|
On April 26 2013 06:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2013 06:27 VisceraEyes wrote:
Palmar, conversely, made one post at the very beginning of the game and that was it for his thougths on Oats. If you're counting that as "meaningful contribution to the Oats case" then there's either something seriously wrong with your metric or you're fucking scum. Take your pick, I'm done fucking talking to you unless you're willing to get your head out of your ass tunnel and think for a second. Palmar doesn't always express his thoughts clearly, that's what i have learned during the last couple of games. I'm not sure he is 100% town but his reads seem accurate. To me it seems like your case on him is you trying to make the evidence (which i think is false) to fit your case and your case on him points more to you or even Ace being scum than him, because if we are honest here, neither of you have done jack shit to find scum this game.That's what i think, and that's why i think we should lynch you.
You're just making shit up. I've done what I can to find scum. Tell me why my game is lacking. I'm in here VERY OBVIOUSLY trying to find the best lynch for today. You and Palmar are both just attesting that "I haven't done shit" this game and it's a COMPLETE FUCKING FABRICATION. What has Palmar done to find scum rayne? WHAT? That's your only reasoning for thinking I'm scum apparently, but WHAT IN THE FUCK HAS PALMAR DONE TO FIND SCUM?!
|
On April 26 2013 06:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2013 06:37 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On April 26 2013 06:36 VisceraEyes wrote:Nonono, buddying implies that you're being overly agreeable with me, not that we have the same reads. But whatever I'm just paranoid. You're like the only person who thinks I'm town in the game apparently.  To be fair you are also one of the few who thinks I'm town as well. However if anyone compared your play here to boardwalk perhaps they would see a different VE. I find it unlikely to have someones scum game change this drastically in one game. Let alone a scum who would defend a town BC when it would be more advantageous to let me die. Since when have you been in danger of being lynched?
I have been talked about for the last two days of being scum. IE there is potential chance of me dying to lynch or vig bullet. Period. If VE was scum and saw this happening. Why would he not fan the fire / just let it continue. Instead he opted to defend me. Given that only two players in this game of done so and have also been logical overall in their reads. I find it likely they are more likely town than scum.
|
I am also waiting for yamato's response to BC. In case i'm wrong about VE he would be my, if not second, at least third pick for todays lynch. N1 he called Clarity scum due to his timing of the case on Sharrant without a doubt, now it's suddenly a possibility that he was just a townie who wanted to contribute something of his own. I questioned yamato about this on N1 sepecifically asking if it's possible that Clarity just thought he should say something about his scumreads when he came back. Everyone can see him changing his mind on D2 based on nothing if you read his filter.
|
On April 26 2013 06:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2013 06:27 VisceraEyes wrote:
Palmar, conversely, made one post at the very beginning of the game and that was it for his thougths on Oats. If you're counting that as "meaningful contribution to the Oats case" then there's either something seriously wrong with your metric or you're fucking scum. Take your pick, I'm done fucking talking to you unless you're willing to get your head out of your ass tunnel and think for a second. Palmar doesn't always express his thoughts clearly, that's what i have learned during the last couple of games. I'm not sure he is 100% town but his reads seem accurate. To me it seems like your case on him is you trying to make the evidence (which i think is false) to fit your case and your case on him points more to you or even Ace being scum than him, because if we are honest here, neither of you have done jack shit to find scum this game. That's what i think, and that's why i think we should lynch you.
Read Palmars filter, tell me what hes done and where VE lied. All I see is an excuse for him made by you and not him. If I was being reamed for not expressing myself in detail why is Palmar getting off the hook for the same shite?
|
On April 26 2013 06:48 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2013 06:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 26 2013 06:27 VisceraEyes wrote:
Palmar, conversely, made one post at the very beginning of the game and that was it for his thougths on Oats. If you're counting that as "meaningful contribution to the Oats case" then there's either something seriously wrong with your metric or you're fucking scum. Take your pick, I'm done fucking talking to you unless you're willing to get your head out of your ass tunnel and think for a second. Palmar doesn't always express his thoughts clearly, that's what i have learned during the last couple of games. I'm not sure he is 100% town but his reads seem accurate. To me it seems like your case on him is you trying to make the evidence (which i think is false) to fit your case and your case on him points more to you or even Ace being scum than him, because if we are honest here, neither of you have done jack shit to find scum this game.That's what i think, and that's why i think we should lynch you. You're just making shit up. I've done what I can to find scum. Tell me why my game is lacking. I'm in here VERY OBVIOUSLY trying to find the best lynch for today. You and Palmar are both just attesting that "I haven't done shit" this game and it's a COMPLETE FUCKING FABRICATION. What has Palmar done to find scum rayne? WHAT? That's your only reasoning for thinking I'm scum apparently, but WHAT IN THE FUCK HAS PALMAR DONE TO FIND SCUM?!
You have not done anything to find scum. I think it's very clear. You voted for geript with no reasoning, then voted for BM with no reasoning, voted yamato purely because of OMGUS. Then voted for Oats with this:
On April 23 2013 06:50 VisceraEyes wrote:
Oats' early game looks like a weak attempt at aggression too. He's quick with accusations, but slow with follow-up or explanation. This is a stark contrast from previous games I've played with him as town when he's all over the thread dumping opinions and calling people out.
I could get behind an Oats lynch.
This is what most people figured out added to Vivax' case, at least i did aswell. Went wrong there. On D2 you voted for ShiaoPi based on what Vivax said before. You have failed to contribute to anything relevant that has been going on in thread in D1-N1. How is this "doing anything"?
I agree that Palmar has not done anything to find scum. Why i am voting for you instead of him is because his reads are basically the same as mine.
|
On April 26 2013 06:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2013 06:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On April 26 2013 06:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 26 2013 06:27 VisceraEyes wrote:
Palmar, conversely, made one post at the very beginning of the game and that was it for his thougths on Oats. If you're counting that as "meaningful contribution to the Oats case" then there's either something seriously wrong with your metric or you're fucking scum. Take your pick, I'm done fucking talking to you unless you're willing to get your head out of your ass tunnel and think for a second. Palmar doesn't always express his thoughts clearly, that's what i have learned during the last couple of games. I'm not sure he is 100% town but his reads seem accurate. To me it seems like your case on him is you trying to make the evidence (which i think is false) to fit your case and your case on him points more to you or even Ace being scum than him, because if we are honest here, neither of you have done jack shit to find scum this game.That's what i think, and that's why i think we should lynch you. You're just making shit up. I've done what I can to find scum. Tell me why my game is lacking. I'm in here VERY OBVIOUSLY trying to find the best lynch for today. You and Palmar are both just attesting that "I haven't done shit" this game and it's a COMPLETE FUCKING FABRICATION. What has Palmar done to find scum rayne? WHAT? That's your only reasoning for thinking I'm scum apparently, but WHAT IN THE FUCK HAS PALMAR DONE TO FIND SCUM?! You have not done anything to find scum. I think it's very clear. You voted for geript with no reasoning, then voted for BM with no reasoning, voted yamato purely because of OMGUS. Then voted for Oats with this: Show nested quote +On April 23 2013 06:50 VisceraEyes wrote:
Oats' early game looks like a weak attempt at aggression too. He's quick with accusations, but slow with follow-up or explanation. This is a stark contrast from previous games I've played with him as town when he's all over the thread dumping opinions and calling people out.
I could get behind an Oats lynch. This is what most people figured out added to Vivax' case, at least i did aswell. Went wrong there. On D2 you voted for ShiaoPi based on what Vivax said before. You have failed to contribute to anything relevant that has been going on in thread in D1-N1. How is this "doing anything"? I agree that Palmar has not done anything to find scum. Why i am voting for you instead of him is because his reads are basically the same as mine.
YOU SAID I CONTRIBUTED SOMETHING AND THEN ASKED HOW THAT IS CONTRIBUTING ANYTHING LMAO
|
Sorry guys, was working on my final yesterday.Completely my fault.
I'm drawing up a more detailed post at the moment.
|
On April 26 2013 06:50 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2013 06:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 26 2013 06:27 VisceraEyes wrote:
Palmar, conversely, made one post at the very beginning of the game and that was it for his thougths on Oats. If you're counting that as "meaningful contribution to the Oats case" then there's either something seriously wrong with your metric or you're fucking scum. Take your pick, I'm done fucking talking to you unless you're willing to get your head out of your ass tunnel and think for a second. Palmar doesn't always express his thoughts clearly, that's what i have learned during the last couple of games. I'm not sure he is 100% town but his reads seem accurate. To me it seems like your case on him is you trying to make the evidence (which i think is false) to fit your case and your case on him points more to you or even Ace being scum than him, because if we are honest here, neither of you have done jack shit to find scum this game. That's what i think, and that's why i think we should lynch you. Read Palmars filter, tell me what hes done and where VE lied. All I see is an excuse for him made by you and not him. If I was being reamed for not expressing myself in detail why is Palmar getting off the hook for the same shite?
VE lied when he said Palmar had no scumread on him when he voted for him, and presented Palmar's list of reads as "evidence". Palmar left out VE purposely because he voted for him right after.
|
On April 26 2013 07:03 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2013 06:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 26 2013 06:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On April 26 2013 06:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 26 2013 06:27 VisceraEyes wrote:
Palmar, conversely, made one post at the very beginning of the game and that was it for his thougths on Oats. If you're counting that as "meaningful contribution to the Oats case" then there's either something seriously wrong with your metric or you're fucking scum. Take your pick, I'm done fucking talking to you unless you're willing to get your head out of your ass tunnel and think for a second. Palmar doesn't always express his thoughts clearly, that's what i have learned during the last couple of games. I'm not sure he is 100% town but his reads seem accurate. To me it seems like your case on him is you trying to make the evidence (which i think is false) to fit your case and your case on him points more to you or even Ace being scum than him, because if we are honest here, neither of you have done jack shit to find scum this game.That's what i think, and that's why i think we should lynch you. You're just making shit up. I've done what I can to find scum. Tell me why my game is lacking. I'm in here VERY OBVIOUSLY trying to find the best lynch for today. You and Palmar are both just attesting that "I haven't done shit" this game and it's a COMPLETE FUCKING FABRICATION. What has Palmar done to find scum rayne? WHAT? That's your only reasoning for thinking I'm scum apparently, but WHAT IN THE FUCK HAS PALMAR DONE TO FIND SCUM?! You have not done anything to find scum. I think it's very clear. You voted for geript with no reasoning, then voted for BM with no reasoning, voted yamato purely because of OMGUS. Then voted for Oats with this: On April 23 2013 06:50 VisceraEyes wrote:
Oats' early game looks like a weak attempt at aggression too. He's quick with accusations, but slow with follow-up or explanation. This is a stark contrast from previous games I've played with him as town when he's all over the thread dumping opinions and calling people out.
I could get behind an Oats lynch. This is what most people figured out added to Vivax' case, at least i did aswell. Went wrong there. On D2 you voted for ShiaoPi based on what Vivax said before. You have failed to contribute to anything relevant that has been going on in thread in D1-N1. How is this "doing anything"? I agree that Palmar has not done anything to find scum. Why i am voting for you instead of him is because his reads are basically the same as mine. YOU SAID I CONTRIBUTED SOMETHING AND THEN ASKED HOW THAT IS CONTRIBUTING ANYTHING LMAO
A single contribution in 7 pages of filter which is an addition to a case already made and accepted by many people. That's not much in my eyes.
|
On April 26 2013 07:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2013 07:03 VisceraEyes wrote:On April 26 2013 06:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 26 2013 06:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On April 26 2013 06:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 26 2013 06:27 VisceraEyes wrote:
Palmar, conversely, made one post at the very beginning of the game and that was it for his thougths on Oats. If you're counting that as "meaningful contribution to the Oats case" then there's either something seriously wrong with your metric or you're fucking scum. Take your pick, I'm done fucking talking to you unless you're willing to get your head out of your ass tunnel and think for a second. Palmar doesn't always express his thoughts clearly, that's what i have learned during the last couple of games. I'm not sure he is 100% town but his reads seem accurate. To me it seems like your case on him is you trying to make the evidence (which i think is false) to fit your case and your case on him points more to you or even Ace being scum than him, because if we are honest here, neither of you have done jack shit to find scum this game.That's what i think, and that's why i think we should lynch you. You're just making shit up. I've done what I can to find scum. Tell me why my game is lacking. I'm in here VERY OBVIOUSLY trying to find the best lynch for today. You and Palmar are both just attesting that "I haven't done shit" this game and it's a COMPLETE FUCKING FABRICATION. What has Palmar done to find scum rayne? WHAT? That's your only reasoning for thinking I'm scum apparently, but WHAT IN THE FUCK HAS PALMAR DONE TO FIND SCUM?! You have not done anything to find scum. I think it's very clear. You voted for geript with no reasoning, then voted for BM with no reasoning, voted yamato purely because of OMGUS. Then voted for Oats with this: On April 23 2013 06:50 VisceraEyes wrote:
Oats' early game looks like a weak attempt at aggression too. He's quick with accusations, but slow with follow-up or explanation. This is a stark contrast from previous games I've played with him as town when he's all over the thread dumping opinions and calling people out.
I could get behind an Oats lynch. This is what most people figured out added to Vivax' case, at least i did aswell. Went wrong there. On D2 you voted for ShiaoPi based on what Vivax said before. You have failed to contribute to anything relevant that has been going on in thread in D1-N1. How is this "doing anything"? I agree that Palmar has not done anything to find scum. Why i am voting for you instead of him is because his reads are basically the same as mine. YOU SAID I CONTRIBUTED SOMETHING AND THEN ASKED HOW THAT IS CONTRIBUTING ANYTHING LMAO A single contribution in 7 pages of filter which is an addition to a case already made and accepted by many people. That's not much in my eyes.
rofl, actually that is something Vivax even brought up in his case:
His play differs a lot from his town play, where he can be disruptive, but is also ballsy and involved. In Boardwalk empire he played an aggressive early game, not afraid to tunnel players, or to be annoying with his aggression.
So it makes it even less of a contribution..
|
On April 26 2013 07:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2013 07:03 VisceraEyes wrote:On April 26 2013 06:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 26 2013 06:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On April 26 2013 06:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:On April 26 2013 06:27 VisceraEyes wrote:
Palmar, conversely, made one post at the very beginning of the game and that was it for his thougths on Oats. If you're counting that as "meaningful contribution to the Oats case" then there's either something seriously wrong with your metric or you're fucking scum. Take your pick, I'm done fucking talking to you unless you're willing to get your head out of your ass tunnel and think for a second. Palmar doesn't always express his thoughts clearly, that's what i have learned during the last couple of games. I'm not sure he is 100% town but his reads seem accurate. To me it seems like your case on him is you trying to make the evidence (which i think is false) to fit your case and your case on him points more to you or even Ace being scum than him, because if we are honest here, neither of you have done jack shit to find scum this game.That's what i think, and that's why i think we should lynch you. You're just making shit up. I've done what I can to find scum. Tell me why my game is lacking. I'm in here VERY OBVIOUSLY trying to find the best lynch for today. You and Palmar are both just attesting that "I haven't done shit" this game and it's a COMPLETE FUCKING FABRICATION. What has Palmar done to find scum rayne? WHAT? That's your only reasoning for thinking I'm scum apparently, but WHAT IN THE FUCK HAS PALMAR DONE TO FIND SCUM?! You have not done anything to find scum. I think it's very clear. You voted for geript with no reasoning, then voted for BM with no reasoning, voted yamato purely because of OMGUS. Then voted for Oats with this: On April 23 2013 06:50 VisceraEyes wrote:
Oats' early game looks like a weak attempt at aggression too. He's quick with accusations, but slow with follow-up or explanation. This is a stark contrast from previous games I've played with him as town when he's all over the thread dumping opinions and calling people out.
I could get behind an Oats lynch. This is what most people figured out added to Vivax' case, at least i did aswell. Went wrong there. On D2 you voted for ShiaoPi based on what Vivax said before. You have failed to contribute to anything relevant that has been going on in thread in D1-N1. How is this "doing anything"? I agree that Palmar has not done anything to find scum. Why i am voting for you instead of him is because his reads are basically the same as mine. YOU SAID I CONTRIBUTED SOMETHING AND THEN ASKED HOW THAT IS CONTRIBUTING ANYTHING LMAO A single contribution in 7 pages of filter which is an addition to a case already made and accepted by many people. That's not much in my eyes.
READ MY FUCKING FILTER THE WHOLE THING IS AWASH WITH ME TRYING TO DISCERN PEOPLES MOTIVES AND QUESTION THEIR ACTIONS WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU EVEN BLATHERING ABOUT?! THAT WAS ONE EXAMPLE, NOT MY SOLE CONTRIBUTION YOU LITTLE SHIT
|
I'm done with this for today. Fucking lynch me I don't even fucking care anymore.
|
Hmmm I agree with VE and BC that Palmar is useless and scummy. Only thing that gives me reservations is his roleblock but now that BC says he was roleblocked, that opens up new possibilities.
Palmar's tunnel on VE makes ZERO sense and Palmar is unwilling to explain.
##vote palmar
|
Tunneling VE- his activity shift under suspicion gives me a blue read.
Largest threats are those who gradually shifted away from posting once people started attacking them, as if waiting for the suspicion to tide over. Stop defending them in their absence or you're scum.
Personally I think we should start voting Stutters until he posts.
|
On April 26 2013 07:22 tube wrote:
Tunneling VE- his activity shift under suspicion gives me a blue read.
Largest threats are those who gradually shifted away from posting once people started attacking them, as if waiting for the suspicion to tide over. Stop defending them in their absence or you're scum.
Personally I think we should start voting Stutters until he posts.
Why?
|
He posted, vote TheRavensName guys.
|
Because he wasn't posting.
|
|
|
On April 26 2013 07:24 tube wrote:
It's all about posting.
You realize that you cropped up after like 2+ days of not posting right? And that until now you had exactly 1 in-game post? Are you sure you think we should be lynching based on post count? YOU SURE FRIEND?
|
On April 26 2013 07:24 tube wrote:
He posted, vote TheRavensName guys.
Again...why? This one had even less information than the last.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
