RED Team's Prize - Page 37

On March 27 2013 12:20 Acrofales wrote:

I have answered your question already. Your turn to explain where your magic meta read on OO came from where you left out the other half of OO's meta.

On March 27 2013 11:47 Acrofales wrote:

Where are you going with this?

I looked at fruity and was like "wait, that's not how he's playing this game", then read LX and saw that he was actively engaging the thread and pretty damned relaxed, which is pretty similar to his later play in Fruity.

I will do whatever I like with this info, now explain your damn meta town read on OO.

On March 27 2013 12:21 InsertSmurfHere wrote:
Keir, since you're here, what do you think of this whole Marv/Acro thing going on?

On March 27 2013 12:30 Acrofales wrote:
What I found in Fruity D1 was that he played differently from here. What I found in the rest of Fruity was that he loosened up and started engaging the thread. He continued to do so in his next town game, LX, and did so right from the start. I said that here:

On March 27 2013 12:34 Hapahauli wrote:
And someone needs to comment on mah prplzh case:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=403256&currentpage=36#720

On March 27 2013 12:41 Nisani201 wrote:
I don't understand why we're still taking about this meta stuff. Just because OO’s play style is different in this game than another doesn't make him scum. In fact, it means absolutely nothing.

I agree that prplhz has been flying under the radar and he could be scum. I want to hear other's thoughts on it though.

On March 27 2013 12:40 Hapahauli wrote:
Nah I can see Grack actually being a busy/rusty townie. I can't see Prplhz being this dis-engaged as town.

On March 27 2013 12:41 Nisani201 wrote:
I don't understand why we're still taking about this meta stuff. Just because OO’s play style is different in this game than another doesn't make him scum. In fact, it means absolutely nothing.

I agree that prplhz has been flying under the radar and he could be scum. I want to hear other's thoughts on it though.

On March 27 2013 05:33 prplhz wrote:

Aren't you worried that Palmar is making bad cases and people are just sheeping them? It kinda seems like you think it's a bad thing but you're perfectly fine with it.

On March 27 2013 12:50 Nisani201 wrote:
Perhaps I've been not reading the thread. Why did we have a 1.5 page discussion about OO's meta?

On March 27 2013 11:16 Grackaroni wrote:

lol see what the hell is this. I thought he was town but nobody is going to listen to me so now I'll just vote for town.

On March 26 2013 14:08 ObviousOne wrote:
==Some thoughts on today's action==
+ Show Spoiler +
Broken out, preserving the interaction above:

I thought about this sentence for a while. I probably thought about it for too long. It might even be nothing.

I thought about what a Rayn might be implying here, assuming town:
If we emphasize the "don't" and following parenthesis, the implication here is that Rayn is calling out Kei for shutting down a potentially useful avenue of information. Okay, I get that.

I thought about what Rayn might be implying here, assuming mafia:
If we emphasize the "given that you" portion, we get a scum claim.

---

I don't know Rayn, and I can't reference the only other recent game since it's ongoing, so I want to say it's believe from a town mindset as an accusation against Kei derailing SNB's poorly constructed case. The alternative is a tired mind, ready for sleep, just posting for the sake of posting and literally claiming scum in the thread.

-snip irrelevant portion-

On March 27 2013 09:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
PALMAR LET GO OF CORA AND GRACK AND FOCUS ON SCUM LIKE OO/OATS/SMURF/NISANI PLZ!
Don't you see thye have disappeared when townies call out other townies and laugh in the background. Man, you should be able to see that.

Who of those guys are mafia?

On March 27 2013 05:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:


Okay, here is your fucking reasoning:

Oats:
Oats is calling S&B scum for his bad case and Smurf he is leaning town on for equally bad case. Both of the cases are based on same (apparently false/bad) meta-reads. After being called out does a full 180. Has no scum reads other than slightly leaning scum on Smurf (in that 180).

Smurf:
Smurf is leaving out stuff that does not speak in favor of his DI case. Stuff that he should have obviously checked. Does defend the case later on when people call him out on it. Can't be any sort of reaction test (rofl Nisani). Other than that this is all he has done:

Called Cora out. How is he allowed to tell Cora to do something other than go after me when he hasn't done shit other than an scummy case?

On March 27 2013 11:12 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Nobody is going to vote OO/Oats/Smurf either way whatever i say. And Grack has not dona anythig useful. I would be okay switching into one of those three or Nisani/prplhz, but nobody is going to listen to me anyways so what the hell. Better to trust people i trust are town then.

On March 27 2013 05:33 prplhz wrote:

Aren't you worried that Palmar is making bad cases and people are just sheeping them? It kinda seems like you think it's a bad thing but you're perfectly fine with it.