|
On April 12 2013 11:06 Mocsta wrote:
OK.. can we focus on a consolidated vote pls
I going to assume you shooting (unclaimed OO)
then..
shevlocke, for VT as showtime
which DT checker do we want to lynch
so far we have austin/SnB/keirath/Sharrant
keirathi is off the block as far as i am concerned, boviously so is austin
So SnB or Sharrant? ?
I am not shooting. ALTHOUGH THIS IS ONE REASON WHY I'M STILL FRIGGING TEMPTED TO SHOOT YOU.
WE ARE NOT LYNCHING PEOPLE BASED ON THEIR CLAIMS. NOBODY IS GETTING LYNCHED FOR PICKING X OR Y. PEOPLE ARE GETTING LYNCHED FOR BEING SCUMMY, OR BECAUSE FOLKS ARE SHEEPING, OR BECAUSE ... I DON'T ACTUALLY PARTICULARLY KNOW. BUT NOBODY IS LYNCHING PEOPLE JUST BECAUSE THEY PICKED A CERTAIN THING.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH. YOU CANNOT ACTUALLY HAVE JUST SUGGESTED THAT WE WANT TO LYNCH BASED ON CLAIMS CAN YOU?
AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
|
On April 12 2013 11:06 Mocsta wrote:
OK.. can we focus on a consolidated vote pls
I going to assume you shooting (unclaimed OO)
then..
shevlocke, for VT as showtime
which DT checker do we want to lynch
so far we have austin/SnB/keirath/Sharrant
keirathi is off the block as far as i am concerned, boviously so is austin
So SnB or Sharrant?
At this point I think StrongAndBig should just be lynched, it's obviously not going to happen tonight, so please lynch him tomorrow, or shoot him tonight.
Like I said, you can't take me off of the chopping block tonight without just making more problems tomorrow. It'd be unreliable to check me because we know that mafia can have GF in their roles, and that's going to make it stick that I should still be lynched.
Best to lynch me now, and then lynch StrongAndBig tomorrow. Unless there's third party, everyone that's up for lynch today is someone I think is town. I'm going to move my votes to myself and to ObviousOne because I think those are the best lynches today, even if we're both town.
Just please listen about StrongAndBig.
|
What was the point of claiming
if the intention wasnt to lynch.
|
If there's a shot it should be vivax
|
On April 12 2013 11:11 Mocsta wrote:
What was the point of claiming
if the intention wasnt to lynch. It pulls some people off the table. It possibly catches scum. It forces scum to commit to a story now, rather than later, if they want to fakeclaim.
Maybe geript had terminally low blood pressure, and dangling sn0 claiming in front of him all day helped to raise his blood pressure and save his life.
EVEN IF THE POINT WAS TO LYNCH PEOPLE WHY WOULD WE JUST GO "LET'S LYNCH PEOPLE WHO CLAIMED DETECTIVE ROLES"?
That doesn't make sense to me why, if we were lynching on only claims, we'd lynch ... a specific role that was claimed?
|
On April 12 2013 11:11 Mocsta wrote:
What was the point of claiming
if the intention wasnt to lynch.
I think wanting to kill Shelvocke based on the fact that he claimed to have become VT trying to take showtime is poor play. If you think he's scum, show why he's scum, and then lynch him. Make it a part of a case, but by itself I don't think it's any reason to go after him.
|
Also @mocta: what about Vivax? Why did you leave him out?
|
On April 12 2013 11:14 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On April 12 2013 11:11 Mocsta wrote:
What was the point of claiming
if the intention wasnt to lynch. It pulls some people off the table. It possibly catches scum. It forces scum to commit to a story now, rather than later, if they want to fakeclaim. Maybe geript had terminally low blood pressure, and dangling sn0 claiming in front of him all day helped to raise his blood pressure and save his life. EVEN IF THE POINT WAS TO LYNCH PEOPLE WHY WOULD WE JUST GO "LET'S LYNCH PEOPLE WHO CLAIMED DETECTIVE ROLES"? That doesn't make sense to me why, if we were lynching on only claims, we'd lynch ... a specific role that was claimed?
Because we came to the conclusion
there was too many dt roles
we asked for hard dt claims & didnt get them
I forgot to add Vivax as a dt claimer.
|
On April 12 2013 11:15 Keirathi wrote:
Also @mocta: what about Vivax? Why did you leave him out?
See above 
|
On April 12 2013 11:13 geript wrote:
If there's a shot it should be vivax
Vivax is not a good shot. At the very least give him another day for his parity check. I personally think he's town, but even if I had him as null I would tell you Vivax would be a bad shot, especially while StrongAndBig is alive.
|
On April 12 2013 11:14 austinmcc wrote:
Maybe geript had terminally low blood pressure, and dangling sn0 claiming in front of him all day helped to raise his blood pressure and save his life.
Wtf is this supposed to mean?
|
On April 12 2013 11:16 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On April 12 2013 11:14 austinmcc wrote:On April 12 2013 11:11 Mocsta wrote:
What was the point of claiming
if the intention wasnt to lynch. It pulls some people off the table. It possibly catches scum. It forces scum to commit to a story now, rather than later, if they want to fakeclaim. Maybe geript had terminally low blood pressure, and dangling sn0 claiming in front of him all day helped to raise his blood pressure and save his life. EVEN IF THE POINT WAS TO LYNCH PEOPLE WHY WOULD WE JUST GO "LET'S LYNCH PEOPLE WHO CLAIMED DETECTIVE ROLES"? That doesn't make sense to me why, if we were lynching on only claims, we'd lynch ... a specific role that was claimed? Because we came to the conclusion there was too many dt roles we asked for hard dt claims & didnt get them I forgot to add Vivax as a dt claimer.
What do you mean "we came to the conclusion that there are too many of them"?
We never came to any such conclusion. I'm actually happy that we have so many (claimed) investigation roles.
|
On April 12 2013 11:16 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On April 12 2013 11:14 austinmcc wrote:On April 12 2013 11:11 Mocsta wrote:
What was the point of claiming
if the intention wasnt to lynch. It pulls some people off the table. It possibly catches scum. It forces scum to commit to a story now, rather than later, if they want to fakeclaim. Maybe geript had terminally low blood pressure, and dangling sn0 claiming in front of him all day helped to raise his blood pressure and save his life. EVEN IF THE POINT WAS TO LYNCH PEOPLE WHY WOULD WE JUST GO "LET'S LYNCH PEOPLE WHO CLAIMED DETECTIVE ROLES"? That doesn't make sense to me why, if we were lynching on only claims, we'd lynch ... a specific role that was claimed? Because we came to the conclusion there was too many dt roles we asked for hard dt claims & didnt get them I forgot to add Vivax as a dt claimer. Who is we, where did this happen, where were there too many DT roles, and who did not provide a hard claim?
|
AND WHY DO YOU WANT TO KILL PEOPLE BASED ON THEIR CLAIMS WHEN YOU HAVE CLAIMED TO HAVE A ROLE THAT ROLECHECKS, SO YOU CAN TOTALLY, YOU KNOW, CONFIRM OR CATCH SOMEONE IF YOU'RE SUSPICIOUS OF THEM?
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
|
On April 12 2013 11:17 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On April 12 2013 11:16 Mocsta wrote:On April 12 2013 11:14 austinmcc wrote:On April 12 2013 11:11 Mocsta wrote:
What was the point of claiming
if the intention wasnt to lynch. It pulls some people off the table. It possibly catches scum. It forces scum to commit to a story now, rather than later, if they want to fakeclaim. Maybe geript had terminally low blood pressure, and dangling sn0 claiming in front of him all day helped to raise his blood pressure and save his life. EVEN IF THE POINT WAS TO LYNCH PEOPLE WHY WOULD WE JUST GO "LET'S LYNCH PEOPLE WHO CLAIMED DETECTIVE ROLES"? That doesn't make sense to me why, if we were lynching on only claims, we'd lynch ... a specific role that was claimed? Because we came to the conclusion there was too many dt roles we asked for hard dt claims & didnt get them I forgot to add Vivax as a dt claimer. What do you mean "we came to the conclusion that there are too many of them"? We never came to any such conclusion. I'm actually happy that we have so many (claimed) investigation roles. Im playing sc2 atm, so cant quote
but im sure someone said it like 1 or 2 pages ago.
|
On April 12 2013 11:19 austinmcc wrote:
AND WHY DO YOU WANT TO KILL PEOPLE BASED ON THEIR CLAIMS WHEN YOU HAVE CLAIMED TO HAVE A ROLE THAT ROLECHECKS, SO YOU CAN TOTALLY, YOU KNOW, CONFIRM OR CATCH SOMEONE IF YOU'RE SUSPICIOUS OF THEM?
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Cos. i expect to die, like i expected to die night 1.
Whether you read my posts or not, i still think i have contributed a lot this game.
so fuck off with the caps.
|
Sharrant is voting for himself now. ok.
|
|
|
|
|
On April 12 2013 11:23 sinani206 wrote:
yeah
VoteRigger.. hmm
im making a leap of faith
but maybe u dont get to choose bonus
i.e. you not a killer, so didnt get gf bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
