appears to only be doing what he does for shits and giggles Ok, so if I'm giggles, who's shits?
In all seriousness, I'm gonna start re-reading the thread with who has been lynched in mind and try and come up with something.
|
I'm re-reading the thread and I'm actually concerned for Drazak. His last post on tl was that he wasn't feeling well, and then he just disappeared, after looking really excited to play. D:
I'm on page 26 atm, we'll be going all night if it takes me that long to reread this thread.
|
On April 22 2013 08:20 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2013 08:14 Sharrant wrote:On April 22 2013 08:06 raynpelikoneet wrote: Palmar could you or someone else like Ace come in and tell these idiots why claiming miller at the start of the game is either scummy or extremely dumb. So, we're back to you wanting to lynch BM as a policy because he claimed miller? On April 22 2013 08:09 Ace wrote:On April 22 2013 07:24 Sharrant wrote:On April 22 2013 06:45 Ace wrote: @Sharrant: RN looks like a noobie to me. I see. I am assuming this to be you saying he looks like a noobie town then, yes? Or are you saying he seems new, and null? Is there someone you would be comfortable with lynching right this second (aside from Bill Murray)? Is there someone you would recommend looking into? newbie and null. Not interested in lynching anyone specific at the moment. I'm just sitting back reading and will see what happens. I'm a little wary of you sitting back, I've heard you generally take a less active role as scum. What do you think of Rayn right now? I dont know why people keep saying that. I've got more than 30 games on this forum behaving all kinds of ways. My activity depends on how I feel, what I see, and how active other players are. Can someone who plays with Ace more tell me if this is true or not?
|
On May 01 2013 10:59 yamato77 wrote: Fine.
Why don't people want to lynch Hopeless?
Let's talk about him, since he's one person who is not Ace/BC/Palmar/VE who I feel could be mafia. Wanna give some reasoning for that before getting the rest of the town to do it for you?
|
Well all I can say Yamato is that I'm on page 33 and have seen some things too. I completely forgot that he dissuaded the town read on Vivax. His entire day 1 was basically dedicated to that heuristic thing even long after it was done and dealt with. That said, you and Hopeless haven't done practically anything of real substance up until this point (rayn pointed out kush's lack of contribution on page 31 if you're interested).
|
|
|
|