|
@Hapahauli Maybe sinani206 should know Nisani201 better, but does he?
|
On March 28 2013 05:18 Nisani201 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2013 05:16 sinani206 wrote:On March 28 2013 05:13 marvellosity wrote:On March 28 2013 05:11 sinani206 wrote:On March 28 2013 05:05 Hapahauli wrote:On March 28 2013 05:02 cDgCorazon wrote:On March 28 2013 04:58 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 04:55 cDgCorazon wrote:
@Marv and Oats:
Right now, adding in the Kei case is anti-consolidation. Because a lack of consolidation would mean a no-lynch, anti-consolidation would mean anti-town.
Why are you guys trying to add in another case to steal potential votes away from Nisani? To save your scumbuddy by forcing a no-lynch, yet at the same time looking like you are scum hunting?
It's not very hard to see through your ruse, Marv.
My town read on you = gone. Why the fuck does marv pushing another player from you mean that he is scum?? You seem 100% sure that Nisani is scum. Why are you so sure? I'm not 100% sure Nisani is scum, but I'm more sure about him than I am with Yamato. There's no use making a hipster vote because we need to lynch someone today. A no-lynch would only leave us with more questions and give the scum a huge victory for D1. It's not because he is pushing a different players, it's because he is pushing a new read so close to the deadline. It reeks of trying to save Nisani from being lynched. @Hapa: I think you are putting way too much faith in Nisani's meta. I went and read his vote on Acro and there's not much beside him quoting one scummy sentence and saying that Acro doesn't have much else in his filter so he must be scum. His vote on prp is absolutely silly, and he has refused to give a reason. Just like you shouldn't build cases solely on metas, you shouldn't build defenses solely on metas. Fuck me I need to do a podcast on meta. All y'alls have no idea what you're doing when it comes to it. Meta is fantastic for highlight broad/general differences in mentality. In Nisani's case, he has very two different mindsets between his scum and town games wiht a HUGE sample-size to back it up. While he's a lurker in all his games, his town games are markedly more productive. He pushes cases, and tries to scumhunt, and all his posts are towards an objective purpose. When he's scum, he's "chatty," "trolly," and barely contributes. And this is consistent over MANY MANY of his games. 4 scumgames, and many more town games. Nisani plays very similarly as scum and town, and according to you, I know him well. This knowledge of him allows me to determine whether he is scum or town more efficiently than others (hint: you) who seem to be extremely confused Could you tell me what distinguishes his scum and townplay then? What are you seeing here that you see in his usual mafia play but not his town play? As town, Nisani generally uses very logical analysis to determine who is scum and will stay confident on said player. As scum, Nisani is unsure and just tries to win favor of the town without being too aggressive, which is what he has done in this game. ok you're scum
ok why
|
I like my vote on Nisani201 over sinani206, I'm busy for the unforseeable future, might be back before deadline (depending on when it is).
|
On March 28 2013 05:19 sinani206 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2013 05:18 Nisani201 wrote:On March 28 2013 05:16 sinani206 wrote:On March 28 2013 05:13 marvellosity wrote:On March 28 2013 05:11 sinani206 wrote:On March 28 2013 05:05 Hapahauli wrote:On March 28 2013 05:02 cDgCorazon wrote:On March 28 2013 04:58 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 04:55 cDgCorazon wrote:
@Marv and Oats:
Right now, adding in the Kei case is anti-consolidation. Because a lack of consolidation would mean a no-lynch, anti-consolidation would mean anti-town.
Why are you guys trying to add in another case to steal potential votes away from Nisani? To save your scumbuddy by forcing a no-lynch, yet at the same time looking like you are scum hunting?
It's not very hard to see through your ruse, Marv.
My town read on you = gone. Why the fuck does marv pushing another player from you mean that he is scum?? You seem 100% sure that Nisani is scum. Why are you so sure? I'm not 100% sure Nisani is scum, but I'm more sure about him than I am with Yamato. There's no use making a hipster vote because we need to lynch someone today. A no-lynch would only leave us with more questions and give the scum a huge victory for D1. It's not because he is pushing a different players, it's because he is pushing a new read so close to the deadline. It reeks of trying to save Nisani from being lynched. @Hapa: I think you are putting way too much faith in Nisani's meta. I went and read his vote on Acro and there's not much beside him quoting one scummy sentence and saying that Acro doesn't have much else in his filter so he must be scum. His vote on prp is absolutely silly, and he has refused to give a reason. Just like you shouldn't build cases solely on metas, you shouldn't build defenses solely on metas. Fuck me I need to do a podcast on meta. All y'alls have no idea what you're doing when it comes to it. Meta is fantastic for highlight broad/general differences in mentality. In Nisani's case, he has very two different mindsets between his scum and town games wiht a HUGE sample-size to back it up. While he's a lurker in all his games, his town games are markedly more productive. He pushes cases, and tries to scumhunt, and all his posts are towards an objective purpose. When he's scum, he's "chatty," "trolly," and barely contributes. And this is consistent over MANY MANY of his games. 4 scumgames, and many more town games. Nisani plays very similarly as scum and town, and according to you, I know him well. This knowledge of him allows me to determine whether he is scum or town more efficiently than others (hint: you) who seem to be extremely confused Could you tell me what distinguishes his scum and townplay then? What are you seeing here that you see in his usual mafia play but not his town play? As town, Nisani generally uses very logical analysis to determine who is scum and will stay confident on said player. As scum, Nisani is unsure and just tries to win favor of the town without being too aggressive, which is what he has done in this game. ok you're scum ok why
Because your extreme overgeneralization of my playstyle is total horseshit.
|
On March 28 2013 05:14 marvellosity wrote:
Again, 2.5 hours is plenty to get a majority. And again
Lol you really can't count can you.
Either that or you're just trying to make it look less like what I'm accusing you of doing.
|
I'm going to support Sinani, Cora, reyn lynches I think. Since the last 2 are not going to happen I'm with hapa on the sinani wagon.
I don't think nisani201 will flip scum.
##Vote sinani206
|
On March 28 2013 05:17 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2013 05:08 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 05:05 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2013 05:03 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 05:00 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2013 04:57 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 04:52 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2013 04:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
EBWOP:
##Unvote
##Vote: Keirathi And why do YOU think I am scum. Sheeping marv is not a "reason". Give me a reason. Why the fixation for reasons? Basically cause you pushed prp for almost the whole of day 1, really hard, shutting down everyone who defended him then after like 3 posts from prp, and town sentiment shifting, you give up. What. Also the most important point, clearly, is that you have a 3 page filter. A 3 PAGE FILTER. I pushed prplhz for the whole of day 1? What the hell? I was on Grack for the first 24 hours. Is that the only thing you can say?? What about marv's 'concerns'? I already replied to marv. By saying nothing incriminating and being all nice, same with mine. Kinda, by objecting to a non-relevant part of my reasoning. Where is the post with your reads that you were promising? I wasn't objecting to the non-relevant part of your reasoning. I was objecting to the only part of your reasoning that was actually coherent. "What is with your obsession with reasons?" and "You have a 3 page filter." are not valid reasons at all, and not worth responding to. Anyways, I'm really not feeling the sinani push.
My preferred lynch today would be Smurf. The way he was just so absolutely sure that prplhz was town when Hapa and I were both arguing the opposite really feels like he knows alignments already.
If Smurf isn't happening, I am really unsure past that. I would consolidate to Nisani to secure a lynch, but i don't feel super strong about it either. He could be scum, but mostly he's just a lurker to me. Marv is being useless, Palmar has like 10 scumreads but isn't pushing any of them or doing anything. S&B: Where the hell is he in all this? I could get behind lynching him too.
I was pretty sure prp was town so I dont see your point about smurf.
Why did you focus on the facts that I was wrong about and not my main point?
Its nitpicking and discredit's my point without addressing the main issue which is your really fucking quick unvote in line with thread sentiment.
|
On March 28 2013 05:20 Nisani201 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2013 05:19 sinani206 wrote:On March 28 2013 05:18 Nisani201 wrote:On March 28 2013 05:16 sinani206 wrote:On March 28 2013 05:13 marvellosity wrote:On March 28 2013 05:11 sinani206 wrote:On March 28 2013 05:05 Hapahauli wrote:On March 28 2013 05:02 cDgCorazon wrote:On March 28 2013 04:58 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 04:55 cDgCorazon wrote:
@Marv and Oats:
Right now, adding in the Kei case is anti-consolidation. Because a lack of consolidation would mean a no-lynch, anti-consolidation would mean anti-town.
Why are you guys trying to add in another case to steal potential votes away from Nisani? To save your scumbuddy by forcing a no-lynch, yet at the same time looking like you are scum hunting?
It's not very hard to see through your ruse, Marv.
My town read on you = gone. Why the fuck does marv pushing another player from you mean that he is scum?? You seem 100% sure that Nisani is scum. Why are you so sure? I'm not 100% sure Nisani is scum, but I'm more sure about him than I am with Yamato. There's no use making a hipster vote because we need to lynch someone today. A no-lynch would only leave us with more questions and give the scum a huge victory for D1. It's not because he is pushing a different players, it's because he is pushing a new read so close to the deadline. It reeks of trying to save Nisani from being lynched. @Hapa: I think you are putting way too much faith in Nisani's meta. I went and read his vote on Acro and there's not much beside him quoting one scummy sentence and saying that Acro doesn't have much else in his filter so he must be scum. His vote on prp is absolutely silly, and he has refused to give a reason. Just like you shouldn't build cases solely on metas, you shouldn't build defenses solely on metas. Fuck me I need to do a podcast on meta. All y'alls have no idea what you're doing when it comes to it. Meta is fantastic for highlight broad/general differences in mentality. In Nisani's case, he has very two different mindsets between his scum and town games wiht a HUGE sample-size to back it up. While he's a lurker in all his games, his town games are markedly more productive. He pushes cases, and tries to scumhunt, and all his posts are towards an objective purpose. When he's scum, he's "chatty," "trolly," and barely contributes. And this is consistent over MANY MANY of his games. 4 scumgames, and many more town games. Nisani plays very similarly as scum and town, and according to you, I know him well. This knowledge of him allows me to determine whether he is scum or town more efficiently than others (hint: you) who seem to be extremely confused Could you tell me what distinguishes his scum and townplay then? What are you seeing here that you see in his usual mafia play but not his town play? As town, Nisani generally uses very logical analysis to determine who is scum and will stay confident on said player. As scum, Nisani is unsure and just tries to win favor of the town without being too aggressive, which is what he has done in this game. ok you're scum ok why Because your extreme overgeneralization of my playstyle is total horseshit.
And that makes me mafia?
|
On March 28 2013 05:20 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2013 05:17 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2013 05:08 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 05:05 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2013 05:03 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 05:00 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2013 04:57 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 04:52 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2013 04:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
EBWOP:
##Unvote
##Vote: Keirathi And why do YOU think I am scum. Sheeping marv is not a "reason". Give me a reason. Why the fixation for reasons? Basically cause you pushed prp for almost the whole of day 1, really hard, shutting down everyone who defended him then after like 3 posts from prp, and town sentiment shifting, you give up. What. Also the most important point, clearly, is that you have a 3 page filter. A 3 PAGE FILTER. I pushed prplhz for the whole of day 1? What the hell? I was on Grack for the first 24 hours. Is that the only thing you can say?? What about marv's 'concerns'? I already replied to marv. By saying nothing incriminating and being all nice, same with mine. Kinda, by objecting to a non-relevant part of my reasoning. Where is the post with your reads that you were promising? I wasn't objecting to the non-relevant part of your reasoning. I was objecting to the only part of your reasoning that was actually coherent. "What is with your obsession with reasons?" and "You have a 3 page filter." are not valid reasons at all, and not worth responding to. Anyways, I'm really not feeling the sinani push.
My preferred lynch today would be Smurf. The way he was just so absolutely sure that prplhz was town when Hapa and I were both arguing the opposite really feels like he knows alignments already.
If Smurf isn't happening, I am really unsure past that. I would consolidate to Nisani to secure a lynch, but i don't feel super strong about it either. He could be scum, but mostly he's just a lurker to me. Marv is being useless, Palmar has like 10 scumreads but isn't pushing any of them or doing anything. S&B: Where the hell is he in all this? I could get behind lynching him too. I was pretty sure prp was town so I dont see your point about smurf. Why did you focus on the facts that I was wrong about and not my main point? Its nitpicking and discredit's my point without addressing the main issue which is your really fucking quick unvote in line with thread sentiment.
So: Keep my vote on prplhz when he stops doing everything I called him out for = scum.
Unvote him when he stops doing everything I called him out for = scum.
Gotcha.
|
Your OMGUS on me seems forced.
|
On March 28 2013 05:21 sinani206 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2013 05:20 Nisani201 wrote:On March 28 2013 05:19 sinani206 wrote:On March 28 2013 05:18 Nisani201 wrote:On March 28 2013 05:16 sinani206 wrote:On March 28 2013 05:13 marvellosity wrote:On March 28 2013 05:11 sinani206 wrote:On March 28 2013 05:05 Hapahauli wrote:On March 28 2013 05:02 cDgCorazon wrote:On March 28 2013 04:58 Oatsmaster wrote:
[quote]
Why the fuck does marv pushing another player from you mean that he is scum??
You seem 100% sure that Nisani is scum. Why are you so sure?
I'm not 100% sure Nisani is scum, but I'm more sure about him than I am with Yamato. There's no use making a hipster vote because we need to lynch someone today. A no-lynch would only leave us with more questions and give the scum a huge victory for D1. It's not because he is pushing a different players, it's because he is pushing a new read so close to the deadline. It reeks of trying to save Nisani from being lynched. @Hapa: I think you are putting way too much faith in Nisani's meta. I went and read his vote on Acro and there's not much beside him quoting one scummy sentence and saying that Acro doesn't have much else in his filter so he must be scum. His vote on prp is absolutely silly, and he has refused to give a reason. Just like you shouldn't build cases solely on metas, you shouldn't build defenses solely on metas. Fuck me I need to do a podcast on meta. All y'alls have no idea what you're doing when it comes to it. Meta is fantastic for highlight broad/general differences in mentality. In Nisani's case, he has very two different mindsets between his scum and town games wiht a HUGE sample-size to back it up. While he's a lurker in all his games, his town games are markedly more productive. He pushes cases, and tries to scumhunt, and all his posts are towards an objective purpose. When he's scum, he's "chatty," "trolly," and barely contributes. And this is consistent over MANY MANY of his games. 4 scumgames, and many more town games. Nisani plays very similarly as scum and town, and according to you, I know him well. This knowledge of him allows me to determine whether he is scum or town more efficiently than others (hint: you) who seem to be extremely confused Could you tell me what distinguishes his scum and townplay then? What are you seeing here that you see in his usual mafia play but not his town play? As town, Nisani generally uses very logical analysis to determine who is scum and will stay confident on said player. As scum, Nisani is unsure and just tries to win favor of the town without being too aggressive, which is what he has done in this game. ok you're scum ok why Because your extreme overgeneralization of my playstyle is total horseshit. And that makes me mafia?
Yes, I think you're deliberately lying.
|
Just a heads up I honestly can't find the reason whatever it was that switched my keirathi read to slight town lean. So I guess if sinani isnt' happening I'm going to support keirathi over nisani dying.
|
On March 28 2013 05:22 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2013 05:20 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 05:17 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2013 05:08 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 05:05 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2013 05:03 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 05:00 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2013 04:57 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 04:52 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2013 04:50 Oatsmaster wrote:
EBWOP:
##Unvote
##Vote: Keirathi And why do YOU think I am scum. Sheeping marv is not a "reason". Give me a reason. Why the fixation for reasons? Basically cause you pushed prp for almost the whole of day 1, really hard, shutting down everyone who defended him then after like 3 posts from prp, and town sentiment shifting, you give up. What. Also the most important point, clearly, is that you have a 3 page filter. A 3 PAGE FILTER. I pushed prplhz for the whole of day 1? What the hell? I was on Grack for the first 24 hours. Is that the only thing you can say?? What about marv's 'concerns'? I already replied to marv. By saying nothing incriminating and being all nice, same with mine. Kinda, by objecting to a non-relevant part of my reasoning. Where is the post with your reads that you were promising? I wasn't objecting to the non-relevant part of your reasoning. I was objecting to the only part of your reasoning that was actually coherent. "What is with your obsession with reasons?" and "You have a 3 page filter." are not valid reasons at all, and not worth responding to. Anyways, I'm really not feeling the sinani push.
My preferred lynch today would be Smurf. The way he was just so absolutely sure that prplhz was town when Hapa and I were both arguing the opposite really feels like he knows alignments already.
If Smurf isn't happening, I am really unsure past that. I would consolidate to Nisani to secure a lynch, but i don't feel super strong about it either. He could be scum, but mostly he's just a lurker to me. Marv is being useless, Palmar has like 10 scumreads but isn't pushing any of them or doing anything. S&B: Where the hell is he in all this? I could get behind lynching him too. I was pretty sure prp was town so I dont see your point about smurf. Why did you focus on the facts that I was wrong about and not my main point? Its nitpicking and discredit's my point without addressing the main issue which is your really fucking quick unvote in line with thread sentiment. So: Keep my vote on prplhz when he stops doing everything I called him out for = scum. Unvote him when he stops doing everything I called him out for = scum. Gotcha.
So you call out Prp, he changes. And you are happy. ???
Your initial push wanted to get him lynched, not wanted him to change his play. Why wouldnt he as scum change his play?
DUDE YOU HAVE NO READS.
AND YOU COMPLAINED ABOUT THAT WITH PRP.
DUUUDE.
|
sinani206 is showing some classic illusion of grandeur in his "I know Nisani201 so just sheep me" post. That's how I remember town sinani206 while scum sinani206 doesn't want to do much and just tries to get other player's sympathy.
|
Fuck all the goddamn sheep.
Seriously.
|
There is one another thing why i won't change my vote from Nisani.
When the Grack shot happened (and later when prplhz started town telling) there were two players who were totally thrown off their game. Palmar and Hapahauli.
Palmar came in with a list of five people and was totally clueless what to do. Which would be okay since he had pushed Grack the whole early D1. If only there wasn't this post of his:
No idea yet, I think it's the best option we have right now, aside from maybe one or two other openings I will explore later in the cycle. I think we still have more than a day to form our final wagon, so there's no need to rush it.
He already had another couple of suspects. Where is the exploring? Right.
And look what Hapa is doing...
|
I don't understand why everyone wants to switch off Nisani just because Hapa was spamming a shitty defense.
He is SCUM.
Look at his recent posts. More proof.
|
On March 28 2013 05:23 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2013 05:22 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2013 05:20 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 05:17 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2013 05:08 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 05:05 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2013 05:03 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 05:00 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2013 04:57 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 04:52 Keirathi wrote:
[quote]
And why do YOU think I am scum. Sheeping marv is not a "reason". Give me a reason. Why the fixation for reasons? Basically cause you pushed prp for almost the whole of day 1, really hard, shutting down everyone who defended him then after like 3 posts from prp, and town sentiment shifting, you give up. What. Also the most important point, clearly, is that you have a 3 page filter. A 3 PAGE FILTER. I pushed prplhz for the whole of day 1? What the hell? I was on Grack for the first 24 hours. Is that the only thing you can say?? What about marv's 'concerns'? I already replied to marv. By saying nothing incriminating and being all nice, same with mine. Kinda, by objecting to a non-relevant part of my reasoning. Where is the post with your reads that you were promising? I wasn't objecting to the non-relevant part of your reasoning. I was objecting to the only part of your reasoning that was actually coherent. "What is with your obsession with reasons?" and "You have a 3 page filter." are not valid reasons at all, and not worth responding to. Anyways, I'm really not feeling the sinani push.
My preferred lynch today would be Smurf. The way he was just so absolutely sure that prplhz was town when Hapa and I were both arguing the opposite really feels like he knows alignments already.
If Smurf isn't happening, I am really unsure past that. I would consolidate to Nisani to secure a lynch, but i don't feel super strong about it either. He could be scum, but mostly he's just a lurker to me. Marv is being useless, Palmar has like 10 scumreads but isn't pushing any of them or doing anything. S&B: Where the hell is he in all this? I could get behind lynching him too. I was pretty sure prp was town so I dont see your point about smurf. Why did you focus on the facts that I was wrong about and not my main point? Its nitpicking and discredit's my point without addressing the main issue which is your really fucking quick unvote in line with thread sentiment. So: Keep my vote on prplhz when he stops doing everything I called him out for = scum. Unvote him when he stops doing everything I called him out for = scum. Gotcha. So you call out Prp, he changes. And you are happy. ??? Your initial push wanted to get him lynched, not wanted him to change his play. Why wouldnt he as scum change his play? DUDE YOU HAVE NO READS. AND YOU COMPLAINED ABOUT THAT WITH PRP. DUUUDE.
Yes, I am happy that he started playing better. I don't want to mislynch townies. What are you even asking?
Basically you're saying that I should have 100% confident reads, and never re-evaluate or change my mind no matter what happens later. Yea okay, bro. You play mafia like that if you want to.
1) I have had reads. Quit being bad.
2) More than that, prplhz at the time wasn't invested in town affairs. Can you say that about me?
|
On March 28 2013 05:27 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2013 05:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 05:22 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2013 05:20 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 05:17 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2013 05:08 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 05:05 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2013 05:03 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 28 2013 05:00 Keirathi wrote:On March 28 2013 04:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
[quote]
Why the fixation for reasons?
Basically cause you pushed prp for almost the whole of day 1, really hard, shutting down everyone who defended him then after like 3 posts from prp, and town sentiment shifting, you give up.
What.
Also the most important point, clearly, is that you have a 3 page filter. A 3 PAGE FILTER.
I pushed prplhz for the whole of day 1? What the hell? I was on Grack for the first 24 hours. Is that the only thing you can say?? What about marv's 'concerns'? I already replied to marv. By saying nothing incriminating and being all nice, same with mine. Kinda, by objecting to a non-relevant part of my reasoning. Where is the post with your reads that you were promising? I wasn't objecting to the non-relevant part of your reasoning. I was objecting to the only part of your reasoning that was actually coherent. "What is with your obsession with reasons?" and "You have a 3 page filter." are not valid reasons at all, and not worth responding to. Anyways, I'm really not feeling the sinani push.
My preferred lynch today would be Smurf. The way he was just so absolutely sure that prplhz was town when Hapa and I were both arguing the opposite really feels like he knows alignments already.
If Smurf isn't happening, I am really unsure past that. I would consolidate to Nisani to secure a lynch, but i don't feel super strong about it either. He could be scum, but mostly he's just a lurker to me. Marv is being useless, Palmar has like 10 scumreads but isn't pushing any of them or doing anything. S&B: Where the hell is he in all this? I could get behind lynching him too. I was pretty sure prp was town so I dont see your point about smurf. Why did you focus on the facts that I was wrong about and not my main point? Its nitpicking and discredit's my point without addressing the main issue which is your really fucking quick unvote in line with thread sentiment. So: Keep my vote on prplhz when he stops doing everything I called him out for = scum. Unvote him when he stops doing everything I called him out for = scum. Gotcha. So you call out Prp, he changes. And you are happy. ??? Your initial push wanted to get him lynched, not wanted him to change his play. Why wouldnt he as scum change his play? DUDE YOU HAVE NO READS. AND YOU COMPLAINED ABOUT THAT WITH PRP. DUUUDE. Yes, I am happy that he started playing better. I don't want to mislynch townies. What are you even asking? Basically you're saying that I should have 100% confident reads, and never re-evaluate or change my mind no matter what happens later. Yea okay, bro. You play mafia like that if you want to. 1) I have had reads. Quit being bad. 2) More than that, prplhz at the time wasn't invested in town affairs. Can you say that about me?
1) What are those 'reads', you seem really uncertain about the upcoming lynch
2)Why are you challenging me to prove that you werent invested when that is a very subjective thing.
This whole post feels off. I dont know. :/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
